Am 05.12.2011 04:00, schrieb bls:
On 12/04/2011 03:39 PM, bearophile wrote:
This seems the 15th D implementation of certain things I've seen so
far. Also to avoid further duplication I'd like 2D/3D/4D vectors (for
game or graphics purposes) in Phobos.
Isn't he a nice guy ?
Since 5, maybe 6,
Hi David,
what a lovely Library, very useful for me right now. I am using Derelict and
have
just right now written my first Shader Projection Matrix ( as Uniform ). As far
as
I can see, there is no code for a Projection Matrix in your Lib ( ignore this
if I
have just missed it ), so the
Am 05.12.2011 13:30, schrieb ParticlePeter:
Hi David,
what a lovely Library, very useful for me right now. I am using Derelict and
have
just right now written my first Shader Projection Matrix ( as Uniform ). As far
as
I can see, there is no code for a Projection Matrix in your Lib ( ignore
Hi,
and sorry, I found the perspective method just right now :-)
Unfortunately this does not help, still having issues. I will ask on the VisualD
Forum.
Meanwhile, I just copied the files into my project dir, and there it works fine,
so I can play around :-)
Cheers, ParticlePeter
+1
Hi everyone,
I just want to announce the first alpha release of Mono-D.
FYI, Mono-D is a MonoDevelop AddIn which provides code completion/refactoring
features and project management for D.
So, you'll be able to enjoy comfort-features also on non-windows systems!
Just check out
://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/downloads/gcc-4.6.1-tdm-1-gdc-7e22befef29c-20111205.zip
All MinGW GDC downloads.
It's highly recommended to ignore all prior builds. TLS *will* not work.
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/downloads
All patches, source files and build scripts can be found at
https
is the only
option at all to produce Win64 binaries.
(and of course beginning with Win7 everyone should use an x64 OS anyway ;))
* 7-zip format for size reasons: http://7-zip.org
perfect.
This release
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/downloads/gcc-4.6.1-tdm-1-gdc-7e22befef29c-20111205.zip
On 12/5/2011 8:28 PM, Trass3r wrote:
Why is D1 still the default?
Because this is the first release where I felt D2 was capable of being
the default and I forgot about it until writing the post. It also
requires some reworking of the changes that enable dual compilers.
but why is there a
Why is D1 still the default?
Because this is the first release where I felt D2 was capable of being
the default and I forgot about it until writing the post. It also
requires some reworking of the changes that enable dual compilers.
but why is there a zip version anyway?
I posted with a
On 12/5/2011 10:49 PM, ParticlePeter wrote:
Hi,
and sorry, I found the perspective method just right now :-)
Unfortunately this does not help, still having issues. I will ask on the VisualD
Forum.
Meanwhile, I just copied the files into my project dir, and there it works fine,
so I can play
Daniel Green:
* -v1(default) compiles for D1.
I suggest to make D2 the default.
I have installed the latest TDM GCC in
C:\MinGW
Then I have unpacked the 7-zip over the directories of the MinGW install. 150+
files got overwritten, some executables too.
I have made sure C:\MinGW\bin and
On 12/5/2011 9:47 PM, bearophile wrote:
I suggest to make D2 the default.
That's the plan.
I have installed the latest TDM GCC in
C:\MinGW
Then I have unpacked the 7-zip over the directories of the MinGW install. 150+
files got overwritten, some executables too.
I have made sure
http://d-p-l.org
Andrei
1) Code completion can be enabled via adding phobos library paths etc. to the
compiler configuration(s). There's a tutorial how to do this in the 'Getting
Started' section of the project site.
2) You can add per-project (both linker and compiler) parameters. Extra include
paths and library
You've mentioned you made a fix for the project settings bug, but did
you upgrade the plugin? In the updates section it says no updates are
available.
I've used MonoD for a while before and it looks like a very nice IDE. :)
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:jbka3d$2r2m$2...@digitalmars.com...
http://d-p-l.org
Nice, but a little reminder that the See Example links are still totally
broken without JS. Should be easy to fix. May want to just simply them all
shown by default
On 2011-12-05 07:59, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote in message
news:jbglgs$2no2$1...@digitalmars.com...
