On Saturday, March 13th, at 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC), Phabricator will be
taken down for a period
of two hours for database maintenance.
A recent upstream migration requires a change to one of the larger
tables that could cause Phabricator
to be unresponsive. So we decided best to do the
Swag forms
https://bugzil.la/1667321 : release tracking report hardcodes old date ranges
dkl
David Lawrence
Bugzilla Senior Software Engineer
d...@mozilla.com
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
That's an impressive speedup!
Congrats on enabling this, everyone.
On 24/09/2020 14:56, Jan de Mooij wrote:
Warp is now enabled by default on Nightly, after positive feedback
from users dogfooding it [0,1].
Here are just a few of the Talos/Raptor graphs showing improvements
when Warp landed:
the following changes have been pushed to bugzilla.mozilla.org:
(tag: https://github.com/mozilla-bteam/bmo/tree/release-20200908.1)
https://bugzil.la/1657542 : During recent bmo deployment, emails were delivered
to a file instead of SES which caused interruption of email service
and
guidance when needinfo is requested of the bug's reporter
https://bugzil.la/1654370 : Remove remaining code that references
Firefox OS from BMO code base
https://bugzil.la/1655808 : Send guided bug flow users to GitHub for
Fenix issues
--
David Lawrence
Mozilla, Inc
in May 2019
https://bugzil.la/1652863 : setting the needinfo flag when filing a new bug in
Core or Toolkit does not cause the textbox for user information to pop up
dkl
David Lawrence
dklaw...@gmail.com
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform
: Can't attach some text, 500 internal server error
https://bugzil.la/1646559 : Phabricator to BMO OAuth2 authentication fails to
work properly due to CSP protections
David Lawrence
d...@mozilla.com
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform
I agree that it's a bad idea for users to be running permanently with this
setting on their daily driver browsers.
But the environment variable has been a huge productivity enhancer to
reduce my mental load when setting up an extra-hairy debug session or
taking system traces.
I wish we could
ince many developers who *do* care about testing
on Firefox may produce content that's broken for those users.
(I'd note that I've expressed this concern to Erik, Sean, and others
in the past, but also encouraged them to send this intent because I
think this should be a broader discussion.)
-David
in custom forms and
other places
https://bugzil.la/1641117 : Add Sentry to the list of See Also URLs.
https://bugzil.la/1642654 : Add ability for users to reactivate their own
account when disabled from inactivity
David Lawrence
d...@mozilla.com
the following changes have been pushed to bugzilla.mozilla.org:
(tag: https://github.com/mozilla-bteam/bmo/tree/release-20200526.1)
https://bugzil.la/1638022 : Phabbugz should not try to set needs-review when
the revision is closed or abandoned
https://bugzil.la/1639311 : Attaching a file with
from
me.
(On a side note, it's also not clear to me that dev-platform is
really the best way to have those discussions today; it's possible
we should look for an alternative forum that lends itself a bit more
to discussion.)
-David
--
턞 L. David Baronhttps://dbaron.org
the following changes have been pushed to bugzilla.mozilla.org:
(tag: https://github.com/mozilla-bteam/bmo/tree/release-20200511.1)
https://bugzil.la/1633846 : Enable retries for uploading attachments to S3 when
an error occurs
https://bugzil.la/1636549 : Guided Bug Helper extension filing
the following changes have been pushed to bugzilla.mozilla.org:
(tag: https://github.com/mozilla-bteam/bmo/tree/release-20200429.1)
https://bugzil.la/1631051 : The current setting of the auto-refresh button in
My dashboard should be stored
https://bugzil.la/1631971 : Create link to Matrix
The database for bugzilla-dev.allizom.org, which is our testing instance
of BMO, has data that was last synchronized from
production on July, 2017.
On Friday, May 8th, we will be switching over to a newer import of test
data that is more in sync with data from production.
The data is of course
other systems that rely on BMO such
as Phabricator and Lando. So you may see
some issues with those systems as well.
