Hi Eranga,
You may want to set the data coding scheme to 0xF5 as this seemed
to work for us. According to spec gsm 3.038 this should indicate
that the message class is me specific and the message coding is
8 bit.
hope this works for you,
Regards,
Michael.
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http:
No, currently kannel does not support query_sm, the
difficulty with implementing this is that the query_sm
is based on a reference number returned by the SMSC.
When an application sends an sms it only receives an
acknowledgement that the sms reached the bearerbox.
Thus without the reference num
Hi,
What version of SMPP SMSC are you connecting
to?
What
is the response to the bind statements when you connect?
How
often are you sending enquire links?
May be
no harm to send the log from the bearerbox.
cheers,
mike.
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutionshttp://www.anam.com mailto:[EMA
connections are shortlived and are started when a message is sent!
Regards,
Michael Mulcahy.
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+353 1 284 7555
Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Mulcahy
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 8:52 AM
> To: Kannel Devel (E-mail 2)
> Subject: FW: Vodafone UK Connection
>
>
>
>
> Hi David,
>
> What does the kannel logs show? send in the bearerbox log
Hi,
An example would be an SMS aggregator (a virtual SMSC) that provides a http
interface to their system. There are a number of companies that provide a
http interface for sending SMS messages and a company may wish to connect to
one of these systems. I can't think of any of these offhand but I
Hi,
As an aside, in order to keep my mail load low, please reply to the group
only :-) thanks!
> ok, so someone calls your SMSC HTTP via HTTP and you call SMSC EMI to
> your provider as example?!
Yes so we would have the following:
Kannel ---[http]--- sms aggregator [smsc protocol]--- smsc
what Kannel thinks
is the SMSC, which in your case is the SMS broker.
There is no mechanism to retrieve a report for delivery to the SMSC
when a sms broker is present, unless that broker provides one
of course.
Kindest Regards,
Michael Mulcahy.
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http
is an
optional parameter in SMPP that is not currently supported by Kannel.
However if you set the version to 3.3 then this should solve the problem
that you are experiencing as the SEMA implementation will then store the
message contents in the short message field.
Kind Regards,
Michael Mulcahy
Hi All,
The TON and NPI parameters are defined according to the GSM and the SMPP
standards. Unfortunately how they are used in an SMSC does not seem to be
standardised.
I have seen people using different values to achieve the same functionality
using different SMSC implementations. This is also
working here so maybe the version of the gateway you are connecting to
is different? Perhaps you could send in the log file.
Kindest Regards,
Michael Mulcahy.
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+353 1 284 7555
Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, C
PDU.
Kindest Regards,
Michael Mulcahy.
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+353 1 284 7555
Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
The code used for the validity period in SMPP may be reused for
the scheduled delivery period in the SMPP module as the formats
are the same.
Regards,
Michael Mulcahy.
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+353 1 284 7555
Castle Yard, Saint
il 23, 2002 2:51 PM
> To: Michael Mulcahy
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: SMPP Defer ability
>
>
> You sure you mean smsc_smpp.c validity period code as the
> version I have
> (and cvs has) doesn't appear to have any validity code
> setting in it (mo
iator into this list.
It is just for the Pom-SessionRequest that the Push headers should
have the a content type for sia and an application id for sia.
comments?
Regards,
Michael Mulcahy.
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+353 1 284 7555
Castle Y
Comments Below:
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+353 1 284 7555
Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland
> 1) submit_sm gave message id in decimal (same as deliver_sm).
> So needed
> to change the base 16 conversion to b
er yet! I suggest that you may enquire about
this on the www.smsforum.net website, this website has a discussion forum
for
SMPP 3.4 that is very useful.
Warm Regards,
Michael Mulcahy
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+353 1 284 7555
Castle Yard, Sai
Hi
Patrick,
AFAIK
%s is for 1 word only, you can use this with %r which passes the remaining words
to URL.
Use %a
if you wish to use all the words.
Questions like this would probably be better sent to the users mailing
list rather than the developers
mailing list as we prefer to concen
Hi,
Unfortunately the Ericsson PI does not appear to conform to the WAP
standard.
The address element of the PAP message is incorrect.
The text "type" should be in capital letters and not lowercase.
The WAP standard states the following for an address:
user-defined-identifier = ( escaped-va
the idea of smsbox routing. Should the message be stored until that box
reconnects?
comments appreciated.
Regards,
Michael Mulcahy
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+353 1 284 7555
Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland
The problem is with the calling of "parse_url" in the code.
"parse_url" is called twice when a http request is being made.
It is the second call that causes the leak.
the "write_request_thread" function invokes "get_connection", this calls
"parse_url" and populates the trans->host field.
then "wri
Hi All,
Bug:
If the SMPP driver receives a successful submit_sm_resp with a NULL
message_id field
and a submission report was requested then Kannel panics.
Yes, Sending a submit response without a message_id is incorrect according
to specification
but if it does happen Kannel should not fall over.
> Throttling error is issued when I'm sending too much messages to
> the SMSC. The correct behaviour then is to slow down (I usually
> wait for a second per 8 fired messages).
>
> The queue full error is something completelly different (at least
> in my case). I get that one when the recepient can
> > So it looks like different SMSC vendors have different interpretations
of
> > the message queue full error code.
> Not really. The message queue full is to prevent a end user to receive
> thousand times the same SMS by error.
> This is exactly the same on EMI/UCP.
One of the UK SMSC operator
bind_receiver_resp pdus,
the status variable is modified in both places and is not protected.
Regards,
Michael Mulcahy.
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+353 1 284 7555
Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland
> I understood from the following messages that this is a
> fundamental problem
> with the smpp driver. How to fix this?
>
> Regards,
> Indrek
>
>
> Michael Mulcahy wrote:
>
> >Hi All,
> >
> >There is a bug in the current SMPP driver that stops the dri
Hi All,
There is a bug in HTTP module when connections are proxied and
the connection is persistent.
The host:port key of the target server is put into the connection pool
rather than the host:port key of the proxy.
The proxy connection never gets reused as the conn_pool_get call is passed
th
Hi All,
Comments embedded:
> > There is a bug in HTTP module when connections are proxied and
> > the connection is persistent.
> >
> > The host:port key of the target server is put into the
> connection pool
> > rather than the host:port key of the proxy.
> >
> > The proxy connection never gets
s out
> and nothing else but a restart helps.
>
> I understood from the following messages that this is a
> fundamental problem
> with the smpp driver. How to fix this?
>
> Regards,
> Indrek
>
>
> Michael Mulcahy wrote:
>
> >Hi All,
> >
> >There i
Hi All,
Summary:
The assigning of a nonexistent field in the EMI driver when creating a
submission
report results in an out of bounds read.
Scenario:
The EMI driver checks for a DLR when a response is received for a submitted
message.
If there is a DLR requested for that message then the driver d
TED]]
Sent: 03 February 2003 13:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EMI Driver Bug
On Montag, Februar 3, 2003, at 01:23 Uhr, Michael Mulcahy wrote:
Hi All,
Summary:
The assigning of a nonexistent field in the EMI driver when creating a
submission
report results in an out
ternet Solutions
http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+353 1 284 7555
Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 February 2003 14:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EMI Driver Bug
amp;receiver=%p&sende
> r=%P&message-
> >n umber=0>
> >
> > This occurs as the EMI driver is accessing a field
> (E50_AMSG) that is not
> > available in an EMI acknowledgement. It is surprising that
> no one has
> > experienced
> > t
Yes, +1 from me
ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions
http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+353 1 284 7555
Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stipe Tolj
> Sent: 05 Feb
34 matches
Mail list logo
