It's the same with recent Polish translations, with one exception I've
found so far. It was Andrei's Modern C++ design translated by Grzegorz
Jakacki with in-depth understanding of the original book,
perfect sense of what should be translated and what shouldn't, correct,
natural and itelligible
http://uvu.freshsources.com/page9/page7/files/Syllabus4450.html
Andrei
On 11/15/10 2:00 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://uvu.freshsources.com/page9/page7/files/Syllabus4450.html
Andrei
I had a class from Chuck; he introduced me to D. He's an excellent teacher.
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
[Good Stuff™]
Awesome!
--
Simen
Hello!
I tried to find any module to work with SQLite3 in D2, and failed. I
found either just bindings to old SQLite versions or D1 modules with
craft-SQL-on-the-fly interface, all abandoned.
So I want to add just another D2 SQLite3 bindings and OO-wrapper and
uploaded to GitHub:
Andrei:
http://uvu.freshsources.com/page9/page7/files/Syllabus4450.html
This is good. Despite its bugs/unfinished parts D2 is a good language to teach
certain kinds of lower level programming (and some OOP too).
This is the page of the resources of the course:
While it might be better to update existing projects, here are some answers.
Alexey Khmara Wrote:
I want there to call appropriate overloaded function for each item of
args tuple, but I was not able to do this without mixin - compiler
gives syntax errors when I try to write something like
2010/11/16 Jesse Phillips jessekphillip...@gmail.com:
While it might be better to update existing projects, here are some answers.
Alexey Khmara Wrote:
I want there to call appropriate overloaded function for each item of
args tuple, but I was not able to do this without mixin - compiler
Alexey,
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 01:14 +, Alexey Khmara wrote:
Hello!
I tried to find any module to work with SQLite3 in D2, and failed. I
found either just bindings to old SQLite versions or D1 modules with
craft-SQL-on-the-fly interface, all abandoned.
So I want to add just another D2
Sean Kelly Wrote:
shared uint cnt;
void atomicInc ( ) { uint o; while ( !cas( cnt, o, o + 1 ) ) o = cnt; }
is compiled with dmd -O to something like:
shared uint cnt;
void atomicInc ( ) { while ( !cas( cnt, cnt, cnt + 1 ) ) { } }
What a mess. DMD isn't supposed to optimize
At the current state of my object optlink fails with EID=0042785B
What options do I have to work around this issue?
Go back to older dmd / optlink versions?
Keep coding and hope it fixes itself?
Search for cyclic references and remove them?
--
Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:25:56 -0800
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Sunday 14 November 2010 11:29:55 spir wrote:
I don't understand in which case you need to reuse the same name in a
subclass for a _different_ field -- whether the field is public or private
does not seem
Daniel Gibson wrote:
Stanislav Blinov schrieb:
spir wrote:
Hello,
I think the compiler should complain when sub-classes hold fields
with the same name as super-classes. After all, names (in addition to
types) are used to identify. Intentionally reusing the same name
would not only be bad
On Monday 15 November 2010 02:29:55 Stanislav Blinov wrote:
Daniel Gibson wrote:
Disallowing public fields is too restrictive IMHO.
Maybe. I just always view public fields as encapsulation breakers. And
silent invariant breakers. And maintenance cripplers :)
Personally, it's the kind of
Benjamin Thaut Wrote:
At the current state of my object optlink fails with EID=0042785B
What options do I have to work around this issue?
Go back to older dmd / optlink versions?
Keep coding and hope it fixes itself?
Search for cyclic references and remove them?
dmd has a -lib option to
Am 15.11.2010 12:33, schrieb Kagamin:
Benjamin Thaut Wrote:
At the current state of my object optlink fails with EID=0042785B
What options do I have to work around this issue?
Go back to older dmd / optlink versions?
Keep coding and hope it fixes itself?
Search for cyclic references and
Benjamin Thaut Wrote:
How does that help if the linker crashes?
