On 18/03/2011 20:01, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We have just got word from Google - Digital Mars has been accepted as a
mentoring organization for Google Summer of Code 2011.
Thanks to Trass3r for bringing up this idea, to Jens Mueller for
reiterating it, and to the people who added to the
On 3/23/11 7:19 AM, Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We have just got word from Google - Digital Mars has been accepted as
a mentoring organization for Google Summer of Code 2011.
Thanks to Trass3r for bringing up this idea, to Jens Mueller for
reiterating it, and to the people who added
Walter and I will be mentors for students participating to GsoC 2011.
It's quite likely more mentors will be needed. Please read on if you are
interested in becoming a mentor.
Requirements include solid experience in the industry/academia and good
knowledge of D. Participants to dmd and
dsimcha wrote:
On 3/22/2011 8:22 PM, Daniel Green wrote:
D2 has been released for testing. Now in a zip file.
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/downloads
gcc-4.5.1-tdm-1-gdc-r499-20110322.zip
From here on out, D1 and D2 will be combined into a single release.
Since D1 appears more stable
On 3/23/2011 3:46 PM, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
On 3/22/2011 8:22 PM, Daniel Green wrote:
D2 has been released for testing. Now in a zip file.
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/downloads
gcc-4.5.1-tdm-1-gdc-r499-20110322.zip
From here on out, D1 and D2 will be combined into a
On 3/23/2011 7:15 PM, dsimcha wrote:
Ok, did that and moved the GDC binaries into the bin/ directory of this
installation. Now, I get:
gdc.exe: CreateProcess: No such file or directory
Did you move any of the files in libexec? You may want to extract the
zip file to your TDM installation.
I think you need to add GDC's /bin to path.
On 23/03/11 4:59 AM, %u wrote:
I just thought of a (crazy) idea:
Should D implement a likely keyword for if statements?
Something like:
if likely (x == 2)
{
//do something
}
This would allow the compiler to generate branch prediction code for
the program, allowing the programmer to
Peter Alexander wrote:
On 23/03/11 4:59 AM, %u wrote:
I just thought of a (crazy) idea:
Should D implement a likely keyword for if statements?
Something like:
if likely (x == 2)
{
//do something
}
This would allow the compiler to generate branch prediction code for
the program, allowing
They are my tool who generate makefille for make or ninja (need test it)
- make: http://www.gnu.org/software/make/
- ninja: http://neugierig.org/software/chromium/notes/2011/02/ninja.html
web page: http://gitorious.org/dmake/dmake
wiki for dmake: http://gitorious.org/dmake/pages/Home
dmake is
On 2011-03-23 00:27:51 +0200, Ilya Pupatenko said:
Hi,
First of all, I want to be polite so I have to introduce myself (you
can skip this paragraph if you feel tired of newcomer-students’ posts).
My name is Ilya, I’m a Master student of IT department of Novosibirsk
State University
dsimcha wrote:
On 3/22/2011 1:25 AM, Don wrote:
There are a few approaches we can take from here. One is to define
certain traits that differentiate BigInt from other integrals (e.g.
preferAdditionToMultiplication or whatnot), and then design Rational to
use those traits. Another is of course
Graham St Jack wrote:
On 23/03/11 15:12, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Graham St Jackgraham.stj...@internode.on.net wrote in message
news:imbai9$2jb9$1...@digitalmars.com...
My own solution to this problem is to never have circular imports at
all. The build system I use prohibits them, so any
On 2011-03-22 23:21, dsimcha wrote:
On 3/22/2011 6:04 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I've now finished the port of Dominic Sayers' PHP is_email function
(http://www.dominicsayers.com/isemail) and sending it for review.
