and how to add attribute parameters like DoSerialize(type=packed) for
example - very very common in C# attributes and java annotations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_annotation
Am 19.03.2012 22:00, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 3/19/12 3:44 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/19/12, Jacob C
"H. S. Teoh" wrote in message
news:mailman.910.1332214803.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> Is this a bug?
>
> char[] a = "abc".dup;
> const(char)[] b = "abc";
> string c = "abc";
>
> writeln(typeid(a).getHash(&a)); // 12914
> writeln(typeid(b).getHash(&b)); // 8503969683799911018
> writeln(t
On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 21:00:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/19/12 3:55 PM, F i L wrote:
I think this could get tricky for the compiler to confidently
use given
that the mixed in enums can collide with existing members
(although not
likely). Also, if objects are not identified as b
Is this a bug?
char[] a = "abc".dup;
const(char)[] b = "abc";
string c = "abc";
writeln(typeid(a).getHash(&a)); // 12914
writeln(typeid(b).getHash(&b)); // 8503969683799911018
writeln(typeid(c).getHash(&c)); // 12914
T
--
Obviously, some things
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 08:43:44PM +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 3/19/12, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > dmd -unittest source.d
> >
> > in GDC, you'd have to write:
> >
> > gdc -funittest source.d
> >
>
> That's what GDMD is for. It's a Perl script (in GDC's /bin folder)
> that acts like a DM
All,
I just wanted to post a note here that I have added support for D(2) to
premake (http://industriousone.com/premake).
The fork is available on Bitbucket
(https://bitbucket.org/goughy/premake-dev-d/overview) and I would
really appreciate feedback if it's of interest to the community.
I have
On 20 March 2012 13:17, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> Sites should be blazingly fast with today's computing power, but a
>> ridiculous focus on "Developer productivity" has meant that no change
>> has happened.
>
> Exactly! In spite of the fact that CPU speed has increased on the order
> of a millionfold s
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:55:29PM +1300, James Miller wrote:
> On 20 March 2012 01:33, Derek wrote:
> > Is the effort to do this really an issue with today's vast amounts
> > of RAM (virtual and real) available? How much memory are you
> > expecting to 'save'?
> >
> > And is RAM address alignment
On 20 March 2012 01:33, Derek wrote:
> Is the effort to do this really an issue with today's vast amounts of RAM
> (virtual and real) available? How much memory are you expecting to 'save'?
>
> And is RAM address alignment an issue here also? Currently most literals are
> aligned on a 4 or 8-byte
On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 17:23:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/18/12 11:12 PM, Jay Norwood wrote:
I'm timing operations processing 10 2MB text files in
parallel. I
haven't gotten to the part where I put the words in the map,
but I've
done enough through this point to say a few things
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:28:00 +0100, Simen Kjærås
wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:29:34 +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
The current limitations make it impossible to define (for example) a
floating point type with NaN that behaves like built-in
float/double/real.
As it turns out, this is possib
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:05:55AM +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 01:33 PM, Derek wrote:
> >On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:16:18 +1100, Kevin wrote:
> >
> >>This is in no way D specific but say you have two constant strings.
> >>
> >>const char[] a = "1234567890";
> >>// and
> >>const char[] b =
On 03/19/2012 01:33 PM, Derek wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:16:18 +1100, Kevin wrote:
This is in no way D specific but say you have two constant strings.
const char[] a = "1234567890";
// and
const char[] b = "67890";
You could lay out the memory inside of one another. IE: if a.ptr = 1
then
deadalnix wrote:
As all functionnality of a Ship are final, you basically ends
up with a mother ship that is a ship and then have some other
function that are de facto separated and unreachable from ship.
Yes, because Ship is designed to be the common denominator among
Ship types. This is not
On 3/19/12 5:11 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 19/03/2012 21:39, F i L a écrit :
deadalnix wrote:
That is totally broken design. The fact that mothership inherit from
ship is a pretty good example of misusing inheritance. The fireMissle
is useless unless you KNOW that you are manipulating a MotherShip
Le 19/03/2012 21:43, Walter Bright a écrit :
On 3/18/2012 9:25 AM, FeepingCreature wrote:
See subject.
When proposing a new feature, the question is not "why not?". The
question is what compelling capability does it bring.
In this case, this isn't really a feature, but more syntaxic sugar.