Thanks
David Lawrence
BMO Team
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev
Yes, I believe so.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:09 PM Botond Ballo wrote:
> Thanks, compile time improvements are always good news!
>
> Out of curiosity, does this impact builds targeting Android on Linux or
> Windows?
>
> Thanks,
> Botond
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at
As of bug 1326486, our clang toolchains for Linux and Windows are built
with PGO. (Apologies to Mac users: that toolchain is cross-compiled.)
Under optimal conditions (Spidermonkey build, touch mfbt) I've seen 10-15%
compile time improvements locally, but in more common scenarios the gains
will
the following changes have been pushed to bugzilla.mozilla.org:
(tag: https://github.com/mozilla-bteam/bmo/tree/release-20200401.1)
https://bugzil.la/1621662 : Remove option for using Vagrant for BMO development
and support Docker as primary method
https://bugzil.la/1621160 : First row of
should
say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
Out of curiosity, what external application? OS-specific?
On 19/03/2020 01:24, Michal Novotny wrote:
> We plan to remove FTP protocol implementation from our code. This work
> is tracked in bug 1574475 [1]. The plan is to
>
> - place FTP behind a pref and turn it off by default on 77 [2]
> -
was
attempting to do in case of crash.
Is anything like this planned?
Cheers,
David
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
https://bugzil.la/1472757 : Comment field empty after clicking "go back
page"
https://bugzil.la/1614634 : 13 hours ago wasn't "1 day ago"
(tag: https://github.com/mozilla-bteam/bmo/tree/release-20200226.1
<https://github.com/mozilla-bteam/bmo/tree/release-
ery search
--
David Lawrence
d...@mozilla.com
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it. (We should probably say something, even if
it's just support, given our involvement.)
-David
--
턞 L. David Baronhttps://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
support or oppose it. (We should probably say something, even if
it's just support.)
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I
this. If you would like to be part of the process please let me know and I
will schedule an interview with you.
David
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 00:28, Andrew Sutherland
wrote:
> On 1/8/20 12:50 PM, Geoffrey Brown wrote:
> > Instead of changing the reviewers, how about:
> > - we remi
of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it.
(My one note so far is that the charter should link to the previous
charter; it currently only links to the charter before that.)
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla
of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling
in that
direction relative to the previous charter. That said, I don't
think anybody from Mozilla is currently participating in this work,
and I haven't looked into the current approach in much detail.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla
also have concerns about).)
-David
[1] https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/173
[2] https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/214
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Normally we do Phabricator release updates for
phabricator.services.mozilla.com on Mondays at 10:00 AM EST. This coming
weeks update will occur Tuesday at the same time instead.
Thanks
dkl
--
David Lawrence
d...@mozilla.com
___
dev-platform mailing
Bugzilla.mozilla.org will be down for maintenance work on Saturday,
November 9th, from 11:00 AM EST (16:00 UTC) for approximately four hours.
Various maintenance tasks will be performed during that time period such
as upgrading of the database to a newer version of MySQL on RDS.
If any
For what it's worth, when I last tried, I couldn't even `moz-phab
submit` a self-reviewed patch. I had to arbitrarily pick another
reviewer for a patch that was not meant for landing (it was a
demonstration of a reproducible bug in phabricator, but that's another
story).
Cheers,
Yoric
On
On Monday 2019-10-21 16:01 -0500, Mike Taylor wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 10/21/19 7:22 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> > (That we haven't applied the policy that much because we've granted
> > exceptions because other browsers have shipped the features reduces
> > the
those removed
elements, including accessibility and including interventions that
we make on behalf of the user (many of which depend on the identity
of objects in the DOM). So limiting subgrid to secure contexts
while grid is available in insecure contexts would perpetuate these
problem
fundamental issues
for the first time at this stage.)
I think we should probably explicitly support these specifications
given our involvement.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 03:30, wrote:
>
>
> Web-platform-tests: requires manual tests.
>
Is this something that we could be tested with testdriver.js inside wpt?
David
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozil
a
> much less general mechanism, and to scope it down to handling these specific
> cases?
I think it's also quite useful for horizontal resizes of the browser
window (which can include device rotation on mobile, window
resizing/maximization on desktop, and also hiding/showing of browser
sideb
leave the feature enabled for pages that don't do these things.
Based on what I've heard it seems like many of the cases where pages
are really broken involve some of those, although I haven't gone
through the bug lists.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://d
, or if you think we should
support or oppose it.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out
should
say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What
there's something we should
say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Before I built a wall I'd ask
Very good news!
Does this have any impact on SpiderMonkey error handling?
Cheers,
David
On 14/09/2019 06:47, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ErrorResult has two kinds of exception-throwing APIs on it: the older
> ones that don't allow specifying a custom message string, an
I'm sure that Searchfox could have useful highlights.
However, as you guessed, this was something that happened within an
editor + debugger, so there's only so much we can do in this direction.
Cheers,
David
On 06/09/2019 15:40, Andrew Sutherland wrote:
> On 9/6/19 7:31 AM, David Teller wr
For what it's worth, I recently spent half a day attempting to solve a
bug which would have been trivial if `a` and `m` prefixes had been
present in that part of the code.
While I find these notations ugly, they're also useful.
Cheers,
David
On 06/09/2019 12:57, Honza Bambas wrote:
> On 2
hink it's grounds for an objection.
(I also think that if we haven't actually reviewed the charters from
a technical level of what we think should be happening, then it
might be better to *not* reply, to avoid suggesting that we have
done so.)
-David
> On 8/28/19 5:41 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Thursday 2019-08-29 13:44 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:41 AM L. David Baron wrote:
> >
> > The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
> >
> > Timed Text (TT) Working Group
> > https://www.w3.org/2019/08/ttwg-proposed-charte
rg/css-shapes-2/#supported-basic-shapes
which is currently a delta on top of:
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes-1/#supported-basic-shapes
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
is always discussions about what sort of
compromise would allow objectors to withdraw their objections. And
given the number of current supporters of the work, I think any
director's decision that happens if there isn't consensus would
likely be in favor of chartering the work.
-David
On Thursday 2019-08
of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling
as part of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I
from the
review and add brief comments to that abstention.
-David
[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Aug/0013.html
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Before I
That sounds useful :)
Do we have any documentation on how to add documentation?
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Are there any web platform tests for this or will they be added as part of
this work?
David
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 17:38, Mats Palmgren wrote:
> Summary:
> Add support for 'display:block ruby' which creates a block box
> with a ruby box inside it.
>
> Bug: https://bugzi
. (Sorry for delaying sending this for so long!)
Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should
say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla
for
> them or until we see too much fallout.
Are there wpt that we can write to make sure We eventually do have the interop
we want here?
David
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
I believe in least surprise for the caller of an API. This seems to
match with the Google style, as you describe it: any parameter which may
be mutated in any manner should be passed as pointer, rather than reference.
Cheers,
David
On 22/07/2019 08:43, Karl Tomlinson wrote:
> ht
On Thursday 2019-07-11 10:59 -0400, Jeff Muizelaar wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:46 AM Emilio Cobos Álvarez
> wrote:
> > On 7/10/19 11:01 PM, Connor Brewster wrote:
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > >> It's not clear to me what this option mean
to me if that's for backdrop-filter
only, or also for the filter property -- when WebRender is enabled.
-David
>
> > * Do we have other web-exposed features that are only supported when
> WebRender is enabled?
>
> I don't believe we have any other web-exposed features only s
Thank you Nick! This is going to be an enduring resource!
D
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 5:34 PM Nicholas Alexander
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:08 AM Nicholas Alexander <
> nalexan...@mozilla.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:19 AM Nicholas Alexander <
> >
The Google style sounds pretty good to me.
On 04/07/2019 07:11, Gerald Squelart wrote:
> Recently I coded something with a not-very-important slow-changing
> rarely-used positive number: `unsigned mGeneration;`
> My reviewer commented: "Please use a type with an explicit size, such as
>
;> requires an unfortunate amount of boilerplate.
>
> Thanks. (nsIAsyncShutdown indeed looks like it involves a lot of boilerplate.)
I'll be happy to review patches that scrap the boilerplate :)
Cheers,
David
___
dev-platform mailing
Even on Desktop, we needed to move some cleanup to startup, in case the
process was killed by the OS.
On 07/06/2019 20:40, Chris Peterson wrote:
> On 6/7/2019 9:36 AM, Kris Maglione wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 09:18:38AM +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>>> For late shutdown cleanup, we have
Have you looked at nsIAsyncShutdown?
On 07/06/2019 08:18, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> For late shutdown cleanup, we have nsLayoutStatics::Shutdown(). Do we
> have a similar method for running things as soon as we've decided that
> the application is going to shut down?
>
> (I know there are observer
to be partially unavailable
during this window.
If you have any questions about this, we’re available in #phabricator on
slack for any questions and concerns.
Regards,
David Lawrence
Engineering Workflow Team.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform
g these distinctions from
the User-Agent header we send over HTTP even if they're still
accessible from Javascript (and useful there for sites offering
downloads).
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/
Not yet as we are stabilising tests for gecko view but hopefully soon!
David
On May 10, 2019, 7:22 PM +0100, Botond Ballo , wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 7:50 AM David Burns wrote:
> > There are a number of wpt that fail only in firefox. Are we planning on
> > fix
There are a number of wpt that fail only in firefox[1]. Are we planning on
fixing those tests with this work?
David
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1546387
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 01:41, Botond Ballo wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I would like to ship the Visual Viewpo
during this window.
If you have any questions about this, we’re available in #phabricator
on slack for any questions and concerns.
Regards,
David Lawrence
Engineering Workflow Team.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https
as part of this charter review. Given my involvement in the
process that led to this charter being created, I strongly believe
we should support the charter, but it's entirely reasonable to give
specific feedback to improve the charter.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http
to be partially unavailable
during this window.
If you have any questions about this, we’re available in #phabricator on
slack for any questions and concerns.
Regards,
David Lawrence
Engineering Workflow Team.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 1:39 PM Bobby Holley wrote:
>
> Thanks Mike!
>
> So Fennec is the last remaining non-e10s configuration we ship to users.
> Given that Fennec test coverage is somewhat incomplete, we probably want to
> keep running desktop 1proc tests until Fennec EOL. We don't strictly
On Tuesday 2019-04-09 13:55 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:32 PM L. David Baron wrote:
> >
> > The W3C is proposing revised charters for:
> >
> > Internationalization (i18n) Working Group
> > https://www.w3.org/2019/04/proposed
reply to this thread if you think there's something we should
say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it. (Absent specific comments, I'd be inclined to
support the charters, because I think the i18n work at W3C has been
generally effective.)
-David
--
턞
on this charter, even it is just
support.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out
l 26.
Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should
say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/
you've been implementing based off of resolutions that aren't in
the spec, it's probably worth submitting PRs to the spec so that
other future implementors are aware of those resolutions and you
don't have to later go and undo the effects of those resolutions for
compatibility.
-David
--
턞 L.
or an existing feature and part of that CSS
explanation lives in the UA stylesheet.
This has been under discussion in the CSS working group for... over
a decade now, so I wouldn't say that there hasn't been any
cross-browser discussion of it.
That said, the specs could certainly coordinate better.
attempt to describe what is needed for HTML:
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-lists/#ua-stylesheet
although it admits that the CSS counter model on its own can't
describe reversed.
The web-platform-test test expectation changes in
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ae4e
).
This charter replaces *most* of what was covered in the Web Platform
working group, whose current charter is at
https://www.w3.org/2017/08/webplatform-charter.html , but not the
parts that are related to forks/copies of WHATWG specifications.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron
a good reason to do otherwise.)
