I was looking at how you added Sun Java 1.5 support... Wouldn't it
make sense to look for 1.5 before looking for 1.4? That way if a user
has both installed it will choose the more modern 1.5.
If you agree I have attached a patch that will fix the detection and
look for 1.5 first.
If that patch
On 9/20/05, mazzanet wrote:
> I've done the most recent work on the wininstaller.
> freenet-modern.nsi is the current NSIS script which builds fine with the
> latest version of NSIS. freenet-new.nsi doesn't actually exist anymore.
> The current installer on the Freenet website should correctly
I've done the most recent work on the wininstaller.
freenet-modern.nsi is the current NSIS script which builds fine with the
latest version of NSIS. freenet-new.nsi doesn't actually exist anymore.
The current installer on the Freenet website should correctly identify
both Java 1.4 and 1.5.
Feel
Ok, I got to looking into this and I think I would be able to do basic
maintainance of the webinstallers if no-one else demands the job...
I have put together a hacked webinstaller that allows for the use
of Sun Java 1.5. It compiles and runs on my system, but I haven't
tested it for Sun Java
It appears that the only working script in the directory is the
freenet-new.nsi script. You will need to edit the build.bat file to
run that, or rename freenet-new.nsi to freenet.nsi
On 9/19/05, Juiceman wrote:
> On 9/19/05, Yongqian Li wrote:
> > I have noticed that the installers on the
I've done the most recent work on the wininstaller.
freenet-modern.nsi is the current NSIS script which builds fine with the
latest version of NSIS. freenet-new.nsi doesn't actually exist anymore.
The current installer on the Freenet website should correctly identify
both Java 1.4 and 1.5.
On 9/20/05, mazzanet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done the most recent work on the wininstaller.
freenet-modern.nsi is the current NSIS script which builds fine with the
latest version of NSIS. freenet-new.nsi doesn't actually exist anymore.
The current installer on the Freenet website should
On 9/19/05, Yongqian Li wrote:
> I have noticed that the installers on the freenet website is seriously
> outdated. It is for Java 1.4, which is not only not the most current version
> but has shown to have serious security bugs (see
> http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3439391).
I have noticed that the installers on the freenet website is seriously
outdated. It is for Java 1.4, which is not only not the most current version
but has shown to have serious security bugs (see
http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3439391). The installer
that does not include a
I have noticed that the installers on the freenet website is seriously
outdated. It is for Java 1.4, which is not only not the most current version
but has shown to have serious security bugs (see
http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3439391). The installer
that does not include a
On 9/19/05, Yongqian Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noticed that the installers on the freenet website is seriously
outdated. It is for Java 1.4, which is not only not the most current version
but has shown to have serious security bugs (see
11 matches
Mail list logo
