Re: [Development] Failed to run configure.bat in qt/qt5 on MINGW64/MSYS2 shell?

Hi, You are trying to compile Qt on a configuration that Qt is not officially supporting, namely MSYS2. At Supported Platforms | Qt 6.6 you can see that on Windows Qt supports building with the Visual C++ compiler and a MinGW toolchain. The Min

Re: [Development] On the use of the inline keyword

The other way of fixing this is by using ... macros. The article at c++ - Importing inline functions in MinGW - Stack Overflow mentions using inline in the class declaration. Their example works fine with both GC

Re: [Development] On the use of the inline keyword

Hi, The issue here is that MinGW GCC is issuing a warning and that we compile with -Werror to treat warnings as errors. c++ - Importing inline functions in MinGW - Stack Overflow has a similar case. LLVM-MinGW u

Re: [Development] Failed to run configure.bat in qt/qt5 repository on Windows?

ust 21, 2023 14:13 To: Qt development mailing list Cc: Macieira, Thiago ; Paul Wicking ; Cristian Adam Subject: Re: [Development] Failed to run configure.bat in qt/qt5 repository on Windows? Hello, Qt Development Team. Just now, I think I made some progress. But I still can't fully build it co

Re: [Development] Failed to run configure.bat in qt/qt5 repository on Windows?

n" toolchain that works. MSYS2 is a different story, they have their own MinGW GCC builds and they build Qt themselves, so things have to work 🙂 Cheers, Cristian From: Haowei Hsu Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2023 05:18 To: Cristian Adam Cc: Qt development maili

Re: [Development] Failed to run configure.bat in qt/qt5 repository on Windows?

t: Saturday, August 19, 2023 16:42 To: Cristian Adam Cc: Qt development mailing list Subject: Re: [Development] Failed to run configure.bat in qt/qt5 repository on Windows? Hello, Cristian. Regarding the commands and parameters you provided for building LLVM, I will try them later. @echo off

Re: [Development] Failed to run configure.bat in qt/qt5 repository on Windows?

change suggested in the bugreport. 🙁 This is again a MSVC thing, a MinGW build wouldn't have the DIA SDK and won't have the issue in the first place. Cheers, Cristian. From: Haowei Hsu Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 15:46 To: Cristian Adam Cc: Q

Re: [Development] Failed to run configure.bat in qt/qt5 repository on Windows?

On 17-Aug-23 17:08, Haowei Hsu wrote: Hello, Alexandru. I have already installed LLVM on my Windows computer using the LLVM-xxx-win64.exe installer downloaded from LLVM's GitHub. From the installation results, it does indeed

Re: [Development] Nominating Artem Sokolovskii

On 08-Aug-23 15:25, Marcus Tillmanns via Development wrote: Hello all, I would like to nominate Artem Sokolovskii for approver rights in the Qt project. Artem is a member of the Qt Creator Team and has been working on Code formatting and is now creating a DAP integration for the Creator. Y

Re: [Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

On 07/21/2023 14:46, Martin Storsjö wrote: On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, Cristian Adam wrote: Right, lldb was using the DWARF debugging information 🙁 I've attached 3 screenshots of Qt Creator using lldb: 1. Unstripped MaxiDump.exe showed the bad source line and the correct stacktrace (d

Re: [Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

On 07/21/2023 14:26, Cristian Adam via Development wrote: On 07/21/2023 11:04, Martin Storsjö wrote: - With LLDB: As LLDB supports both DWARF and PDB, it will prefer DWARF if such debug info was found. As other toolchain files that are linked in happen to have some DWARF in them, the executable

Re: [Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

On 07/20/2023 15:48, Cristian Adam via Development wrote: At How to open Windows crash dumps? | Qt Forum<https://forum.qt.io/topic/146109/how-to-open-windows-crash-dumps> this is one case of using Windows minidump files with MinGW, which is not supported. With the LLVM MinGW and t

Re: [Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

On 07/19/2023 18:14, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Wednesday, 19 July 2023 08:46:27 PDT Cristian Adam via Development wrote: Hi, we are thinking of migrating from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW. The ticket in question is [QTBUG-107516] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM-MinGW - Qt Bug Tracker<ht

Re: [Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

On 07/20/2023 14:47, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Thursday, 20 July 2023 01:50:50 PDT Hasselmann Mathias via Development > wrote: >> MSYS2 has a configuration matrix on their website: >> https://www.msys2.org/docs/environments/ > Thanks, that's very informative. > > To Cristian: is the proposal to a

