On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Greg Zartman wrote:
> Does anyone know of a fairly simply DNS server for Windows 2000/XP
> workstation that can be used as a development aid? I'm running VMware
> to simulate a SME setup, but can't test email related stuff without
> proper MX records pointing the VMware/S
BrowseGate looks promising. (15 Day evaluation)
Thanks Abe. Yes, I've found a couple like this one. SimplyDNS seemed
to look promising. There's always BIND for windows, but BIND is a real
pain to setup.
Regards,
Greg
--
Greg J. Zartman, P.E.
Vice-President
Logging Engineering International,
BrowseGate looks promising. (15 Day evaluation)
http://www.webattack.com/get/browsegate.shtml
A couple years ago I found a real good one on Tucows.com, but I don't have
any idea which one it was. A quick search there revealed quite a few hits,
but a lot of them were Dynamic DNS clients.
Go
Does anyone know of a fairly simply DNS server for Windows 2000/XP
workstation that can be used as a development aid? I'm running VMware
to simulate a SME setup, but can't test email related stuff without
proper MX records pointing the VMware/SME setup.
Thanks.
Greg Zartman
--
Greg J. Zart
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Inhabitant of Zion wrote:
> For some strange reason I have some problems with DNS. I am running the
> beta2.
Please report all beta2 issues (only) to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cheers for any help
As I'm sure you've heard before, this is not a help list. If you wish to
ask for he
Hi
For some strange reason I have some problems with DNS. I am running the
beta2.
I have my DNS service with Zone Edit and my registrar is UKreg.
I have checked with both of those and they have confirmed that as far as
they can tel my services are set up correctly their end.
I can get to most s
The DNS /home/e-smith/configuration settings appear to have changed from
4.1.2 to 5.1.2.
4.1.2 used:
$conf {'DNSPrimayIP'}
$conf {'DNSSecondary'}
5.1.2 replaces these with:
(\%conf, 'named', 'Forwarder1', '')
(\%conf, 'named', 'Forwarder2', '')
I'm looking to build a server-manager panel suit
Hello All,
I presently have a W2K Small Business Server participating with
an e-smith 4.1.2 server and the upgraded Samba distrib. Active directory
is working fine with the W2K machines on the network.
The e-smith box is the DHCP Server and primary DNS Server (the gateway)
The W2K SBS has been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> AD stores info into DNS and ldap, right ?
>From a pure technical standpoint, I'm not sure how MS ties DNS into the
active directory. I do know that the two complement onr another.
> When you have an e-smith server as Internet gateway togheter with a
win2k AD
> co
> Linux (Samba) can participate in such a domain in legacy mode only
> (i.e., as if it were a win nt4.0 server).
Understood.
I have some AD documentation to read, from what I know it needs a DNS and LDAP
server, they usually run on win2k server, right ?
AD stores info into DNS and ldap, right ?
> But I think it's a widespread setup, at least I have found once an AD
> deployment and I needed to add a SME5 gateway.
Linux (Samba) can participate in such a domain in legacy mode only (i.e.,
as if it were a win nt4.0 server).
Samba 3.0, currently in beta testing, will be able to participat
> I'm interested in getting SME 5.1 to bind to a W2K Active
> Directory or
> At least replicate user information from the available LDAP tree.
Integration of an Active Directory setup (win2k based) with a SME5 server
has never been discussed if I recall well.
But I think it's a widespread setup,
x : (613) 592-1686
-Original Message-
From: Filippo Carletti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:15 AM
To: P. Sanchez; e-smith-devinfo
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] DNS
[ DNS-DHCP integration]
> I can help with testing the templates and adapting it to sme.
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Filippo Carletti wrote:
> I would like to receive a pseudo-official comment from Mitel on plans to use
> bind 9 (RedHat 7.2 uses bind 9) in next releases.
We've mentioned a number of times that we have strong leanings towards
using Dan Berstein's DNS software - tinydns and
[ DNS-DHCP integration]
> I can help with testing the templates and adapting it to sme.
Ok, thanks.
I'll send you everything I have.
I would like to receive a pseudo-official comment from Mitel on plans to use
bind 9 (RedHat 7.2 uses bind 9) in next releases.
bind 9 offers dhcp integration nati
>= Original Message From "Filippo Carletti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
>> >It seems it's working, I need to find time to package it.
>> >
>> >Is there anybody who wants to help ?
>>
>> I have found the 'mku' (make_uninstall) very useful, it could now make
>
>In this case "packaging" doesn't mea
> >It seems it's working, I need to find time to package it.
> >
> >Is there anybody who wants to help ?
>
> I have found the 'mku' (make_uninstall) very useful, it could now make
In this case "packaging" doesn't mean to make an rpm (that's not so hard)
but transforming it into templates and adap
>= Original Message From "Filippo Carletti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
>>I would like my e-smith server (sm5) to resolve the real names
>>of my local network computers insted of pc-1, pc2
>>...etc
I'll also like this.
>I'm testing a solution involving bind and dhcp2 with s
>From: "Filippo Carletti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >I would like my e-smith server (sm5) to resolve the real names
> >of my local network computers insted of pc-1, pc2
> >...etc
> >
> >Anyone can help me ?
>
> I'm testing a solution involving bind and dhcp2 with some perl sc
>I would like my e-smith server (sm5) to resolve the real names
>of my local network computers insted of pc-1, pc2
>...etc
>
>Anyone can help me ?
I'm testing a solution involving bind and dhcp2 with some perl scripts from
Stephen Carville (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
It see
Hello ,
I would like my e-smith server (sm5) to resolve the real names
of my local network computers insted of pc-1, pc2
...etc
Anyone can help me ?
--
Best regards,
Lolo mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please
Simply edit [Section I] of /usr/local/rav8/formail/ravmd.config
sender = ravms
host = mail.client.com
smtp_server = localhost
Regards,
Darrell
Thursday, 22 February 2001 11:23 AM
> To: E-smith developers list
> Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] DNS problems?
>
>
> I'm having trouble looking up one particular host with my
> e-smith box.
> If I tell nslookup to use my ISP's DNS servers, it finds it, but the
> e-s
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Fran Boon wrote:
> [...]
> Excellent, you agree with me & are working on it already :)
> I look forward to viewing this...I'd volunteer for being an alpha tester if
> that's a possibility...
Sure - I'm hoping to put an initial version up very soon, with the usual
disclaimers
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Fran Boon wrote:
> The current templates don't provide any simple mechanism for adding
> extra entires to the DNS.
> I thinmk it makes sense for the pc-00* to come from:
> DHCPServerStart to DHCPServerEnd
> This way, it's much simpler to add the entries for other servers...
I may be misunderstanding you, but I believe part of what you are looking
for is in the web manager in the Workgroup configuration. This lets you
change the workgroup name and the server name -- this is Samba (ie, Windows
Networking) and not tcp/ip.
I have updated my templates to change the rest
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Michael Weinberger wrote:
> I have tested the dynamic DNS service and noticed
> that the registration failed after reboot.
> It seems as if the named service was started to late.
Indeed.
> Other services like ntpd or fetchmail are also effected, but work
> when named final
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Smith, Jeffery S (Scott) wrote:
> Also, it is somewhat easier to effect the changes using:
>
> /sbin/e-smith/signal-event console-save
> reboot
>
> rather than the long series of expand-template commands.
expand-template is really there for testing template changes.
FYI -
Also, it is somewhat easier to effect the changes using:
/sbin/e-smith/signal-event console-save
reboot
rather than the long series of expand-template commands.
From: "Gordon Rowell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I thinmk it makes sense for the pc-00* to come from:
> > DHCPServerStart to DHCPServerEnd
> > This way, it's much simpler to add the entries for other servers...
> This is something I am working on at the moment. Damien Curtain provided
> some initial
ld require yet
another config file setting.
> -Original Message-
> From: Fran Boon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 2:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] DNS improvements?
>
>
> From: "Smith, Jeffery S
From: "Smith, Jeffery S (Scott)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have updated my templates to change the rest as you note
-snip-
Here are detailed instructions for customising the SubdomainName based on
this work from Scott & the 'External DNS' server instructions from R Allen
in the Advanced Forum:
mkd
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Smith, Jeffery S (Scott) wrote:
> There is another change you may want to make. In /etc/atalk/config there is
> a literal reference to "e-smith" as the ATALK_NAME. There are a couple of
> options for handling this one. Probably the easiest is to use $SystemName. I
> suppose y
From: "Smith, Jeffery S (Scott)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I may be misunderstanding you, but I believe part of what you are looking
> for is in the web manager in the Workgroup configuration. This lets you
> change the workgroup name and the server name -- this is Samba (ie,
Windows
> Networking) and
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] DNS service comes up to late
>
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Michael Weinberger wrote:
>
> > I have tested the dynamic DNS service and noticed
> > that the regis
Slightly off topic but while we are looking at networks
We have tried to run two servers on the same network but the
appletalk server bombs badly - unable to register on network!
any clues as we are looking to use dual servers on a large site
Stewart Evans
Macclinic
> > > I'm also in a
> > > Wi
From: "Smith, Jeffery S (Scott)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I would prefer to see a single variable (name to be decided)
> > which is the
> > name of the server on the local network and deprecate
> > SambaServerName. I
> > feel that the AppleTalk name and the Samba name should always match.
