Re: DefaultMarkupIDGenerator

On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:07 AM Korbinian Bachl wrote: > Hi, > > I've stumbled over a not so old blog post describing the problem when many > components with AJAX are used: > > https://www.coderdreams.com/tracking-down-a-bug-in-production-wicket-application/ > > Can this problem still happen? >

Re: wicket version definition in maven poms

I guess because it "Just Works TM". Our release scripts will need to be adapted to any changes... On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 10:33 AM Korbinian Bachl wrote: > Hi, > > is there any reason wicket has static > 9.19.0-SNAPSHOT > everywhere, even in modules > > > org.apache.wicket > wicket-parent > 9.1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.16.0

+1 to release On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 12:13 AM Andrea Del Bene wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.16.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote > lasts for 72

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 10.1.0

+1 to release Tested: - local build from sources - various examples On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 10:35 PM Andrea Del Bene wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 10.1.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures

Re: new wicket releases?

Someone wants to take a look at https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/846 before the new release ? The contributor spent time debugging the issue and offering a fix. It would be nice to give some feedback. On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 7:49 AM Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Previous release was ~6 weeks ago

Re: Could not lock page exception improvement

Hi, On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 2:20 PM Martijn Dashorst wrote: > Hi! > > I was looking at our exception reporting in our application(s), and noticed > that when the CouldNotLockPageException is thrown, it only logs the stack > elements of the request that keeps the lock. > "... of the request that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 10.0.0 - TAKE 2

+1 to release ! Tested: - local build from the .tar.gz file - create a new project from the archetype - build and test wicket-jquery-selectors, wicket-webjars and wicket-bootstrap - test various Wicket examples on Tomcat 11 On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 8:55 PM Andrea Del Bene wrote: > This is a vote

Re: Commons Fileupload M2

Done with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-7100 On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 9:51 AM Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 2:40 PM Thomas Heigl wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> There is a new milestone for commons-fileupload (M2): >>

Re: Commons Fileupload M2

Hi, On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 2:40 PM Thomas Heigl wrote: > Hi all, > > There is a new milestone for commons-fileupload (M2): > > https://github.com/apache/commons-fileupload/blob/master/RELEASE-NOTES.txt > > They decided to split servlet support into two modules: > > - commons-fileupload2-jakarta

Re: wicket 10 production ready plan

Hi, We work on the non-technical tasks (press release, announcement, etc.). IMO it should be released in the next few weeks! Martin On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 7:13 AM any sdk wrote: > Hello wicket team, > > May I ask you when the wicket 10 production ready version will be released? > > > https://

Re: Wicket 10 and wicket bootstrap 7.0.2-SNAPSHOT error in modal

Hi Andrea, Please use Wicket-Bootstrap's issues or StackOverflow for questions about Wicket-Bootstrap. Or us...@wicket.apache.org. dev@wicket.a.o is about the development of Apache Wicket itself. On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 6:57 PM Andrea Patricelli < andreapatrice...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi all, > >

Re: Upgrade to Wicket 10 and Bootstrap 5

o > we have to get from some other source? > Please try again! > > Best regards, > Andrea > > On 04/01/24 12:44, Martin Grigorov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 1:05 PM Andrea Patricelli < > > andrea.patrice...@tirasa.net> wr

Re: Incorrect modification time in jars

On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 1:02 PM Emond Papegaaij wrote: > > > > I've just opened a PR with this change ( > > https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/758). I don't think this change > > will be problematic, but as it only really influences the release builds, > > it's hard to test its effect without d

Re: Upgrade to Wicket 10 and Bootstrap 5

Hi, On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 1:05 PM Andrea Patricelli < andrea.patrice...@tirasa.net> wrote: > Good morning all and happy new year, > > I'm currently upgrading my frontend application to wicket 10, I'm on > 10.0.0-M2. I'm also using some de.agilecoders.wicket.wicket-bootstrap > libraries. > > Whic

Re: Wicket 10(-M?) checkpoint

eases. I am not sure about wicket-cdi - some (test) dependencies there still have only Java EE releases... > > On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 07:33, Vit Rozkovec wrote: > > > > One more catch: https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/749 > > > > > > On 15. 12. 23 13:24,

