simple - under
FreeBSD you have to use "gmake" instead of "make". btw, kannel port
(version 1.2.1) has USE_GMAKE=yes in Makefile. it seems that
"gmake" compilation succession differs from
"make".
maybe this information would prevent others to consider with
the same problem.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
y-my/utils$
./start-stop-daemon --start./start-stop-daemon: need one of --start or
--stopTry `./start-stop-daemon --help' for more
information.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
Hi list,
I was trying to use sendsms push, but I got strange warning. I
looked up through the
sources and realized, that it's something about msg_type().
although SMS reaches
the sender.
i'm interested to know, what could cause "Received other
message than sms/admin, ignoring!"
warning.
Thanks, Stipe, I just found a thread about this patch, sorry.
in other words, the idea is to ask SMSC for the answer,
simplify
it and "forward" to smsbox in order to see the status of
recently sent
message with, i.e. sendms push. am I right? :)
regards,
Dziugas
Hello sir,
seems like we have already told you ;))
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Vijay Patwari wrote:
> Hello sir,
> Is Kannel gateway-1.2.1 supports MMS, if so wht
> will be necessar changes to be made.
> reg
please read the following thread:
http://www.kannel.org/mailman/private/devel/2003-March/016373.html
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Cipher Strength wrote:
>
>
> i complied latest CVS release of Kannel on 18th March got follwoing waring
>
> WARNING: Received oth
d UDH is not being sent. futhermore, there is nothing about
accept-x-kannel-headers in usergide of developement version
(http://www.kannel.org/download/1.3.1/userguide-1.3.1/userguide.html)
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
sorry, seems like it's my mistake since i mixed up when restarting kannel
after changing configuration file.
everything seems to work fine. but what about the userguide?
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> i'm using cur
I think it's possible :)
therefore i can't understand why the snip about accept-x-kannel-headers
has been removed from userguide?! :)
btw, should I write a patch for the current CVS ?
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> > everything seems to wor
I currently was writing a question to the mailing list about plans to
rewrite CIMD2 to smsconn :))
great job, Angel.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> commited to cvs. Thanks a lot Angel!
>
> Stipe
>
> [
REQUEST (i.e.
commenting out the line).
unfortunately I don't know if our provider has prohibited it using the
right issues (i.e. configuration file or something), so stating that my
operator's CIMD2 "doesn't support DLR" is not true. it's just forbidden :)
regards,
Dzi
here is additional information what CIMD2 reports:
2003-03-25 17:50:47 [12] ERROR: CIMD2[mysmsc]: Submit message response contained error
message:
2003-03-25 17:50:47 [12] ERROR: code 310: Incorrect status report request parameter
usage
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Dziugas
y one expiriencing this problem? :)
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
I commented out two smsc cimd2 instances and reloaded bearerbox and smsbox
daemons.
situation has changed:
13770 root 2 0 6108K 3112K poll 0:00 0.00% 0.00% bearerbox
I will try to patch Angel's most recent smsc_cimd2.c patch and then will
report.
regards,
Dziugas Baltruna
Angel,
I've applied the patch, but bearebox still eats lots of cpu resources:
16441 root 61 0 6260K 3188K RUN 2:05 98.67% 98.49% bearerbox
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
- Original Message -
From: Angel Fradejas
To: Dziugas Baltrunas ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2003 m.
checkout yours and mine
versions.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
- Original Message -
From:
Angel
Fradejas
To: Dziugas Baltrunas ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2003 m. kovo 25 d. 19:45
Subject: RE: high cpu load
>I've applied the patch, but bearebox still
an comment out the line:
packet_add_int_parm(packet, P_STATUS_REPORT_REQUEST, 0);
and if yes, maybe we could add one more directive in the configuration
file, like "use-dlr"?
it seems stupid, because why, according to CIMD2, "0" doesn't meen "NO"? :)
regards,
Dziug
let mine +1 vote go on to the next patch by Angel :)
thanks again.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Angel Fradejas wrote:
> >
> > This patch fixes some problems with the SMSCConn CIMD2 driver, for
> > example high CPU load in a connecti
Hi list,
something mysterious has happend after commiting cimd2_smsc2.c patches
written by Angel Fradejas. there were problems with sleep times and Angel
wrote the final patch (file was called cimd2_fix2.diff) and it was
commited by Stipe. recently I did cvs update and seems like most recent
fix w
PROTECTED]:~/kannel/gateway$ cvs diff -u gw/smsc/smsc_cimd2.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/kannel/gateway$
50402 root 60 0 6268K 3200K RUN 2:10 99.17% 99.02% bearerbox
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Angel Fradejas wrote:
> >> Stipe, could you revert smsc_cimd2.c
D USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
51838 root 64 0 6268K 3200K RUN 2:47 99.00% 98.97% bearerbox
am I doing something wrong? correct please ;)
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Angel Fradejas wrote:
> >> >MD5
t;
2121d2122
<
2133,2135d2133
< }
< else {
< sleep = 0.0001;
here "../gateway-my/gw/smsc/smsc_cimd2.c" is the file, which "works fine"
and "gw/smsc/smsc_cimd2.c" is the file from current CVS.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 31
25:21 UTC).