> That is
> > I'm also in a
> > Windows workgroup called agdev.
> > Therefore:
> > My system name in Unix, Samba, and Windows is the same name.
> > My subdomain and workgroup names are the same. (Doesn't
> AppleTalk have
> some
> > concept of zones or similar, too?)
>
> I think that these 2 should be kept
> I would prefer to see a single variable (name to be decided)
> which is the
> name of the server on the local network and deprecate
> SambaServerName. I
> feel that the AppleTalk name and the Samba name should always match.
That is what I'd prefer. It would get confusing keeping track of the
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 11:21:01AM -0500, Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> No, I didn't write that. Daniel C. Slagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote that.
> You have quoted from my reply to him.
My apologies. You are quite correct. This is part of the reason why we like
to keep replie
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 10:39:15PM -0500, Charlie Brady
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [...As part of some other mail...]
> >
> > I would still like to go to my internal DNS first, then corporate, then out.
> > Maybe it's just me.
No, I didn't wri
turday, 24 February 2001 1:42 AM
> To: Craig Foster
> Cc: E-smith developers list
> Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] DNS problems?
>
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Craig Foster wrote:
>
> > On one 4.1.1 machine I have Bind 8.2.2 and on the other (same ISP
> > different
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Craig Foster wrote:
> On one 4.1.1 machine I have Bind 8.2.2 and on the other (same ISP
> different connection) I have e-smith-named running on 127.0.0.1, and dnrd
> running on 192.168.1.1 the ISP's forwarder. I'm trialling which system
> works best, and what sites I have tr
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 09:35:55AM +0100, Stanislaw Winiecki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> I am not a fan of BIND either, my e-smith 4.0 box, where I had to set up a
> public DNS server experienced a break-in two days ago :-(. All the tracks
> lead to BIND having been exploited... I'm stil
quot;E-smith developers list"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 7:46 PM
Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] DNS problems?
> I've had similar problems. But as I can't find out what's happening
exactly,
> I haven't sent anything to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I am not a fan of BIND, and we intend to move to djbdns in the future.
> This will add security and robustness, but will not fix broken remote
> sites.
I am interested in your plans to move to djbdns. Since you have run qmail
since day zero, I am puzzled why you have delayed deploying dnsca
ts shortly...
Craig Foster
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Rowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 23 February 2001 2:51 PM
> To: Rob Adams
> Cc: E-smith developers list
> Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] DNS problems?
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 23 February 2001 6:13 PM
To: Gordon Rowell
Cc: E-smith developers list
Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] DNS problems?
On one 4.1.1 machine I have Bind 8.2.2 and on the other (same ISP
different connection) I have e-smith-named running on 127.0.0.1, and
t; Rob.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Craig Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Dan Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "E-smith developers list"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 7:46 PM
> Subject: RE: [e-sm
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:07:07AM -0500, Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:49:52PM +0800, Craig Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry, that should be "listening on 192.168.1.1 *AND* the ISP's forwarder,
> > thus allowing for domainname.xxx to be referred
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:49:52PM +0800, Craig Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, that should be "listening on 192.168.1.1 *AND* the ISP's forwarder,
> thus allowing for domainname.xxx to be referred to bind 8.2.3 (127.0.0.1)
> and all external to be forwarded to our ISP's round-robin DNS
| > I am not a fan of BIND, and we intend to move to djbdns in the future.
| > This will add security and robustness, but will not fix broken remote
| > sites.
|
[snip]
I am not a fan of BIND either, my e-smith 4.0 box, where I had to set up a
public DNS server experienced a break-in two days ago
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:30:53AM -0500, Peter Cavender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am not a fan of BIND, and we intend to move to djbdns in the future.
> > This will add security and robustness, but will not fix broken remote
> > sites.
>
> I am interested in your plans to move to djbdns
53 matches
Mail list logo