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out
Will setting the "regressed by" field send mail to the subscribers of
the earlier bug? This was a useful aspect of the blocks/depends field.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:59 PM Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>
> Le 12/03/2019 à 17:48, Andrew McCreight a écrit :
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 3:55 AM Sylvestre
https://bugzil.la/bootstrap-toolchain-redownloads (it's even got a
name!) is a really annoying one that's been on file for 6+ months.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:39 AM Nathan Froyd wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 6:22 AM Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 3:40 AM Axel Hecht
Does configure warn about this?
The link between this error and needing to bootstrap is not super
clear (and a surprising number of people don't read dev-platform) so
I'm not looking forward to answering the same question in #build for
the rest of the week. :)
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:23 PM
Security and the Visibility API,
Confinement with Origin Web Labels
Origin-Wide Policy becomes Site-Wide Policy
(I'm happy about the addition of Feature Policy, since I think it's
important for, among other things, improvements to permission
prompts triggered from iframes.)
-David
--
턞 L. David
em announced plans to ship (or actually shipped)
this feature?
(What's the opinion of TC39 on shipping features that are at stage
3? That doesn't seem obvious from
https://tc39.github.io/process-document/ .)
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.or
I don't think anyone wants to allow aliasing merely for its own sake.
A lot of these flags were added just to keep builds working in the
face of noisy compilers a long time ago. It would be good to retest
with our current codebase and current compilers and see where we
stand. If we can easily
issues
directly, whichever seems appropriate. (Feel free to contact me
directly if you're not sure.)
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
For what it's worth, arcanist works fine for me in WSL, with a
considerably less-horrifying installation process than on real
Windows.
With an alias you can call it from MozillaBuild as if it were native:
alias arc="cmd //c ubuntu1804 run arc"
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 3:49 PM Jörg Knobloch
fundamental issues
for the first time at this stage.)
Given that we implement this specification, one of the editors works
for us, and have been supporting this work for a while, I'm assuming
we should support this advancement as well...
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http
fundamental issues
for the first time at this stage.)
(I'm not sure to what extent we implement this specification.
Knowing that would be helpful. If it's something we implement, then
we should probably explicitly support it unless we have a good
reason to do otherwise.)
-David
--
턞 L. David
reply to this thread if you think there's something we should
say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it.
-David
--
턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂
턢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 턂
Hi,
As importing third-party code into libxul seems to be pretty popular,
I wanted to point out something that's easy to overlook.
Libraries usually have code that goes like:
#ifdef _WIN32
#define MYLIB_EXPORT __declspec(dllexport)
#else
#define MYLIB_EXPORT
I find them extremely useful, too (as in "removing them would make my
life miserable in quite a few bugs"). I have no problem with putting
them on a separate line.
Cheers,
David
On 26/01/2019 15:19, Jonathan Watt wrote:
> Personally I find them useful. Putting them on a separa
Thanks. Revised comments submitted at:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Jan/0010.html
-David
On Thursday 2019-01-24 23:32 -0800, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> Comments inline.
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 5:54 PM L. David Baron wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday 2018
On Sunday 2018-12-23 09:59 -0800, L. David Baron wrote:
> The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
>
> Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Working Group
> https://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/svg-2019-ac.html
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2018Dec/0006.html
&
and Interop: Marionette, Webdriver and Web
Platform Tests
If you are unsure of where your question may fall feel free to try any of
the channels listed and you will be directed to the best team to help.
David
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform
Hi everybody,
My last two attempts to update our crates with `./mach vendor rust`
failed, not during vendoring, but when I attempted to upload the patch.
Both times, moz-phab/arcanist or phabricator simply choked during the
call and I gave up after waiting 24h for the patch to be
it feels like we have some WPT from the
start, even if its a pure conversion of the mochitest, it would help make
sure we interoperable with them.
[1]
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/testing/web-platform/tests/reporting/
David
___
dev
1 - 100 of 963 matches
Mail list logo