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
- Original Message -
From: "Angel Fradejas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dziugas Baltrunas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 2003 m. kovo 31 d. 17:19
Subject: RE: [PATCH] smsc_cimd2.c sleep times
/smsc_cimd2.c,v
Sticky Tag: (none)
Sticky Date: 2003.03.30.21.00.00
Sticky Options: (none)
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
- Original Message -
From: "Angel Fradejas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dziugas Baltrunas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
i think it's time to end this
thread :)
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
- Original Message -----
From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dziugas Baltrunas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Angel Fradejas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
does it mean that it would be up to the user's application in order to
submit _valid_ timestamp? so I wish to make message validity 2 days long,
everytime I have to calculate "future" timestamp, ie. localtime() +
2*24*60. shouldn't it be done somehow automatically?
regard
Hi list,
I made a small patch whichs adds optional no-dlr parameter to CIMD2 SMSC
section. seems like some operators have prohibited DLR requests at all and
it reports with the following message:
ERROR: code 310: Incorrect status report request parameter usage
so, when no-dlr is set to true, nei
Hi list,
after some test I found small logical mistake in my previous patch.
it was with checking:
else if( !pdata->no_dlr && (msg->sms.dlr_mask & 0x03) )
warning(0, "CIMD2[%s]: dlr request make no sense while no-dlr set to false",
octstr_get_cstr(conn->id));
and there sh
thank you VERY much.
Stipe, I think this DLR issue is "special" for CIMD2 connections because
they are violating logics, i.e. they don't accept that 0 ("zero") means
nothing, i.e. not to request a delivery report. I haven't heard similar
issue with SMPP.
regards,
Dz
Xavier,
please ask your question exactly, what items (i.e. ems melody, picture)
you are trying to send and what's wrong there.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Sun, 20 Apr 2003, Xavier RODRIGUEZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to send an EMS with kannel ? The response seems to
Stipe,
some of them are "a bit" old, but their status is still "new". does it
mean that all of them are still active or maybe some of them were fixed
with the help of mailing list? so perhaps when fixing a bug, attention
should also be paid if the bug wasn't fixed?
regar
o write short documentation about
my experience of implementation of EMS services.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
it's OTB. I'm able
to send so called "operator logo" to my Ericsson T65, but it fits into one
SMS so there is no need to thing about concatenation while it's different
larger "picture message".
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Arne K. Haaje wrote:
27;
but there is nothing about it in access.log.
Kannel's versiom is cvs-20030627.
btw, any ideas about EMS picture concatenation are still very expected,
because my way of disconvering it leads to undesirable circumstances
described above :(
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
40 - 22 - 3 - length(683.bmp) = 108 octets).
when i try to send these messages to Siemens ME45, phone keeps silent and
here is no asking for indication.
what might be wrong here? Illimar, are you alive?! ;)
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
Hi,
"SMPP server" usually is a software that runs at provider's side. You can
find information about SMPP in http://www.smsforum.net.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Stefan Cars wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Of course I know kannel speak SMPP, what I want is an &quo
so, you are a provider or something? ;))
AFAIK there already exists "such thing" and what is left for you is to
add/modify access list, i.e. username and password for Kannel to connect
to your SMPP server. Kannel itself is not a SMPP server.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 1
Thanks for the answer.
Should i use alt-dcs = 1 together with the combination of coding = 2, i.e.
alt-dcs=1&coding=2&text=.. ?
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Illimar Reinbusch wrote:
> Hi
>
> First u have to set alt-dcs=1 so it will be FX.
>
> > I
Angel,
could you please explain, what's the purporse, architecture and principles
of those [smpp|emi]box'es, because it seems that I didn't get the point,
but it would be really interesting to know.
thanks.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Angel Fradejas w
Angel,
thanks for explanation. seems like i've got the point, but just like
to assure - it would be only *seen* as SMSC, i.e. it would be virtual and
act as ESME in SMPP logics, right?
