Re: [RESULT] TomEE 8.0.0-M3 (staging-1136) - take two

All merged. Thank you -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 1:52 PM j4fm wrote: > I've also created a PR for the website downloads pages update: > > https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/pull/17 >

Re: Assign Jira Task

done -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 5:42 PM David Salter wrote: > Hi all, > > I’ve started looking at: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2484 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 7.0.6

+1, Thanks Jon. I'll give it a try with the other now -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 3:59 AM César Hernández Mendoza < cesargu...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, thank you. > > El jue., 6 jun. 2019 a las 5:09

PR reviews and merges

Hello people, I've done some PR reviews and merge. Added the question label to 2 of them because I think they require a JIRA ticket. If I missed something or some PRs need attention, please lemme know. I'll be around for a couple of hours. JLouis -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 7.1.1

+1 Thank you Jon Le mar. 11 juin 2019 à 04:15, César Hernández Mendoza a écrit : > +1, thank you. > > El vie., 7 jun. 2019 a las 11:05, Alex The Rocker () > escribió: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm starting a broad verification with these binaries, but before > > that, wouldn't it be nice to have the

Re: ManagedConnection weirdness with XA

Weird situation but good catch. The datasource code is overall very complex. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 11:09 PM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks > > Just wanted to g

Java 11 - continuing work

our openejb-core thoughts? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Java 11 - continuing work

digging into? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:07 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have revived the Java 11 PR/Branch Jon started a while back. > I have rebase

Re: Java 11 - continuing work

: TCK :: MicroProfile JWT TCK . FAILURE > [01:06 min]* > [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Fault Tolerance TCK . SUCCESS [11:08 > min] > [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Health TCK .. SUCCESS [01:24 > min] > [INFO] OpenEJB :: TCK :: MicroProfile Metrics TCK . SUCCESS [08:47 > min] &

Re: Java 11 - continuing work

Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 12:21 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Ok, before doing that, I am trying to fix some remaining issues. > Here is the build status so far > > [INFO] Rea

Building Github PRs at Apache

FYI, I'm trying to revive this JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17654 I'll see if I can set that up and build Github PRs at Apache so we get a view of the build before merging a PR. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Building Github PRs at Apache

sure if I don't have permissions or so, but I don't see where to configure it. I also would like to configure the PR builder and why not use Pipelines. Anyone has a better understanding? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Jul 22,

com.sun transitive dependencies

old dependencies. I'll be looking at it soon, but if someone already had a look, it would be helpful. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Java 11 - continuing work

Hey David, Thanks for the feedback. I already removed some of them. It has some side effects that I still need to investigate. For instance, removing soap-api, makes the UniverseTest to fail. The Geronimo service locator seems to mess up the test. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com

Re: Java 11 - continuing work

e pom stuff because I suspect we have too much stuff in the binaries. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 3:28 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Hey David, > > Thanks for the feedback.

BasicURLClassPath with Java 11

d.invoke(Method.java:566) > at org.apache.openejb.cli.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:189) > Does someone know why we have done that? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Java 11 - continuing work

ouple of tickets and tasks that I gonna file into JIRA today -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:30 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > I ended up throwing all the PR away and starting from

Re: Java 11 - continuing work

Hey Jon, Thanks so much for the help and the update. Definitely helps. On the Java 11 builder, we would need to keep building with JDK 8 and run with Java 11. Currently, it's configured to also build with Java 11 which does not work or would require more work. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro

Re: Java 11 - continuing work

yes, it's a good step -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:49 PM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > A JDK8 build, JDK11 test config would require more work, but I'll try and &

Re: Java 11 - continuing work

FYI, on my local machine, the build is green in that branch. So if buildbot is green, I'll go ahead and merge it unless someone objects. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:49 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <

Re: Java 11 - continuing work

Yeah, first build green also on buildbot. Let's merge this one and continue the work. https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-java11-take2-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/0 -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:22 PM Jean-Louis Mon

Re: Java 11 - continuing work

Done. New snapshot binaries uploaded. JIRA ticket and subtasks created - at least what I had in mind for now. I'll continue to add more on the flow. Building TCK and I'll be running over the weekend or beginning of next week. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismon

Re: Java 11 - continuing work

a.net/jeps/320 And what we have in the API jars https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/javaee-api/trunk/pom.xml or distribution (jaxb api and impl) there is probably not much missing. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 6:02 PM

Jakarta EE 8 TCK against TomEE master

have activeMQ in there because it's out of scope, but looks like when we run the webprofile TCK we try to create a resource ending up with a NoClassDefFound on some ActiveMQ classes. Any help is welcome -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

TomEE 8 / Jakarta EE 8 / JavaMail 1.5

e.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2606 If that looks quite well, I will do a release of both this week if possible -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [EXTERNAL] - TomEE 8 / Jakarta EE 8 / JavaMail 1.5

Hi, First of, thanks for the feedback and trying it. I ran a build and deploy this morning, but did not get a chance to check it. I'll investigate and see why Maven is pulling the timestamp version + the SNAPSHOT version. JLouis -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro

Re: [EXTERNAL] - TomEE 8 / Jakarta EE 8 / JavaMail 1.5

unning some TCK later tonight and try to follow up over here. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:13 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Hi, > > First of, thanks for the feedback and

Re: JIRA cleanup

Good point. Thanks Mark -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:32 AM Mark Struberg wrote: > I've now at least moved the open ones from M3 to M4. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 05.08.2019 u

Re: [EXTERNAL] - TomEE 8 / Jakarta EE 8 / JavaMail 1.5

Grrr No idea what Maven is doing. Thanks for having a look again. I tried locally and it was working fine. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:51 AM Cees Bos wrote: > Hi Jean-Louis, > > > > I dow

Re: Wrong m3 bval dep?

Just looked at it today. Looks like the build has org.apache.tomee.patch bval-jsr 2.0.2-69c36fa8-1 But available from maven central is [image: image.png] Should we update to one of those? Should we go to the official final? Can you guys give some hints so I can fix it? -- Jean-Louis

Re: Wrong m3 bval dep?

I fixed it a while back, but when I reverted last week, I reverted the fix as well. Sorry about that, I'll fix now. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 3:12 PM David Blevins wrote: > First step would be to get t

Re: Wrong m3 bval dep?

Pushed -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 3:14 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > I fixed it a while back, but when I reverted last week, I reverted the fix > as well. > Sorry about that, I'll fix now. >

Re: Wrong m3 bval dep?

Thanks David. New build ... https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1143 -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 3:20 PM David Blevins wrote: > > On Aug 5, 2019, at 6:14 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <

Re: Wrong m3 bval dep?

Build is back to green -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 3:21 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > Thanks David. > New build ... > https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/1143 > > > -- >

TomEE 8 / Jakarta EE 8 / Derby No Class Def Found

Hi, I had a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2604 I pushed a fix. I just ran a TomEE deploy and I'll run a new TCK run whenever possibe -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Upgrade BVal to official (not patched) one

Following up on this thread. What version would you recommend? On Maven central we have https://search.maven.org/search?q=g:org.apache.bval I believe it's 2.0.2 but wanted to double check -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Jul 29, 20

Re: Wrong m3 bval dep?

This repo is no more available btw https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1134/ -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 5:40 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > Build is back to green > -- > J

Re: Wrong m3 bval dep?

twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Aug 5, 2019, at 8:40 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > > > Build is back to green > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > htt

Jakarta EE TCK status

, I'm now trying to run with Java 11 so we can compare. It should give us good confidence on what the Java 11 support is. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [EXTERNAL] - TomEE 8 / Jakarta EE 8 / JavaMail 1.5

Thanks for the feedback. That was something weird with the assembly plugin. Thanks Jon for the fix -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 10:09 AM Cees Bos wrote: > Hi Jon and Jean-Louis, > > With the latest changes of

Re: Jakarta EE TCK status

Let's start filling subtasks in this ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2603 I'll try to start adding subtasks with how to reproduce and what to look at. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:1

Building TomEE with JDK8 and running with JDK11

he APIs straights in the javaee-api? Add the dependencies straights without profiles? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Building TomEE with JDK8 and running with JDK11