[Development] [RFCs] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW

Hi, we are thinking of migrating from GCC MinGW to LLVM MinGW. The ticket in question is [QTBUG-107516] Migrate from GCC MinGW to LLVM-MinGW - Qt Bug Tracker For a while now we have a CI configuration testing with LLVM MinGW. The benefits of the L

Re: [Development] CMake UNITY_BUILD ( QTBUG-109394 )

On 01/16/2023 13:49, Friedemann Kleint via Development wrote: Hi, It is basically what webengine has been using for a long time: Source files are concatenated to jumbo files which are then compiled. Back in August 2019 Chromium announced the removal of the jumbo build

Re: [Development] [Interest] Qt 6.5 Is Irrelevant for More than 95% of Mac Desktops

Hi, See qt-creator/plugin-telemetry.git - A plugin that collects usage data from Qt Creator users. This data is used to improve the Qt user experience and is one information source for product decisions. Cheers, Cristian

Re: [Development] Nominating Marcus Tillmanns as Approver

+1 Cheers, Cristian. Disclaimer: I work with Marcus in the same team. From: Development on behalf of A. Pönitz Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 22:27 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Nominating Marcus Tillmanns as Approver I'd like to

Re: [Development] Qt 6.2.2 Released

On 01/12/2021 23:13, Albert Astals Cid via Development wrote: El dimecres, 1 de desembre de 2021, a les 13:48:57 (CET), Jani Heikkinen va escriure: Hi all! We have released Qt 6.2.2 today, see https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-6.2.2-released Should https://wiki.qt.io/MinGW be updated to point to the

Re: [Development] [Interest] download.qt.io is down

On 19/01/2021 21:08, Tuukka Turunen wrote: Hi, There are multiple mirrors, try for example: https://qt-mirror.dannhauer.de/ https://www.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/download.qt-project.org/ https://ftp.fa

Re: [Development] How to build 32-bit Qt with Qt6/CMake

On my Ubuntu 20.04 x86_64 I've build Qt6Base x86 like this: 1. Upgrade the compiler: sudo apt install g++-9-multilib 2. Install dev packages: sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386 sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install '^libxcb.*-dev:i386' libx11-xcb-dev:i386 libglu1-mesa-dev:i386 libxrender

Re: [Development] QThread::create mandatory in Qt 6?

Monday, November 16, 2020 8:14 PM Thiago Macieira wrote: >> Qt 6 at the moment can be complied with Clang, which will map the mkspec >> win32-clang-g++. > Indeed, but that is Clang/MinGW. This is not Clang-cl/MSVC. And Allan says > Clang-cl/MSVC works, so what is this option you're trying to ad

Re: [Development] QThread::create mandatory in Qt 6?

> -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > Thiago Macieira > Sent: Monday, 16 November 2020 17:34 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] QThread::create mandatory in Qt 6? > > On Sunday, 15 November 2020 23:55:24 PST Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > > ✗

[Development] GitHub Pull requests

Hi, With the “GitHub issues” E-Mail thread we made sure the Issues are gone from the projects. What about Pull requests? For example qtbase has 7 pull requests. Usually people point out that the Qt project uses a different collaboration method: https://wiki.

Re: [Development] Broken RNG on AMD Ryzen CPUs affect QTemporaryFile, Qt IFW

> > > Judging from the screenshots, it's the latest and greatest version > > > of the Qt installer (qt-opensource-windows-x86-5.14.1.exe) [1] > > > > Okay, but what version of Qt is the Qt Installer using? Installer > > team, can you check? > > > > Looking into the binary I've found: > > "Build d

Re: [Development] Broken RNG on AMD Ryzen CPUs affect QTemporaryFile, Qt IFW

> > > > Judging from the screenshots, it's the latest and greatest version of > > the Qt installer (qt-opensource-windows-x86-5.14.1.exe) [1] > > Okay, but what version of Qt is the Qt Installer using? Installer team, can > you > check? > Looking into the binary I've found: "Build date: Jan 8

Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering

> -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > Konstantin Tokarev > Sent: Monday, 27 January 2020 17:52 > To: Lars Knoll ; Qt development mailing list > > Subject: Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering > > > > 27.01.2020, 17:36, "Lars Knoll" mailto:lars.kn...@qt.io>>

Re: [Development] Porting QT to new OS

You can use https://qtlite.com/ to figure out only the parts you need for your setup. Cheers, Cristian. > -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > drwho > Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2019 16:07 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Porting QT to new O

Re: [Development] HTML5/CSS vs Qt QML and QtCreator / Assistant

> -Original Message- > From: Giuseppe D'Angelo > Sent: Monday, 1 July 2019 16:10 > To: Konstantin Tokarev ; Ville Voutilainen > > Cc: Cristian Adam ; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] HTML5/CSS vs Qt QML and QtCreator / Assistant > &g

Re: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9

> -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > Frederik Gladhorn > Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2019 16:11 > To: Qt Project Development Mailing-List > Subject: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9 > > Hi, > > Just to keep the ball rolling, we prepared the upgrade to move from Gerri

Re: [Development] HTML5/CSS vs Qt QML and QtCreator / Assistant

> -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development > Sent: Friday, 28 June 2019 18:22 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] HTML5/CSS vs Qt QML and QtCreator / Assistant > > Il 28/06/19 13

Re: [Development] HTML5/CSS vs Qt QML and QtCreator / Assistant

> -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > Konstantin Tokarev > Sent: Friday, 28 June 2019 13:33 > To: Jedrzej Nowacki ; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] HTML5/CSS vs Qt QML and QtCreator / Assistant > > What about external documentation? Right now peo

Re: [Development] HTML5/CSS vs Qt QML and QtCreator / Assistant

> -Original Message- > From: André Pönitz > Sent: Friday, 28 June 2019 13:23 > To: Cristian Adam > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] HTML5/CSS vs Qt QML and QtCreator / Assistant > > > Having the documentation as QML will have n

Re: [Development] HTML5/CSS vs Qt QML and QtCreator / Assistant

> -Original Message- > From: Samuel Gaist > Sent: Friday, 28 June 2019 11:56 > To: Cristian Adam > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] HTML5/CSS vs Qt QML and QtCreator / Assistant > > > > > On 28 Jun 2019, at 11:32,

[Development] HTML5/CSS vs Qt QML and QtCreator / Assistant

Hi, Some of you might have been familiar with white papers such as Qt QML v HTML5 – a practical comparison. Qt Creator already ships with QML support, why not transform the HTML offline documentati

Re: [Development] Assistant WebKit/WebEngine support

> -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > Simon Hausmann > Sent: Monday, 24 June 2019 14:44 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Assistant WebKit/WebEngine support > > > > I don't quite share the opinion that these are "beastly" numbers for > deskt

[Development] Qt6: Adding UTF-8 storage support to QString

Hi, With every Qt release we see how the new release improved over previous releases in terms of speed, memory consumption, etc. Any chance of having UTF-8 storage support for QString? UTF-8 is native on Linux and other *NIX platforms, Qt programs should use less memory, and perform better by re

Re: [Development] Build system for Qt 6

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:42 PM Cristian Adam wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 12:24 Christian Gagneraud wrote: > >> > > On 30 Oct 2018, at 05:00, Christian Gagneraud >> wrote: >> > > - Any track record that Qbs was not fit for the job? (Please no "

Re: [Development] Build system for Qt 6

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 12:24 Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > > On 30 Oct 2018, at 05:00, Christian Gagneraud > wrote: > > > - Any track record that Qbs was not fit for the job? (Please no "we > > > can't build Qt with it", as you cannot build Qt with anything but > > > qmake right now) > > > > No,

Re: [Development] iMX6 EGLGS 2D (QtWidgets) painting acceleration

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:46 PM Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Please note Qt 4 is out of support, is not receiving security updates and > has > known security problems. It would be irresponsible to use it. > > Have a look at http://www.copperspice.com/, which is a Qt 4 fork, and it's being constantly

Re: [Development] [BB++] Now is 3.5x faster than Node.JS

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: > On 07/21/2017 02:10 AM, Lorn Potter wrote: > >> >> On 21 Jul 2017, at 2:22 pm, Phil Bouchard wrote: >>> >>> >>> So I would like to know if Qt thinks what I am proposing (BB++ -> C++ -> >>> WebAssembly) is a good plan. >>> >> >> What does th

Re: [Development] Dropping older compilers for Qt 5.10 (was: Qt 5.10 pre-built bunaries)

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Ville Voutilainen < ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So, what's your take on gcc versions? You seemed hesitant to drop > support for QNX 6 > here: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017- > June/030113.html > Are you suggesting we drop support

Re: [Development] Notes on "Qt Build Systems" @ QtCon 2016

On 06-Sep-16 19:59, André Pönitz wrote: On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 05:35:03PM +0200, Cristian Adam wrote: On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: I guess somebody could even get CMake to write Qbs files, it would just be one more generator. :-) This was done already <ht

