Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

> SquidGuard is stable for 4.1.2, however, it is not ready for SME5. I really > don't have much time for upgrading it to SME5 in the near future, but I > would be happy to answer any questions if someone else wants to do it. I would like to spend some time on "porting" to SME5. I have squidguard

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

Hi Filippo, SquidGuard is stable for 4.1.2, however, it is not ready for SME5. I really don't have much time for upgrading it to SME5 in the near future, but I would be happy to answer any questions if someone else wants to do it. Trevor. > -Original Message- > From: Filippo Carletti [

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard Interface Ver2.1 is Available

Trevor Ouellette; E-Smith Developers Info Mailing List > Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard Interface Ver2.1 is Available > > > > Trevor Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Hi All, > > > > Version 2.1 of the SquidGuard Interface i

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard Interface Ver2.1 is Available

Trevor Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hi All, > > Version 2.1 of the SquidGuard Interface is complete and ready for > download. Hi Trevor. Not reporting any problem :) Just wondering if you have tried this on SME5 yet or just 4.1.2? Regards, -- Darrell May DMC NETSOURCED.COM http:

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development

iling List Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development I'd suggest that you start by looking at the way that the e-smith-imp RPM integrates /webmail into the website without using an i-bay. You'll find detailed instructions on making and modifying e-smith RPMs on the e-smi

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development

On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Trevor Ouellette wrote: > On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Darrell May wrote: > > > I see you got the answer for this already, however, I would recommend you > > not use an ibay to host your application. I'd strongly second Darrell's recommendation. > Do you have any more information

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development

lette; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Allen Rapini; E-Smith Developers Info Mailing List Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development Trevor Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > But you can still reach it by doing a \\servername\ibay right? It just > becomes like the netlogon

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development

Trevor Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > But you can still reach it by doing a \\servername\ibay right? It just > becomes like the netlogon directory. Plus, netatalk is still running. Correct. Again, if these ibays in question are not used for file sharing, then again it is better not t

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development

Developers Info Mailing List Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development It is actually just a matter of editing /etc/samba.conf and setting 'browseable = no', via the e-smith way of course by diving into the templates and creating/editing a templates-custom fragment. -- Please r

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development

Allen Rapini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I had posted a "wish list" entry about just that sort of thing. I would like > to see the number of announced browsable share reduced to the minimum via > SAMBA, and Appletalk. > > Allen It is actually just a matter of editing /etc/samba.conf and set

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development

I had posted a "wish list" entry about just that sort of thing. I would like to see the number of announced browsable share reduced to the minimum via SAMBA, and Appletalk. Allen -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development

riginal Message- From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:57 PM To: Trevor Ouellette; E-Smith Developers Info Mailing List Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development What part stops working? Anyhow, probably due to the fact the admin console runs a

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development

Trevor Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > If there is any security issues, please bring them to my attention. > > 1. When you go through the admin console squidguard stops working. > What part stops working? Anyhow, probably due to the fact the admin console runs as user admin and your P

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development

- Original Message - From: "Trevor Ouellette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Keith Woody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "E-Smith Developers Info Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:32 PM Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo]

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development

ECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:35 PM To: Trevor Ouellette Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development Trev, i dunno about the first one, but... - Original Message - From: "Trevor Ouellette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "E-Smith Deve

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development

Trev, i dunno about the first one, but... - Original Message - From: "Trevor Ouellette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "E-Smith Developers Info Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:01 PM Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Development > 2. I need to know how

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2

do my best to help you through it. Trev. -Original Message- From: Brandon Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:39 AM To: Trevor Ouellette Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2 Hi Trevor I have the first release installed. Must I uninstall first??

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard interface 2nd release

Hi Trevor I have the first release installed. Must I uninstall the first release before I install this one??? if so how? Trevor Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > [This may be a double post -- I haven't received my first post yet] > > I'm trying to fix all the problems that were pla

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard interface 2nd release

Sorry guys, I must have missed the first e-mail where can we get the second release of this Squidguard GUI??? Timothy Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Allen > Rapini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >Trevor > >Thanks again, for the squidGuard package. I honest

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard interface 2nd release

In message , Timothy Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >Allen Rapini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >>Trevor >>Thanks again, for the squidGuard package. I honestly didn't have any >>problems I knew of with ver. 1, but I figured I could "guinea pi

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard interface 2nd release

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Allen Rapini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Trevor >Thanks again, for the squidGuard package. I honestly didn't have any >problems I knew of with ver. 1, but I figured I could "guinea pig" my home >system for you. Works great, as advertised, without a reboot... > >All

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard interface 2nd release

Trevor Thanks again, for the squidGuard package. I honestly didn't have any problems I knew of with ver. 1, but I figured I could "guinea pig" my home system for you. Works great, as advertised, without a reboot... Allen -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2

installing the transproxy rpm SHOULD do it. Don't worry, I'm working on an uninstall proggy this week. Trev. -Original Message- From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:19 PM To: Trevor Ouellette Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard 2

[e-smith-devinfo] RE: e-smith manager "limitations" (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI)

t: e-smith manager "limitations" (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI) On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 02:53:56PM +0200, Jelmer Kuperus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i think that goes for a lot more things in e-smith , i find the management > console is really kind of limmitin

[e-smith-devinfo] e-smith manager "limitations" (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI)

On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 02:53:56PM +0200, Jelmer Kuperus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i think that goes for a lot more things in e-smith , i find the management > console is really kind of limmiting > [...] Limiting user visible options is a primary e-smith design goal. We don't expect users to m

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI

t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 3:05 PM Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI > > Sorry... silly question... > > But does squidguard need to be installed on e-smith first, and then install > this package? --

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI

To: "Matthieu Perreira Da Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:54 PM > Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI > > > > > > Where is this e-smith manager for squidguard > > >

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI

- Original Message - From: "Brandon Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Matthieu Perreira Da Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:54 PM Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI > > Where is this

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI

Where is this e-smith manager for squidguard Is it on the contrib list? Matthieu Perreira Da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > - Original Message - > From: "Brandon Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:40 PM > Subject: [e-smith-

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI

i think that goes for a lot more things in e-smith , i find the management console is really kind of limmiting -Original Message- From: Brandon Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: dinsdag 21 augustus 2001 14:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI Altho

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI

- Original Message - From: "Brandon Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:40 PM Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] Squidguard GUI > > Although I think squidguard is a cool add-on to e-smith... I think from an > administrative point of view it does

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard for essg reports

revor Ouellette Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard for essg reports Hello Trevor I installed squidguard. It could not find blacklists/* I reinstalled as you suggested to Bertrand, same result - no blacklist/* ftp to ftp.ost.eltele.no .. no blacklist/* I have only been going

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard for essg reports

new internal IP address via DHCP? I've had the same one now for a couple months. Trev. -Original Message- From: David Brustad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 1:44 PM To: Trevor Ouellette Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard for essg reports Trevor,

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard for essg reports

interface have more authority than the blacklist and will take precedent. Trev. -Original Message- From: David Brustad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 1:44 PM To: Trevor Ouellette Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard for essg reports Trevor, I installed your

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard for essg reports

Thanks everyone, And my squidguard stuff is working on my test box too. I'll keep my eye on this. Trev. -Original Message- From: Timothy Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard for

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard for essg reports

I second that opinion, I am using it since last week on a essg 4.1.2 at home with no problems. It's not the most scientific testing, but the features definitely work as advertised. Allen -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues S

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard for essg reports

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Trevor Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >All, > >Has anybody else installed/used the squidguard.tar that I put together? >Bertrand seems to be having problems with it after about a week? > >I'm suspecting the crons.weekly script isn't doing it's job properly...

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard interface 99% complete.

I wrote my squidguard interface today... all in PHP! I can now update domains, expressions and URL's for trusted and untrusted files. Add, remove and list files are possible. It's a cheap little database based on the six squidguard text files. But, does anyone know how to execute a squid resta

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard returns

al Message- From: Tim Litwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 11:59 PM To: e-smith-devinfo Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard returns make another perl file called loader ( for this example ) that takes the script name the domain and the switch as variables

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard returns

Thanks Orville, I've got a few production machines here. But thanks for the offer! Trev. -Original Message- From: Orville Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:17 AM To: Trevor Ouellette; e-smith-devinfo Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard returns

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard returns

From: "Trevor Ouellette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "e-smith-devinfo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:03 AM Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard returns > Thanks Tim. That looks great! I like the idea of a loader script. > > -Origi

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard returns

Thanks Tim. That looks great! I like the idea of a loader script. -Original Message- From: Tim Litwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 11:59 PM To: e-smith-devinfo Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard returns make another perl file called loader ( for

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard returns

and I will be sending the scripts to you shortly! Trev. -Original Message- From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 11:09 PM To: Trevor Ouellette; e-smith-devinfo Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard returns Trevor Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> s

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard returns

make another perl file called loader ( for this example ) that takes the script name the domain and the switch as variables and then check that script name is valid before running the domain and the switch thru it. this will keep users from being able to attempt to run other executables. in thi

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidguard returns

Trevor Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Any ideas? Any perl wizards out there? Sounds like you've done quite a lot. I'm not a perl wizard at all but I'll offer to take a look. Forward me your scripts and any docs and I'll try to follow along and assist. My simple first thought for tes

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:34:11 +0100, "Pierluigi Miranda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >-Original Message- >Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Thank you very much :-) That was excellent information! >>Also, there is mention that transproxy is needed. Do you know >>where I would

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Tim Litwiller wrote: > so is the e-smith-transproxy-0.2-3.noarch.rpm ok to use with 4.1.1 ? No, you'll need e-smith-transproxy-0.3-1.noarch.rpm. It should be up in my contrib directory, but isn't. It should be later today. Charlie Brady [EMAIL PROT

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] squidGuard HowTo

Brandon Friedman wrote: > A quick question: > > How many urls, sites etc on in the databases & how often are > they updated? > New porn, warez, etc sites come out daily - so the database > needs to be > updated regularly! > Visit www.squidguard.org for more info. Regards, Darrell