Re: Wicket 10(-M?) checkpoint

t; > LGTM! > > Thomas > > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 2:08 PM Vit Rozkovec wrote: > > > > > > > On 06. 12. 23 13:08, Martin Grigorov wrote: > > > > > > The reason is SameSite support - > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/wicket/c

Re: Incorrect modification time in jars

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 7:45 PM Emond Papegaaij wrote: > Op wo 6 dec 2023 18:22 schreef Richard Eckart de Castilho >: > > > > We can switch from LastModifiedResourceVersion to something else in our > > > applications to work around this issue, but maybe we should consider > > > tracking down this

Re: Wicket 10(-M?) checkpoint

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 2:08 PM Martin Grigorov wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 12:40 PM Vit Rozkovec wrote: > >> Hi, >> in parent pom.xml you are referencing >> 6.0.0 >> >> but here you state that Servlet 5+ is required: >> >> https://c

Re: Wicket 10(-M?) checkpoint

33e12c8b2b04e22fcf73b773ec34 It is easy for us to fix the version in the wiki! How easy is it for you to use a container that supports Servlet API 6 ? > > Vit > > > > On 28. 11. 23 17:05, Martin Grigorov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 16:55, And

Re: Wicket 10(-M?) checkpoint

Hi, On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 16:55, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > Just a brief mail to summarize the job status for Wicket 10. AFAIK there > are some few minor activity that should be done before releasing the new > main release, for example reworking the ApacheLicenseHeaderTest to make it > work with

Re: is 9.x branch build broken?

https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/wicket-9.x/wicket-core/src/test/java/org/apache/wicket/model/IModelTest.java#L240 LGTM On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:52 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote: > sealed interface TextMatchingStatus > { > record NotSubmitted() implements TextMatchingStatus {} > recor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 10.0.0-M2 - take 2

+1 to release On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 1:37 AM Andrea Del Bene wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 10.0.0-M2 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote > lasts for 7

Re: DOAP on projects.a.o points to svn instead of our website

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:37 AM Martin Grigorov wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:17 AM Martin Grigorov > wrote: > >> I made a small fix in the doap file - >> https://github.com/apache/wicket-site/pull/15 >> > >> Does the file have to start with

Re: DOAP on projects.a.o points to svn instead of our website

On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:17 AM Martin Grigorov wrote: > I made a small fix in the doap file - > https://github.com/apache/wicket-site/pull/15 > > Does the file have to start with YAML - > https://github.com/apache/wicket-site/blob/eb26085e15759da6b9510c56942b8b232a7a4e11/doap.rdf#

Re: DOAP on projects.a.o points to svn instead of our website

I made a small fix in the doap file - https://github.com/apache/wicket-site/pull/15 Does the file have to start with YAML - https://github.com/apache/wicket-site/blob/eb26085e15759da6b9510c56942b8b232a7a4e11/doap.rdf#L1-L3 ? The content is a XML but the YAML header bothers me ... On Tue, Sep 5, 2

Re: TinyMce 6 and possible alternatives

Hi Johannes, On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 3:23 PM Johannes Renoth wrote: > Hi all, > > First of all: Thanks for providing continued support and even further > development for Wicket. > > Now to my questions: > > Since Wicketstuff only has TinyMCE until version 4 but this version has > some serious

Re: wicket and commons-fileupload 2.0.0-M1

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:51 PM Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 at 18:34, Martin Grigorov > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:03 AM Maxim Solodovnik > > wrote: > > > > > BTW here is the discussion regarding future of commons-fil

Re: wicket and commons-fileupload 2.0.0-M1

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:03 AM Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > BTW here is the discussion regarding future of commons-fileupload: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/koclgykqx0sfkrz8tf1w37n15zyql822 > please join :) > Regarding commons-fileupload vs. Servlet API: I've mentioned the reason why Wicket do

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 10.0.0-M1

+1 to release Checked: - build from source - tested various examples on Tomcat 11 alpha with JDK 22 EA b1 On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 3:35 PM Andrea Del Bene wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 10.0.0-M1 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked be