Re: [Development] Notes on "Qt Build Systems" @ QtCon 2016

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > I guess somebody could even get CMake to write Qbs files, it would just be > one more generator. :-) > > This was done already , but it was removed from

Re: [Development] Notes on "Qt Build Systems" @ QtCon 2016

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2016-09-05, Andrew Knight wrote: > > tl;dr: Lots of discussion on the merits of which build system (CMake, > > Qbs) should replace qmake in building Qt; lots of supporters of CMake > > but no volunteers to do the work, many reasons to use

Re: [Development] Use of Standard Library containers in Qt source code

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Marco Bubke wrote: > I think it simply a question of time to get used to the STL. You get used > to many things. > > I think we should mind about the new features of C++ which are coming, > which cannot integrated very well with Qt because we use a different idiom

Re: [Development] We are planning to upgrade qdoc to use clang for parsing C++

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2016 11:20:16 PST Cristian Adam wrote: > > Since qdoc will be using libclang, any change of getting the same > treatment > > for moc? > > I don't think that's a goo

Re: [Development] We are planning to upgrade qdoc to use clang for parsing C++

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Smith Martin < martin.sm...@theqtcompany.com> wrote: > Send ideas for upgrading the Qt documentation to C++11. > > > 1. Which C++11 constructs will be used in Qt? > > > 2. Which of these should appear in the documentation? > > > Send comments to the CC list. > Si

Re: [Development] What kind of airplane we want to build?

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Marc Mutz wrote: > > I'm not sure about what outcome to expect, and I don't remember any numbers > posted by anyone else, either. > > > >From the David Stone's Writing Robust Code page 34: Performance

Re: [Development] What kind of airplane we want to build?

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Bogdan Vatra wrote: > > AFAIK C++11/14 compilers have zero-cost exception, so, is there any reason > why > not start using them in Qt 6.0 ? > > +1 Exceptions in normal path lead to faster execution than using return codes. For more information about this see th

Re: [Development] Replace QtXml backend

On 7/27/2015 11:21 PM, Cristian Adam wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Gerhard Scheikl wrote: I didn't fully think it through yet, was just an idea. :) > > So we came up with the idea to replace the back-end with Xerces and try to > > leave the Qt

Re: [Development] Replace QtXml backend

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Gerhard Scheikl > wrote: I didn't fully think it through yet, was just an idea. :) > > So we came up with the idea to replace the back-end with Xerces and try to > > leave the Qt API part the same. > > That's in

Re: [Development] Replace QtXml backend

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Gerhard Scheikl wrote: > Hi > > Unfortunately, the QtXml classes contain a lot of bugs and are not really > maintained. > So we came up with the idea to replace the back-end with Xerces and try to > leave the Qt API part the same. > > Hi, pugixml has a benchmark

Re: [Development] Qt LTS & C++11 plans (CopperSpice)

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > You're making trade-offs. One of them, given your presentation, is that > there's > no current version of MSVC that will work with your codebase. Another is > that > you're replacing a code generator by a lot of boilerplate macros. > >

Re: [Development] Qt LTS & C++11 plans

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Knoll Lars wrote: > > > Well, please tell me where this is such a big problem that we *have to > have* VS2013 when it comes to our APIs. For our implementation inside Qt, > we can work with slightly older compilers. It’s not the end of the world > and our users wo

[Development] Testability Driver

Hi, Does anyone know what happened with the Testablity Driver? One can read about TDriver here: http://voices.canonical.com/tag/testability%20driver/ It was released by Nokia as LGPL, source code is still available on Gitorious: https://www.gitorious.org/tdriver But that won't be for long since

Re: [Development] Mime database size

On Feb 24, 2015 8:06 AM, "Adam Majer" wrote: > > By rewrite, he meant *port to*. So, you don't have to rewrite > anything, "just" port it to the API that is available on a given > platform. By porting it to Qt, then it would be automatically > available everywhere that Qt is available. > > If the

Re: [Development] Proposal: Deprecating platforms in Qt 5.6 that don't support lambda

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Rafael Roquetto wrote: > > Now, having said that, QNX 6.6.0 is gcc 4.7 based. Compiler-wise, that > should > be enough for lambdas, but correct me if I am wrong. > The problem with 6.6.0 starts to arise when we > decide to use features that their libcpp does not s

Re: [Development] Proposal: Deprecating platforms in Qt 5.6 that don't support lambda