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

Pierluigi Miranda wrote: > Yessir! :) > > An additional note: if you want, you can precompile the > databases for faster > loading during startup (the blacklists file from squidGuard > site contains > precompiled databases, Matthijs files did not, at least until > the last time > I downloaded

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Gordon Rowell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:37:44PM -0500, Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Darrell May wrote: > > > > > I have a potential client, a Christian School, looking at e-smith. > > > One of their requirements is blocking

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Darrell May wrote: > I have a potential client, a Christian School, looking at e-smith. > One of their requirements is blocking access to inappropriate > content/web sites. There is no way to block access to inappropriate content/web sites. There are ways to block access to

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

Gordon Rowell wrote: > Seriously, the only way to attempt content blocking is to > have a "White" > list of allowable sites. Which makes the web somewhat useless. > Someone needs to maintain this list and add "appropriate" sites. > > "Black" lists are easily circumvented - many, many content

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

Pierluigi Miranda wrote > I don't want to clutter the list, so I am sending you in > private both the > original Matthijs' instructions and the module I modified... > if someone else > is interested, I'll post them somewhere :) > Thank you very much :-) That was excellent information! Also, t

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

Charlie Brady wrote: I've copied his squidGuard SRPMS into my contrib > directory on ftp.e-smith.org. They'll show up there overnight. > Thanks Charlie :-) Darrell

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

If you want to go commercial and choose an NT machine (ouch) to do only that part of the job, it's fairly easy. Have a look at www.mimesweeper.com and check out their websweeper product. You can configure it to not load web-sites and pages that have certain words on them. Does anyone know of a

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

so is the e-smith-transproxy-0.2-3.noarch.rpm ok to use with 4.1.1 ? Darrell May wrote: > Pierluigi Miranda wrote: > > E-Smith is not transproxy enabled, as far as I now. Transproxy is an > > additional module someone (Charlie Brady? Are you the author, > > aren't you?) > > > Yes I found a tr

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:37:44PM -0500, Charlie Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Darrell May wrote: > > > I have a potential client, a Christian School, looking at e-smith. > > One of their requirements is blocking access to inappropriate > > content/web sites. Darrel

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

Pierluigi Miranda wrote: > I'm using transproxy/squidGuard on my 4.0.1 gateway. It works > well, and > constitutes a good deterrent measure. > Thanks Pierluigi. I haven't looked into this in depth but would you mind forwarding a HowTo for installing and setting up transproxy/squidGuard on e-sm

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Yes, thanks, I downloaded all these links. > >BerkleyDB-2.7.7-1.i386.rpm >e-smith-squidguard-0.2-3.htm >e-smith-squidGuard-0.2-3.noarch.rpm >e-smith-squidGuard-dbads-010313-1.noarch.rpm >e-smith-squidGuard-dbaggressive-010313-1.noarch.rpm >e-smith-squidGuar

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

Pierluigi Miranda wrote: > E-Smith is not transproxy enabled, as far as I now. Transproxy is an > additional module someone (Charlie Brady? Are you the author, > aren't you?) Yes I found a transproxy rpm in Charlie's config area: e-smith-transproxy-0.2-3.noarch.rpm No idea what e-smith versio

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Thanks Pierluigi. I haven't looked into this in depth but would >you mind forwarding a HowTo for installing and setting up >transproxy/squidGuard on e-smith. I don't want to clutter the list, so I am sending you in private both the original Matthijs' ins

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have a potential client, a Christian School, looking at e-smith. >One of their requirements is blocking access to inappropriate >content/web sites. Is anyone using SquidGuard with e-smith or >is there an e-smith-squidguard rpm and HowTo somewhere? I'm

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Charlie Brady wrote: > On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Tim Litwiller wrote: > > > so is the e-smith-transproxy-0.2-3.noarch.rpm ok to use with 4.1.1 ? > > No, you'll need e-smith-transproxy-0.3-1.noarch.rpm. It should be up in my > contrib directory, but isn't. It should be later today

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

it run on port 3128 which can be done in its own web manager.) Philip -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March 2001 12:05 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard If you want to go commercial and choose an NT machine (o

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidGuard HowTo

A quick question: How many urls, sites etc on in the databases & how often are they updated? New porn, warez, etc sites come out daily - so the database needs to be updated regularly! Regards Brandon Friedman Tech-Knowledgy Advantage (Tel.) +27 11 486-0626 (Cell.) 0834087840 (Fax.) +27 11 486-06

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

Charlie Brady wrote: > No, you'll need e-smith-transproxy-0.3-1.noarch.rpm. It > should be up in my > contrib directory, but isn't. It should be later today. > Thanks Charlie :-) Regards, Darrell

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] SquidGuard

-Original Message- Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Thank you very much :-) That was excellent information! >Also, there is mention that transproxy is needed. Do you know >where I would find or how I would implement this or is e-smith >transproxy enabled already? E-Smith is n

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] squidGuard localhost errors [was RE: [e-smith-devinfo] I tried squidguard]

that is exactly the same as what I experienced here, with one exception, (using the LocalIP instead of the name) I tried both and both work. but localhost does not. Darrell May wrote: > Pierluigi Miranda, Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 1:45 AM > > Hmm... on my 4.0.1 the redirection works like a