On 2012-02-10 13:58, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/10/2012 08:17 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-02-10 02:47, bearophile wrote:
Some more comments about the conference.
--
About Variadic Templates are Funadic by Andrei Alexandrescu fun talk:
I have had to see it at only
On 02/10/12 14:04, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/10/2012 02:47 AM, bearophile wrote:
An alternative is to give an else to the template constraints, but the error
message is at the bottom of the function, making it not easy to find, so I
don't like this syntax:
int spam(T)(T x) if (IsFoo!T ||
Well, a friend of mine helped me with some translate errors. So,
I uploaded a new version of the first guide. (Same link)
I am already writing the second part, which I think will be more
interesting. I'll talk about makefile, modules and... hmm let
the rest as surprise, all I can say it will
On 2/10/12 4:35 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
BTW, is there any summary of how the 2011 D projects went, were all of
them finished successfully in GSoC terms? And incorporated into D? I
haven't been paying full attention to the newsgroups, so I only saw that
blog page about the Thrift one..
The
On 02/11/2012 01:47 AM, bearophile wrote:
Timon Gehr:
I'm not sure what you are saying here.
I meant using something like this, instead of a template:
bool IsNumberWithError(T, string file=__FILE__, int line=__LINE__)() {
enum bool result = is( ...
if (!result)
On 2012-02-09 21:12, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 09.02.2012 17:20, schrieb Walter Bright:
On 2/9/2012 1:37 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
I have a project that we actually plan to use in production in the
company for
which I work. They still require 10.5 support for their products so
removing
that support
On 9 February 2012 09:37, Sönke Ludwig lud...@informatik.uni-luebeck.de wrote:
Am 09.02.2012 04:52, schrieb Walter Bright:
Lately, dmd seems to have broken support for OS X 10.5. Supporting that
system is problematic for us, since we don't have 10.5 systems available
for dev/test.
On 2012-02-10 06:48, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:57:21 -0600, Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com
wrote:
Thanks for your feedback! Comments below:
Am Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:40:14 -0600
schrieb Robert Jacques sandf...@jhu.edu:
[snip]
All the generators have the function name
On Friday, February 10, 2012 09:56:36 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-02-10 06:48, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:57:21 -0600, Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com
wrote:
Thanks for your feedback! Comments below:
Am Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:40:14 -0600
schrieb Robert Jacques
Le 10/02/2012 05:37, Walter Bright a écrit :
On 2/9/2012 12:09 PM, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Nice article! I particularly liked this comment:
The classic hacker disdain for “bondage and discipline languages” is
short
sighted – the needs of large, long-lived, multi-programmer projects
are just
I wonder how much it helps to just optimize the GC a little. How much
does the performance gap close when you use DMD 2.058 beta instead of
2.057? This upcoming release has several new garbage collector
optimizations. If the GC is the bottleneck, then it's not surprising
Is there a way
On 2012-02-10 14:54, Oliver Plow wrote:
I wonder how much it helps to just optimize the GC a little. How much
does the performance gap close when you use DMD 2.058 beta instead of
2.057? This upcoming release has several new garbage collector
optimizations. If the GC is the bottleneck, then
Le 09/02/2012 20:57, Martin Nowak a écrit :
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:44:46 +0100, Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org
wrote:
So a queue per message type? How would ordering be preserved? Also,
how would this work for interprocess messaging? An array-based queue
is an option however (though it
On 02/10/12 14:54, Oliver Plow wrote:
I wonder how much it helps to just optimize the GC a little. How much
does the performance gap close when you use DMD 2.058 beta instead of
2.057? This upcoming release has several new garbage collector
optimizations. If the GC is the bottleneck, then
GC.disable and GC.reserve are applicable. I tested with these and they did help
but not a ton.
On Feb 10, 2012, at 5:54 AM, Oliver Plow saxo...@gmx.de wrote:
I wonder how much it helps to just optimize the GC a little. How much
does the performance gap close when you use DMD 2.058 beta
lambda instead of macro?
On 02/05/2012 07:57 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/05/2012 03:53 PM, so wrote:
On Sunday, 5 February 2012 at 14:24:20 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
This should work:
#define DOTDOTDOT ...
templateclass T void fun(T a){
if(condT::value) {
auto var = make(a);
DOTDOTDOT;
}else{
On 2/10/2012 3:10 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Typeless is great when sketching some piece of code, but you'll way more problem
at the end.