Le 19/03/2012 21:39, F i L a écrit :
deadalnix wrote:
That is totally broken design. The fact that mothership inherit from
ship is a pretty good example of misusing inheritance. The fireMissle
is useless unless you KNOW that you are manipulating a MotherShip, so
you totally break all the abstrac
On 3/19/12, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> Yeah, but that will complicate the retrieval of the information.
What is so complicated about extracting fields? Just iterate via .tupleof:
module test;
import std.stdio;
import std.conv;
struct Foo
{
int x;
string name;
mixin NonSerialized!name;
On 2012-03-19 22:00, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I salute creative uses of the language over defining new features.
Andrei
Sure, just as well as you can do object oriented programming in C, but
it is a mess. So is this.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 19.03.2012 22:14, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:46:04PM +0100, Don wrote:
On 19.03.2012 18:25, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
The main idea is to require a minimal number of lowerings from the
compiler (effectively nothing more than syntactic sugar such as V[K]
and AA literal syntax
On 2012-03-19 21:44, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
When I implemented NonSerialized for Vladimir's json library he made a
suggestion to simply create enums of each field that is not to be
serialized and encode it as "fieldname_nonSerialized". That would
enable using a NonSerialized mixin multiple times
Hi everyone,
It may sounds a bit annoying because I already was asking
everywhere in the IRC channels but still had no success -
Is there anyone who wants to be my GSoC mentor for the Mono-D
project?
In the case you don't know what Mono-D is all about:
It's about creating a D language bindi
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:jk81a6$2o7l$1...@digitalmars.com...
> On 3/19/12 1:59 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> I see this a lot, and it's why I wrote the chapter on templates for
>> Learn to Tango with D. I don't think I can sort out releasing the
>> chapter though. One approach is
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Also I've no idea what "objects being unique marked" means.
I meant that Attribute metadata is distinct data in the compilers
eyes, ie, no name magic, just attribute lookup.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 04:00:00PM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 3/19/12 3:44 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
[...]
> >So all you'd have to do is use compile-time introspection and a
> >little bit of string processing to figure out if a field should be
> >serialized or not.
>
> I salute creati
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:46:04PM +0100, Don wrote:
> On 19.03.2012 18:25, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]
> >The main idea is to require a minimal number of lowerings from the
> >compiler (effectively nothing more than syntactic sugar such as V[K]
> >and AA literal syntax), and everything else will be do
On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 21:00:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/19/12 3:55 PM, F i L wrote:
I think this could get tricky for the compiler to confidently
use given
that the mixed in enums can collide with existing members
(although not
likely). Also, if objects are not identified as b
On 3/19/12 3:55 PM, F i L wrote:
I think this could get tricky for the compiler to confidently use given
that the mixed in enums can collide with existing members (although not
likely). Also, if objects are not identified as being unique marked (in
the compilers eyes), what specific attribute pos
On 3/19/12 3:44 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/19/12, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
* Can be repeated on several fields (with the mixin you can only mixin
"NonSerialized" once)
When I implemented NonSerialized for Vladimir's json library he made a
suggestion to simply create enums of each field that
On 3/19/12, F i L wrote:
> Also, if objects are not identified as
> being unique marked (in the compilers eyes), what specific
> attribute post-fixes will it be searching for on enums members?
I'm really not talking about general-purpose attributes, I was
commenting on a specific serialization ex
On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 20:44:43 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/19/12, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
* Can be repeated on several fields (with the mixin you can
only mixin
"NonSerialized" once)
When I implemented NonSerialized for Vladimir's json library he
made a
suggestion to simply create
On 19.03.2012 18:25, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:49:07AM +0100, Don Clugston wrote:
[...]
Yes. The existing D2 AA implementation is hopelessly broken.
You have to understand that the whole implementation of AAs in D2 is
a HACK. It is extremely complicated and the slightest chang
On 3/18/2012 9:25 AM, FeepingCreature wrote:
See subject.
When proposing a new feature, the question is not "why not?". The question is
what compelling capability does it bring.
On 3/19/12, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> * Can be repeated on several fields (with the mixin you can only mixin
> "NonSerialized" once)
When I implemented NonSerialized for Vladimir's json library he made a
suggestion to simply create enums of each field that is not to be
serialized and encode it as "
deadalnix wrote:
That is totally broken design. The fact that mothership inherit
from ship is a pretty good example of misusing inheritance. The
fireMissle is useless unless you KNOW that you are manipulating
a MotherShip, so you totally break all the abstraction the OOP
could provide.