On the japaee-api updates, I was looking the other day and noticed some outdated dependencies. Thanks for pushing the tickets, you made my life easier to fix some of them when they exist. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9

Re: Java EE 8 versions of APIs

Thanks David. Fantastic job with the review and summary. I am currently working on Jakarta EE 8 compliancy. I have noticed some gaps and attempted to fix some of them. I'm happy to give it a try with them but the 3 last until we can move on. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitte

Running WebSocket TCK on TomEE

t It seems to fail with a NullPointerException -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Running WebSocket TCK on TomEE

yes correct -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 4:40 PM Cesar Hernandez wrote: > I can give it a try, > Does your setup is the one described in: > https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck > ? > > El mar., 13 ag

Re: Running WebSocket TCK on TomEE

Looks like ContainerProvider.getWebSocketProvider fails, but I am not able yet to find where that is configured and how it works -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 4:43 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>

Re: Running WebSocket TCK on TomEE

should work with https://jenkins.eclipse.org/glassfish/job/glassfish/job/master/59/artifact/bundles/glassfish.zip -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:04 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: >

Re: Running WebSocket TCK on TomEE

yeah, I had the same issue with Glassfish I went a bit up in the hierarchy and picked up one from https://jenkins.eclipse.org/glassfish/job/glassfish/ I pulled from one build of master -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8

Re: TOMEE-2618 Reconcile javax.activation dependencies

I'll check out the APIs and see where we can use Geronimo. There should be Geronimo spec jars for everything. If not, it means we should create them or update the ones we have -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 9:29 AM

JPA Spec jar missing Activator

Hello, Does anyone know why the activator disappeared between 2.1 and 2.2 spec jars? https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/tree/trunk/geronimo-jpa_2.1_spec/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/specs/jpa Is it desired? I'm happy to open a ticket and fix it -- Jean-Louis

Re: Java EE 8 versions of APIs

See comments below -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:10 AM David Blevins wrote: > I did a small gap-analysis of where we're still short on Java EE 8 APIs > from the perspective of our javaee-api jar: &

Re: JPA Spec jar missing Activator

o fix the spec jar or the javaee-api. I have the answer now ;-) -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 9:57 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi JL, > > Not sure if you need it - which can make us reconsider it - but long st

Re: Java EE 8 versions of APIs

David, May I ask where you got all the versions please? I was looking at this page and I see some mismatches. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:10 AM David Blevins wrote: > I did a small gap-analysis of where we

Re: Java 11 Maven Test profile and Buildbot builder

up a new Java 11 tests run. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:23 AM David Blevins wrote: > > On Aug 12, 2019, at 10:20 PM, David Blevins > wrote: > > > > Second, there is a Buildbot builder that f

Javaagent attach issue for Java9+

g to contribute that to TomEE? ByteBuddy is ASL v2, so we can of course reuse some of its code. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

BVal TCK failing

lass(ValidationMappingParser.java:163) > Obviously I checked the archive created by the TCK and the class is in there. So looks like BVal is not able to see that class in the arquillian archive created. Anyway, thoughts are welcome. BTW, I tried upgrading to 2.0.2 and it's the same, so it might be related with changes I made. I will continue to look at this issue -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Javaagent attach issue for Java9+

und still > work for earlier Java versions? > > Jon > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:32 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This is a follow up of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2619 > > When ru

Re: Upgrade BVal to official (not patched) one

Merged and ticket closed. Thanks -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 3:56 PM Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > PR here: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/538 > > Am Di., 13. Aug. 20

Re: BVal TCK failing

missions now so I'll be able to help. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 4:59 AM David Blevins wrote: > I'm not able to reproduce any of this in master so far. I hesitate to say > "since the upgrade"

Re: TOMEE-2565 - PR available

Thanks Richard. All merged. Ticket marked as resolved. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:05 AM Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > Hi, > > can someone move forward with <https:/

Re: Java 11 Maven Test profile and Buildbot builder

. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:58 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I think I got to update the buildbot job and get it to run with Java 11. > > I have push

Build master back to green

0.0.24 instead of 9.0.22 but I had to revert because the async-servlet example fails with new version. I need to investigate a bit more. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Java 11 - another update