It can stop crashes.
bearophile Wrote:
Probably we'll see more people asking for that kind of help. Not all D
newbies come from languages that use a linker. Today a significant and
growing percentage of newbie D programmers come from Java, C#, JavaScript,
Python, etc.
java and c# do use a linker (I suppose
On 2010-11-07 22:29, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
This wraps up a thread from a few days ago. Pascal featured my D
examples on his Scriptometer site.
http://rigaux.org/language-study/scripting-language/
D comes 17th out of 28, so it's so-so for scripting.
I'm wondering whether the issue of D's
On Nov 15, 10 14:58, Steve Teale wrote:
Some time ago in phobos2, the following:
RegExp wsr = RegExp((\\s+));
int p = wsr.find(thingie att1=\whatever\);
writefln(%s|%s|%s %d,wsr.pre(), wsr.match(1), wsr.post(), p);
would print:
thingie| |att1=whatever 7
Now it prints
thingie|
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:15:50 +0100
Per Ångström d-n...@autark.se wrote:
On 2010-11-07 22:29, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
This wraps up a thread from a few days ago. Pascal featured my D
examples on his Scriptometer site.
http://rigaux.org/language-study/scripting-language/
D comes 17th out
Kagamin:
java and c# do use a linker (I suppose you just didn't use them). It's
builtin, but still suffers from the same problems as traditional linkers.
I generally try to talk only about the things I know something about, but I
don't know enough about linkers yet, I am sorry.
Bye,
spir:
I *want* my language of choice to let me write clear code --
During the design stages of Python3 I've even asked to remove those dirty
boolean shortcuts of Python2 :-)
Bye,
bearophile
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Having public fields shadow each other is problematic.
Detecting a problem requires having a model.
What does your model look like?
-manfred
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:09:32 -0500, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 13:19:25 -0500
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
Then you just wasted time duping that argument. Instead of a
defensive
dup, what if we had a function ensureHeaped
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:26:53 -0500, div0 d...@sourceforge.net wrote:
On 12/11/2010 21:42, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
uriel_followerwasteyourt...@reddit.com wrote in message
People who find generics worthwhile *don't use Go*. So of course the
remaining Go users aren't going to miss them.
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:33:37 -0500, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Friday, November 12, 2010 17:25:31 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
I'm not quite sure how that will work with scope going away though.
This scope will not go away.
What's the difference between this
Page 8, in the example:
import std.stdio, std.string;
void main()
{
uint[string] dictionary;
foreach (line; stdin.byLine()) {
// Break sentence into words
// Add each word in the sentence to the vocabulary
foreach (word; splitter(strip(line))) {
if (word in dictionary)
KennyTM~ Wrote:
On Nov 15, 10 14:58, Steve Teale wrote:
Some time ago in phobos2, the following:
RegExp wsr = RegExp((\\s+));
int p = wsr.find(thingie att1=\whatever\);
writefln(%s|%s|%s %d,wsr.pre(), wsr.match(1), wsr.post(), p);
would print:
thingie|
On 2010-11-15 14:27, spir wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:15:50 +0100
Per Ångströmd-n...@autark.se wrote:
string func(string s)
{
/++
// A handy feature of many scripting languages, but not in D
// (in D, the type of the or-expression is bool):
// The type of the
Steve Teale Wrote:
I guess std.regexp is still there because not all of us necessarily want to
iterate a range to simply find out the position of the first whitespace in a
string.
I'm pretty sure it is still there for the same reason many are, trying to
figure out when it should be
Per Ångström d-n...@autark.se wrote:
/++
Simulates type-returning or-expression
+/
template or(T) {
T _(T a, lazy T b) {T tmp = a; return tmp ? tmp : b;}
}
You should probably use a function template[1] or at least an eponymous
template here:
// function template:
auto or( T )( T a,
On Monday, November 15, 2010 06:00:33 Manfred_Nowak wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Having public fields shadow each other is problematic.
Detecting a problem requires having a model.
What does your model look like?
You're going to have to be more specific in your question than that. It's
On Monday, November 15, 2010 07:28:33 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:33:37 -0500, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Friday, November 12, 2010 17:25:31 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
I'm not quite sure how that will work with scope going away though.
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:36:42 -0500, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Monday, November 15, 2010 07:28:33 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:33:37 -0500, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
On Friday, November 12, 2010 17:25:31 bearophile wrote:
On 2010-11-15 18:40, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Per Ångström d-n...@autark.se wrote:
/++
Simulates type-returning or-expression
+/
template or(T) {
T _(T a, lazy T b) {T tmp = a; return tmp ? tmp : b;}
}
You should probably use a function template[1] or at least an eponymous
template here:
//
On Monday, November 15, 2010 10:45:06 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Forgot completely about scope(failure|success|exit)...
LOL. Whereas that's almost the only reason that I use the scope keyword -
though
the fact that it doesn't actually give you the exception means that I don't end
up using
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:45:26 -0800
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Monday, November 15, 2010 06:00:33 Manfred_Nowak wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Having public fields shadow each other is problematic.
Detecting a problem requires having a model.
What does your model
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:15:15 -0500, Sean Kelly wrote:
To be honest, I haven't spent much time with Go because my cursory
exposure to the language hasn't shown it to solve the problems I
care about better than the languages I currently use. I think Go is
in the right ballpark with channels
On 11/15/10 7:31 AM, flyinghearts wrote:
Page 8, in the example:
import std.stdio, std.string;
void main()
{
uint[string] dictionary;
foreach (line; stdin.byLine()) {
// Break sentence into words
// Add each word in the sentence to the vocabulary
foreach (word;
On Monday 15 November 2010 11:44:11 spir wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 09:45:26 -0800
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Monday, November 15, 2010 06:00:33 Manfred_Nowak wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Having public fields shadow each other is problematic.
Detecting a
On 11/15/10 7:55 AM, Steve Teale wrote:
KennyTM~ Wrote:
On Nov 15, 10 14:58, Steve Teale wrote:
Some time ago in phobos2, the following:
RegExp wsr = RegExp((\\s+));
int p = wsr.find(thingie att1=\whatever\);
writefln(%s|%s|%s %d,wsr.pre(), wsr.match(1), wsr.post(), p);
Steve Teale wrote:
KennyTM~ Wrote:
On Nov 15, 10 14:58, Steve Teale wrote:
Some time ago in phobos2, the following:
RegExp wsr = RegExp((\\s+));
int p = wsr.find(thingie att1=\whatever\);
writefln(%s|%s|%s %d,wsr.pre(), wsr.match(1), wsr.post(), p);
would print:
Steven Schveighoffer:
To have the language continually working against that goal is going to great
for inexperienced programmers but hell for people trying to squeeze
performance out of it.
The experienced programmers may write scope int[] a..., and have no heap
allocations.
All the other
Per Ångström d-n...@autark.se wrote in message
news:ibr8bs$22m...@digitalmars.com...
return s || default;
I think allowing the second expression in the ternary operator to be omitted
would be a better fit for D, and provide the same function.
ie.
auto x = a ? a : b;
auto x = a ? : b;
I
Why do not you update it? GDC has been updated to dmd2.049 .
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It becomes easy to end up in a situation
where you're not using the one that you think that you're using
Which means that the model one is thinking in, is inconsistent with the
model used in fact.
The OP used a model in which a name becomes invisible by redefinition
I thought that the compiler could evaluate all intrinsics at compile
time, but this doesn't seem to be the case for std.math.yl2x(). Is my
assumption wrong, or is this a bug that should be reported?
-Lars
Hello,
Is there a way to explore the current scope, meaning the set of currently
defined symbols?
(Equivalent of python's vars(), locals(), globals().)