I think CoffeeScript works really well, it's been around a while and it's
the default way to handle JavaScript in Rails 3.1 and later versions (SASS
is the default
Jacob Carlborg:
I think they're good languages, regardless of the indent-syntax or not.
CoffeeScript and Ruby share a couple of language features that I'm not
sure if Python does:
* Instance variables start with @ (shortcut for this. in CS)
* Functions can be called without parentheses
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 12/3/11, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
If you have a considerably better proposal for std.signals
Johannes Pfau made an updated one, not me. And I'd rather use it for a
while and hack in new features when necessary and debug it properly
than shove it into
Am 04.12.2011, 15:36 Uhr, schrieb Vladimir Panteleev
vladi...@thecybershadow.net:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:33:52 +0200, Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de
wrote:
Am 04.12.2011, 14:02 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com:
On 2011-12-03 05:26, dsimcha wrote:
I volunteered ages ago to manage
Last time I looked at it, the try/catch/finally block was rather
expensive because it always invokes the exception handler unwinding
mechanism, even if no exception occurs.
Try moving the try/catch block out of the loops that call rt_finalize.
(maybe just remove it, onFinalizeError just
On 2011-12-05 08:25, Graham St Jack wrote:
I always use arrays or structs. Until the tail-const thing (or something
like it) happens, classes don't seem to be viable in messages between
threads.
You can always serialize the object, if a copy is acceptable.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2011-12-05 08:17, Adrian wrote:
Yes it is - but did you ever tried haXe ? IMO it is the best cross
platform language around - you target JavaScript, Flash, PHP, NEKO, C++
and soon Java and C# with one language. Typesafe with type inference,
compiled and code completion support from the
Le 03/12/2011 07:54, Gour a écrit :
Just, curious what would be your choise for multi-platform GU app: gtk,
qt or wx?
Sincerely,
Gour
1) By far wxWidgets because it's native and stable
2) FLTK because it's small, fast and supports OpenGL, allowing for
custom interfaces. It's also
On Monday, December 05, 2011 09:13:57 Johannes Pfau wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 12/3/11, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
If you have a considerably better proposal for std.signals
Johannes Pfau made an updated one, not me. And I'd rather use it for a
while and hack in new
Am 04.12.2011, 21:17 Uhr, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe
destructiona...@gmail.com:
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
If you like the idea there, but want something a lot more conservative,
in my html.d (in here:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/misc-stuff-including-D-programming-language-web-stuff
)
there's now
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 23:08 -0600, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[...]
Anyway, my comment is strictly on that discussion, not on the entire
effort within the Python community. When we were working on D's
concurrency model Bartosz pushed for a while quite strongly in favor of
STM, but I
Am 05.12.2011 09:17, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2011-12-05 08:17, Adrian wrote:
Yes it is - but did you ever tried haXe ? IMO it is the best cross
platform language around - you target JavaScript, Flash, PHP, NEKO, C++
and soon Java and C# with one language. Typesafe with type inference,
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:52:13 +0200, Jonas Drewsen jdrew...@nospam.com
wrote:
The same applies here because all it comes down to in the end is the
sizes of buffers.
The async ranges simply allows you to fill a specified number buffers in
another thread async. Most OSes also have socket
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:14:00 +0200, Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de
wrote:
Try moving the try/catch block out of the loops that call rt_finalize.
This sounds like a good idea. Just make sure that all code paths that lead
to rt_finalize (e.g. delete) can recover from an exception.
I see. BTW, do you have an examples?
entertainment software like media players.
and interestingly enough tools for artists often come with non-native
guis. e.g. 3d modeler applications (like autodesk maya, blender,
luxology modo), pixologic zbrush, adobe after effects, the foundry nuke,
On 12/05/2011 02:56 AM, bearophile wrote:
Timon Gehr:
It is not fully implemented and apparently Walter would like a different
solution, because it is quite ugly.
Do you know why it is ugly?
Bye,
bearophile
It overloads the 'ref' keyword with an unrelated meaning.