JAX-WS coverage is still low and I'd like to bump it up to something a bit more acceptable and then look at the tests passing on Java 8 and failing on Java 11 to make sure they pass on both. How does that sound? Thoughts? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Yank Polling application example

on. I am also not sure we are showing or teaching good things (sleeps, weird hard coded assertions, ...). I'd be in favor of removing the entire polling sample. Thoughts? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Yank Polling application example

Thanks Richard. I am ok with plan 1/ if someone wants to contribute it. I would still yank the polling-mdb module. It has nothing to do with the rest of the application and does not bring anything useful to teach. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Java 11, victory day?

/22 Aside from pooling and mbean-auto-registration examples commented out, CDI TCK, BVal TCK, MicroProfle TCKs, and all other examples are all green. I would need to create few tickets to make sure all changes are available in the releases notes when 8.0.0 goes final. Thoughts? -- Jean-Louis

Re: Getting a TomEE 8.0.0 final out the door

Pulling this thread up to the list Now that we have Java 11 support, and a good MicroProfile coverage. What about trying something out end of the month? We could have something for CodeOne and use the event to promote TomEE. Thoughts? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro

Re: Java 11, victory day?

still planning to fix the Java Agent for OpenJPA enhancement. I'll see if I can fix this during the week. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:33 PM Alex The Rocker wrote: > Hello Jean-Louis, > > Congratulat

JAXB 2.3.2 update in TomEE 7.1.x

he CI and revert if something is broken. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: JAXB 2.3.2 update in TomEE 7.1.x

Ok, I think I have sorted out the remaining issues with the upgrade. Build is currently running https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-7.1.x-ubuntu-jvm8/builds/83 I'll monitor and fix any remaining issues. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com O

Re: JAXB 2.3.2 update in TomEE 7.1.x

Ok looks like build is now green after the upgrade. If you guys want to give it a try and provide feedback that would be great. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:49 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>

JSON-B and JSON-P TCKs

where. I figured I would start small so I can clear the setup quickly. JLouis -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Activation 1.2 API/IMPL

Hi, We currently don't have any Activation 1.2 spec jar (api/impl). We need it for Jakarta EE 8 certification so I'll start creating a Geronimo spec jar for it. If someone already started, shoot now ;-) -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: JSON-B and JSON-P TCKs

Can we do a release then? I'd like to get that into TomEE when possible -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:15 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi JL, > > AFAIK we are passing now > > Romain Manni-

DISCUSS geronimo-security_1.0_spec content unclear

was to create a specific artifact per specification. Mixing them is a bit annoying from a certification perspective. It's also not clean because in Tomcat for instance, there is already jaspic API so it becomes a duplicate. Would it be possible to split them up in 2 artifacts? -- Jean-

Re: DISCUSS geronimo-security_1.0_spec content unclear

Thanks Romain. I'm fine with using Eclipse jars if from a legal point of view, it works. Otherwise, I'd like to split our spec jars. What about MicroProfile? It's the same license and we are using them in our MicroProfile implementations. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com

Re: DISCUSS geronimo-security_1.0_spec content unclear

Yep that was the point. So I was asking if we should do the same yes or not. That seems to be your opinion Romain. Mark on the other end is having some doubts about the license. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:31 PM

Re: DISCUSS geronimo-security_1.0_spec content unclear

We can raise the issue at Jakarta Meanwhile, can I remove the jaspic api classes because they really don't have anything to do in this spec jar -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:37 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:

Re: DISCUSS geronimo-security_1.0_spec content unclear

Ok I fixed the issue. Actually the spec module was clean but the bundle configuration was not so we were badly including JASPIC dependencies. I'll open up a VOTE for it -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:49 PM Romain

Re: Java EE 8 versions of APIs

work involved and I am not sure we can get it done by CodeOne. Of course it's not a good reason, but I still want to revive this topic so we can decide all together how we want to proceed. Do we update/create our specs in Geronimo? Do we use the eclipse jars? thoughts -- Jean-Louis Mon

Re: TOMEE-2465: JDK 11 compatibility on Tomee 7.1.1 Needs an Update

Sorry, took some days off last week. If you have some fixes to backport and you are willing to create a PR I'm more than happy to review and merge for you. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:54 PM Salomon Mayengue

Re: DISCUSS geronimo-security_1.0_spec content unclear

> This is my current thinking as well; maintain apis that are impls, use the EPL version otherwise. I believe you meant "that are not impls ..." I'll make the changes on the javaee-api jar -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On T

Re: DISCUSS geronimo-security_1.0_spec content unclear

so for instance activation and javamail would stay in Geronimo Specs and let's say @Inject would be Eclipse? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 11:11 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > No I guess it was right, &

Re: Java EE 8 versions of APIs

t it done in > that time, cool. > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Sep 3, 2019, at 8:48 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > > > Trying to pull this message

Re: DISCUSS geronimo-security_1.0_spec content unclear

t; strub > > >> > > >> > > >>> Am 03.09.2019 um 16:37 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > >>> : > > >>> > > >>> MP license is ok (Apache2) but Jakarta is EPLs so keeps

New committer Cesar Hernandez

contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable better productivity. Being a PMC member enables assistance with the management and to guide the direction of the project. Please join me and send him a warm welcome and thank you. -- Jean

Re: JSON-B and JSON-P TCKs

up? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:45 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > was planned, we were waiting Mark green light IIRC > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>

Re: Getting a TomEE 8.0.0 final out the door

JIRA and other TomEE dependencies in order to start the release process over the weekend of beginning of next week. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 6:48 AM Cesar Hernandez wrote: > Thanks, Jean-Louis for the update >

javaee-api re-roll

s not there because it's also an impl and therefor it gets added to TomEE so it can have it's own lifecycle without having to re-roll the API jar. Side note, JAF (Java Activation Framework) being the same, I have also remove activation so we are consistent. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro htt

Re: New committer Cesar Hernandez

Welcome on board Cesar! -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:55 PM Cesar Hernandez wrote: > Thank you all for your kind word. > It's such a great honor to be part of the Apache TomEE community since day > 1

[VOTE] Release javaee-api 8.0-2

Hi, Here we go. Here is an updated API jar. There will be some more iteration to get the jar fully Jakarta EE 8 compliant. See ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2620 for the identified gaps. This release is primarily addressing Java 11 issues because some APIs have been removed

[RESULT][VOTE] Release javaee-api 8.0-2

My own +1 Vote passes with 8 +1 and no other vote. Thanks everyone, I'll proceed -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 3:32 PM Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > +1 > > Am Freitag

Johnzon release

Hi, Romain and Mark have done a great work with the TCK. I'd like to open up a vote to get a release out and fill a certification request like this one https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonb-api/issues/175 Any problem? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro

TomEE update to Java EE API

Hello, I closed the javaee-api vote this morning and I have updated TomEE accordingly. It broke a few things that I have hopefully now fixed. Build should be back to green. Starting the JIRA review -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] Release quartz-openejb-shade 2.2.4

Looks good. +1 -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 10:26 PM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > This is a vote for releasing an updated quartz-openejb-shade jar. This is > used

Re: Johnzon release

Now that the JSONB spec jar is released, I pushed the changes to move to non snapshot dependencies. Question guys: are the changes for passing TCK small so we do a 1.1.14 or do we consider they are significant enough to produce a 1.2 instead? thoughts? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com

Re: Johnzon release

Great. Thanks -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 7:24 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > As mentionned on the related thread 1.2.0, master is ready normally > > Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 18:18, Jean-Louis Monteiro &l

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 8.0.0 (take 3)

Here is my +1 Thanks Jon Le sam. 14 sept. 2019 à 06:20, David Salter a écrit : > +1 from me. > > Tried it on some of my apps that work on 8M3. Mainly JPA/JAX-RS/MP. > > David. > > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:49:42 +0100 Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote > > Hi

Re: TOMEE-2419 - Web Server Configuration for TomEE Website - Easy fix available?

I'm not quite sure about who can fix it. This is usually handled by the INFRA team, so I believe opening a ticket on INFRA would be the better way to solve the issue. I can do that and link it to your ticket if you want. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >