Re: Xfce 4.10pre1 in rawhide

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 03/04/12 07:52, Gilboa Davara wrote: > >> >> Any chance of building a personal repository for F17 or better yet, F16? >> >> - Gilboa > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2012-April/001082.html The feature page doesn't includ

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Brian Wheeler wrote: > I can't say that as a user (and sysadmin) I'm really thrilled with this. > /tmp doesn't go away on reboots now so this is a biggish change from my point > of view. That's what /tmp has always meant to be i.e a temporary filesystem that is

Re: /tmp on tmpfs (was: Re: Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2012-04-02))

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> Actually I think this is a good feature, but ... > > I'm unsure about whether this makes sense for new installs or not, but I > feel my objection in > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/tmp-on-tmpfs was no

Re: Xfce 4.10pre1 in rawhide

On 03/04/12 08:13, Gilboa Davara wrote: On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: On 03/04/12 07:52, Gilboa Davara wrote: Any chance of building a personal repository for F17 or better yet, F16? - Gilboa https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2012-April/001082.html Th

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On 04/03/2012 03:10 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: As long as the RE and QE requirements are similarly defined that's fine. It would be good to get a clarification from fesco what they are referring to when they speak of "QE" ( Depending on it's meaning it might fall under the QA community ) a

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On 04/03/2012 03:10 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: Let's make the list exhaustive; there needs to be a path to sure success. This means establishing a complete procedure where when an SA formally applies to become PA, acceptance means there is a definitive set of steps needed to get there. This

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

Daniel J Walsh wrote: ... > I have been running with a tmpfs /tmp for years, without a problem. I have > found the having /tmp be anything else that a tmpfs has caused me pain over > the years with mislabeled files or files with the wrong UID. > > Change to use a confined user or change the UID of

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

Brendan Conoboy wrote: > If those requirements are deemed to have been met, promotion is automatic. I still don't agree that this approach makes any sense whatsoever. Promotion must be an exceptional event decided on a case-by-case basis or we may end up with an unmaintainable skyrocketing of pr

Re: Xfce 4.10pre1 in rawhide

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > Hence my reply. *Sigh* - Gilboa -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Xfce 4.10pre1 in rawhide

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: >> Hence my reply. > > *Sigh* Then better look here: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2012-April/001082.html :) Greetings, Tom -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapr

F-17 Branched report: 20120403 changes

Compose started at Tue Apr 3 08:15:09 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [HippoDraw] HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-

Re: httpd 2.4 is coming, RFC on module packaging draft

On 04/02/2012 09:08 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > 2012/3/27 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" : >> On 03/27/2012 05:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> I assume that that mod_access_compat module only requires a few bytes, so> I >>> don't see why it should not be loaded by default forever (or at least as >>> long a

Re: Xfce 4.10pre1 in rawhide

On 03/04/12 11:57, Thomas Spura wrote: On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote: On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: Hence my reply. *Sigh* Then better look here: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/xfce/2012-April/001082.html :) Greetings, Tom If

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On Apr 2, 2012 11:10 PM, "Brendan Conoboy" wrote: > All builds must occur on Fedora-maintained build servers. > > FYI, this will require an additional koji-hub for each architecture trying to move to PA. Generally agree, though. No. The additional hub is only needed while an arch is secondary.

Re: users, "private" groups, and The Unix Way (was, Re: Is it me or is it sudo?)

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/03/2012 08:10 AM, Joel Rees wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Tim >> wrote: s/some/a lot of/ >> >> if you set it up right. > > It can still do a fair amount of nasty stuff. >

[Bug 808714] perl-App-cpanminus-1.5010 is available

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808714 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Re: /tmp on tmpfs (was: Re: Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2012-04-02))

On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 05:10 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Actually I think this is a good feature, but ... > > I'm unsure about whether this makes sense for new installs or not, but I > feel my objection in > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/tmp-on-tmpfs w

[Bug 809427] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.46 is available

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809427 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-03 08:44:32 EDT --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.46-1.fc16 has been submitted as a

[Bug 809427] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.46 is available

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809427 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-03 08:45:22 EDT --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.46-1.fc15 has been submitted as a

[Bug 809427] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.46 is available

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809427 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2012-04-03 08:45:31 EDT --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.46-1.fc17 has been submitted as a

Re: users, "private" groups, and The Unix Way (was, Re: Is it me or is it sudo?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/03/2012 01:15 PM, Joel Rees wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Bryn M. Reeves > wrote: >> You're allowing the local sandbox user to connect to the local X >> server so any process running in one of your sandboxes can start >> a connection