And furthermore:
auto x
On 2011-12-05 10:10, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 04.12.2011, 21:17 Uhr, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe
destructiona...@gmail.com:
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
If you like the idea there, but want something a lot more conservative,
in my html.d (in here:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:12:00 +0200, Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de wrote:
Polling on the NG has two problems:
1. Polls generate a lot of noise here (single word posts).
2. Counting the results must be done manually.
These are rather minor problems.
Although voting is not anonymous, you can
On 2011-12-05 10:24, Adrian wrote:
Am 05.12.2011 09:17, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
On 2011-12-05 08:17, Adrian wrote:
Yes it is - but did you ever tried haXe ? IMO it is the best cross
platform language around - you target JavaScript, Flash, PHP, NEKO, C++
and soon Java and C# with one language.
On 2011-12-05 12:01, Mirko Pilger wrote:
I see. BTW, do you have an examples?
entertainment software like media players.
and interestingly enough tools for artists often come with non-native
guis. e.g. 3d modeler applications (like autodesk maya, blender,
luxology modo), pixologic zbrush,
Timon Gehr Wrote:
On 12/05/2011 02:16 AM, Graham St Jack wrote:
What is the status of the immutable(Object) ref proposal? Is it on the
list of things to do, or is it ruled out? If it is ruled out, then what
is the superior proposal?
It is not fully implemented and apparently Walter
Found through Reddit, two blog posts about how integers should behave in system
languages (with hardware support):
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/641
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/642
Bye,
bearophile
On 05.12.2011 06:27, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/3/2011 6:53 PM, Don wrote:
It's the things like:
is (foo bar == super)
which I think you can't understand without looking up the spec every
time. We
still don't have a nice way of expressing such things.
I agree, but that's a low priority for
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:43:08 -0500, Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 03.12.2011, 10:01 Uhr, schrieb Benjamin Thaut
c...@benjamin-thaut.de:
Thanks, That doesn't sound to bad. If I manage to get a non leaking non
gc version of d-runtime working would there be any interest in that?
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:46:27 -0500, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm at my traditional passtime of trying to speed up D's garbage
collector again, and I've stumbled on the fact that rt_finalize is
taking up a ridiculous share of the time (~30% of total runtime) on a
benchmark where
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
for e in arr
# do something with the element e
Heh, I used to think that would work in regular Javascript,
since it does have a for(blah in something) form...
But in regular javascript, that only works on objects!
Marco Leise Wrote:
This is really one of the largest shortcomings of the language that can
not be explained with a simple design choice.
Aye. One of the newer versions adds a forEach member to the
array prototype, that works like this:
[1, 2, 3].forEach(function(element) { use element here;
Ok, this is probably a silly question but why are the array appending
operations dependent on the GC. Why cant you allocate from a fixed pool?
or can you it just requires writing your own malloc/free implementation?
On 12/5/2011 5:46 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011
On 05.12.2011 14:31, bearophile wrote:
Found through Reddit, two blog posts about how integers should behave in system
languages (with hardware support):
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/641
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/642
Bye,
bearophile
Not very convincing, since he proposes a change
On 12/5/11 2:46 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
But what's difficult is finding leaks which don't have any anchor to
search for. For example, how do you search for code that allocates an
array and *doesn't* deallocate it?
By using a decent memory debugger/profiler like Valgrind?
David
On 12/05/2011 02:24 PM, Jason House wrote:
Timon Gehr Wrote:
On 12/05/2011 02:16 AM, Graham St Jack wrote:
What is the status of the immutable(Object) ref proposal? Is it on the
list of things to do, or is it ruled out? If it is ruled out, then what
is the superior proposal?
It is not
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:43:08 -0500, Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de
wrote:
Am 03.12.2011, 10:01 Uhr, schrieb Benjamin Thaut
c...@benjamin-thaut.de:
Thanks, That doesn't sound to bad. If I manage to get a non leaking
non gc version of d-runtime working would there
Somedude lovelyd...@mailmetrash.com wrote in message
news:jbhquu$1mj2$1...@digitalmars.com...
Le 04/12/2011 21:24, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
But the problem remains, CoffeeScript compiles to JavaScript so you are
still limited by JS.
What about Lua ?