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Rafael Roquetto wrote: > > > > QNX 6.6 comes with GCC 4.7.3, which has lambda support: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/cxx0x_status.html > > Indeed, but it builds against Dinkumware's libcpp, which has half-baked > C++11 > support (see https://codereview.qt-projec

Re: [Development] Proposal: Deprecating platforms in Qt 5.6 that don't support lambda

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Rafael Roquetto wrote: > > We need to start now and deprecate old compilers that do not support any > C++11 > > features at all. I I suggest requiring support for lambda as > > supported by MSVC 2010, g++ 4.5 and clang 3.1 in Qt 5.7 and deprecating > all > > platf

Re: [Development] Mime database size

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Иван Комиссаров wrote: > Do you think it's ok to store binary file in a git repo? > > 2015-02-17 15:25 GMT+03:00 Giuseppe D'Angelo : > >> On 17 February 2015 at 13:22, Mark Gaiser wrote: >> > Glib and libxml also compile under windows. >> >> What's the need for w

Re: [Development] Deprecating modules with 5.5

On 04.02.2015 10:23, Knoll Lars wrote: > In principle I agree. The problem with 2008 is that this is currently the > only compiler supporting Windows Embedded 7, so we can’t easily get rid of > it. Dropping gcc 4.4 is afaik not a big problem. > QNX 6.5.0 has GCC 4.4.2. I don't know how important Q

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4 Mingw-4.9.1 offline package

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Cristian Adam wrote: > Hi, > > I've installed Qt 5.4 Mingw-4.9.1 > (qt-opensource-windows-x86-mingw491_opengl-5.4.0.exe) > and I've noticed that the Qt Creator bundled with it was compiled with > MSVC 2010 and had its > own v

[Development] Qt 5.4 Mingw-4.9.1 offline package

Hi, I've installed Qt 5.4 Mingw-4.9.1 (qt-opensource-windows-x86-mingw491_opengl-5.4.0.exe) and I've noticed that the Qt Creator bundled with it was compiled with MSVC 2010 and had its own version of Qt 5.4 MSVC 2010 DLLs (~100MB) What is the reason for this? Is Mingw-GCC 4.9.1 that bad, that a

Re: [Development] Help needed to test Ministro 10.3, needed for Qt 5.4!

Please "star" the android issue so that Google developers understand the severity of the problem. It's not like only six people are affected by this. Cheers, Cristian. On 26 Nov 2014 12:45, "BogDan" wrote: > Hello folks, > > I have some bad news about Ministro on Android 5.0. Due to a bug > htt

Re: [Development] The dark side of QtMultimedia

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Gianluca wrote: > > Dear Lars, > I’m using Qt from more than 10 years, and I like so much the Qt library > that I always want to contribute in some way. I cannot afford at the moment > to put myself in working at the Qt code, so often I think to buy a > commercial

Re: [Development] How long until clang memory model is ready?

On 22.01.2014 19:35, ext Olivier Goffart wrote: > Regarding the use of libclang for the code model in Qt creator, there > was no progress in a long time. I think the clang code model branch has been merged into master: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-creator/2013-December/003028.html T

[Development] C++ Now!

Hi, No Qt talk at C++ now ? It looks like the most important C++ conference and Qt is missing from the schedule . I mean, Visual Studio will be there, why not Qt & QtCreator? Qt5 and QtCre

Re: [Development] Changing qreal to a float

On 02/15/2012 01:17 PM, ext Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Wednesday 15 February 2012 07:38:44 gunnar.sle...@nokia.com wrote: >> The only questionable use case is geolocation. We know for a fact that >> floats have limitations in this area and both Qt3D and QtLocation make use >> of QVector[2|3|4]D an

Re: [Development] Qt Contributors Summit: when and where

On 01/05/2012 02:22 PM, ext alexandra.lei...@nokia.com wrote: I agree. That was one of the reasons I chose Berlin last year. In addition, it's pretty central, and has accommodation options in literally all budget ranges. It's worth mentioning that starting with 3rd of June 2012 Berlin will be a

Re: [Development] Unicode/i18n support

Hi, Boost in the latest version (1.48 released on 15th November 2011 ) added the Locale library, which can provide ICU or non-ICU locale support. Not necessarily use

[Development] Qt5 Development on a Tablet PC

Hi, Has anybody ran apps / developed Qt5 on a Tablet PC? By Tablet PC I mean the 8" screen and larger . That list consists in the following OSes: Android, Windows 7, iOS and WebOS. Only Windows 7 is officially supp