Re: Plans for Wicket 10 Release

akarta.servlet-api-6.0.0.jar:/home/andrea/.m2/repository/org/slf4j/slf4j-api/2.0.6/slf4j-api-2.0.6.jar' > > '--multi-release' '17' > > '/home/andrea/WicketBuild/wicket/target/checkout/wicket-commons-fileupload/target/classes' > > Do you have any suggestion

Re: Plans for Wicket 10 Release

I don’t have any tasks for 10 at the moment On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 16:17, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > Ready when you are :-)...if everything is in place I can start working on > RC1 release on this weekend > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 4:06 PM Martin Grigorov > wrote: > > >

Re: Plans for Wicket 10 Release

The PR has been merged! On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 3:32 PM Greb Lindqvist wrote: > I am looking forward to testing RC1 in several projects. > > Thank you for moving this forward! > > On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 6:00 AM Martin Grigorov > wrote: > > > On Wed, May 31, 2023

Re: Plans for Wicket 10 Release

repo duplicates classes from commons-io, Jakarta Servlet and > >> SLF4J and is triggering my Maven Enforcer's BanDuplicateClasses rule. > > > > > > Sounds interesting > > Could you share details? :) > > > >> > >> Op za 27 mei 2023 om 21:53

Re: Plans for Wicket 10 Release

Since we use a local copy of commons-fileupload2 I see no stopper for a release! A milestone one or a release candidate. The last problem is in the CDI module - several dependencies still miss jakarta impls (e.g. cdi-unit). I cannot say how big of an issue this is for a Wicket itself. On Thu, May

Re: using fileupload2

On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 7:18 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was looking into the Form's code for wicket 10.x and I just noticed that > by using file fileupload2 we will lose the ability to distinguish between > one file that is too big and the whole request i

Re: addying support for upload to resource

t would be good also to add an example to wicket-examples that uses a smart JS uploader, llike in the blog. This way you will verify that the new APIs are easily extendable. > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:59 PM Martin Grigorov > wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:25 PM Er

Re: addying support for upload to resource

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:25 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In our application we are heavily using web socket push (repainting web > wicket components via web-socket push). One problem we found is that in > some pages we have some uploads and those uploads ca

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

> > > > Unfortunately not :( > The build will not be reproducible > > > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 8:36 AM Emond Papegaaij < > emond.papega...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Op do 9 feb. 2023 om 08:32 schreef Martin Grigorov < > mgrigo..

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

omponent-queuing mean? > > Best, > > KB > > - Ursprüngliche Mail - > > Von: "Martin Grigorov" > > An: "dev" > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Februar 2023 07:45:50 > > Betreff: Re: Time for Wicket M1? > > > Please update > &

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 9:16 AM Emond Papegaaij wrote: > Op do 9 feb. 2023 om 07:47 schreef Martin Grigorov : > > > Please update > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+10.0 > > that the Component Queueing is gone > > > &

Re: Time for Wicket M1?

Please update https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+10.0 that the Component Queueing is gone Before releasing M1 I think we need to: 1) update all dependencies to their latest stable version 2) copy over commons-fileupload2 classes to wicket-util or a new Maven mod

Re: @Inject in wicket-10

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 18:51 Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > The only place I was to find is > > org.apache.wicket.arquillian.testing.pages.ListContacts; > Arqillian is not supported since a long time. It is not member of the Maven reactor. > On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 23:47, Martin Gr

Re: @Inject in wicket-10

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 18:43 Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > What about "import javax.annotation.Resource;" ? > Do we use/support it?! > On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 23:41, Martin Grigorov > wrote: > > > > Do it! > > > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 17:33

Re: wicket-10 spring bean injection

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 18:06 Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Hello All, > > It seems "Injector.get().inject(this);" doesn't work for me as expected > > The bean annotated with @Inject or @SpringBean is injected > Here you say @Inject injects the proxy. (WicketProxy, via ByteBuddy but it differs from w

Re: @Inject in wicket-10

Do it! On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 17:33 Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Hello All, > > Am I right thinking "import javax.inject.Inject;" should be replaced > with "import jakarta.inject.Inject;"? > > Shall I do it in "master" branch of wicket? (My IDE reports "17 > results in 14 files") > > -- > Best regar

