Re: Improved stacks in Linux crash reports

2020-11-09 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2020/11/10 14:49, Gabriele Svelto wrote: On 10/11/20 05:57, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: Does this support split dwarf object files? Not yet, but it should be possible to add support easily because the crates we depend on for parsing DWARF debuginfo have just been updated to support split DWARF

Re: Improved stacks in Linux crash reports

2020-11-09 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2020/11/06 17:56, Gabriele Svelto wrote: [cross-posting to dev-platform] Hello all, I'm glad to announce that we switched our symbol scrapers for Linux distributions to our new and improved Rust-based tooling [1]. This means that when looking at crash reports or profiling you will not find

Re: Proposal: remove support for running desktop Firefox in single-process mode (e10s disabled) anywhere but in tests

2020-06-19 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
I think I have found an inconsistency in TB's pref setting during mochitest regarding e10s. The gory detail is in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1629433#c10 Major find (excerpt from the above bugzilla.) --- begin quote --- 1) Dynamically generated user.js files during tests of C-

Re: Proposal: remove support for running desktop Firefox in single-process mode (e10s disabled) anywhere but in tests

2020-06-10 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
I can't speak for what TB development plan is. One thing I observe as an occasional submitter of TB patches is this. Thunderbird ditched |mozmill| test December 2019, and switched to mochitest in place of mozmill test. Unfortunately, valgrind no longer works locally for mochitest. This is quite

Re: Cargo.lock in hg repository?

2020-05-19 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
I have rebased and the changes are gone. Thank you for keeping the tree in good shape. Chiaki On 2020/05/19 18:35, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: On 5/19/20 3:11 AM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: Thank you for the feedback. So I am not alone in seeing this. I will ignore the anomaly for now although

Re: Cargo.lock in hg repository?

2020-05-18 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
bug 1636068.  -- Emilio On 5/17/20 2:44 PM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: I am developing TB patches locally on my linux PC. Have anyone noticed mozilla/Cargo.lock seems to be in mercurial repository and that it got updated during development? That is, as far as *I* am concerned, I never tough it dir

Re: Is --disable-libjpeg-turbo gone?

2020-05-17 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2020/05/17 5:52, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 09:26:30AM +0900, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: On 2020/05/16 7:51, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 07:24:44AM +0900, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: I have --disable-libjpeg-turbo in my mozconfig for many years (I build TB locally

Cargo.lock in hg repository?

2020-05-17 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
I am developing TB patches locally on my linux PC. Have anyone noticed mozilla/Cargo.lock seems to be in mercurial repository and that it got updated during development? That is, as far as *I* am concerned, I never tough it directly. But, it seems |mach clobber|, |mach configure|, |mach build|

Re: Is --disable-libjpeg-turbo gone?

2020-05-15 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2020/05/16 7:51, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 07:24:44AM +0900, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: I have --disable-libjpeg-turbo in my mozconfig for many years (I build TB locally). After an update of the local source tree this morning, it is no longer recognized? (The last update was

Is --disable-libjpeg-turbo gone?

2020-05-15 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
I have --disable-libjpeg-turbo in my mozconfig for many years (I build TB locally). After an update of the local source tree this morning, it is no longer recognized? (The last update was several days ago.) Has anyone also experienced this? Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/NEW-SSD

Re: New and improved stack-fixing

2020-04-30 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
stack trace thus obtained was trash. (See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1621274 ) Strange. linux-stack-fix.py  used to work when the output was not modified by the recent fix-stack. That is what I used to for many years. TIA Chiaki On 2020/04/30 3:07, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote

Re: New and improved stack-fixing

2020-04-29 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Thank you for the tips. I will have a go to incorporate the logic of old fix_linux_stack.py into fix-stacks. TIA Chiaki On 2020/04/29 13:11, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 02:32, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: Ouch, I am using -gsplit-dwarf to make gdb startup time faster

Re: New and improved stack-fixing

2020-04-28 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2020/04/28 18:13, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 at 17:50, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: 0:28.98 GECKO(727384) #01: ??? (/NEW-SSD/moz-obj-dir/objdir-tb3/dist/bin/libxul.so + 0x5ab5921) 0:28.99 GECKO(727384) #02: ??? (/NEW-SSD/moz-obj-dir/objdir-tb3/dist/bin/libxul.so