A few comments:
* Due to limitations in std.regex some unit tests fail and are
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:imcgim$1sk4$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2011-03-22 23:21, dsimcha wrote:
3. What are EmailStatusCode.On and EmailStatusCode.Off?
I had some problem figuring out how I wanted to solve this. In the PHP
version the function takes a parameter,
Hi,
I tried to do the following:
auto arr = new int[2][2];
arr[] = 1; // using array expressions
// The above gives - Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (1) of type
int to const(int[2u][])
This was the first step to try out if array arithmetic that worked with single
dimensional arrays
On 03/23/2011 12:41 AM, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
Hi,
It seems that every now and then a discussion about build tools or D package
management pops up in this group. Many people on this list have a huge amount
of experience and knowledge in this area. Some has even created their own tools
for D.
On 03/23/2011 12:12 AM, Graham St Jack wrote:
Avoiding circularities has plenty of advantages, like progressive development,
testing and integration.
Maybe it depends on your app domain or whatnot; there are lots of cases, I
guess, where circularities are inevitable, if not direct expression
On 03/23/2011 12:01 PM, Madhav wrote:
Hi,
I tried to do the following:
auto arr = new int[2][2];
arr[] = 1; // using array expressions
// The above gives - Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (1) of type
int to const(int[2u][])
This was the first step to try out if array arithmetic
On 03/22/2011 11:27 PM, Ilya Pupatenko wrote:
As I understand, the library should allow programmer to write grammar directly
in D (ideally, the syntax should be somehow similar to EBNF) and the resulting
parser will be generated by D compiler while compiling the program. This method
allows
== Quote from spir (denis.s...@gmail.com)'s article
On 03/23/2011 12:01 PM, Madhav wrote:
Hi,
I tried to do the following:
auto arr = new int[2][2];
arr[] = 1; // using array expressions
// The above gives - Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (1) of type
int to
On 03/23/2011 05:39 AM, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:27:51 -0400, Ilya Pupatenko pupate...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
First of all, I want to be polite so I have to introduce myself (you can skip
this paragraph if you feel tired of newcomer-students’ posts). My name is
Ilya, I’m a
Madhav wrote:
== Quote from spir (denis.s...@gmail.com)'s article
On 03/23/2011 12:01 PM, Madhav wrote:
Hi,
I tried to do the following:
auto arr = new int[2][2];
arr[] = 1; // using array expressions
// The above gives - Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (1) of type
int to
dsimcha Wrote:
Some discussions about std.parallelism have prompted an examination of
how far D's guarantees against low level data races should extend and
how safety and practicality should be balanced.
I didn't follow the review of std.parallelism, can you give some specific
examples?
Don:
However, the other case which is interesting is when BigInt is replaced
with FixedInt!n (maybe someone can come up with a better name for this?)
-- an integer with a length of a fixed number of ints.
Unlike BigInt, this has basically the same semantics as built-in integer
types. In
On 22/03/2011 17:47, Luca Boasso wrote:
Hello,
I am Luca and I am finishing my master in computer engineering. I am currently
an intern at Panasonic in Cupertino.
My great passion has been always programming language design and implementation
and I am studying the D programming language.
I
On 09/03/2011 16:12, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/9/11, Bruno Medeirosbrunodomedeiros+spam@com.gmail wrote:
but that requires compiling and using GDC, which
apparently has a host of issues and problems as well;
It doesn't have much building problems anymore. There's a couple of
patches that
On 3/23/2011 9:09 AM, Jason House wrote:
dsimcha Wrote:
Some discussions about std.parallelism have prompted an examination of
how far D's guarantees against low level data races should extend and
how safety and practicality should be balanced.
I didn't follow the review of std.parallelism,
On 2011-03-23 00:41, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
Hi,
It seems that every now and then a discussion about build tools or D
package management pops up in this group. Many people on this list have
a huge amount of experience and knowledge in this area. Some has even
created their own tools for D.
Bruno Medeiros Wrote:
Of course, all of this is my personal opinion, and doesn't necessarily
reflect the opinion of the rest of the community, or the D GSoC umbrella
organization.
If a student is really interested in learning more about language parsing and
apply skills they have already
bearophile wrote:
Don:
However, the other case which is interesting is when BigInt is replaced
with FixedInt!n (maybe someone can come up with a better name for this?)
-- an integer with a length of a fixed number of ints.
Unlike BigInt, this has basically the same semantics as built-in
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:22:10 -0400, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/23/2011 05:39 AM, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:27:51 -0400, Ilya Pupatenko
pupate...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
First of all, I want to be polite so I have to introduce myself (you
can skip
this
result1 ==On 11/02/2011 22:51, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Bruno Medeiros brunodomedeiros+spam@com.gmail wrote:
In this code sample if the optimization is applied on the second call
to func, it would cause different code with be executed: the else
clause instead of the then clause. Obviously this is
On 03/23/2011 02:40 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
The first two items (LexingandParsing, ANTLRandJavabasedDparserforIDEusage) are
fairly concrete ideas.
The last one, D Tools in D is far more general, and can involve a lot of
different things
It is instead more specific: The aim is to boost the
On 19/02/2011 23:53, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
But even though I hate Win7 (if I wanted my OS to be like OSX
I'd still be using OSX - although it looks like
http://classicshell.sourceforge.net; might fix some of my Win7 complaints),
Linux still isn't quite to the point where I'm ready to switch to
On 09/03/2011 13:32, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:33:31 -0500, Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeiros+spam@com.gmail wrote:
I'm not saying all pointer arithmetic and manipulation should be
illegal. It could be allowed, but only so long as the coder maintains
the contract of the
There's some odd review of TDPL on amazon.com that claims that (a) gdc
only supports D1 and (b) dmd is too expensive for students. Sigh.
I'd appreciate it if you guys commented in response to that post (as
David Simcha did) and/or clicked the report abuse button. If enough
clicks are
On 2011-03-23 11:46, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote in message
news:imcgim$1sk4$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2011-03-22 23:21, dsimcha wrote:
3. What are EmailStatusCode.On and EmailStatusCode.Off?
I had some problem figuring out how I wanted to solve this. In the PHP
On 12/03/2011 20:21, Don wrote:
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 23/02/2011 17:47, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:28:33 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 2/23/11 11:16 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Just because a function is not marked @safe
On 09/03/2011 17:20, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 09:02:14 -0500, Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeiros+spam@com.gmail wrote:
Although in the particular cased of named arguments, I still don't
feel it is worthwhile. Not unless it could be done in a very
orthogonal way (both in
On 23/03/2011 16:12, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
But for bigger changes (in fact even for smaller ones as well) it might
be worthwhile to use an IDE tool, because it can offer a lot of help in
navigation and other stuff related to reviewing the code. I mean, the
named arguments only address a very
== Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article
On 3/23/2011 9:09 AM, Jason House wrote:
dsimcha Wrote:
Some discussions about std.parallelism have prompted an examination of
how far D's guarantees against low level data races should extend and
how safety and practicality should be
On 23/03/2011 14:59, spir wrote:
On 03/23/2011 02:40 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
The first two items (LexingandParsing,
ANTLRandJavabasedDparserforIDEusage) are fairly concrete ideas.
The last one, D Tools in D is far more general, and can involve a lot of
different things
It is instead more
Sorry for being this much late to reply( and thanks to all of you for replying
this much quickly), I was really busy with my semester end exams. Now that it's
over I can concentrate fully on this project.
I implemented a stack using D in the little time I had to study D. And currently
I'm looking
On 2011-03-22 23:21, dsimcha wrote:
On 3/22/2011 6:04 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I've now finished the port of Dominic Sayers' PHP is_email function
(http://www.dominicsayers.com/isemail) and sending it for review.
A few comments:
* Due to limitations in std.regex some unit tests
On 3/23/11 10:03 AM, Ishan Thilina wrote:
Sorry for being this much late to reply( and thanks to all of you for replying
this much quickly), I was really busy with my semester end exams. Now that it's
over I can concentrate fully on this project.