Re: Strange memory leak in CachingResourceStreamLocator

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-7024 The attached quickstart there does not use your finder. On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:27 PM Tobias Gierke wrote: > > I see! > > Can you reproduce this in a quickstart ? > > > > Yes, attached a quickstart to this e-mail (I hope it goes through). It >

Re: Strange memory leak in CachingResourceStreamLocator

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:21 AM Tobias Gierke wrote: > Hi Martin, > > I wonder why people create images of plain text to paste it in text > context (email) ... It just makes it hard to do anything with this text, > e.g. to copy/paste the relevant part! > > Good point, will try to better myself ;

Re: Strange memory leak in CachingResourceStreamLocator

I wonder why people create images of plain text to paste it in text context (email) ... It just makes it hard to do anything with this text, e.g. to copy/paste the relevant part! In your first email the CacheKey says that the scope is o.a.w.Application, but here we see that it actually is com.vode

Re: Strange memory leak in CachingResourceStreamLocator

What is the url for any of the problematic resources in the generated HTML ? The resources' urls are not related to page *instances*, so I don't expect to see anything like pageId, renderCount and behaviorId in them. On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:17 PM Tobias Gierke wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm current

Re: Release Wicket 10.0.0-M1?

rote: > > > >> According to this: > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/22ro2qbstmrhrdq92g370kdsgf3fpfv2 > >> > >> There should be release soon :) > >> > >> > >> from mobile (sorry for typos ;) > >> > >> > >> On Sat,

Re: Release Wicket 10.0.0-M1?

JIRA? > > I'm still blocked by one other dependency (Apache Shiro) but they are close > to releasing Jakarta artifacts. > > Best, > > Thomas > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 9:27 PM Martin Grigorov > wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 2:42 PM Thomas Hei

Re: Regarding JDK 11/17 support for Apache Wicket v7

Hi, Yes, Wicket 7 should work just fine with any JDK newer than JDK 8! But, Wicket 7.x receives only security related fixes! If you find any non-security issues then most probably they won't be fixed! This is valid also for JDK 8! We recommend you to upgrade to a newer version! Martin On Wed, N

Re: Time for 9.12.0?

Nothing has changed. I am fine to proceed with the release. On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 2:20 PM Andrea Del Bene wrote: > I think I've lost track about this activity...what do we still miss to > proceed with the new release? > Thank you. > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 6:19 PM Matt Pavlovich wrote: > >

Re: Time for 9.12.0?

than to upgrade to 2.0 from 1.7. > > But this is my .02 (which is even worth less with the current exchange > rates). > > Martijn > > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 9:15 AM Martin Grigorov > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have one concern - https://issues

Re: Time for 9.12.0?

Hi, I have one concern - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6958 Some history: Some time ago I have upgraded slf4j-api from 1.7.x to 2.x-alpha/beta/stable. The reason to do it was because 2.x is a JSPM module. SLF4J 2.x is API compatible with 1.7.x but there is a difference - 1.7.x uses

Re: JDK 19 first Release Candidates!

Hi David, Apache Wicket's build and tests pass successfully with JDK 19 b36 and 20 b11 on both Ubuntu x86_64 and openEuler OS ARM64. Regards, Martin On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 4:23 PM David Delabassee < david.delabas...@oracle.com> wrote: > Greetings! > > I hope you had a chance to take some time

Re: [CVE-2020-11976] Apache Wicket information disclosure vulnerability

Hi, Wicket 6.x is no more supported. Wicket 7.x is the current security maintaince branch. Your options are: - patch locally - upgrade to a newer version On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 6:17 PM Daniel Stoch wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any JIRA issue for this? I tried to find but none issue in Wicket > J

Re: Possibility for each browser tab to have independent wicket session

10 (master) is the best place for new features. Once we have the complete picture/diff we could decide whether it can be backported and to which version. > > ** > Martin > > ke 10. elok. 2022 klo 10.21 Martin Grigorov (mgrigo...@apache.org) > kirjoitti: > > > No, I

Re: Possibility for each browser tab to have independent wicket session

** > Martin > > ke 10. elok. 2022 klo 10.00 Martin Grigorov (mgrigo...@apache.org) > kirjoitti: > > > Hi, > > > > Looking at the ticket comments I guess you already know the answer. > > Claudia Hirt and yourself reported problems which no one addressed in 5 &g

Re: Possibility for each browser tab to have independent wicket session

Hi, Looking at the ticket comments I guess you already know the answer. Claudia Hirt and yourself reported problems which no one addressed in 5 years. So, no. On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 8:29 AM Martin Terra < martin.te...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > Hi! > > Can the feature: > > Possibility for e

Re: JDK 19: Rampdown Phase 2 + JavaOne

Hi David, Apache Wicket build and tests pass successfully with JDK 19-ea+32-2220 and 20-ea+7-379 on Ubuntu 20.04 x86_64 and openEuler 20.03 aarch64 ! Regards, Martin On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 6:06 PM David Delabassee < david.delabas...@oracle.com> wrote: > Greetings! > > JDK 19 is now in Rampdown

Re: JDK 19: Rampdown Phase 1 + EA builds 26 & JDK 20: EA builds 1

Hi David, Same for JDK 20-ea+1-3 ! Regards, Martin On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:28 AM Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi David, > > Apache Wicket build and tests pass successfully with JDK 19-ea+26-2060 on > both Linux x86_64 and aarch64! > > Regards, > Martin > > On Mon, Ju

Re: JDK 19: Rampdown Phase 1 + EA builds 26 & JDK 20: EA builds 1

Hi David, Apache Wicket build and tests pass successfully with JDK 19-ea+26-2060 on both Linux x86_64 and aarch64! Regards, Martin On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:42 PM David Delabassee < david.delabas...@oracle.com> wrote: > Greetings! > > JDK 19 has now entered Rampdown Phase One (RDP1) [1], which

Re: JDK 19 - Virtual Threads Testing!

Hi David, Apache Wicket's build and tests pass successfully with JDK 19-ea+22-1598 on both Linux x86_64 and aarch64! Regards, Martin On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:54 AM David Delabassee < david.delabas...@oracle.com> wrote: > Welcome to a new OpenJDK Quality Outreach update! > > This time, we have

Re: Release Wicket 9.10.0?

+1 On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 3:16 PM Thomas Heigl wrote: > Hi all, > > What do you think about releasing Wicket 9.10.0? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WICKET/versions/12351540 > > I'd very much like to roll out all the recent allocation improvements. > > Best, > > Thomas >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Shall we clean-up git branches?

Hi, Easy win is to delete all branches which are already merged. The next step is to review the "closed" ones. On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 5:55 AM Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Hello All, > > Currently we have 130 git branches: > https://github.com/apache/wicket/branches > Maybe we can perform clean-up

Re: Disable Travis builds?

No need to kill it all! I've removed the part for JS testing. On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:43 AM Thomas Heigl wrote: > Hi, > > Given that our Travis builds aren't working anymore, should we delete the > travis.yml files? > > It is annoying that all builds show up as failed on Github because the >

Re: New JDK 19 EA builds and JCE Survey!

Hi David, Apache Wicket's build and tests pass successfully with JDK 19-ea+18-1211 on both Linux x86_64 and aarch64! Regards, Martin On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 5:18 AM David Delabassee < david.delabas...@oracle.com> wrote: > Greetings! > > The proposed schedule for JDK 19 is now known [1] with ‘Ra

Re: Release Wicket 10.0.0-M1?

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 2:42 PM Thomas Heigl wrote: > OK I just saw that Martin already asked them to do a release in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FILEUPLOAD/issues/FILEUPLOAD-309. > 1 year ago ... I see you JIRA voted for the issue. I think no one cares about the number of votes. B

Re: Wicket-8.x compatibility with Servlert-5

Hi, On Tue, Apr 5, 2022, 21:37 satya inv wrote: > Hi Team, > We are trying to host wicket-8.11 application on Tomcat 10. > While migrating, we could observe that wicket-8.11 has dependency on > javax.servlet packages and is not compiling when we change servlet packages > from javax.servlet to ja

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.9.1

Hi, I won't be able to help in the next few days. Just go ahead and improve it the way you find good! Martin On Sun, Apr 3, 2022, 12:53 Thomas Heigl wrote: > I have to take back my +1. > > I found one more issue with WICKET-6965 while stress testing our staging > environment: > > > https://iss