Re: New and improved stack-fixing

2020-04-28 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
16:50, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: Dear Nick, I must have been doing something very stupid, but can't figure out exactly. I think after this change of fix-stack script(s), the local TB's mochitest log's NS_ASSERTION (or is it MOZ_ASSERT?) stack trace cannot be decoded. I scratc

Re: New and improved stack-fixing

2020-04-28 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Dear Nick, I must have been doing something very stupid, but can't figure out exactly. I think after this change of fix-stack script(s), the local TB's mochitest log's NS_ASSERTION (or is it MOZ_ASSERT?) stack trace cannot be decoded. I scratched my head and figured out that there is somethi

Re: Deprecation notice - change to Treeherder's jobdetail API

2020-04-10 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2020/04/11 3:03, Steve Fink wrote: On 4/10/20 10:06 AM, Andrew McCreight wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:51 PM Sarah Clements wrote: Hello, As part of maintenance work and performance improvements to Treeherder, we're making changes to some of the data that's stored in our database. On

Re: Bugzilla posting failure.

2019-09-25 Thread ISHIKAWA, Chiaki
t place to file bugs related to creating bugs is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=bugzilla.mozilla.org&component=Bug+Creation%2FEditing . E C Humphries, Bugmaster On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 8:10 PM ishikawa wrote: Hi, Where is the proper forum to post a bug regarding bugzi

Bugzilla posting failure.

2019-09-23 Thread ishikawa
Hi, Where is the proper forum to post a bug regarding bugzilla.mozilla.org? I *THINK* I posted a bug regarding bugzilla failure a couple of months ago, but for some reason, I could not find it in "My Dashboard" and so I am posting the question here. I experienced a bugzilla problem today and it

Bug 1578296 JavaScript error: resource://gre/modules/SessionStoreFunctions.jsm, line 392: NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND

2019-09-02 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Hi, I filed the following entry to bugzilla: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1578296 Bug 1578296 Many errors of the form JavaScript error: resource://gre/modules/SessionStoreFunctions.jsm, line 392: NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND during |make mozmill| testing of Full Debug of C-C TB.

Re: Help: why won't Thunderbird display mail in mochitest conditions?

2019-08-28 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Hi, those familiar with test infrastructure I am sorry that I am piggybacking my question/comment on a not directly related topic. During xpcshell test of TB, no display (of X11, say, under linux) is shown. Is this a design decision and is to be expected? If TB tries to show an error messag

Re: Must we rebuild all our rust code constantly?

2019-08-24 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
be compiling TB. I added the following in my mozconfig for TB, but I am not sure if this is the right way to disable incremental compilation. mk_add_options "export CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0" TIA On 2019/08/22 11:22, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: Well, I have a problem now after trying to upda

Re: Must we rebuild all our rust code constantly?

2019-08-23 Thread ishikawa
On 2019/08/23 11:00, Mike Hommey wrote: > > In the meanwhile, as discussed on irc, it seems fair to disable > CARGO_INCREMENTAL when building with sccache. So how can we disable this? Setting environment variable as in the following? export CARGO_INCREMENTAL= ___

Re: Must we rebuild all our rust code constantly?

2019-08-21 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Well, I have a problem now after trying to update sccache just in case I need a new version in the future. I did the following: cargo install --force sccache (I was not so sure of what the proper update procedure of already installed package. sccache 2.0.8-alpha-something was already installe

Re: Must we rebuild all our rust code constantly?

2019-08-21 Thread ISHIKAWA, Chiaki
On 2019/08/21 3:52, Eric Rahm wrote: mach clobber --full Thank you for the tips. I will try this. At the same time, I have a feeling that the debug symbol that rustc generates may be a tad bigger than I would like it to be, but I need to investigate more about this. Chiaki ___

Re: Must we rebuild all our rust code constantly?

2019-08-20 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2019/08/20 14:32, Kris Maglione wrote: On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 02:23:06PM +0900, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: On 2019/08/20 9:11, Dave Townsend wrote: Thanks to a tip I've tracked this down. This seems to only be the case when I have sccache enabled. Disabling it gives me nice quick increm

Re: Must we rebuild all our rust code constantly?

2019-08-19 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2019/08/20 9:11, Dave Townsend wrote: Thanks to a tip I've tracked this down. This seems to only be the case when I have sccache enabled. Disabling it gives me nice quick incremental builds again. Of course that isn't an ideal solution but it will do for now. On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 1:55 PM D

Re: clang version on tryserver?