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: >> as such there are various expectations that the overall Fedora >> experience will be consistent over all primary architectures. > > Can we quantify what the overall experience is that must be consistent?  I > understand Anaconda installatio

Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

I was quite depressed how hard it can be for a layman to find a way to install Fedora from LiveCD environment. If you don't recognize the icon in Gnome Shell Overview mode, it can give you quite some work to find it. Since OSS philosophy is "if you don't like it, fix it", I did. In the last two

[perl-Data-Dump-Streamer/f17] update to 2.33

Summary of changes: 9c1a8c0... update to 2.33 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

File Devel-PatchPerl-0.68.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-PatchPerl: 7d2ba4ae9a3e0f24e196afa63c8ddc20 Devel-PatchPerl-0.68.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.o

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

On 04/02/2012 05:30 PM, M A Young wrote: On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 02.04.12 16:55, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote: What about forensics? Any reboot erases information that might have been needed to see what happened during a break in. /tmp is already volatil

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/02/2012 05:30 PM, M A Young wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mon, 02.04.12 16:55, Steve Grubb (sgr...@redhat.com) wrote: > > What about forensics? Any reboot erases information that might have been > needed >

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > This is feedback vs the current version of the following web page: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements_%28Draft%29 > FESCo and affected groups should have the ability to review whether or not > t

Re: httpd 2.4 is coming, RFC on module packaging draft

Le 03/04/2012 13:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn a écrit : > Is there a way to only pull in mod_access_compat only on updates but not on > new installs? That would be the best option I think as it would not break > existing installations that get updated but allows new setups to either not > have to deal

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Apr 2, 2012 11:10 PM, "Brendan Conoboy" wrote: > >> All builds must occur on Fedora-maintained build servers. >> >> FYI, this will require an additional koji-hub for each architecture trying >> to move to PA.  Generally agree, though. > > No

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On Apr 3, 2012, at 7:26 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > You can see it here: > http://kparal.fedorapeople.org/misc/InstallFedoraButton.png > > What do you think? Better than default? How about "Install Fedora" since it could be installed to SSD or iSCSI etc. > I personally think it's definitely bette

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

2012/4/3 Miloslav Trmač : > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: >>> as such there are various expectations that the overall Fedora >>> experience will be consistent over all primary architectures. >> >> Can we quantify what the overall experience is that must be consistent?  I >

[perl-Wx] 0.9906

commit ec7f4f9fb0f91d4370a8a8f3f3109a664e850bd4 Author: Tom Callaway Date: Tue Apr 3 10:28:21 2012 -0400 0.9906 .gitignore |1 + perl-Wx.spec |6 +- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index ceb260

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 09:26 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > I was quite depressed how hard it can be for a layman to find a way to > install Fedora from LiveCD environment. If you don't recognize the icon in > Gnome Shell Overview mode, it can give you quite some work to find it. Since > OSS philoso

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

/tmp is a like a litter box. From a user perspective, I'm happy to have it emptied regularly, because clearly the cats don't clean up their own doodles. That one of the cats might think he's deposited something valuable that he'll come back for someday, is hilarious to me, as well as ridiculous.

Re: Xfce 4.10pre1 in rawhide

Yes, I am planning for sure a f17 repo... and possibly a f16 side repo as well. ;) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

> On Apr 3, 2012, at 7:26 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > You can see it here: > > http://kparal.fedorapeople.org/misc/InstallFedoraButton.png > > > > What do you think? Better than default? > > How about "Install Fedora" since it could be installed to SSD or > iSCSI etc. I pull that string from defa

[Bug 807614] perl-Wx-0.9906 is available

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807614 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added ---

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

> So, we decided for F16 that we don't want to add extensions like that > to > the shell that we ship on the live cd. It should be the default > experience. Can't be 100% default, because installer is a slightly different use case, isn't it. > > For the 'make installing obvious' problem, what w

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

On 04/03/2012 10:31 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: /tmp is a like a litter box. From a user perspective, I'm happy to have it emptied regularly, because clearly the cats don't clean up their own doodles. That one of the cats might think he's deposited something valuable that he'll come back for somed

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

Kamil Paral píše v Út 03. 04. 2012 v 09:26 -0400: > I was quite depressed how hard it can be for a layman to find a way to > install Fedora from LiveCD environment. If you don't recognize the icon in > Gnome Shell Overview mode, it can give you quite some work to find it. Since > OSS philosophy