Other
On 2012-03-19 13:31, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 04:03:29 -0400, Walter Bright
I mean there is modifiable-at-runtime, instance-specific data.
I don't think we should go this far with attributes. If you want to
store instance-specific data, we already have a place for that.
On Mar 19, 2012, at 12:21 PM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
> Am 19.03.2012 19:08, schrieb Sean Kelly:
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
>>>
>>> I somehow hit a bug where dmd deadlocks within Mem::Free if I use -inline.
>>> With previous bugs I was able to reduce my code using
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 20:37, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>
> It would be nice if somebody could write up a general introduction to
> the idea of templates (not specific to D), the motivations behind it,
> perhaps some historical background, and then eventually lead up to
> advanced template tricks using D
Le 18/03/2012 22:36, James Miller a écrit :
On 19 March 2012 06:41, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Sunday, 18 March 2012 at 17:24:15 UTC, F i L wrote:
[…] I know LDC has a LTO flag.
Unfortunately it doesn't (-O4/-O5 are defunct), but working on seamless LTO
integration (and better optimization
On 3/19/12, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> dmd -unittest source.d
>
> in GDC, you'd have to write:
>
> gdc -funittest source.d
>
That's what GDMD is for. It's a Perl script (in GDC's /bin folder)
that acts like a DMD front-end to GDC, so you can pass regular
DMD-style flags to GDC via GDMD. I th
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:27:04PM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 3/19/12 1:59 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
> >I see this a lot, and it's why I wrote the chapter on templates for
> >Learn to Tango with D. I don't think I can sort out releasing the
> >chapter though. One approach is to think of t
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 05:47:11PM +, Russel Winder wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 07:55 -0700, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> [...]
> > Thank you!!! The current D support in SCons is very spotty; I'm
> > finding myself having to redefine DCOM and LINKCOM in order to make
> > things work. I actually want
On 3/19/12 1:59 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
I see this a lot, and it's why I wrote the chapter on templates for
Learn to Tango with D. I don't think I can sort out releasing the
chapter though. One approach is to think of templates as
compile-time polymorphism. In Java, you might create a linked-lis
Am 19.03.2012 19:08, schrieb Sean Kelly:
On Mar 19, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I somehow hit a bug where dmd deadlocks within Mem::Free if I use -inline. With
previous bugs I was able to reduce my code using DustMite but with this one it
is hard because dmd gives no output and
I somehow hit a bug where dmd deadlocks within Mem::Free if I use
-inline. With previous bugs I was able to reduce my code using DustMite
but with this one it is hard because dmd gives no output and just
freezes. Any ideas how I could reduce my code?
You could play with DustMite + timeout.
On 3/19/12, Matthias Walter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've written a small module (at the moment called utils.keywordargs)
> which simulates keyword arguments (aka named parameters).
Cool. A small tip (in case you didn't already know):
You can use allSatisfy from std.typetuple when checking a single
cons
On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 15:33:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
For D, hooking built-in operators is a poor way to implement
DSLs. Best is to use strings, CTFE, and mixin.
Andrei
Hmm I have to say I'm not (yet) convinced. But I'll try to drink
the kool-aid and see if it converts me. I'
On Mar 17, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Entity325 wrote:
> (Sorry if this is the wrong place for this, or if there's already a thread in
> existence which would be better. If either of these is the case, simply
> point me in the right direction, and I'll be on my way.)
>
> My first interaction with Temp
Matthias Walter:
> I've written a small module (at the moment called utils.keywordargs)
> which simulates keyword arguments (aka named parameters). The
> documentation can be found here,
Regardless the implementation quality of your code, I wait for the real thing
:-)
Bye,
bearophile
Le 19/03/2012 17:28, Gor Gyolchanyan a écrit :
Because of the syntax sugar.
This is exactly the type of behavior that a language should discourage.
Le 19/03/2012 18:41, F i L a écrit :
deadalnix wrote:
It looks like a bad usage of inheritance. If you want to use these
methods, why not use composition ?
It make no sense to use such an inherited class in a polymorphic
context, so why use inheritance at all ?
Am I missing something about wh
On Mar 19, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
>
> I somehow hit a bug where dmd deadlocks within Mem::Free if I use -inline.
> With previous bugs I was able to reduce my code using DustMite but with this
> one it is hard because dmd gives no output and just freezes. Any ideas how I
> cou
Hi,
I somehow hit a bug where dmd deadlocks within Mem::Free if I use
-inline. With previous bugs I was able to reduce my code using DustMite
but with this one it is hard because dmd gives no output and just
freezes. Any ideas how I could reduce my code?
Callstack:
kernel32.dll!_WaitForSingl
On 3/19/12, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> What if you don't have std.random's source, all you (the compiler) have is
> the function signature?
I know there are what ifs, but in this case it's a template.
deadalnix wrote:
It looks like a bad usage of inheritance. If you want to use
these methods, why not use composition ?
It make no sense to use such an inherited class in a
polymorphic context, so why use inheritance at all ?
Am I missing something about what you're saying? Having a final
cla
Hi,
I've written a small module (at the moment called utils.keywordargs)
which simulates keyword arguments (aka named parameters). The
documentation can be found here,
http://xammy.xammy.homelinux.net/~xammy/utils_keywordargs.html
while the code is at
http://xammy.xammy.homelinux.net/~xammy/key
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:29:34 +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
The current limitations make it impossible to define (for example) a
floating point type with NaN that behaves like built-in
float/double/real.
As it turns out, this is possible. opCmp can return a float, and
things work just fine (!<,
On 3/18/12 11:12 PM, Jay Norwood wrote:
I'm timing operations processing 10 2MB text files in parallel. I
haven't gotten to the part where I put the words in the map, but I've
done enough through this point to say a few things about the measurements.
Great work! This prompts quite a few bug rep
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:49:07AM +0100, Don Clugston wrote:
[...]
> Yes. The existing D2 AA implementation is hopelessly broken.
> You have to understand that the whole implementation of AAs in D2 is
> a HACK. It is extremely complicated and the slightest change to any
> code in the compiler or t
Because of the syntax sugar.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:26 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> Le 19/03/2012 14:38, Gor Gyolchanyan a écrit :
>
>> Having a final class is conceptually different from having a class
>> with only final methods. You can legitimately inherit from a class
>> with no virtual methods
Le 19/03/2012 14:38, Gor Gyolchanyan a écrit :
Having a final class is conceptually different from having a class
with only final methods. You can legitimately inherit from a class
with no virtual methods and add to its interface and implement other
methods using its final ones. The final class c
On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 00:41:44 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Maybe this is why I don't much care for attributes - it's all
just a fog to me what is happening.
Maybe this will help:
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/cszypers/events/WCOP2006/rouvoy-wcop-06.pdf
Attribute-Oriented
On 3/19/12 10:17 AM, Brian Palmer wrote:
On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 01:29:50 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
In C++, for example, you can define operator<() and operator>() in
completely arbitrary ways, which means they can be totally unrelated to
each other, and return results that have nothing to do
I think the only people who have issues with operator definitions don't
think of them as function names, in the abstract mathematics sense.
+, < and so on are just simbolic names for some operation.
If I want to know what + does, I have to do the same as when I see Add, and
look to the definitio
On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 01:29:50 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
In C++, for example, you can define operator<() and operator>()
in
completely arbitrary ways, which means they can be totally
unrelated to
each other, and return results that have nothing to do with
each other.
This causes inconsisten
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:55:40 -0500
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> DDoc has two main assets: (a) it understands D structures, e.g. you
> can use it to document D APIs, and (b) it highlights D code nicely.
Yeah, that's anticpated usage of it.
> More specialized tools that have a focus on document f
On 3/19/12 5:01 AM, Gour wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 01:08:20 +
Stewart Gordon wrote:
Has anybody else got further with getting logical HTML out of DDoc?
Have you been using DDoc to generate some internal format and then
some other program to turn it into HTML, or what?
Excuse me for jump
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:12:27PM +, Russel Winder wrote:
> I will likely be able to do some work on the D tool for SCons over the
> next few weeks. As preparation, I am wondering about the DMD, GDC, LDC
> issue and also the fact that currently DMD is only used as a
> front-end, GCC or whateve
On 03/18/12 12:34, Derek wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:00:06 +1100, Derek wrote:
>
>>
>> The 'adding' is not the point; it could be any functionality. The point I
>> was trying to get across was that it would be useful if the compiler could
>> infer the type parameters of a template instantia
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:04:45 +0100
Paulo Pinto wrote:
> Enterprise software?
Not here, we'll write open-source project. ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
All living bodies subsist on food grains, which are produced
from rains. Rains are produced by performance of yajña [sacrifice],
and yajña is born
Having a final class is conceptually different from having a class
with only final methods. You can legitimately inherit from a class
with no virtual methods and add to its interface and implement other
methods using its final ones. The final class concept is extremely
useful when you just don't wa
On 19.03.2012 14:45, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 03/19/12 08:30, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 19.03.2012 2:17, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 03/18/12 15:37, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 18.03.2012 5:23, Manu wrote:
The virtual model broken. I've complained about it lots, and people
always say "stfu, use 'f
exactly my point - thx
Am 19.03.2012 13:31, schrieb Steven Schveighoffer:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 04:03:29 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 3/17/2012 10:01 PM, F i L wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
My impression is it is just obfuscation around a simple lazy
initialization
pattern.
While I ca
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:16:18 +1100, Kevin wrote:
This is in no way D specific but say you have two constant strings.
const char[] a = "1234567890";
// and
const char[] b = "67890";
You could lay out the memory inside of one another. IE: if a.ptr = 1
then b.ptr = 6. I'm not sure if this has
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 04:03:29 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 3/17/2012 10:01 PM, F i L wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
My impression is it is just obfuscation around a simple lazy
initialization
pattern.
While I can see the abstraction usefulness of compile time attribute
metadata,
I am hav
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:46:56 -0400, James Miller wrote:
Another thing I have noticed, is that that compared to a cast,
to! is incredibly slow. Most of the time it doesn't matter, but
I was doing some work with noise generation, and found that casting
the floats to integers was an order of magn
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:53:56 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 3/18/12, Manu wrote:
I'm finding that in this code I'm writing, casts are taking up more
space
on many lines than the actual term being assigned.
Another classic which fails to compile is:
import std.random;
ubyte c = unifor
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 22:16:18 -0400, Kevin wrote:
This is in no way D specific but say you have two constant strings.
const char[] a = "1234567890";
// and
const char[] b = "67890";
You could lay out the memory inside of one another. IE: if a.ptr = 1
then b.ptr = 6. I'm not sure if this has
"Don Clugston" wrote in message
news:jk6ru4$1seu$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> I do not understand why it still part of the compiler after we agreed to
> roll back to the D1 version.
>
Walter didn't agree, so it didn't happen.
On 03/19/12 08:30, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
> On 19.03.2012 2:17, Artur Skawina wrote:
>> On 03/18/12 15:37, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
>>> On 18.03.2012 5:23, Manu wrote:
The virtual model broken. I've complained about it lots, and people
always say "stfu, use 'final:' at the top of your cla
Am 19.03.2012 10:03, schrieb F i L:
dennis luehring wrote:
i don't get the GC relation here?
all attribute values are static const - because they are
type-related (static) and read-only, attributes are type
orientated not instance orientated
C# doesn't support free-types (everything's wra
On 19-03-2012 11:12, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 19-03-2012 11:03, deadalnix wrote:
Le 18/03/2012 16:09, Sean Kelly a écrit :
On Mar 18, 2012, at 7:12 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Page size in druntime is sometime a constant (4Kb), sometime
calculated, often assumed to be a compile time constant.
On 2012-03-19 09:01, Tove wrote:
Well I was thinking if we can go one step further than C#, because of
D:s CTFE... by introducing a call back from the D compiler to the
library CTFE attribute handler... this way we can hide all reflection
from the "end user"... and the compiler doesn't need to kn
On 19-03-2012 11:03, deadalnix wrote:
Le 18/03/2012 16:09, Sean Kelly a écrit :
On Mar 18, 2012, at 7:12 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Page size in druntime is sometime a constant (4Kb), sometime
calculated, often assumed to be a compile time constant.
druntime should define a proper, authoritative, p
Le 18/03/2012 18:06, Simen Kjærås a écrit :
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 18:07:10 +0100, deadalnix wrote:
Le 18/03/2012 17:49, Timon Gehr a écrit :
On 03/18/2012 05:25 PM, FeepingCreature wrote:
Advantages: internally consistent, no need for completely new syntax,
"final class" can be deprecated (it
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 01:08:20 +
Stewart Gordon wrote:
> Has anybody else got further with getting logical HTML out of DDoc?
> Have you been using DDoc to generate some internal format and then
> some other program to turn it into HTML, or what?
Excuse me for jumping into the thread, but I hop
Le 18/03/2012 19:57, Andrej Mitrovic a écrit :
On 3/18/12, deadalnix wrote:
Le 18/03/2012 17:49, Timon Gehr a écrit :
On 03/18/2012 05:25 PM, FeepingCreature wrote:
Advantages: internally consistent, no need for completely new syntax,
"final class" can be deprecated (it never worked well any
Le 18/03/2012 16:09, Sean Kelly a écrit :
On Mar 18, 2012, at 7:12 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Page size in druntime is sometime a constant (4Kb), sometime calculated, often
assumed to be a compile time constant.
druntime should define a proper, authoritative, place to calculate that page
size, an
On 03/19/2012 04:40 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
OK, perhaps the previous subject line of the previous post deterred
people from actually reading the contents. :-(
Basically, I'm trying to address Andrei's request that this should work
with my AA implementation:
int[dstring] aa;
aa["ab
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:21:41 +0200
Manu wrote:
> Can I see your changes anywhere? I have a premake based project
> infrastructure that I'd like to incorporate some D code into.
https://bitbucket.org/goughy/premake-dev-d
Sincerely,
Gour
--
One is understood to be in full knowledge whose every
On 7 December 2011 11:27, Andrew Gough wrote:
> It seems there is SCons support (python), CMake, Orbit (Ruby), DSSS
> (D1 only?), xfbuild, dake, rdmd options - I've added preliminary D
> support to premake.
>
Can I see your changes anywhere? I have a premake based project
infrastructure that I'd
On 19 March 2012 08:46, dennis luehring wrote:
>
> attributes does not containing code - there just a (at-runtime) queryable
> information that can be attached to serveral things (like classes, methods,
> ...) - think of it like double.epsilon - but extendable by users - thats
> it, and in the c#
dennis luehring wrote:
i don't get the GC relation here?
all attribute values are static const - because they are
type-related (static) and read-only, attributes are type
orientated not instance orientated
C# doesn't support free-types (everything's wrapped up in
classes) so the technique i
On 19/03/12 06:43, H. S. Teoh wrote:
While testing my AA implementation on existing AA-related bug, I came
across this issue:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7602
Upon playing around a bit with the sample code given in the bug, I
managed to find a code snippet that would c
On 2012-03-19 01:54, Brian Palmer wrote:
I'm working on a DSL for generating SQL queries, based loosely on
Python's SQLAlchemy and Ruby's Sequel. One nice thing about the DSL is
the compact syntax for specifying WHERE clauses. With some fiddling, I
got it working for opEquals, a simplified exampl
On 03/19/2012 02:31 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:54:27AM +0100, Brian Palmer wrote:
[...]
However, this won't work for comparison operators like< and>, which
all map to opCmp, or for != (since that's rewritten to !(a == b))
I guess I have two questions, one, am I going to s
On 2012-03-19 01:41, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/18/2012 2:58 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Ok, now to the user defined attribute:
@attribute class NonSerialized {} // This is what's called a "marker"
in Java.
It doesn't contain any information, the information is the type itself.
@attribute class S
i don't get the GC relation here?
all attribute values are static const - because they are type-related
(static) and read-only, attributes are type orientated not instance
orientated
@GC.NoScan int value;
@GC this() {}
Compiler Asks library for transformation of unknown @GC
bool library("@G
On Monday, 19 March 2012 at 06:46:09 UTC, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 19.03.2012 01:41, schrieb Walter Bright:
I'm sorry, I find this *massively* confusing. What is foo? Why
are you
serializing something marked "NonSerialized"? I really have no
idea what is
going on with this. What is the seriali
On 19.03.2012 8:12, Jay Norwood wrote:
I'm timing operations processing 10 2MB text files in parallel. I
haven't gotten to the part where I put the words in the map, but I've
done enough through this point to say a few things about the measurements.
I hope you are going to tell us dmd flags be
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