2019-07-31 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
4 * 1024 );   mCopyState->m_fileStream = tmp_out; On 2019/07/31 5:45, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: Dear Steve, Thank you for your analysis and suggestion for moving to gcc-8. I would change my local GCC compiler to gcc-8, and g++-8. Also, I would modify the offending code so that the evaluation o

Re: clang version on tryserver?

2019-07-30 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
07/31 0:15, Steve Fink wrote: On 7/30/19 6:20 AM, Jan de Mooij wrote: On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:51 PM ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:     nsresult rv2   = NS_NewBufferedOutputStream(getter_AddRefs(mCopyState->m_fileStream), mCopyState->m_fileStream.forget(),  <=== It seems this can be nul

Re: clang version on tryserver?

2019-07-30 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
PM ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: nsresult rv2 = NS_NewBufferedOutputStream(getter_AddRefs(mCopyState->m_fileStream), mCopyState->m_fileStream.forget(), <=== It seems this can be nullptr in clang-8 version??? 64 * 1024 ); This looks like it could

Re: clang version on tryserver?

2019-07-30 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2019/07/30 21:13, Jörg Knobloch wrote: On 30 Jul 2019 13:50, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: What is the version of clang used on tryserver? The same as on the local machine? For Windows I get: $ ../.mozbuild/clang/bin/clang --version clang version 8.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_800/final 356365) Target

clang version on tryserver?

2019-07-30 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
ily to see where the problem lies. "./mach boostrap" installed clang-8 under /home/ishikawa/.mozbuild/clang/bin/clang-8 and so I thought I would use it. However, this binary crashed miserably during optimization pass with a message that prompts me to report the issue to llvm.org, and I am

Re: HG problem: abort: decoding near '9: error: ‘sse2::l': 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 213: ordinal not in range(128)

2018-12-04 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
hey are local memo files. It is very annoying and again the problem was traced to encode/decode in python runtime. Thank you again. On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 11:53 PM ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: Hi, I am developing mozilla patches locally under my local PC running linux. I often include the GCC&#

HG problem: abort: decoding near '9: error: ‘sse2::l': 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 213: ordinal not in range(128)

2018-12-01 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Hi, I am developing mozilla patches locally under my local PC running linux. I often include the GCC's error/warning message in the mercurial commit message (in the second and subsequent lines, the first line is for usage by mozilla's bugzilla procedure.) when my local patch is created to addres

Re: Prefs overhaul

2018-03-10 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2018/03/07 12:08, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: Hi, I've been doing a lot of work to improve libpref recently, and there is more in the pipeline. I've written a brief roadmap that might be of interest to people: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/PrefsOverhaul I'd be happy to hear feedback, via

Re: Dropping remains of support for non-UTF-8 file paths on Gtk platforms (was: Re: Please do not use GetNativePath and GetNativeTarget in XP code and Windows-specific code)

2017-12-05 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2017/12/06 1:04, Jonathan Kew wrote: On 05/12/2017 15:16, Henri Sivonen wrote: On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:37 PM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: There are other non-ASCII character issues such as https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1258613 Very weird bug! (Summary for others: decomposed

Re: Dropping remains of support for non-UTF-8 file paths on Gtk platforms (was: Re: Please do not use GetNativePath and GetNativeTarget in XP code and Windows-specific code)

2017-12-05 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2017/12/05 22:24, Henri Sivonen wrote: On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Masatoshi Kimura wrote: * If by any chance a profile path contains non-ASCII characters on non-UTF-8 UNIX systems, Firefox 57.0.1 must have broken the profile just like 57.0 broke it on Windows. But we didn't hear any suc

Re: We need better canaries for JS code

2017-10-20 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
I am for stricter checks and crashing the test when some of the errors discussed here are detected. I have been puzzled when some attributes are undefined as such when I ran tests for Thunderbird in the past. The bugs are found non-Thunderbird-specific code often times. Crashing the tests would

Re: Intent to require `mach try` for submitting to Try

2017-09-15 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Does "mozilla/mach try" will work for try-comm-central? (Well, I know there has been a general talk of moving thunderbird to somewhere else, but it is not going to happen overnight.) TIA ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Intent to ship: Changing default Japanese fonts to modern fonts

2017-08-25 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
as default settings). FYI: We still need to keep using legacy "MS Gothic" font for default Japanese monospace font since Windows doesn't have modern monospace font. On 8/24/2017 7:47 AM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: Hi, I use firefox under Windows most of the time, and so it wil