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On 04/02/2012 11:10 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > This is feedback vs the current version of the following web page: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Secondary_Architecture_Promotion_Requirements_%28Draft%29 > > It would be nice if the bullet points were numbers so they could be > referenced nume

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On 04/03/2012 04:03 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 04/03/2012 03:10 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: >> >> Let's make the list exhaustive; there needs to be a path to sure >> success. This means establishing a complete procedure where when >> an SA formally applies to become PA, acceptance mea

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

Once upon a time, Brian Wheeler said: > * The competition for space between things in /tmp and VM. When someone > abuses space in /tmp (on purpose or not) then the system is going to > start swapping and performance is going to suffer and the common > response for fixing it will end up being '

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On Apr 3, 2012, at 8:29 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > So, we decided for F16 that we don't want to add extensions like that to > the shell that we ship on the live cd. It should be the default > experience. > > For the 'make installing obvious' problem, what we really want is to > just autost

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On 04/03/2012 10:16 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Apr 2, 2012 11:10 PM, "Brendan Conoboy" wrote: >> >>> All builds must occur on Fedora-maintained build servers. >>> >>> FYI, this will require an additional koji-hub for each architecture tryi

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Peter Jones wrote: > On 04/03/2012 04:03 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >> On 04/03/2012 03:10 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: >>> >>> Let's make the list exhaustive; there needs to be a path to sure >>> success.  This means establishing a complete procedure where wh

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

Dne 3.4.2012 16:31, Chris Murphy napsal(a): My only concern about it being on tmpfs instead of on disk, is how big it could get, how much memory could be held hostage, until there's a reboot. I'd rather see it be both size and age limited (each item has a decay rate or something), so that it's ev

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Chris Adams wrote: Also, if some user has taken up lots of space in /tmp, you can LART the user and delete the files; that's no different than a user filling up a partition by writing to /tmp (no reboot necessary in either case). That assumes your system is still functiona

Re: users, "private" groups, and The Unix Way (was, Re: Is it me or is it sudo?)

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/03/2012 01:15 PM, Joel Rees wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Bryn M. Reeves >> wrote: >>> You're allowing the local sandbox user to connect to the local X >>> server so any

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

On Apr 3, 2012, at 9:35 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Brian Wheeler said: >> * The competition for space between things in /tmp and VM. When someone >> abuses space in /tmp (on purpose or not) then the system is going to >> start swapping and performance is going to suffer and the

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

On Apr 3, 2012, at 9:48 AM, M A Young wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Chris Adams wrote: > >> Also, if some user has taken up lots of space in /tmp, you can LART the user >> and delete the files; that's no different than a user filling up a partition >> by writing to /tmp (no reboot necessary in

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

On Tue, 03.04.12 08:31, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: > My only concern about it being on tmpfs instead of on disk, is how big > it could get, how much memory could be held hostage, until there's a > reboot. I'd rather see it be both size and age limited (each item has > a decay ra

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

Once upon a time, M A Young said: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Chris Adams wrote: > >Also, if some user has taken up lots of space in /tmp, you can LART the > >user and delete the files; that's no different than a user filling up a > >partition by writing to /tmp (no reboot necessary in either case). >

KDE and Evolution

Did a F17 install yesterday (has happened last couple test installs), with KDE as my desktop. Fired up evolution for first time, did the restore as always do. When it finally came up to enter my password for my imap server, after entering it, a menu came up (KDE DaemonSecret service?) to enter pa

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Peter Jones wrote: > On 04/03/2012 10:16 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Apr 2, 2012 11:10 PM, "Brendan Conoboy" wrote: >>> All builds must occur on Fedora-maintained build servers. FYI, this w

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

Michal Schmidt wrote: > Cleanup of old files is already done, by systemd-tmpfiles. > See /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/tmp.conf. Files, yes. Directories, no. Due to a bug[1] in gvfs, I had over 100 old, empty directories in /tmp. Other apps may fill /tmp with directories, too, that will not be cleaned by a

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On 04/03/2012 12:07 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Peter Jones wrote: >> On 04/03/2012 10:16 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Apr 2, 2012 11:10 PM, "Brendan Conoboy" wrote: > All builds must occur on Fedor

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

On 04/03/2012 11:35 AM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Brian Wheeler said: * The competition for space between things in /tmp and VM. When someone abuses space in /tmp (on purpose or not) then the system is going to start swapping and performance is going to suffer and the common respons