I have 2 use cases for this:
1. name objects automatically
I need some objects to know their name (as field on themselves). the only
solution
On 15/11/2010 12:12, div0 wrote:
On 15/11/2010 11:00, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
I thought that the compiler could evaluate all intrinsics at compile
time, but this doesn't seem to be the case for std.math.yl2x(). Is my
assumption wrong, or is this a bug that should be reported?
-Lars
Looks
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:03:03 +, div0 wrote:
On 15/11/2010 12:12, div0 wrote:
On 15/11/2010 11:00, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
I thought that the compiler could evaluate all intrinsics at compile
time, but this doesn't seem to be the case for std.math.yl2x(). Is my
assumption wrong, or is
Hello.
Consider this code
void main()
{
l:
{
int v;
}
v = 5; // ok, v is defined
}
As I understand from D's grammar this behaviour is not a bug as
LabeledStatement:
Identifier : NoScopeStatement
and NoScopeStatement in turn takes BlockStatement without creating new
scope.
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:57:50 -0500, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:03:26 -0500
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
Essentially, if you change your line above to:
this.patterns = patterns.dup;
Works, but I don't understand why: isn't the duplicate also
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 05:28:29 -0500, Per Ångström d-n...@autark.se wrote:
On 2010-11-11 17:21, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
First, you can't forward-declare classes in one file that are defined in
another file, instead of importing. The reason is because in D, the
module is the namespace that
My gut feeling is that the if statement's behavior is wrong and the
while statement's is correct, but it could go either way.
No need for a rationale for what can be adequately explained as a
compiler bug (this is a downside of dmd - it trains you to think like
this) It is curious, though, as
poking around a little more and I really don't know what's going on.
fun piece of trivia though: while loops get rewritten to for loops, so
for(;;) l1 {
int v;
}
v = 4;
exhibits the same behavior as the while loop.
do loops seem to do the same thing as the if statement
On 11/15/2010 10:34
Ellery Newcomer:
No need for a rationale for what can be adequately explained as a
compiler bug (this is a downside of dmd - it trains you to think like
this)
Or: Any sufficiently incomprehensible behaviour is indistinguishable from a DMD
compiler bug :-)
Bye,
bearophile
spir:
1. name objects automatically
I need some objects to know their name (as field on themselves). the only
solution I can else imagine is for the user write:
x = ...;
x.name = x;
What if you have two or more references to the same object?
Regarding your generic question,
quick question: are the following rewrites always valid:
e1 != e2 - !(e1 == e2)
e1 !is e2- !(e1 is e2)
e1 !in e2- !(e1 in e2)
?
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:06:34 -0500, Ellery Newcomer
ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu wrote:
quick question: are the following rewrites always valid:
e1 != e2 - !(e1 == e2)
e1 !is e2- !(e1 is e2)
e1 !in e2- !(e1 in e2)
I believe this is in fact what the compiler does
On 15/11/2010 16:45, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
poking around a little more and I really don't know what's going on.
fun piece of trivia though: while loops get rewritten to for loops, so
for(;;) l1 {
int v;
}
v = 4;
exhibits the same behavior as the while loop.
do loops seem to do the same
parser definitely does it for !in, but it doesn't for the other ones,
and I didn't want to go digging all over the place for it.
Also, spec says yes for !in, but is silent for the other ones
On 11/15/2010 01:08 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:06:34 -0500, Ellery
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:36:33 -0500, Ellery Newcomer
ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu wrote:
parser definitely does it for !in, but it doesn't for the other ones,
and I didn't want to go digging all over the place for it.