Re: Intent to ship: Changing default Japanese fonts to modern fonts

2017-08-23 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Hi, I use firefox under Windows most of the time, and so it will be very nice. But obviously this is only for Windows platform, and does not affect linux or OSX versions. Correct? On 2017/08/23 14:19, Masayuki Nakano wrote: Hi, We decided that we should change our default Japanese fonts fro

Re: sccache as ccache

2017-08-05 Thread ISHIKAWA, Chiaki
On 2017/08/06 2:06, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: On 2017/08/04 20:46, Simon Sapin wrote: On 04/08/2017 13:02, Mike Hommey wrote: On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:25:52AM +0200, Simon Sapin wrote: `mk_add_options export RUSTC_WRAPPER=sccache` causes an error: It's `mk_add_options "export RUS

Re: sccache as ccache

2017-08-05 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2017/08/04 20:46, Simon Sapin wrote: On 04/08/2017 13:02, Mike Hommey wrote: On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:25:52AM +0200, Simon Sapin wrote: `mk_add_options export RUSTC_WRAPPER=sccache` causes an error: It's `mk_add_options "export RUSTC_WRAPPER=sccache"`. That worked, thanks! I now have:

Re: Shipping Headless Firefox on Linux

2017-06-19 Thread ishikawa
On 2017年06月16日 11:22, Andrew Sutherland wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017, at 09:37 PM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: >> Interesting. >> But this covers only modal prompts generated by/in JavaScript modules, >> and not C++ code? >> If so, maybe I should re-think my previous

Re: Shipping Headless Firefox on Linux

2017-06-15 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2017/06/16 6:47, Mike Hommey wrote: On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 04:51:48PM -0400, Ben Kelly wrote: On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote: On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Brendan Dahl wrote: Headless will run less of the platform specific widget code and I don't recommend using

Re: Shipping Headless Firefox on Linux

2017-06-15 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2017/06/16 5:33, Andrew Sutherland wrote: On Thu, Jun 15, 2017, at 03:27 AM, ishikawa wrote: On local machine, when I added a modal error dailog as a response to an error condition, which happens to be artificially created and tested in xpcshell test, the test fails because the screen or

Re: Shipping Headless Firefox on Linux

2017-06-15 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
orm::IsHeadless() in c++. Thank you for the tips. I think I will resurrect the warning/error dialog somehow. On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:27 AM, ishikawa wrote: On 2017年06月15日 08:51, Brendan Dahl wrote: Hello All, As of Firefox 55 I intend to ship headless Linux support (Firefox without

Re: Shipping Headless Firefox on Linux

2017-06-15 Thread ishikawa
On 2017年06月15日 08:51, Brendan Dahl wrote: > Hello All, > > > As of Firefox 55 I intend to ship headless Linux support (Firefox without a > GUI and X11 server connection). Headless mode is enabled via the --headless > command line flag for Firefox and does not affect Firefox when running in > norm

Re: Improving visibility of compiler warnings

2017-05-21 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Hi, On 2017/05/20 19:36, Martin Thomson wrote: On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Kris Maglione wrote: Can we make some effort to get clean warnings output at the end of standard builds? A huge chunk of the warnings come from NSS and NSPR, and should be easily fixable. Hmm, these are all -Wsig

Re: Should &&/|| really be at the end of lines?

2017-02-17 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2017/02/18 7:28, Bobby Holley wrote: On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:18 PM, wrote: Hi again Nick, Someone made me realize that I didn't fully read your message, sorry for that. I now see that as well as &&/||, you have grepped for other operators, and shown that the overwhelming usage is to put

Re: Changing the representation of rectangles in platform code

2017-02-13 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2017/02/14 8:37, gsquel...@mozilla.com wrote: On Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 3:25:05 AM UTC+11, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: On 2017-02-11 3:27 AM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: On 2017/02/11 7:07, Botond Ballo wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Milan Sreckovic wrote: First step needs to happen

Re: Changing the representation of rectangles in platform code

2017-02-11 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2017/02/11 7:07, Botond Ballo wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Milan Sreckovic wrote: First step needs to happen completely before the second step does, so I guess the danger is that we start and give up before we get to step 2. I don't think that will happen, but it is something we

Re: A reminder about MOZ_MUST_USE and [must_use]

2017-01-20 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2017/01/20 8:10, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: There are lots of functions where not checking the return value is reasonable, such as close(). A file opened for writing and is buffered will flush pending data to disk upon Close() and may encounter the error such as disk full AT THAT POINT, an

Re: GCC 4.9 now required to build on Linux/Android

2016-12-23 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2016/12/24 1:54, Nathan Froyd wrote: On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Mike Hoye wrote: On 2016-12-23 11:08 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote: Bug 1322792 has landed on inbound, which changes configure to require GCC 4.9 to build; our automation switched over to GCC 4.9 for our Linux builds earlier th

Re: hg.mozilla.org certificate fingerprint changed?