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:29:27 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: For the 'make installing obvious' problem, what we really want is to just autostart the installer. Unfortunately, the current live installer does not really work well for that... I don't think that is a good idea. This imposes a

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 10:35 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Brian Wheeler said: > > * The competition for space between things in /tmp and VM. When someone > > abuses space in /tmp (on purpose or not) then the system is going to > > start swapping and performance is going to suffe

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 11:30 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:29:27 -0400, >Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > >For the 'make installing obvious' problem, what we really want is to > >just autostart the installer. Unfortunately, the current live installer > >does not really

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

Am 03.04.2012 09:17, schrieb drago01: > I don't really get why people make so much fuss about a non issue > really. 99,99% of the users won't even notice that anything changed at > all. for this 99.9% the current behavior is also good enough if they do not notice any change the other 0.1% are s

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

On 04/03/2012 04:50 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 03.04.2012 09:17, schrieb drago01: >> I don't really get why people make so much fuss about a non issue >> really. 99,99% of the users won't even notice that anything changed at >> all. > > for this 99.9% the current behavior is also good eno

[Bug 787888] CVE-2012-0839 ocaml: hash table collisions CPU usage DoS (oCERT-2011-003)

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787888 --- Comment #5 from Kurt Seifried 2012-04-03 12:47:04 EDT --- According to Xavier Leroy xavier.le...@inria.fr: We decided to s

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On 04/03/2012 01:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:29:27 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: For the 'make installing obvious' problem, what we really want is to just autostart the installer. Unfortunately, the current live installer does not really work well for that... I d

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On Apr 3, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > Anyway, we can easily arrange things so that the installer does not get > autostarted anymore once you tick the 'No thanks, just playing' checkbox. How about two user logins listed? One is a user named "Install Fedora" which autostarts th

Re: users, "private" groups, and The Unix Way (was, Re: Is it me or is it sudo?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/03/2012 04:56 PM, Joel Rees wrote: > Good point. I don't visit those sites, and it's important for me > to mention that. No p0rn, period, and many of the moral reasons are > in There are a lot of perfectly family-friendly websites whose administ

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

Dne 3.4.2012 18:09, Michael Cronenworth napsal(a): Michal Schmidt wrote: Cleanup of old files is already done, by systemd-tmpfiles. See /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/tmp.conf. Files, yes. Directories, no. It removes old directories too. Due to a bug[1] in gvfs, I had over 100 old, empty directories

File Class-Load-0.19.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-Load: 1a81421fda749d36952e7ada7876bcc7 Class-Load-0.19.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

[perl-Class-Load] Update to 0.19

commit 4cc39dbb88898c28851c44d785832a496c8fd960 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Tue Apr 3 18:26:16 2012 +0100 Update to 0.19 - New upstream release 0.19 (no functional changes) - This release by DOY -> update source URL - BR: perl(Exporter) - Don't need to remove empty direc

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On 4/3/12 9:44 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> >> Anyway, we can easily arrange things so that the installer does not get >> autostarted anymore once you tick the 'No thanks, just playing' >> checkbox. > > > Instead of autolaunching the install

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On 04/03/2012 11:36 AM, inode0 wrote: As someone who often uses live media but who almost never uses it to install Fedora this would be extremely annoying compared to just booting to the live media and having some obvious way to do an installation if that is what the user wants to do without repe

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

Once upon a time, Matthias Clasen said: > That really depends on what use cases we see for our live cds. In my > view, there's really only two: > > The primary use for a live cd is to install. That's the primary use of the install media. The primary use of the live media is to boot a live syste

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > How bout adding/changing the icon for installing? Can we not include some > text in the icon? "Install Fedora" somehow?? Actually... would it make sense to force a notification event about the install option on live CD login? It pops up

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

To summarize, I see two major paths: a) Make installer launcher more visible: e.g. http://kparal.fedorapeople.org/misc/InstallFedoraButton.png -or- b) Use a proxy window asking which use case is relevant for you: e.g. http://i.imgur.com/I26vS.png Both approaches are fine in my view and certainl

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On Apr 3, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Jef Spaleta wrote: > > Actually... would it make sense to force a notification event about > the install option on live CD login? It pops up for a few seconds in > the message tray telling you this media can be used for a full > install..and then the message lives in t

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

Hi, 2012/3/29 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn : > On 03/28/2012 07:39 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn : >>> On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson :

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

> Actually... would it make sense to force a notification event about > the install option on live CD login? It pops up for a few seconds in > the message tray telling you this media can be used for a full > install..and then the message lives in the message tray until > dismissed. That is a good