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Angel Fradejas wrote:
> Hi Dziugas,
>
> Its p
gards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, [ISO-8859-1] Aarno Syvänen wrote:
> Do you have ota spec for siemens ? If you do, is it public ?
>
> Aarno
>
> On Monday, July 14, 2003, at 10:40 AM, Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I remember that the
ong with libs, I also tried to recompile,
but nothing happended :(
has anobody of you had the simillar issue?
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
CVS version and report the same issues, please?
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
- Original Message -
From: "Dziugas Baltrunas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 2003 m. rugpjūčio 3 d. 18:55
Subject: freebsd 4.8 @ kannel cvs problems
> Hi list,
>
>
btw, will the userguide be provided with new meanings of SM flags?
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I recently made box upgrade with the FreeBSD 4.8 OS inside. I cvs'ed up Kannel,
&
I just did cvs update -d, recompiled and now everything works as expected.
Thanks for quick and operative replies.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Dziugas Baltrunas schrieb:
> >
> > The situation could be repeated in very simple way - y
1FC7FE7F07C0F1040FFFEFE40087FFFFC04]
[udh:7:0605041582]
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Dziugas Baltrunas schrieb:
> >
> > The situation could be repeated in very simple way - you just have to
> > invoke http sendsms wrapper s
Hi list,
could also somebody report, are these features supported at operator by
default (i.e. every packet is appended with that information), or it's up
to the operator to "add" that feature (sure, according to CIMD2 spec), for
example, binfo, service center address, etc.
r
Hi list,
haven't tested the patch myself, but it looks good and is very useful.
Actually I was thinking if Kannel could implement such a functionality.
+1 for me, without any doubts :)
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, David Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attac
eh, sorry for misplaced words.
let me rephrase: I was thinking if Kannel could have such feature, but of
course, features are not going to appear without the work of individuals :)
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
> >
&g
Hi,
yes, it is - just set coding = 1 (binary). you will also find examples
in Kannel's contrib directory.
IMHO your question should really be redirected to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Linkas wrote:
> Is it possible to send operator logo and
7;t cleared after restarting Kannel. However, we should
probably talk here about a "graceful" restart, which re-reads the file and
does the job appropriately.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, DILWORTH MICHAEL wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Since we are talking about feature r
nough time to figure about something about
max_octets. Does the (SMPP) smsc password really have some limitations?
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
" length?
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm using cvs HEAD version of Kannel and I've considered with the
> following problem. Mine smsc-password is 9 characters long and here is
> what I get while launch
Sorry, seems like the reason for segfault was uncommented
wdp-interface-name = "*"
and no wapbox was running. After commenting it out no more segfault
appeared.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 23 March 2004 08:53
Hi,
> I'm just catching up with mails and issues after my short time holiday
> trip. Will do ASAP.
Were your holidays in Timbuktu, Stipe? ;))
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
Hi,
basicly you need UDH to be set to 0605041582 and use OTA bitmap for UD
(User Data).
You can also take a look at gateway/contrib/web/sendsms.php.
Dziugas
p.s. Such questions should be directed to users@ list.
On Sun, 2 May 2004, Pa nos wrote:
> Dear kannel experts,
> I am using kannel
Found
20:44:31 ERROR 404: Not Found.
Could you fix that? :)
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Sun, 2 May 2004, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
> Ok, after a long silence.
>
> This huge piece of stuff was born as part of exercise named "learn
> automake".
> :)
> http://stin
that version userguide already included information
about this:
http://www.kannel.org/download/kannel-userguide-snapshot/userguide.html
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 4 May 2004, Hiren wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to do MT/MO PSMS using SMPP. We had used Kannel Gateway to send Wap
>
dead his lost code of mmsbox. The problem
is that Stipe himself has again gone somewhere :(
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 4 May 2004, Raphael Bellec wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> For personal use (and personal understanding of MMS specs) I have began
> to write a MMS compiler and déco
MS Inbox, so had to clear
everything there :)
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
Hi Stipe,
what about adding any MMSC features to this release or even the whole
mmsbox (if it exists)?
AFAIK there were some patches in the list, some of them even not in C
language :)
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> back again from
for that).
The worst thing is that the content adaptation task can't be separated
from MMSC as it's the only entity receiving the User Agent Profile
(UAProf) or at least Accept headers. Shall we think about the "adapter"
submodule of the mmsbox?
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
ld sound reasonable to signal sendsms
about the "almost successful" delivery of SM.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
hack.
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
Urs sincerely,
>
> Rajeswari.
>
>
>
--
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
so people (or at
least me) can think about contributions.