2016-09-30 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
rvers when some mismatch is reported by tools like ssh/https-related tools, and decide to update the local check/verification data assuming that they have missed the update announcements. TIA -r On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:18 PM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: In the last few days, hg.mozilla.org c

hg.mozilla.org certificate fingerprint changed?

2016-09-30 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
In the last few days, hg.mozilla.org certificate fingerprint seems to have changed. I noticed this because the trial to update local copy of mozilla-central repository within C-C repository failed due to m-central/mozilla', 'https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/'] pulling from https://hg.mo

Re: Strange error message on try-comm-central: Error: Invalid addon ID: expected addon ID specialpow...@mozilla.org, found special-pow...@mozilla.org in manifest

2016-09-23 Thread ishikawa
On 2016年09月23日 15:53, Mark Banner wrote: > > https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?q=security.turn_off_all_security_so_that_viruses_can_take_over_this_computer&redirect=false > > > This probably means that the Thunderbird specific MozMill builders should > either not be installing the s

Re: Strange error message on try-comm-central: Error: Invalid addon ID: expected addon ID specialpow...@mozilla.org, found special-pow...@mozilla.org in manifest

2016-09-22 Thread ishikawa
rote: >> On 22/09/2016 08:44, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: >>> >>> 3:07:56 INFO - 1474488476446addons.xpi-utilsWARN >>> addMetadata: Add-on specialpow...@mozilla.org is invalid: Error: Invalid >>> addon ID: expected addon ID specialpow...@mozilla.org, foun

Re: Strange error message on try-comm-central: Error: Invalid addon ID: expected addon ID specialpow...@mozilla.org, found special-pow...@mozilla.org in manifest

2016-09-22 Thread ishikawa
On 2016年09月23日 11:42, ishikawa wrote: > On 2016年09月22日 17:33, Mark Banner wrote: >> On 22/09/2016 08:44, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: >>> 3:07:56 INFO - 1474488476446addons.xpi-utilsWARN >>> addMetadata: Add-on specialpow...@mozilla.org is invalid: Error: Inv

Re: Strange error message on try-comm-central: Error: Invalid addon ID: expected addon ID specialpow...@mozilla.org, found special-pow...@mozilla.org in manifest

2016-09-22 Thread ishikawa
On 2016年09月22日 17:33, Mark Banner wrote: > On 22/09/2016 08:44, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: >> 3:07:56 INFO - 1474488476446addons.xpi-utilsWARN >> addMetadata: Add-on specialpow...@mozilla.org is invalid: Error: Invalid >> addon ID: expected addon ID specialpow.

Strange error message on try-comm-central: Error: Invalid addon ID: expected addon ID specialpow...@mozilla.org, found special-pow...@mozilla.org in manifest

2016-09-22 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
While perusing error log of try-comm-central run of Windows 7 debug version run of |make mozmill| test on try-comm-central treeherder, I noticed a strange error message. 3:07:56 INFO - 1474488476446 addons.xpi-utils WARN addMetadata: Add-on specialpow...@mozilla.org is invalid: Error: Inv

Re: NS_WARN_IF_FALSE has been renamed NS_WARNING_ASSERTION

2016-09-21 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2016/09/22 5:56, Daniel Holbert wrote: On 09/21/2016 12:48 PM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: In the following URL about coding style, https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Coding_Style --- begin quote --- if (NS_WARN_IF(somethingthatshouldbetrue)) { return

Re: NS_WARN_IF_FALSE has been renamed NS_WARNING_ASSERTION

2016-09-21 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2016/09/02 16:02, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: Greetings, NS_WARN_IF_FALSE has been renamed NS_WARNING_ASSERTION. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1299727 for details, including the justification. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137 for a bug that this cha