I've heard people say that typeless is just as good, because you load them up
with unit tests that verify the types. To me, this doesn't seem like any
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:19:11AM -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/10/2012 3:10 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Typeless is great when sketching some piece of code, but you'll way more
problem
at the end.
I've heard people say that typeless is just as good, because you
load them up with unit tests
I'm copying a slice of an array into the a slice of another array. dmd
herefor emmits a call to _d_arraycopy which is defined inside arraycat.d
So I'm wondering why is the postblit constructor or assignment operator
not called for every element that gets copied?
Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut
We have C and C++
How about D- and D?
D- would be the have a similar use as today's C compilers.
===
Why create this language?
===
Well I would love to have a D compiler that supports
microcontrollers.
The ones that have say 32 K of RAM and
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.comwrote:
On 2/10/2012 3:10 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Typeless is great when sketching some piece of code, but you'll way more
problem
at the end.
I've heard people say that typeless is just as good, because you load them
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:07:41 +0100, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 09/02/2012 20:57, Martin Nowak a écrit :
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:44:46 +0100, Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org
wrote:
So a queue per message type? How would ordering be preserved? Also,
how would this work for
On 09/02/2012 22:34, bearophile wrote:
Comparing languages with small code snippets doesn't tell you all you want to
know about how a language scales for very large programs, of course, so they
aren't enough. But such small snippets are very useful any way because large
programs are mostly
On 02/10/2012 01:02 PM, Tim Krimm wrote:
We have C and C++
How about D- and D?
D- would be the have a similar use as today's C compilers.
===
Why create this language?
===
Well I would love to have a D compiler that supports microcontrollers.
On Monday, 23 January 2012 at 17:09:30 UTC, so wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:09:58 +0200, Robert Caravani
jfanati...@gmx.at wrote:
Thanks for the links, it was a good read.
I think it is the best answer to the problem.
What's the destructor limitation?
struct S {
static S* make(); //
On 02/10/2012 06:49 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
On 02/05/2012 07:57 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/05/2012 03:53 PM, so wrote:
On Sunday, 5 February 2012 at 14:24:20 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
This should work:
#define DOTDOTDOT ...
templateclass T void fun(T a){
if(condT::value) {
auto var = make(a);
On 02/10/2012 07:59 PM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm copying a slice of an array into the a slice of another array. dmd
herefor emmits a call to _d_arraycopy which is defined inside arraycat.d
So I'm wondering why is the postblit constructor or assignment operator
not called for every element that
On 2/10/12 11:02 AM, Tim Krimm wrote:
We have C and C++
How about D- and D?
No please.
Andrei
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:02:52PM +0100, Tim Krimm wrote:
We have C and C++
How about D- and D?
[...]
Great, just what I need: a D- in programming!
:-P
T
--
PNP = Plug 'N' Pray
On Friday, 10 February 2012 at 20:21:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/10/12 11:02 AM, Tim Krimm wrote:
We have C and C++
How about D- and D?
No please.
Andrei
Please elaborate.
On 2/10/12 12:54 PM, Tim Krimm wrote:
On Friday, 10 February 2012 at 20:21:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/10/12 11:02 AM, Tim Krimm wrote:
We have C and C++
How about D- and D?
No please.
Andrei
Please elaborate.
The last thing we need is balkanization of the community. You
On Friday, 10 February 2012 at 21:04:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/10/12 12:54 PM, Tim Krimm wrote:
On Friday, 10 February 2012 at 20:21:53 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/10/12 11:02 AM, Tim Krimm wrote:
We have C and C++
How about D- and D?
No please.
Andrei
Please
On Friday, 10 February 2012 at 21:04:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/10/12 12:54 PM, Tim Krimm wrote:
On Friday, 10 February 2012 at 20:21:53 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/10/12 11:02 AM, Tim Krimm wrote:
We have C and C++
How about D- and D?
No please.
Andrei
Please
On Friday, February 10, 2012 12:08:19 Brad Anderson wrote:
I actually read an article recently from someone who had written large
applications in dynamic languages and had come to the conclusion that the
productivity gains you have with the dynamic typing are pretty much lost to
the additional
On 2012-02-10 20:08, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com mailto:newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 2/10/2012 3:10 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Typeless is great when sketching some piece of code, but you'll
way more
On Friday, February 10, 2012 13:54:49 H. S. Teoh wrote:
Perhaps one solution is to simply have the compiler recognize all valid
D constructs, but to give an error when it sees a construct not
supported by the target platform. For example:
input.d(123): Error: dynamic arrays not supported by
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:56:36 -0600, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-02-10 06:48, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:57:21 -0600, Johannes Pfau nos...@example.com
wrote:
Thanks for your feedback! Comments below:
Am Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:40:14 -0600
schrieb Robert Jacques
On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:17 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
I didn't yet got around to polish my lock-free SList/DList implementations,
but mutexes should only become a problem with high contention when you need
to block.
You'd also would need some kind
On Friday, 10 February 2012 at 19:02:54 UTC, Tim Krimm wrote:
We have C and C++
How about D- and D?
There has been discussion of having a compiler switch that flags
use of the GC. I'm pretty sure Walter agreed it would be good to
have. So someone needs to create a pull request so he can
On Friday, February 10, 2012 16:36:48 Robert Jacques wrote:
These functions are _constructors_; ideally, they should be expressed as
such. In a managed language, we'd probably for with UUID(random,...).
And if explicit template ctors were valid syntax, we'd used
UUID!random(...) or
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2012 16:36:48 Robert Jacques wrote:
These functions are _constructors_; ideally, they should be expressed as
such. In a managed language, we'd probably for with UUID(random,...).
And if explicit template ctors were valid syntax, we'd used
On 02/11/2012 12:26 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2012 16:36:48 Robert Jacques wrote:
These functions are _constructors_; ideally, they should be expressed as
such. In a managed language, we'd probably for with UUID(random,...).
And if explicit
On Saturday, February 11, 2012 00:40:39 Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/11/2012 12:26 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, February 10, 2012 16:36:48 Robert Jacques wrote:
These functions are _constructors_; ideally, they should be
expressed as such. In a managed
As an exercise in D programming, I'm writing a D lexer from scratch,
based on the online specs posted on DPLO. I'm running into what looks
like a discrepancy between the specs and compiler behaviour (I'm using
gdc-4.6.2):
Spec says:
DecimalFloat:
LeadingDecimal .
Am 10.02.2012, 20:02 Uhr, schrieb Tim Krimm twkr...@yahoo.com:
What are your thoughts?
There is no way you get a D application into 64K. The language is not
powerful enough. Only C can achieve that.
Jonathan M Davis:
I just can't stand the idea that whether an if statement is true or not could
change the type of a variable (e.g. it's set to a string in one branch and an
int in the other).
You have found something that sometimes I like to do in Python, that I can't do
in D, a reduced
On 02/11/2012 01:51 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
As an exercise in D programming, I'm writing a D lexer from scratch,
based on the online specs posted on DPLO. I'm running into what looks
like a discrepancy between the specs and compiler behaviour (I'm using
gdc-4.6.2):
Spec says:
Sorry for the double-post; I have asked the same question on D.learn
earlier but I think this is more of a question to this forum.
Tested on Ubuntu 11.10 64-bit dmd.
The following program gets stuck during the writeln() call.
- Note that the foo() call alone works fine.
- Also note that the
What are your thoughts?
There is no way you get a D application into 64K. The language
is not powerful enough. Only C can achieve that.
I'll need to agree. Porting D to a smaller memory space and with
cramped features in all of this is not going to be good no matter
how you look at it. I'm
If you make a subset of D, it would most likely be named
Mini-D. But at that point you've got an enhanced C without
going C++.
Yes and that probably would be better than what I have now.
Going back and forth programming in C/C++ today,
and then switching back to D tomorrow.
Let me see if I
On Saturday, 11 February 2012 at 00:58:53 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 10.02.2012, 20:02 Uhr, schrieb Tim Krimm twkr...@yahoo.com:
What are your thoughts?
There is no way you get a D application into 64K. The language
is not powerful enough. Only C can achieve that.
It seems to me that if
On Saturday, 11 February 2012 at 01:31:29 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Sorry for the double-post; I have asked the same question on
D.learn earlier but I think this is more of a question to this
forum.
Tested on Ubuntu 11.10 64-bit dmd.
The following program gets stuck during the writeln() call.
On Saturday, 11 February 2012 at 01:46:26 UTC, Era Scarecrow
wrote:
What are your thoughts?
There is no way you get a D application into 64K. The language
is not powerful enough. Only C can achieve that.
I'll need to agree. Porting D to a smaller memory space and
with cramped features in
This is all just speculation, but I think you get the picture.
If you make a subset of D, it would most likely be named
Mini-D. But at that point you've got an enhanced C without
going C++.
Also computer chips are becoming more powerful every day.