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 14:31:41 +0100, Søren Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ons, 17 11 2004 kl. 15:08 +0200, skrev Dziugas Baltrunas:
> > several months have already passed since Søren Hansen started or
> > renewe
Hi,
first of all, please specify what version of Kannel you are using
(there were important changes about coding parameter) and provide some
more debug info.
Here is a snip from userguide near SMS Push (send-sms) CGI Variables:
<>
coding number Optional. Sets the coding scheme bits in DCS field.
Hi,
> As far as I understand, this means, libcurl support is optional via configure
> switch --enable-curl, right?
>
> Some points I'd like to see cleaned:
>
> * moving curl_XXX functions to an "own" file instead of mudging it into
> gw/wap-appl.c. This is not the appropriate place IMO.
>
> * c
t;.
Although sometimes it's necessary to play with LDFLAGS/CFLAGS while
compiling application with BDB, I give my +1 for user to choose the
libs in the ./configure stage as you've suggested.
--
regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
Hi,
you should URL encode the text parameter as required by HTTP protocol.
Basicly change spaces to '+' and other special symbols to ther
equivalent %hexcode or use some function which does url encode.
And please do not cross-post to the lists. This issue should have gone to users.
On Fri, 25 Ma
;53:119
> 021:123456789000900:302 00>
> 2005-03-25 15:49:14 [3839] [7] ERROR: CIMD2[nokia]: Submit message response
> contained error message:
> 2005-03-25 15:49:14 [3839] [7] ERROR: code 302: Syntax error in user data
> parameter
> 2005-03-25 15:49:14 [3839] [1] DEBUG: D
Hi list,
I'd like to ask about ccq-message and ccq-response which are defined
PAP elements used to query device capabilities. I suppose @Aarno could
comment this issue the most as he did lots of work for Kannel's PPG.
As for Kannel's PPG, I didn't found any other commercial PPG which
impelements
Hi list,
I have a question about an outgoing sms queue order. We have old
legacy box with Kannel 1.2.1 inside and using one SMPP connection. I
expected outgoing SMS queue to use FIFO, but however according to my
tests, this is not always the case.
According to 1.2.1 sources, SMS is added to outgo
Hi,
you will find some information on this issue here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@kannel.org/msg02312.html
On 20/08/05, Amin abbaspour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I was not able to receive these characters ( '@' and '_' ) right while using
> SMPP connection. They were conv
Just to note about gwlib/log.c:output() and gwlib/accesslog.c:alog()
functions which IMHO is a base for the whole logging and both of them
uses platform's standard version of vfprintf implementation which
sometimes is buggy, slow and so on.
Apache uses it's own snprintf and clones implementation a
Hi,
you don't need anything to enable in Kannel to send SM to the STK.
Basically, you should set pid value to 0x7f (127) which means that
it's "SIM Data Download message". You may also set mclass to 2 which
indicates that ME should pass SM to the SIM. In most cases you will
want to data to be 8-b
Hi,
do you use alt-dcs sendsms parameter, which might also affect how the
message is interpreted (in your case [flags:-1:1:-1:-1:19] indicates,
that coding is 1 = binary).
Btw, @Stipe and others: we should finally fix the userguide and
scripts in contrib/ related all the changes relating to alt-d
ra o
> alfabeto GSM e cada mensagem leva no máximo 160 caracteres.No caso
> de UNICODE, a mensagem vai até 70 caracteres mas o texto não é
> convertido e suporta todo o alfabeto UNICODE, desde que o telefone
> também suporte",
>
> into english ;)
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
ut it still in the
> bearerboxaccess.log the flags -1:1:-1:-1, how can I change the flags to
> 0:1:0:0 ?
>
>
> Thank's
>
>
> Douglas
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dziugas Baltrunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: terça-feira, 8 de novemb
Hi list,
I'd like you to share the experience about running Kannel as SMS
gateway in clustered environment, when there are more than one node
and fail over is basically more important than load balancing. Idea
behind the scenes is that on each node there is an application server
running which uses
Hi,
if you are constructing WAP Push itself, you should send it to the
sendsms-port (defaults to 13013) instead of ppg-port (defaults to
13003).
PPG accepts XML document via HTTP POST in PAP format.
On 1/10/06, M Amedeo Alaimo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our provider does not want us to send th
Hi,
this is an SMSC generated error. If you look at the recent patches
sent by Peter Christensen, this error is no more "unknown":
+SMPP_ESME_RSUBMITFAIL = 0x0045,
+ case SMPP_ESME_RSUBMITFAIL:
+ return "Submit failed";
From my experience, such an error is raised by SMSC som
Hi list,
I was quite surprised that some Nokia phones supporting WAP 2.0 does
not accept text/vnd.wap.wmlscript content type, but only a compiled
version (text/vnd.wap.wmlscriptc). Here is what Nokia FAQ
(http://www.forum.nokia.com/main/0,6566,1_1_25_30,00.html#37) says
about it:
37. What should
Hi,
this is of course nice and long awaited feature, however, there is
nothing about it in the documentation (i.e. no description of sec and
pin cgi parameters) as original patch
(http://www.mbuni.org/downloads/1.0.0/mbuni-kannel-patch-full) did not
include it.