I implemented a stack using D in the little time
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article
On 3/23/2011 9:09 AM, Jason House wrote:
dsimcha Wrote:
Some discussions about std.parallelism have prompted an examination of
how far D's guarantees against low level data races should extend and
how safety and practicality
I'm not qualified to speak on Spirits internal architecture; I've only
used it once for something very simple and ran into a one-liner bug
which remains unfixed 7+ years later. But the basic API of Spirit would
be wrong for D. “it is possible to write a highly-integrated
lexer/perser generator in
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article
Seems to me, that you're making use of some primitive that I'll call a
'DivisableArray' -- an array that can be sliced up (into other
DivisibleArrays), and different DivisableArrays can be sent to different
threads. You can extract a normal array
On 3/21/11 10:25 PM, Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think by and large failure to define rational for BigInt in a way
that has many commonalities with rational for built-in integrals
reflects a failure of BigInt. By its very design, BigInt is supposed
to transparently replace
On 3/23/11 10:22 AM, Don wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from dsimcha (dsim...@yahoo.com)'s article
On 3/23/2011 9:09 AM, Jason House wrote:
dsimcha Wrote:
Some discussions about std.parallelism have prompted an examination of
how far D's guarantees against low level data races should extend
On 3/21/11 10:25 PM, Don wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think by and large failure to define rational for BigInt in a way
that has many commonalities with rational for built-in integrals
reflects a failure of BigInt. By its very design, BigInt is supposed
to transparently replace
Sorry for the late reply,
even tough I'm not an ANTLR expert, given my previous experience with the tool
and having read most of the official book, I could help more on this GSOC
idea.
I have looked at http://www.antlr.org/grammar/list and on google and I could not
find any recent ANTLR grammar
On 23/03/11 15.07, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-03-23 00:41, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
Hi,
It seems that every now and then a discussion about build tools or D
package management pops up in this group. Many people on this list have
a huge amount of experience and knowledge in this area. Some has
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Don (nos...@nospam.com)'s article
Seems to me, that you're making use of some primitive that I'll call a
'DivisableArray' -- an array that can be sliced up (into other
DivisibleArrays), and different DivisableArrays can be sent to different
threads. You can extract
spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.2690.1300879902.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On 03/23/2011 12:12 AM, Graham St Jack wrote:
Avoiding circularities has plenty of advantages, like progressive
development,
testing and integration.
Maybe it depends on your app
When compiling a project I now get the following error from dmd (2.052,
Mac OS X):
Assertion failed: (!vthis-csym), function toObjFile, file glue.c, line 703.
(No traceback.)
I've been able to locate the problem -- a call to topN. However, when
I've tried to isolate and compile the relevant
On 23.03.2011 1:04, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I've now finished the port of Dominic Sayers' PHP is_email function
(http://www.dominicsayers.com/isemail) and sending it for review.
A few comments:
* Due to limitations in std.regex some unit tests fail and are out
commented
I have tried that
On 2011-03-23 21:51:17 +0100, Magnus Lie Hetland said:
When compiling a project I now get the following error from dmd (2.052,
Mac OS X):
Assertion failed: (!vthis-csym), function toObjFile, file glue.c, line 703.
[snip]
OK, I've managed to simplify thing down about as far as they can go,
D already has a long list of keywords, reserved words can't be used as
identifiers, which can be annoying. body in particular is a common
noun that programmers would gladly use as a variable name in physics
simulation, astronomy, mechanics, games, health, etc. I think body can
be removed from
Yep, this has been brought up at least once before.
Nothing has happened so far.
On Mar 24, 11 05:46, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote:
On 2011-03-23 21:51:17 +0100, Magnus Lie Hetland said:
When compiling a project I now get the following error from dmd
(2.052, Mac OS X):
Assertion failed: (!vthis-csym), function toObjFile, file glue.c,
line 703.
[snip]
OK, I've managed to
On 23.03.2011 1:04, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I've now finished the port of Dominic Sayers' PHP is_email function
(http://www.dominicsayers.com/isemail) and sending it for review.