Also, spec says yes for !in, but is silent for the other ones
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:44:24 -0500
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
spir:
1. name objects automatically
I need some objects to know their name (as field on themselves). the only
solution I can else imagine is for the user write:
x = ...;
x.name = x;
What if you
spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:44:24 -0500
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
spir:
1. name objects automatically
I need some objects to know their name (as field on themselves). the
only solution I can else imagine is for the user write:
x = ...;
a while ago, I assumed that
e1 += e2
gets rewritten as
e1 = e1 + e2
Yeah. It doesn't. It doesn't even behave the same wrt erroneously typed
arguments
On 11/15/2010 02:35 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
As far as is, it doesn't explicitly say that rewriting is done, but, it
does spell out that
On Monday 15 November 2010 12:40:43 Ellery Newcomer wrote:
a while ago, I assumed that
e1 += e2
gets rewritten as
e1 = e1 + e2
Yeah. It doesn't. It doesn't even behave the same wrt erroneously typed
arguments
Well, that would potentially be two different set of operator overloads
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:40:43 -0500, Ellery Newcomer
ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu wrote:
a while ago, I assumed that
e1 += e2
gets rewritten as
e1 = e1 + e2
Yeah. It doesn't. It doesn't even behave the same wrt erroneously typed
arguments
I understand the care taken, but the spec gives
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4781
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2080
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3493
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3293
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4615
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4484
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #83 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-15 04:43:23 PST ---
(In reply to comment #82)
Anyway, unfortunately DMD development model still sucks, it sucks much less
than... let's say 2 years ago, but...
Walter is willing to slowly
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #84 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2010-11-15 04:47:48
PST ---
(In reply to comment #83)
(In reply to comment #82)
Anyway, unfortunately DMD development model still sucks, it sucks much less
than... let's say 2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3749
--- Comment #8 from simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com 2010-11-15 05:27:01 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=811)
PATCH against rev 755 add support for yl2x, yl2xp1
Implements yl2x, yl2xp1 as builtins for DMC, VisualStudio.
Needs implementation
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5205
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5208
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #85 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-15 09:33:56 PST ---
(In reply to comment #84)
I (and others) already suggested him how to improve things,
Keep suggesting those things. Sometimes you have to say something five times to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3463
--- Comment #86 from Leandro Lucarella llu...@gmail.com 2010-11-15 09:44:18
PST ---
(In reply to comment #85)
(In reply to comment #84)
I (and others) already suggested him how to improve things,
Keep suggesting those things. Sometimes
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5093
--- Comment #3 from simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com 2010-11-15 11:03:49 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=812)
PATCH against rev 755: implement a module import backtrace for static assert
Implements a module import back-trace for static
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5090
simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5090
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com 2010-11-15 12:11:09 PST ---
Just under the duplicate union error is where to look iirc.
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4837
simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4837
--- Comment #2 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-11-15 12:39:53 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Created an attachment (id=814) [details]
PATCH against rev 755: remove superfluous asserts
fixed, no idea why asserts where placed in there.
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5093
--- Comment #3 from simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com 2010-11-15 11:03:49 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=812)
PATCH against rev 755: implement a module import backtrace for static assert
Implements a module
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday 15 November 2010 12:49:05 Don wrote:
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5093
--- Comment #3 from simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com 2010-11-15
11:03:49 PST --- Created an attachment (id=812)
PATCH against rev 755:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5212
--- Comment #5 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2010-11-15 14:11:15 PST ---
Extra note:
It's a problem of perception: typesafe variadic arguments don't look like
normal function arguments that you know are usually on the stack, they look
like
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2809
simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2809
--- Comment #4 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2010-11-15 15:06:34 PST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Mr Bs test case is wrong:
static assert((cast(short)-1 1) == int.max);
should be:
static assert((cast(short)-1 1) == short.max);
Not
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5218
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from
On Monday, November 15, 2010 13:59:10 Don wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday 15 November 2010 12:49:05 Don wrote:
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5093
--- Comment #3 from simon s.d.hamm...@googlemail.com 2010-11-15
11:03:49 PST
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5220
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com 2010-11-15 21:07:45
PST ---
As noted by dsimcha on Phobos list, ConvError should be left as a deprecated
alias to ConvException for a few releases to mitigate code breakage.
--
94 matches
Mail list logo