On 12/9/05, Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROT
Hi, list,
attached patch fixes freeing of msg structure in smsbox.c sendota
stuff before extracting it's uuid with store_uuid(). Without patch
applied you can see the following in the logs:
2006-03-20 18:35:36 [29721] [3] DEBUG: Stored UUID
----
However, current p
Hi,
I must confirm that we _need_ to commit the proposed patch either in
current or modified behaviour since the bug still remains in current
CVS head.
On 3/22/05, Kalle Marjola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 13:11, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Kalle Marjola wrote:
actually never really
know, whether bearerbox accepted the message or not.
Thanks.
On 3/21/06, Dziugas Baltrunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, list,
>
> attached patch fixes freeing of msg structure in smsbox.c sendota
> stuff before extracting it's uuid with store_uuid(
Hi list,
in case of client sends us malformed URL (such as
/cgi-bin/sendsms?user=test&pass=test&to=12345 &text=test), attached
patch sends a HTTP 400 Bad request error instead of simply closing the
socket thus giving no indication to the client.
--
Dziugas
Index: gwlib/http.c
===
ere are such checks
> in the code. This becomes more obvious when we look to
> write_to_bearerbox(), which returns void, so we actually never really
> know, whether bearerbox accepted the message or not.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On 3/21/06, Dziugas Baltrunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
ere instead of sending through http_send_reply you do
> something like:
>
> Octstr *resp = http_prepare_reply(...)
> conn_send(resp);
> goto error;
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> Dziugas Baltrunas schrieb:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > in case of client sends us malform
Hi,
compiled and tested - works as expected.
On 3/23/06, Alexander Malysh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how about attached patch? it should work ok but untested.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > ok, wh
>
> patch looks good. one thing: please fix coding style (indents).
> Otherwise I'm +1 for it.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> Dziugas Baltrunas wrote:
>
> > Hi again,
> >
> > any objections on this? I've already tested the patch on bigger loads
>
Hi,
after trying to use rerouting functionality between two SMPP
connections and having reroute-smsc-id set in one of them I have faced
with the following issues:
1. If core group has smsbox-port missing (smsbox should be unnecessary
to achieve internal rerouting), stoping bearerbox gracefully r
Hi, Alex,
thanks for the reply.
> 2. I expect reroute-smsc-id variable to explicitly reroute messages to
> the smsc connection having specified smsc-id. However, this is not
> true - my tests showed that sometimes messages are even "rerouted" to
> the SMSC which the message has originated (i.e.
Hi,
> Moreover, I noticed one more minor issue with rerouting. One would
> expect that both source and destination TON/NPI would remain the same
> in submit_sm as they were in deliver_sm, however, they are not. What
> is more, even if, say, destination address has TON = 1, Kannel will
> not trea
ms queue. Does it weight out or at least
compete with single attempt to deliver single concatenated message
friendly? I guess it is not.
I'm looking forward to other thoughts ASAP and if the proposed way
fits, I will remove part from handle_split() quoted above and prepare
a patch.
Regards,
Any comments?
On 8/30/06, Dziugas Baltrunas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi list,
this is somehow strange that bug which currently floods SMSCs hasn't
been solved for months.
Ok, back to the proposed solution. What's bad with the one below?
///
diff -u -r1.88 bb_smscconn.c
-
Hi, Josh,
I completely agree with you. This never ending retry mechanism is not
only flooding logs, but also causing tons of problems for those
involved in maintenance of SMSCs or SMPP servers.
There is also one similar thread together with the bug report
"pending", you may take a lot at it here
.4.1 and it
IS of course in there. Sorry for the false alarm. =/ Perhaps this should
be highlighted in the Changes file though.?
Thanks for getting it in!
Josh
> -Original Message-
> From: Dziugas Baltrunas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:59 AM
&
52":
http://cvs.kannel.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gateway/gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c?r1=1.95&r2=1.96
Earlier, in case of dcs = 0 or dcs & 0xF0, we were always converting
it to GSM 03.38. Hence for those who did an upgrade characters like
'@' will no longer work.
Regards,
Dziugas Baltrunas
On 9/25
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