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > That is a good idea that can be probably implemented very easily. > > However, what is the benefit over a persistent button in the top panel? I believe its adequately provides a solution to meet all constraints so far expressed in this discuss

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On 04/03/2012 04:58 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Apr 2, 2012 11:10 PM, "Brendan Conoboy" mailto:b...@redhat.com>> wrote: > All builds must occur on Fedora-maintained build servers. > > FYI, this will require an additional koji-hub for each architecture trying to move to PA. Generally agree, thou

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

Hi, W dniu 28 marca 2012 19:39 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > Hi, > > 2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn : >> On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >>> napisał: 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson : >>> [..] > There's not

Re: Rawhide not resolving %{_libdir} properly ?

On 04/03/2012 09:07 AM, Krzysztof Daniel wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 15:00 -0400, Roland Grunberg wrote: Is anyone else getting similar issues? Cheers, -- Roland Grunberg I have the same problem, see bug 808983: pdebuild script fails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808983 I hav

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On 04/03/2012 09:07 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: From a koji perspective, there really isn't much benefit to step 2. What needs to happen is the RPMs from the secondary hub need to be copied to the primary in the correct NVR directories in the hub's storage. That can happen in the background for quite

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 04/03/2012 04:58 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> On Apr 2, 2012 11:10 PM, "Brendan Conoboy" > > wrote: >> >>  > All builds must occur on Fedora-maintained build servers. >>  > >>  > FYI, this will require an additional

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On 04/03/2012 12:02 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: Erm... you already have this. So will any SA making a transition. I don't see a problem. Outside PHX, yes. Inside, no. -- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / b...@redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:58:11 -0700 Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 04/03/2012 09:07 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > From a koji perspective, there really isn't much benefit to step 2. > > What needs to happen is the RPMs from the secondary hub need to be > >

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 04/03/2012 09:07 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >>  From a koji perspective, there really isn't much benefit to step 2. >> What needs to happen is the RPMs from the secondary hub need to be >> copied to the primary in the correct NVR directorie

Re: Meeting minutes FESCo (2012-03-26)

On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 14:29 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:16:30AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:17 +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > > > > Could I suggest that, if FESCo is going to have a different chair each > > week, you at least have an SO

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 04/03/2012 12:02 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> Erm... you already have this.  So will any SA making a transition.  I >> don't see a problem. > > > Outside PHX, yes.  Inside, no. If an SA wants to go off and do a staging hub instead of just

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:04:07 -0700 Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 04/03/2012 12:02 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > Erm... you already have this. So will any SA making a transition. > > I don't see a problem. > > Outside PHX, yes. Inside, no. I'll note again that the ppc and s390 secondary arch hubs ar

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On 04/03/2012 12:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I'll note again that the ppc and s390 secondary arch hubs are in fact in phx2. ;) You're already one step ahead of ARM ;-) -- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / b...@redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapro

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:58:11 -0700 > Brendan Conoboy wrote: > >> On 04/03/2012 09:07 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >  From a koji perspective, there really isn't much benefit to step 2. >> > Wha

Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:13:51 -0400 Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Dennis Gilmore > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:58:11 -0700 > > Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > > >> On 04

Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:45:09 -0700 Brendan Conoboy wrote: > On 04/03/2012 04:58 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Apr 2, 2012 11:10 PM, "Brendan Conoboy" > > wrote: > > > > > All builds must occur on Fedora-maintained build serve

Re: Install Fedora Button for LiveCD

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 12:44:17 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: That really depends on what use cases we see for our live cds. In my view, there's really only two: The primary use for a live cd is to install. And then, there is a secondary use where you want to review or test without the int

Re: Xfce 4.10pre1 in rawhide

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 03/04/12 11:57, Thomas Spura wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Gilboa Davara  wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Frank Murphy >>>  wrote: Hence my reply. >>> >>> >>> *Sigh* >> >> >> Then better look here: >

Re: Xfce 4.10pre1 in rawhide

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Yes, I am planning for sure a f17 repo... and possibly a f16 side repo > as well. ;) > > kevin Thanks! - Gilboa -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Bug 809427] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.46 is available

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809427 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

Re: /tmp on tmpfs

On Tue, 03.04.12 12:30, Steve Clark (scl...@netwolves.com) wrote: > >Also, on servers where there are users with shell access, I'll typically > >limit the size of /tmp with an option in fstab (the default is RAM/2, > >which can be larger than I'd like). However, reading the feature page, > >this

  1   2   >