I find it pretty powerful for such a
I can agree that in some circumstances, a ranged and saturated integer mode
would be REALLY handy (colours, sound samples), but I can't buy in with the
whole trapping overflows and stuff... most architectures will require
explicit checking of the overflow bit after every operation to support
this.
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:34:18 -0500, Hans Uhlig hans.uh...@teamaol.com
wrote:
Ok, this is probably a silly question but why are the array appending
operations dependent on the GC. Why cant you allocate from a fixed pool?
or can you it just requires writing your own malloc/free
On 12/5/11 10:37 AM, Don wrote:
On 05.12.2011 14:31, bearophile wrote:
Found through Reddit, two blog posts about how integers should behave
in system languages (with hardware support):
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/641
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/642
Bye,
bearophile
Not very
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Agreed. One thought that comes to mind is using the small int
optimization for BigInt, i.e. use no dynamic allocation and built-in
operations whenever possible if the value is small enough. Does BigInt
currently do that?
Both the small int optimization (32 or 64 bit?
On 12/05/2011 06:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/5/11 10:37 AM, Don wrote:
On 05.12.2011 14:31, bearophile wrote:
Found through Reddit, two blog posts about how integers should behave
in system languages (with hardware support):
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/641
Manu:
Also, contrary to his claim, I find that wrapping is usually what I
DO want in this case..
It's super rare that I write any code that pushes the limits of an int
(unless we're talking 8-16 bit, see my range+saturation comment before),
and when I do write code that pushes the range of
On 2011-12-05 16:47, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
for e in arr
# do something with the element e
Heh, I used to think that would work in regular Javascript,
since it does have a for(blah in something) form...
But in regular javascript, that only works on objects!
Yeah,
On 2011-12-05 16:53, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Marco Leise Wrote:
This is really one of the largest shortcomings of the language that can
not be explained with a simple design choice.
Aye. One of the newer versions adds a forEach member to the
array prototype, that works like this:
[1, 2,
On 2011-12-05 17:56, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I'd say don't replace the GC with a simple malloc/free stub, remove it
completely. Add a switch to dmd (-nogc) which disables all features
which need the gc (especially 'new', array appending, ...). This will
break a lot of code, but you won't have
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:14:00 +0100, Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de
wrote:
Last time I looked at it, the try/catch/finally block was rather
expensive because it always invokes the exception handler unwinding
mechanism, even if no exception occurs.
Try moving the try/catch block out of
On 2011-12-05 18:05, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Somedudelovelyd...@mailmetrash.com wrote in message
news:jbhquu$1mj2$1...@digitalmars.com...
Le 04/12/2011 21:24, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
But the problem remains, CoffeeScript compiles to JavaScript so you are
still limited by JS.
What about Lua
Adrian adrian.remove-nos...@veith-system.de wrote in message
news:jbhr5j$1n9t$1...@digitalmars.com...
Yes it is - but did you ever tried haXe ? IMO it is the best cross
platform language around - you target JavaScript, Flash, PHP, NEKO, C++
and soon Java and C# with one language. Typesafe
Manu:
Also, contrary to his claim, I find that wrapping is usually what I
DO want in this case..
It's super rare that I write any code that pushes the limits of an int
(unless we're talking 8-16 bit, see my range+saturation comment before),
and when I do write code that pushes the
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote in message
news:jbj0lo$mec$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 2011-12-05 18:05, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Somedudelovelyd...@mailmetrash.com wrote in message
news:jbhquu$1mj2$1...@digitalmars.com...
Le 04/12/2011 21:24, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
But the problem
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 19:05:02 +0100, Andrej Mitrovic
andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on interest on having this. Back when I was attempting to port VST
to D I got asked by a Steinberg dev how I can guarantee that D plugins
will work. But I couldn't guarantee it, if a GC collection were to
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
Do you have any opinion about Dart from Google?
Google's MO is generally to take something bad... and make
it /worse/.
It compiles to Javascript, but script that doesn't actually work everywhere...
On 5 December 2011 15:33, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
On 05.12.2011 06:27, Walter Bright wrote:
On 12/3/2011 6:53 PM, Don wrote:
It's the things like:
is (foo bar == super)
which I think you can't understand without looking up the spec every
time. We
still don't have a nice way of
In that project, Haxe's ability to compile the same code, in the same
language, down to both server-side (PHP) and client-side (Flash8) has been
an *enormous* benefit.
That's what Google Web Toolkit makes possible for Java. It's like SWT for
WEB plus easy connections to server.
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
The only problem now is that that would rule out the possibility of
sharing code between both server and client - Which is *NOT* something I
want to give up...
What kind of code is it? The main reason for the javascript
api thing in my web.d is to help minimize the
Adam Ruppe Wrote:
Of course, it keeps the JS down to size... but doesn't actually let you
run code on the client written in D.
Unless your client is a real application, of course :P
I did a Qt app using the modules from a work web app earlier
in the year. I interfaced with Qt via a message
Manu:
but I don't believe I'm alone.. the rest
of the gamedev community will find D soon enough if the language gets it
right...
I think games are one of the most important short-term purposes of D, despite I
think D was not explicitly designed to write games.
If you're suggesting the
On 12/5/2011 5:31 AM, bearophile wrote:
Found through Reddit, two blog posts about how integers should behave in
system languages (with hardware support):
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/641 http://blog.regehr.org/archives/642
Bye, bearophile
Lotsa good comments on HN:
Am 05.12.2011 19:04, schrieb Manu:
Manu:
Also, contrary to his claim, I find that wrapping is usually what I
DO want in this case..
It's super rare that I write any code that pushes the limits of
an int
(unless we're talking 8-16 bit, see my range+saturation
Adam Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:jbj23n$p68$1...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
The only problem now is that that would rule out the possibility of
sharing code between both server and client - Which is *NOT* something I
want to give up...
What kind of
On 05-12-2011 20:34, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 05.12.2011 19:04, schrieb Manu:
Manu:
Also, contrary to his claim, I find that wrapping is usually what I
DO want in this case..
It's super rare that I write any code that pushes the limits of
an int
(unless we're talking 8-16 bit, see my
On 04.12.2011 21:04, Walter Bright wrote:
You're right, except for one point. If we ever do a moving GC, then the
GC has to either know about all the pointers (so it can modify them) or
the pointers must be 'pinned' (the pointed to object cannot be moved).
The way to 'pin' an object in D is to
On 12/5/2011 11:52 AM, Norbert Nemec wrote:
On 04.12.2011 21:04, Walter Bright wrote:
You're right, except for one point. If we ever do a moving GC, then the
GC has to either know about all the pointers (so it can modify them) or
the pointers must be 'pinned' (the pointed to object cannot be
On 12/2/2011 7:46 AM, Xinok wrote:
Reading through the 'Java Scala' thread, I've realized there are some
benefits to dynamic code generation vs statically compiled code. Things
like unrolling loops, devirtualizing functions, etc.
So it made me wonder, could D benefit from such technology, not
Right - thanks for the hint!
That would leave the following rules for real-time audio code in D:
[snip]
What's about message passing? Is message passing hard real time ready?
== Quote from Martin Nowak (d...@dawgfoto.de)'s article
I appreciate the recursion during mark, wanted to do this myself
sometime ago but expected a little more gain.
The reason the gain wasn't huge is because on the benchmark I have that
involves a
deep heap graph, sweeping time dominates
On 05.12.2011 21:40, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
Right - thanks for the hint!
That would leave the following rules for real-time audio code in D:
[snip]
What's about message passing? Is message passing hard real time ready?
The issue actually came up for me a few weeks ago.
In principle, all
Den 05-12-2011 10:26, Vladimir Panteleev skrev:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:52:13 +0200, Jonas Drewsen jdrew...@nospam.com
wrote:
The same applies here because all it comes down to in the end is the
sizes of buffers.
The async ranges simply allows you to fill a specified number buffers
in another
On 05.12.2011 18:36, bearophile wrote:
Manu:
Also, contrary to his claim, I find that wrapping is usually what I
DO want in this case..
It's super rare that I write any code that pushes the limits of an int
(unless we're talking 8-16 bit, see my range+saturation comment before),
and when I do
On 05/12/2011 01:46, dsimcha wrote:
I'm at my traditional passtime of trying to speed up D's garbage
collector again
Have you thought about pushing for the inclusion of CDGC at all/working
on the tweaks needed to make it the main GC?
--
Robert
http://octarineparrot.com/
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 23:36:27 +0200, Jonas Drewsen jdrew...@nospam.com
wrote:
It is - but as stated it all depends on buffer sizes and IO speed. It is
for the same reason that java recommends using BufferedReader around
sockets instead of reading directly from the socket stream.
Another
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:07:09 +0100, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
== Quote from Martin Nowak (d...@dawgfoto.de)'s article
I appreciate the recursion during mark, wanted to do this myself
sometime ago but expected a little more gain.
The reason the gain wasn't huge is because on the
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 23:07:09 +0200, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
I understand the problem, but please elaborate on the proposed
solution. You've
basically got a bunch of pools, each of which represents a range of
memory
addresses, not a single address (so a basic hashtable is out). You
On 5 December 2011 22:34, Martin Nowak d...@dawgfoto.de wrote:
We currently add something from etext to _end (rt.memory) as static root.
This probably contains read-only sections, data from other languages
and (unlikely) other unrelated sections.
I think some help from the compiler will be
On 12/4/11, Adam Wilson flybo...@gmail.com wrote:
Would you be willing to send me your code? I don't know how much of it i'd
end up using, but it would be really helpful in understanding how you got
as far as you did and where the trouble points were ... maybe it'll give
me a head-start on the
More promising is to put pool addresses ranges in a trie.
addr[7] [... . ...]
/ |\
addr[6] [... . ...][... . ...]
/ |\ / | \
addr[5] pool:8 [... . ...]
== Quote from Martin Nowak (d...@dawgfoto.de)'s article
More promising is to put pool addresses ranges in a trie.
addr[7] [... . ...]
/ |\
addr[6] [... . ...][... . ...]
/ |\ / | \
Le 05/12/2011 14:46, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011 12:43:08 -0500, Marco Leise marco.le...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 03.12.2011, 10:01 Uhr, schrieb Benjamin Thaut
c...@benjamin-thaut.de:
Thanks, That doesn't sound to bad. If I manage to get a non leaking
non gc version of
On 05/12/11 18:48, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-12-05 08:25, Graham St Jack wrote:
I always use arrays or structs. Until the tail-const thing (or something
like it) happens, classes don't seem to be viable in messages between
threads.
You can always serialize the object, if a copy is
On 05/12/2011 01:46, dsimcha wrote:
I'm at my traditional passtime of trying to speed up D's garbage
collector again
Have you thought about pushing for the inclusion of CDGC at all/working
on the tweaks needed to make it the main GC?
So true, it's been rotting in that branch.
bump
On 12/5/2011 6:39 PM, Trass3r wrote:
On 05/12/2011 01:46, dsimcha wrote:
I'm at my traditional passtime of trying to speed up D's garbage
collector again
Have you thought about pushing for the inclusion of CDGC at
all/working on the tweaks needed to make it the main GC?
So true, it's been
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:16:01 +0100, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
== Quote from Martin Nowak (d...@dawgfoto.de)'s article
More promising is to put pool addresses ranges in a trie.
addr[7] [... . ...]
/ |\
addr[6] [... . ...]
IIRC CDGC includes two major enhancements:
1. The snapshot GC for Linux. (Does this work on OSX/FreeBSD/anything
Posix, or just Linux? I'm a bit skeptical about whether a snapshot GC
is really that great an idea given its propensity to waste memory on
long collect cycles with a lot of
Don:
The overflow12.pdf paper on that site shows statistics that overflow
is very often intentional.
In C/C++ code, but we are developing D, a new language that hopes to fix some
of the mistakes of languages invented lot of time ago.
It's strong evidence that you *cannot* make signed
Don:
The overflow12.pdf paper on that site shows statistics that overflow
is very often intentional.
This is expected, the C/C++ programmers are using the semantics of their
language. But it's just because they are using a language with a bad integer
semantics.
A better designed language
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