I think we will soon be needing better tools.
On 02/10/2012 11:02 AM, Tim Krimm wrote:
We have C and C++
How about D- and D?
D- would be the have a similar use as today's C compilers.
===
Why create this language?
===
Well I would love to have a D compiler that supports microcontrollers.
On Saturday, 11 February 2012 at 02:13:19 UTC, Tim Krimm wrote:
If you make a subset of D, it would most likely be named
Mini-D. But at that point you've got an enhanced C without
going C++.
Yes and that probably would be better than what I have now.
Going back and forth programming in C/C++
Well if I change the DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH case to this:
case DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH:
MessageBoxA(null, Injected!, DLL, MB_OK);
g_hInst = hInstance;
dll_process_attach(hInstance, true);
try
{
*cast(int*)0x12FE6C = 1337;
}
Am 09.02.2012, 22:03 Uhr, schrieb MattCodr matheus_...@hotmail.com:
On Thursday, 9 February 2012 at 19:49:43 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
Note that this code does the same, but is more efficient if you don't
actually need the array:
Yes I know, In fact I need re-think the way I code with this new
Am 04.02.2012, 18:37 Uhr, schrieb bioinfornatics
bioinfornat...@fedoraproject.org:
hi,
What should do a D lint?
- check if in code the are no mixin between space / tab for indent
- check indent (4 spaces as default)
complete the list
Do you want to collect ideas or advertise the use of 4
Works perfectly, thanks :)
But... how can I read the complete HTTP-header? When I try the following:
string header;
ubyte[1024] buffer;
while (cs.receive(buffer)) header ~= buffer;
... it works as long as the header doesn't have a length like 1024, 2048,
3072... Otherwise
On 02/10/12 15:18, Don Clugston wrote:
On 09/02/12 23:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, February 09, 2012 14:45:43 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
Normally, it's considered good practice to give modules names which are
all lowercase (particularly since some OSes aren't
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 04:08:36PM +0100, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 02/10/12 15:18, Don Clugston wrote:
On 09/02/12 23:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, February 09, 2012 14:45:43 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
Normally, it's considered good practice to give modules names
On 10/02/12 16:08, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 02/10/12 15:18, Don Clugston wrote:
On 09/02/12 23:03, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, February 09, 2012 14:45:43 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
Normally, it's considered good practice to give modules names which are
all lowercase
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 04:38:12PM +0100, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 02/10/12 16:18, Don Clugston wrote:
On 10/02/12 16:08, Artur Skawina wrote:
[...]
No, having non-lower case filenames would just lead to problems.
Like different modules being imported depending on the filesystem
being
I'm not sure whether the following a compiler/language bug or a Phobos
bug, but it's definitely some kind of bug:
auto s = abc;
immutable t = def;
writeln(typeid(s)); // immutable(char)[]
writeln(typeid(t)); // immutable(immutable(char)[])
Am 10.02.2012, 19:07 Uhr, schrieb H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx:
I'm not sure whether the following a compiler/language bug or a Phobos
bug, but it's definitely some kind of bug:
auto s = abc;
immutable t = def;
writeln(typeid(s)); // immutable(char)[]
On 02/10/12 19:07, H. S. Teoh wrote:
I'm not sure whether the following a compiler/language bug or a Phobos
bug, but it's definitely some kind of bug:
auto s = abc;
immutable t = def;
writeln(typeid(s)); // immutable(char)[]
writeln(typeid(t)); //
I'm trying to write a parametrized class with a type parameter whose
existence depends on whether std.utf.decode() exists for that type.
What's the syntax to do this?
class C(T)
if ( /* ??? exists(decode(T)...?) */ )
{ ... }
Thanks!
T
--
It is not the employer
Ubuntu 11.10 64-bit dmd.
The following program gets stuck during the writeln() call.
- The foo() call alone works fine.
- The program works fine when there is no writeln() call nor foo() call.
All elements get processed in that case and the results are ignored.
Am I using taskPool.map
On 2/10/12 7:35 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
class(T) if (__traits(compiles, { std.utf.decode(T.init); } )) { … }
(untested, you might have to return the value from the delegate to avoid
an expression-without-effect error)
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 07:36:38PM +0100, David Nadlinger wrote:
On 2/10/12 7:35 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
class(T) if (__traits(compiles, { std.utf.decode(T.init); } )) { … }
(untested, you might have to return the value from the delegate to
avoid an expression-without-effect error)
Works
nrgyzer,
please check the return value of 'receive'.
