[freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support > for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no > longer any reason to stick to java 1.4. > Are the opensource jvm's up to 1.5? If

[freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/a7b25690/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19930 - trunk/freenet/test/freenet/crypt/ciphers

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > What's the problem with the 192-bit test? see the discussion on r19912, our Rijndael implementation does not follow FIPS standard. That test would just fail. > > On Wednesday 14 May 2008 16:35, j16sdiz at freenetproject.org wrote: >>

[freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Saturday 17 May 2008 06:24, Ian Clarke wrote: >> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Cheng >> wrote: >> > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Matthew Toseland >> > wrote: >> >> Ian and I have

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Saturday 17 May 2008 16:35, Ian Clarke wrote: >> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland >> wrote: >> > As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might > want >> > to review this before I apply it.

[freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

ven by an unclean shutdown... can anyone confirm this from experience? Or is it only out of disk space and memory corruption that causes this? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/4ebfc71d/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/32e4addb/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] WoT plugin (db4o ?)

week-end and, maybe, publish it tomorrow evening. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080

[freenet-dev] WoT plugin (db4o ?)

-- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/3fddfa5c/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

ext part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/f16912bc/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

ture Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/b121ce78/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] WoT plugin (db4o ?)

rt -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/ccb65b99/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

gt; > effect, so we will need to test it on volunteers' slow systems. > > > > If it's the "requests that don't want to be persisted", what would you do with > > fproxy requests and other non-persistent requests? Store them to disk anyway? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/9a41bebe/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] WoT plugin (db4o ?)

-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/648269f7/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

--- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/3e31b4b9/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea: off-grid darknet!

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: >> Exactly, which is why Thaw, Freemail, etc are the apps that will >> motivate users to use Freenet. Only developers download the JRE, most >> users get it bundled with Java apps. The same will be true of >> Freenet, its a platform, most

[freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include db4o, > and use it for our various persistence needs. I eventually reached the > conclusion that while we can do most of what we need to do with simple > flatfile

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

End of signed message -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/c95a9f6b/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea: off-grid darknet!

s we have to do what we can for *our users*, which means making it as easy as possible to get these client applications. > > Ian. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/e13f48f1/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

xy requests and other non-persistent requests? Store them to disk anyway? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/1f709c54/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] GPG auto-signing key on emu

revoke it if needed. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/b4f85f12/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] indent verification broken (was: Verification of r19955 on emu)

me: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/0b880d11/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

we'd keep them in RAM. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080517/c78314d6/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Cheng wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Matthew Toseland > wrote: >> Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include db4o, Yay. >> Of course there will be latency here when objects are >> not

[freenet-dev] indent verification broken (was: Verification of r19955 on emu)

an empty indent verification message. =( 2008/5/16 : > > ___ > cvs mailing list > cvs at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvs >

[freenet-dev] GPG auto-signing key on emu

* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-15 14:56:56]: (2) emu's gpg autosigning key has expired and will be renewed when I get around to do it The new key has been generated, you can find details about the key on http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/README Ian, toad and me can

Re: [freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

On Saturday 17 May 2008 06:24, Ian Clarke wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include db4o, Yay. Of

Re: [freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea: off-grid darknet!

On Friday 16 May 2008 22:09, Ian Clarke wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Colin Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why are you so obsessed with turning us into Sourceforge for Freenet apps? If we are successful there could be hundreds of apps, there is no reason for us to host all of

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19930 - trunk/freenet/test/freenet/crypt/ciphers

What's the problem with the 192-bit test? On Wednesday 14 May 2008 16:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: j16sdiz Date: 2008-05-14 15:35:44 + (Wed, 14 May 2008) New Revision: 19930 Modified: trunk/freenet/test/freenet/crypt/ciphers/RijndaelTest.java Log: Include (part of) FIPS

[freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want to review this before I apply it. CPUID patch From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday 16 May 2008 03:43:30 Groups: freenet Followup-To: freenet Message was signed with unknown key 0xB3FFA5B9. The validity of the

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 12:29:09]: As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want to review this before I apply it. There is a related bug in the bug tracker... It's not the only bits that need updating :/ See #74 CPUID patch From:

Re: [freenet-dev] WoT plugin (db4o ?)