Re: All profile settings lost in new version

2016-09-02 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2016/09/02 20:15, Wayne wrote: I'm wondering, under what circumstances would a user have a prefs.js-1 and prefs.js be missing? ref https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1136992 ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https

Re: Heads up: valgrind/memcheck issues

2016-08-25 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
and Valgrind on mozilla-central, so it seems likely this is Thunderbird specific. Please file security bugs in bugzilla with any reports you have found. Andrew On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:59 AM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: Hi, I occasionally check C-C TB by running |make mozmill| test suite under

Heads up: valgrind/memcheck issues

2016-08-25 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Hi, I occasionally check C-C TB by running |make mozmill| test suite under valgrind/memcheck for detecting memory issues. I ran such a test the day before and saw a flurry of memcheck warnings which I did not see in the test that was run back on May 12th. So in three months between, some

Re: New [must_use] property in XPIDL

2016-08-25 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2016/08/25 6:38, Mike Hommey wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 04:39:15PM -0700, R Kent James wrote: On 8/21/2016 9:14 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: I strongly encourage people to do likewise on any IDL files with which they are familiar. Adding appropriate checks isn't always easy Exactly,

Re: mach and ccache failure?

2016-08-20 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2016/08/20 10:03, Jan Varga wrote: I see the same problem on my mac, but I didn't investigate why it's not working anymore. Did ccacge ever work on the Mac to support two directories? (I mean the compilation result in one object directory could be substituted for the other object directory

Re: Using rr chaos mode to find intermittent bugs

2016-02-10 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2016/02/11 7:04, Robert O'Callahan wrote: rr should work fine with c-c xpcshell tests (and most other Linux programs). This sounds great! CI ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platfo

Re: Using rr chaos mode to find intermittent bugs

2016-02-10 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2016/02/11 5:47, Robert O'Callahan wrote: On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Ted Mielczarek wrote: BenWa tried doing some work on this but kept getting hung up on hitting test failures unrelated to the ones we see in production, possibly due to environment issues. Yes. In this vein, it's pos

Re: Strange errors n OS X platform

2015-12-15 Thread ISHIKAWA, Chiaki
On 2015/12/15 23:40, Philip Chee wrote: On 13/12/2015 16:26, ISHIKAWA, Chiaki wrote: {"fun":"getCurrentDirectory","id":2} 14:54:20 INFO - PROCESS | 5963 | OS Controller Message posted 14:54:20 INFO - PROCESS | 5963 | OS Controller Expecting reply

Re: Question: "Chrome file doesn't exist: ..." in |make mozmill| log by running DEBUG versions of C-C TB

2015-11-24 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2015/11/24 20:21, Philip Chee wrote: On 22/11/2015 03:20, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: 35 Chrome file doesn't exist: /NREF-COMM-CENTRAL/objdir-tb3/dist/bin/chrome/toolkit/skin/classic/global/icons/information-64.png information-64.png only exists in the osx theme http://mxr.mozill

Re: Question: "Chrome file doesn't exist: ..." in |make mozmill| log by running DEBUG versions of C-C TB

2015-11-23 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2015/11/23 14:00, Philip Chee wrote: On 22/11/2015 03:20, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: 100 Chrome file doesn't exist: /NREF-COMM-CENTRAL/objdir-tb3/dist/bin/chrome/classic/skin/classic/messenger/icons/dropbox.png Was removed in Bug 763471 - Convert Dropbox Filelink provider code to

Question: "Chrome file doesn't exist: ..." in |make mozmill| log by running DEBUG versions of C-C TB

2015-11-21 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Here is another question of mine that has bothered me for a long time. During the invocation of TB |make mozmill| test suite by running locally produced DEBUG version of C-C test, I have seen the following WARNING messages in the log regarding "Chrome file doesn't exist". I checked the bugzil

Re: Question: why an external DTD is accessed (or not)? (svg11.dtd)

2015-11-21 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Thank you for the clarification. It is assuring to know that some people are aware of the issue. On 2015/11/22 3:59, Kyle Huey wrote: Bug 994305 is on file for this. - Kyle On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 10:57 AM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: Hi, I have been puzzled at a pair of strange warning

Question: why an external DTD is accessed (or not)? (svg11.dtd)

2015-11-21 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Hi, I have been puzzled at a pair of strange warning messages over the last few years, but can't hold the curiosity any longer. So here is my question. During the invocation of TB |make mozmill| test suite by running locally produced DEBUG version of C-C test, I have seen the following error