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_socket.html#receive
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012, at 02:06 PM, nrgyzer wrote:
Works perfectly, thanks :)
But... how can I read the complete HTTP-header? When I try the following:
string header;
when I run
dmd -gc -oftopo topo.d multi_index.d replace.d
on the contents of
http://personal.utulsa.edu/~ellery-newcomer/bad.zip
in fedora 16 x86_64 with dmd 2.057 64 bit
dmd starts thrashing like there is no tomorrow and generally locks up my
entire system. Can anyone confirm this
Yep, thanks... but I already checked out the return value and the problem is
If the socket is blocking, receive waits until there is data to be received..
The following
socket blocks and the server doesn't respond:
while(true) {
Socket cs = s.accept();
ubyte[] header;
On 02/10/2012 07:50 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 07:36:38PM +0100, David Nadlinger wrote:
On 2/10/12 7:35 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
class(T) if (__traits(compiles, { std.utf.decode(T.init); } )) { … }
(untested, you might have to return the value from the delegate to
avoid
On 02/10/2012 08:38 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
when I run
dmd -gc -oftopo topo.d multi_index.d replace.d
on the contents of
http://personal.utulsa.edu/~ellery-newcomer/bad.zip
in fedora 16 x86_64 with dmd 2.057 64 bit
dmd starts thrashing like there is no tomorrow and generally locks up my
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:53:58PM +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/10/2012 07:50 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
On that note, I discovered that if you want signature constraints on
a derived class, the syntax is unbearably ugly:
class Derived(T)
if (/* conditions */)
On Friday, February 10, 2012 13:32:56 Marco Leise wrote:
I know that feeling. I had no exposure to functional programming and
options like chain never come to my head. Although map is a concept that
I made friends with early.
It would benefit your programming in general to learn a functional
On 02/11/2012 12:16 AM, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
On 02/10/2012 01:59 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
I seem to have more RAM than you. The behavior is apparently caused by a
Phobos bug:
That is likely.
The code is a dustmite reduction, so I don't really care what the error
is, just that it shouldn't be
dmd 2.057
Two mixin templates, each define toString, mix them in to your class and ..
Error: function test.X.T2!().toString multiple overrides of same function
So this behavior is new, but is it sensical?
Sample code:
mixin template T1(){
string toString(){
return 1;
}
}
mixin
Everything works perfectly if I write the DLL in C++ (and I've
never had any errors with C++ DLL's before that are similar to
this one).
If I remove the cast line and MessageBox()'s in the D version,
then I still get the error.
On Friday, February 10, 2012 22:41:20 Ellery Newcomer wrote:
dmd 2.057
Two mixin templates, each define toString, mix them in to your class and ..
Error: function test.X.T2!().toString multiple overrides of same function
So this behavior is new, but is it sensical?
Sample code:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7476
Kevin ke...@brogan.ca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@brogan.ca
--- Comment #1
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7476
--- Comment #2 from Kevin ke...@brogan.ca 2012-02-10 00:38:30 PST ---
Wait, I'm confused. You said it works on 2.057 (which I can confirm). What
version is it not working on? 2.057 is the latest.
--
Configure issuemail:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7476
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6406
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7475
--- Comment #1 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-02-10 01:32:18 PST ---
Commit pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6406
Don clugd...@yahoo.com.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME
--
Configure
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7475
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7476
--- Comment #4 from Kevin ke...@brogan.ca 2012-02-10 02:00:32 PST ---
Just downloaded the git source and compiled with dmc
Works for me on latest version. 2.048 Beta
c:\Users\Kevin\Documents\D Projects\ConsoleApp1\ConsoleApp1\bindmd ../main.d
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7476
--- Comment #5 from Kevin ke...@brogan.ca 2012-02-10 02:04:28 PST ---
I've got to stop typing at 2 in the morning...
I mean 2.058 Debug, as shown in the console dump.
(In reply to comment #4)
Just downloaded the git source and compiled with
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7479
Summary: Regression(2.046) ICE(glue.c) with invalid template
parameter during gagging
Product: D
Version: D1 D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |All
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7479
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7462
--- Comment #1 from yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com 2012-02-10 22:29:22 EST ---
*** Issue 7479 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|regression |normal
--- Comment #19
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4269
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7462
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
CC|
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6327
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yebbl...@gmail.com
---
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7476
timon.g...@gmx.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timon.g...@gmx.ch
--- Comment #6
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