I've been reading DB4O's whitepaper (mentionned in Toad's post) and I'm wondering if I could use it for the WoT plugin. I could get rid of Derby and it would make the deployment simpler if db4o is shipped with freenet. Query possibilities are sufficient to my needs but I've got a few problems :

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 14:03:10]: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 12:29:09]: As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want to review this before I apply it. There is a related bug in the bug tracker...

Re: [freenet-dev] WoT plugin (db4o ?)

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Julien Cornuwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been reading DB4O's whitepaper (mentionned in Toad's post) and I'm wondering if I could use it for the WoT plugin. I could get rid of Derby and it would make the deployment simpler if db4o is shipped with freenet.

Re: [freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 17 May 2008 06:24, Ian Clarke wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ian and I have

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19930 - trunk/freenet/test/freenet/crypt/ciphers

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's the problem with the 192-bit test? see the discussion on r19912, our Rijndael implementation does not follow FIPS standard. That test would just fail. On Wednesday 14 May 2008 16:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [freenet-dev] WoT plugin (db4o ?)

Julien Cornuwel a écrit : The other problem is how to store the trust values. With derby, I simply have 2 tables, one with identites, the other with the trust values and ids if the truster and the trustee. How can I do that with an OO database ? The only idea I have is : Create a class Trust

Re: [freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

On Saturday 17 May 2008 14:07, Daniel Cheng wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 17 May 2008 06:24, Ian Clarke wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Matthew

Re: [freenet-dev] WoT plugin (db4o ?)

On Saturday 17 May 2008 14:21, Julien Cornuwel wrote: Julien Cornuwel a écrit : The other problem is how to store the trust values. With derby, I simply have 2 tables, one with identites, the other with the trust values and ids if the truster and the trustee. How can I do that with an OO

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:58, Florent Daignière wrote: * Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 14:03:10]: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 12:29:09]: As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want to review this before I

Re: [freenet-dev] WoT plugin (db4o ?)

Matthew Toseland a écrit : If you actually have code, you should commit it somewhere, whether it's finished and working or not. This makes life easier for others who might want to review it. Well, I have some. But it is far too ugly to publish it ATM ;) I'll work on it this week-end and,

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want to review this before I apply it. You know, I wish you guys would at least try using that Smartbear software, this is *exactly* what it is

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

On Saturday 17 May 2008 16:35, Ian Clarke wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want to review this before I apply it. You know, I wish you guys would at least try using

Re: [freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

On Saturday 17 May 2008 00:29, Matthew Toseland wrote: Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include db4o, and use it for our various persistence needs. I eventually reached the conclusion that while we can do most of what we need to do with simple flatfile

Re: [freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea: off-grid darknet!

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exactly, which is why Thaw, Freemail, etc are the apps that will motivate users to use Freenet. Only developers download the JRE, most users get it bundled with Java apps. The same will be true of Freenet, its a

[freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no longer any reason to stick to java 1.4. Comments? pgpE1QU7ZKe6r.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 17 May 2008 16:35, Ian Clarke wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As nextgens is worried about anonymous contributions, I thought he might want to review

Re: [freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no longer any reason to stick to java 1.4. Are the opensource jvm's up

Re: [freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Juiceman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 20:43:17]: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Saturday 17 May 2008 16:35, Ian Clarke wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As nextgens is worried about

Re: [freenet-dev] CPUID patch from FMS

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 14:44:27]: On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:58, Florent Daignière wrote: * Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 14:03:10]: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 12:29:09]: As nextgens is worried about anonymous

Re: [freenet-dev] Combating bloat (was: Re: Post 0.7 idea: off-grid darknet!

* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 13:35:40]: On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exactly, which is why Thaw, Freemail, etc are the apps that will motivate users to use Freenet. Only developers download the JRE, most users get it bundled

Re: [freenet-dev] New database for Freenet: db4o

* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 19:00:13]: On Saturday 17 May 2008 00:29, Matthew Toseland wrote: Ian and I have eventually come to the conclusion that we should include db4o, and use it for our various persistence needs. I eventually reached the conclusion that while

Re: [freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

Hi, while ./freenet/ compiles with 1.4, you already need 1.5 for ./contrib/bdb (yes I know, nobody else want to recompile freenet-ext). // Sven-Ola Am Samstag 17 Mai 2008 22:58:02 schrieb Matthew Toseland: GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support for all