Re: Error of OS X build (c-c TB)

2015-11-16 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2015/11/16 17:03, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: On 2015/11/15 14:28, Xidorn Quan wrote: On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 1:05 PM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: On 2015/11/14 12:31, Xidorn Quan wrote: Have you checked your log here: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=11934&repo=try-

Re: Error of OS X build (c-c TB)

2015-11-16 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2015/11/15 14:28, Xidorn Quan wrote: On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 1:05 PM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: On 2015/11/14 12:31, Xidorn Quan wrote: Have you checked your log here: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=11934&repo=try-comm-central - Xidorn Yes, I have looked at it.

Re: Error of OS X build (c-c TB)

2015-11-15 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2015/11/15 11:05, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: On 2015/11/14 12:31, Xidorn Quan wrote: Have you checked your log here: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=11934&repo=try-comm-central - Xidorn Yes, I have looked at it. The information there is sparse. The error indic

Re: Error of OS X build (c-c TB)

2015-11-14 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
I am not sure why others don't bump into this issue under OS X. My patch does NOT touch anything related to "TextArea", etc. TIA On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 1:05 PM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: Hi, I am trying to test my patches by building C-C TB under OS X using try server. However, the b

Error of OS X build (c-c TB)

2015-11-13 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Hi, I am trying to test my patches by building C-C TB under OS X using try server. However, the build fails with the following compilation error. Since I don't have OS X (my local PC runs linux), I have no idea why the error occurs under OS X. BTW, I can build C-C TB under linux on my local PC, an

Re: Now measuring Firefox size per-commit. What else should we be tracking?

2015-11-10 Thread ishikawa
2015-11-10 04:12 に Andreas Tolfsen さんは書きました: On 9 November 2015 at 18:39, William Lachance wrote: Chris Manchester has volunteered to look into submitting build times in automation to perfherder here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1222549 Another thing it might be interesting

Re: Merging comm-central into mozilla-central (summary v1)

2015-11-06 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2015/10/27 9:06, Philipp Kewisch wrote: Hi all, I'd love to see if we can move towards an agreement. For those of you that would prefer not to merge, I'd love to hear what your absolute minimum requirements would be that you'd accept a merge with. Changes to hg? Changes to dxr? A policy chana

Re: Linux builds now default to building with Gtk+3

2015-07-28 Thread ISHIKAWA, Chiaki
After a few tweaks and patches, the C-C TB can be built using gtk3 under linux successfully. Great! When I run |make mozmill| test locally by running full debug build of C-C TB, I noticed the following deprecation warnings due to the API change in GTK3 (from gtk2). Is there a meta-bug to k

Re: GTK3 linux builds

2015-07-21 Thread ishikawa
On 2015年07月21日 16:04, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:22:05PM -0400, Jeff Muizelaar wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: >>> >>> There are a few remaining perma reds and oranges, FWIW. >> >> Which ones? I don't see anything on elm. > > Well, it looks like

Re: Strange Error: Reentrancy error: some client, attempted to display a message to the console while in a console,listener

2015-07-01 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2015/07/02 4:30, Andrew Sutherland wrote: This is probably due to https://dxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/mailnews/test/resources/logHelper.js that registers itself as a console listener and its low-tech feedback loop prevention. (NB: The quippy file-level comment should be s/aweswome/And

Re: Strange Error: Reentrancy error: some client, attempted to display a message to the console while in a console,listener

2015-07-01 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
ppens towards the test termination. I am still at a loss about why the strange syntax error (missing symbol definition) occurs in the first place. Missing "Components" is really strange. TIA On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:35 PM, ishikawa wrote: Hi, I am not sure where to ask and so as

Strange Error: Reentrancy error: some client,attempted to display a message to the console while in a console,listener

2015-06-30 Thread ishikawa
Hi, I am not sure where to ask and so ask three mailing lists. First off, TB 38.0.1 after many months of waiting solved many outstanding issues, Great. I hope we can correct many remaining issues in the months ahead. I am testing full debug build of C-C TB locally. This is done by running |make

Re: Revisiting modelines in source files

2015-06-17 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Assessing style compliance as == clang-format(whole file) is by far the easiest to implement. I'd be in favor of a flag day (or set of mini flag days) where we mass rewrite the tree with clang-format's output. To be honest, I don't care WHICH particular style we follow, but please set the fl

Re: The War on Warnings

2015-06-17 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2015/06/17 8:29, Eric Rahm wrote: An update on progress. I've landed bugs which should clean up ~180,000 warnings. I have bugs pending for another ~26,000. The latest top 40: *Note: I improved my normalization a bit so it might look a bit different Are there documents explaining why thes

Re: The War on Warnings

2015-06-08 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
Hi, On 2015/06/06 2:39, Eric Rahm wrote: On Friday, June 5, 2015 at 8:23:53 AM UTC-7, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote: After coping with voluminous messages in C-C TB |make mozmill| test suite log [much smaller volume than full FF logs], I think we should have NS_INFORMATION() macro that prints out an

Re: The War on Warnings

2015-06-05 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2015/06/04 21:38, Robert O'Callahan wrote: Usually I use NS_WARNING to mean "something weird and unexpected is happening, e.g. a bug in Web page code, but not necessarily a browser bug". Sometimes I get useful hints from NS_WARNING spew leading up to a serious failure, but for those usages cou

Strange test behavior: stuck test seems to be released by mere mouse motion (|make mozmill| test of TB)

2015-06-03 Thread ishikawa
I have no idea where I should report this for proper attention. Please suggest a better Newsgroup if there is one. I am posting this to mozilla.dev.apps.thunderbird mozilla.dev.platform mozilla.tools During the test of C-C TB using its test suite |make mozmill| I often encounter random errors. The

Re: DBM code too old (Re: mozmill test: Hightail ???)

2015-06-02 Thread ishikawa
I created a bugzilla entry based on the information here. Bug 1170578 - RFC: Buggy NSS dbm code ought to be updated https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1170578 TIA ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozil

Re: DBM code too old (Re: mozmill test: Hightail ???)

2015-05-31 Thread ishikawa
On 2015年05月31日 01:36, Philip Chee wrote: > On 29/05/2015 22:31, ISHIKAWA, Chiaki wrote: > >> I figured out the particular cause of >> test-cloudfile-backend-hightail.js. >> experienced during |make mozmill| when I simulated "short read" and >> "short w

DBM code too old (Re: mozmill test: Hightail ???)

2015-05-29 Thread ISHIKAWA, Chiaki
I changed the subject: Followup-to: mozilla.dev.platform On 2015/05t/29 16:41, ishikawa wrote: > Hi, > > I have been testing locally built FULL DEBUG C-C thunderbird using |make > mozmill| test suite. > > When I tinkered with low-level I/O testing by simulating "short

Re: Replacing Mozmill driven tests for Firefox with Marionette

2015-05-13 Thread ISHIKAWA, Chiaki
On 2015/05/13 23:24, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:> I don't believe marionette currently works on Thunderbird, but that's > most likely due to hardcoded assumptions than any deep technical > reasons. It could probably be made to work with a little bit of effort, > it's just that to date, no one has t

Re: Replacing Mozmill driven tests for Firefox with Marionette

2015-05-13 Thread ISHIKAWA, Chiaki
Ouch, there was a line near the end. Successfully installed jsbridge-2.4.14 mozmill-1.5.16 This is from a local C-C TB build. CI ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: A question about do_QueryInterface()

2015-04-30 Thread ishikawa
On 2015年05月01日 06:30, Seth Fowler wrote: > >> On Apr 30, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote: >> >> do_QueryInterface is the equivalent of a type-checked downcast, e.g. >> (ClassName)foo in Java. (Regular C++ downcasts are not dynamically >> type-checked). > > do_QueryInterface is, in o

Re: A question about do_QueryInterface()

2015-04-30 Thread ishikawa
On 2015年05月01日 04:09, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote: > On 4/30/2015 1:25 PM, ISHIKAWA, Chiaki wrote: >> * 787 nsCOMPtr inboxInputStream = >> do_QueryInterface(m_outFileStream); >> 788 rv = MsgReopenFileStream(m_tmpDownloadFile, inboxInputStream); >> &

Re: A question about do_QueryInterface()

2015-04-30 Thread ISHIKAWA, Chiaki
Thank you for the clarification. On 2015/05/01 3:38, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 4/30/15 2:25 PM, ISHIKAWA, Chiaki wrote: >> Is this to be expected? > > Sure. You're taking an _output_ stream and QIing it to > nsI_Input_Stream. > Yes, that is how the original cod

  1   2   3   >