Re: Hotfix 9.9.1

Please update Spring! On Fri, Apr 1, 2022, 19:55 Thomas Heigl wrote: > +1. Thank you Andrea! > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 6:22 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < > reier...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1. Many thanks for taking care of releases! > > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 8:22 AM Andrea Del Bene >

Re: [DISSCUSSION] can we drop wicketstuff-pushd*

+1 to drop it! If someone uses it then (s)he can use the old releases and send a PR later to revive it! On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 5:20 AM Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Hello All, > > AFAIK these days push is available out-of-the-box via websockets > Do we need all these components? > > If we do need t

Re: wicket 9.9.0 - MarkupExceptions after upgrade - any idea why I get this?

Hi, The changelog is quite short: CHANGELOG for 9.9.0: ** Bug * [WICKET-6957] - Declare JSPM 'uses' for IInitializer * [WICKET-6965] - Memory leak in WicketEndpoint ** Improvement * [WICKET-6960] - Reduce allocations when encoding ComponentInfo * [WICKET-6963] - Use sing

Re: Add destroyed flag to application?

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:47 PM Thomas Heigl wrote: > Hi, > > Yesterday, I discovered that our attempted fix for > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6944 didn't work. Application > destroy listeners are still registered for every new Websocket connection > and never cleared. > > I can

Re: JDK 18 Release Candidate builds & JDK 19 Early-Access builds

Hi David, Apache Wicket build and tests are green with JDK 18+36-2087 and 19-ea+11-661 on Linux x86_64 and aarch64! Regards, Martin On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:29 PM David Delabassee < david.delabas...@oracle.com> wrote: > Martin, All, > > The Release Candidates of JDK 18 have been released [1].

Re: new 9.8.0 release

e conflicts which you will have to resolve, then git add, git commit && git push. > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 7:46 AM Martin Grigorov > wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 1:34 PM Thomas Heigl wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > My PR is mer

Re: new 9.8.0 release

On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 1:34 PM Thomas Heigl wrote: > Hi, > > My PR is merged as well. It only needs to be back-ported to 9.x. > > Martin, how do you usually do the back-porting? Simply cherry-pick the > commit? > Yes! git cherry-pick -x [hash] > > Best, > > Thomas > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 6

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 8.14.0

+1 to release Tested local build and various examples On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 6:00 PM Andrea Del Bene wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.14.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the so

Re: JDK 18 Rampdown Phase 2 & JDK 19 Early-Access Builds

Hi David, Apache Wicket's build and tests pass successfully with JDK 18-ea+33-2077 and 19-ea+7-366 on both Linux x86_64 and aarch64! Regards, Martin On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 11:33 AM David Delabassee < david.delabas...@oracle.com> wrote: > Greetings! > > First off, on behalf of Oracle’s Java Tea

Re: CI for wicketstuff

n 14, 2022 at 9:51 AM Martin Grigorov wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:32 AM Maxim Solodovnik > wrote: > >> On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 10:29, Maxim Solodovnik >> wrote: >> > >> > I'm +1 for any solution :) >> > I can ask INFRA if we

Re: CI for wicketstuff

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:32 AM Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 10:29, Maxim Solodovnik > wrote: > > > > I'm +1 for any solution :) > > I can ask INFRA if we can use Jenkins :) > > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 02:47, Martin Grigorov >

Re: CI for wicketstuff

Shall we move to Github Actions ? TravisCI degrades day by day :-( CircleCI is also a very good alternative! On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 6:52 PM Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > Hello All, > > Maybe you know what is the current status of CI for wicketstuff > > I was unable to find latest snapshot > And the

Re: Use non-final dependencies in master branch ?!

6:20, Sven Meier wrote: > > > > > > +1 for merging > > > > > > Sven > > > > > > > > > On 22.12.21 09:53, Martin Grigorov wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > What do you think about merging > >

Re: CI status

On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 4:21 PM Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > I maintain Github Actions and Buildbot. > Buildbot has been updated recently from ver. 0.8 to 3.x. The new url is > https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders. There are several builders for > different JDKs. Y

Re: CI status

Hi Andrea, I maintain Github Actions and Buildbot. Buildbot has been updated recently from ver. 0.8 to 3.x. The new url is https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders. There are several builders for different JDKs. Yesterday I removed wicket-9.x-java16 from the config. I guess it will disappear once we push

Use non-final dependencies in master branch ?!