A few comments:
* Due to limitations in std.regex some unit tests fail and are out
commented
I have
Hi,
I tried to do the following:
auto arr = new int[2][2];
arr[] = 1; // using array expressions
// The above gives - Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (1) of
type int to const(int[2u][])
This was the first step to try out if array arithmetic that worked with
single
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:31:04 -0400, Ilya Pupatenko pupate...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not qualified to speak on Spirits internal architecture; I've only
used it once for something very simple and ran into a one-liner bug
which remains unfixed 7+ years later. But the basic API of Spirit would
be
On 3/23/2011 7:01 AM, Madhav wrote:
Hi,
I tried to do the following:
auto arr = new int[2][2];
arr[] = 1; // using array expressions
// The above gives - Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (1) of type
int to const(int[2u][])
This was the first step to try out if array arithmetic that
On 03/23/2011 05:44 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 23/03/2011 14:59, spir wrote:
On 03/23/2011 02:40 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
The first two items (LexingandParsing,
ANTLRandJavabasedDparserforIDEusage) are fairly concrete ideas.
The last one, D Tools in D is far more general, and can involve a
Regarding unit tests - I have never been a fan of putting unit test code
into the modules being tested because:
* Doing so introduces stacks of unnecessary imports, and bloats the module.
* Executing the unittests happens during execution rather than during
the build.
All unittests (as in the
On 3/23/11 11:42 AM, Luca Boasso wrote:
Sorry for the late reply,
even tough I'm not an ANTLR expert, given my previous experience with the tool
and having read most of the official book, I could help more on this GSOC
idea.
I have looked at http://www.antlr.org/grammar/list and on google and I
I've finished all of the changes that were discussed in the initial
std.parallelism review. I know I said I needed more time than this, but
honestly, I hit a best-case scenario. I had more time than I
anticipated to work on it *and* the changes (especially fixing the
exception handling
Regarding unit tests - I have never been a fan of putting unit test code
into the modules being tested because:
* Doing so introduces stacks of unnecessary imports, and bloats the module.
* Executing the unittests happens during execution rather than during
the build.
All unittests (as in
On 24/03/11 15:19, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Regarding unit tests - I have never been a fan of putting unit test code
into the modules being tested because:
* Doing so introduces stacks of unnecessary imports, and bloats the module.
* Executing the unittests happens during execution rather than
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 05:32:26 +0100, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
In addition to improving the documentation, I added
Task.executeInNewThread() to allow Task to be useful without a TaskPool.
(Should this have a less verbose name?)
spawnAndRun?
--
Simen
I wrote simple template to test VariantN type (and thus Algebraic and
Variant).
template isVariantN(T)
{
static if (is(T X == VariantN!(N, Types), uint N, Types...))
enum isVariantN = true;
else
enum isVariantN = false;
}
but testing against
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:28:46 -0600, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 03/23/2011 06:48 AM, teo wrote:
How can I use properties with increment/decrement and +=/-= operators?
I did following tests (the errors are from dmd v2.052):
class T
{
private int _x;
@property
public int x() {
On 03/23/2011 10:09 AM, teo wrote:
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:28:46 -0600, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 03/23/2011 06:48 AM, teo wrote:
How can I use properties with increment/decrement and +=/-= operators?
I did following tests (the errors are from dmd v2.052):
class T
{
private int _x;
This is just something I was experimenting with:
import std.stdio;
import std.algorithm;
void echo(T...)(T args)
{
static if (!T.length)
{
writeln();
}
else
{
static if (is(T[0] : string))
{
if (canFind(args[0], %))
{
Caligo Wrote:
The override keyword in the signature of Friend.bgColor is required, (193)
This code compiles:
class Contact{ string bgColor(){ return ; } }
class Friend : Contact{
string bgColor(){ return LightGreen; }
}
So how is 'override' required? Can I get an example of
On 2011-03-21 18:40:07 +0100, Steven Schveighoffer said:
If you looked and couldn't find it, it doesn't hurt to add it. Worst
case -- it gets marked as a duplicate.
OK. Perhaps I should just start doing that, rather than asking here
about every bug I find. (I seem to come across new ones
Magnus Lie Hetland:
Any way to do that without (to be deprecated) typedef?
At the moment with a struct that contains an alias this, I presume...
Bye,
bearophile
On 03/23/2011 09:16 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 07:50:10 -, Jonathan M
Davisjmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday 19 March 2011 18:04:57 Don wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday 19 March 2011 17:11:56 Don wrote:
Here's the
On 3/23/11, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
That would require a full-blown D lexer and parser.
- Jonathan M Davis
Isn't DDMD written in D? I'm not sure about how finished it is though.
Yes, but the lexer and parser in ddmd are not only GPL (which would be a
problem for
On 3/23/11, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On 3/23/11, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
That would require a full-blown D lexer and parser.
- Jonathan M Davis
Isn't DDMD written in D? I'm not sure about how finished it is though.
Yes, but the lexer and parser in
What about the artistic license, the front-end can be used with that
license. Is that less restrictive than GPL?
What about the artistic license, the front-end can be used with that
license. Is that less restrictive than GPL?
I don't know what the exact licensing situation is. However, as I understand
it, the C++ front-end is under the GPL, and therefore because ddmd is based on
the C++ front-end, it is
On 3/23/2011 3:22 AM, Dainius (GreatEmerald) wrote:
Though I find it quite odd that I need workarounds like those to
compile on Linux, but ah well, it works, at least. Also odd that I
can't link using GCC on Linux, it gives me a long list of undefined
references (it seems that they are all
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
--- Comment #37 from Benjamin Thaut c...@benjamin-thaut.de 2011-03-23
00:56:13 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #36)
What's the status of Windows stack trace integration?
Note that Benjamin's code needs to be updated by adding an opApply
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5765
--- Comment #3 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-03-23 03:42:32 PDT ---
OK, although I don't think that the case with Ackermann code is so bad. It's
basically giving you a compile-time warning that the function blows up very,
very easily.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5769
Summary: struct elaborate constructor should make rvalue
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5769
--- Comment #1 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-03-23 05:47:01 PDT ---
Fixing thi bug is difficult for me.
DMD internally behavior is...
1.Elaborate constructor returns this reference internally.
- see CtorDeclaration::semantic()
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5765
--- Comment #4 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-03-23 05:55:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The thing I'm really worried about is this:
BigInt a, b, c;
a = (a ^^ b) % c;
This is an attempt to do modular exponentiation, which comes up
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5770
Summary: Template constructor bypass access check
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5765
--- Comment #5 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-03-23 06:57:19 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
The thing I'm really worried about is this:
BigInt a, b, c;
a = (a ^^ b) % c;
This is an attempt to do
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5771
Summary: Template constructor auto ref and do not work
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5765
--- Comment #6 from bearophile_h...@eml.cc 2011-03-23 10:55:03 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
That's a false consistency. T ^^ int is the common operation, not T ^^ T.
Really. BigInt ^^ BigInt isn't a BigInt. It's too big to be
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5772
Summary: Tuple containing typedefed value causes error in
format.d
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5773
--- Comment #1 from Magnus Lie Hetland mag...@hetland.org 2011-03-23 13:17:29
PDT ---
Perhaps this is just me being stupid -- trying to sort things that can't be
compared? However, if I use a custom struct (instead of a tuple) I get an
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5765
--- Comment #7 from Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au 2011-03-23 13:35:05 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
That's a false consistency. T ^^ int is the common operation, not T ^^ T.
Really. BigInt ^^ BigInt isn't a
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5774
Summary: [64 bit] relocation truncated to fit with __gshared
array, while(), and $
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5775
Summary: body keyword is unnecessary
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