Hi, What do you think about merging - https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/486 - use commons-fileupload2 2.0-SNAPSHOT - https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/487 - use Spring 6.0.0-M1 (Java 17!) This way only wicket-cdi (Weld & cdi-unit) still needs the temporary javax hack. Martin

Re: JDK 18: Rampdown Phase 1 & Early-Access builds 27

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 10:10 AM Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi David, > > Apache Wicket build and tests pass successfully with JDK 8-ea+27-1924 on > both Linux x86_64 and aarch64! > I meant 18-ea+27-1924 > > Regards, > Martin > > On Fri, Dec 10, 20

Re: JDK 18: Rampdown Phase 1 & Early-Access builds 27

Hi David, Apache Wicket build and tests pass successfully with JDK 8-ea+27-1924 on both Linux x86_64 and aarch64! Regards, Martin On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 9:58 AM David Delabassee < david.delabas...@oracle.com> wrote: > Martin, > > Thank you for being part of the OpenJDK Quality Outreach Program

Re: rolling out wicket 9.7.0?

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 9:29 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Who can do the keystore changes? > Done with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6937 > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM Martin Grigorov > wrote: > >

Re: rolling out wicket 9.7.0?

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 1:11 PM Andrea Del Bene wrote: > +1 to release. Even if the current one still quite fresh I think we can go > ahead with the next release, after WICKET-6934 > has been solved. > WICKET-6934 has been removed from 9.7.0 Th

Re: rolling out wicket 9.7.0?

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:12 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > What do you think about rolling outwicket 9.7.0? > > 9.6.0 has been released at Nov 2nd Here is the list of issues for 9.7.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WICKET/versions/12350748 One of t

Re: rolling out wicket 9.7.0?

Hi, On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 10:48 AM Sebastien Briquet wrote: > Hi Ernesto, > > Then it might be good to add a new keystore to the quickstart ; the > existing one seems to have expired a couple of weeks ago... > +1 to fix this issue! > > Thanks and best regards, > Sébastien >

Re: JDK 18 Early-Access builds 23 are available

Hi David, I have already tested JDK 18 b23 and reported the only issue I've found: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/5027#issuecomment-968177213 I've reworked Wicket's test to conform to the new rules and now the build and tests pass successfully on both Linux x86_64 and aarch64! Regards, Mart

JDK 18 b23 - Impossible to set a new value for "static final" field

Hi Oracle team, I've just tested JDK 18-ea+23-1525 with Apache Wicket and I've faced the following problem: [ERROR] Tests run: 29, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.125 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.wicket.util.string.StringsTest [ERROR] org.apache.wicket.util.string.StringsTes

Re: Wicket 10 based on jakarta.** APIs ?

On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 2:29 PM Martin Grigorov wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 2:27 PM Martin Grigorov > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 4:12 PM Maxim Solodovnik >> wrote: >> >>> I've started this work for our project >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wicket 9.6.0

+1 to release ! On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:24 PM Andrea Del Bene wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.6.0 > > Please download the source distributions found in our staging area > linked below. > > I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote > lasts for 72

Re: A solution to hide page id with mounted pages?

Hi Andrea, On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 2:28 PM Andrea Del Bene wrote: > In my current project I'm building a web app which is essentially made of > pages mounted at a precise path which I guess it's a quite common design > pattern with Wicket and web apps in general. Shortly after starting to work >

Re: Thank you! JDK 18 Early Access build 20 is now available

Hi Rory, Apache Wicket build and tests pass with JDK 18-ea+20-1248 on Linux x86_64 and aarch64! Regards, Martin On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 3:18 PM Rory O'Donnell wrote: > Hi Martin, > *Thank you.* > > I'm retiring at the end of November 2021, it's time to spend more time > with the family. > > We

Time for 9.6.0 ?

Hi, https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/WICKET/versions/12350602 There is not much! Mostly documentation improvements. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6921 has been reported by few users and I think it is time to release the fix! Maybe even as 9.5.1 ?! Martin

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >