presentation has been accepted for the D Conference 2012.
Congratulations, Robert!
http://astoriaseminar.com/sessions.html
Am Wed, 23 May 2012 16:26:23 -0700
schrieb Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
presentation has been accepted for the D Conference 2012.
Congratulations, Robert!
http://astoriaseminar.com/sessions.html
What, still no caching at finer granularity than modules? Meh. :p
Besides my
On 5/23/2012 10:43 PM, Marco Leise wrote:
Am Wed, 23 May 2012 16:26:23 -0700 schrieb Walter
Brightnewshou...@digitalmars.com:
presentation has been accepted for the D Conference 2012.
Congratulations, Robert!
http://astoriaseminar.com/sessions.html
What, still no caching at finer
I keep hearing about this popular node.js thing, so I finally looked it up
just now. JavaScript on the server-side?!? WTF?!?! Like having PHP on a
server isn't *enough* pain, now they gotta add in the second-worst language,
too?
That's a great article, though. Interesting, intelligent and very
On 2012-05-22 21:45, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com
mailto:d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-05-21 21:48, Andrew Wiley wrote:
Gee, thanks for your enthusiastic support for GSOC projects that
will
greatly forward the D
On 2012-05-22 21:52, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Jacob Carlborgd...@me.com wrote in message
news:jpg2tq$140c$1...@digitalmars.com...
The Apple mouses has always been a joke. I started with Mac OS X on a
laptop, if you then mostly use the track pad it's not as bad. When I made
the full move to Mac
bearophile , dans le message (digitalmars.D:168160), a écrit :
deadalnix:
http://blog.thebird.nl/?p=93
...
I spreaded the word. This article is great and I 100% agree
with it :D
The article says:
There are a few things I miss in D. For example pattern
recognition on unpacking data,
Le 23/05/2012 08:35, Sönke Ludwig a écrit :
I keep hearing about this popular node.js thing, so I finally looked
it up
just now. JavaScript on the server-side?!? WTF?!?! Like having PHP on a
server isn't *enough* pain, now they gotta add in the second-worst
language,
too?
That's a great
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 06:38:54 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On the other hand if you have a compiler library you can build
a tool based on the library that translates D code to Java, C#
or perhaps their byte code equivalents. Then you can
automatically translate the compiler library to
On 23/05/12 07:05, Mehrdad wrote:
We should make 'pure' mean strongly pure.
For weakly pure, we could introduce the 'doped' keyword :-D
No, the keyword should be more like @noglobal
I wish people would stop using this weak purity / strong purity
terminology, it's very unhelpful. (And it's
Christophe Travert:
This little example raises a question if tuples becomes part of
the langage. Should static array have tuple capabilities ?
Why not? Fixed-sized arrays are similar to tuples with uniform
types. Unpacking short arrays in the same way you unpack tuples
*very handy* and it's
On 23.05.2012 14:10, bearophile wrote:
Why not? Fixed-sized arrays are similar to tuples with uniform types.
Unpacking short arrays in the same way you unpack tuples *very handy*
and it's commonly done in both Python and Haskell (and probably in other
languages too):
I'd rather see common
My proposal the is following using a.{ ... } syntax to unpack:
In short:
I think the original proposal of
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/341
could be enhanced with introduction expr.{ spec } selectors
allowing to cherry pick fields and array elements easily.
If we go
On Wed, 23 May 2012 06:00:11 -0400, Don Clugston d...@nospam.com wrote:
On 23/05/12 07:05, Mehrdad wrote:
We should make 'pure' mean strongly pure.
For weakly pure, we could introduce the 'doped' keyword :-D
No, the keyword should be more like @noglobal
Well, it's actually
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry Olshansky dmitry.o...@gmail.comwrote:
My proposal the is following using a.{ ... } syntax to unpack:
In short:
I think the original proposal of
On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:31:59 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen a...@lycus.org
wrote:
On 23-05-2012 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This solution looks crappy to me:
void gc_collect(void *unused = null);
BTW, any compiler with alias analysis and LTO might even decide to
remove the call even
On 05/23/12 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
it has no parameters and no return, marking it as pure makes it strong pure,
and an optimizing compiler can effectively remove the call completely!
Arguably a pure function not returning a value doesn't make sense... D's
definition
of pure makes
On 05/23/12 13:45, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:31:59 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen a...@lycus.org
wrote:
On 23-05-2012 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This solution looks crappy to me:
void gc_collect(void *unused = null);
BTW, any compiler with alias analysis
bearophile , dans le message (digitalmars.D:168206), a écrit :
Besides that, it is easy to emulate your example with a little
library solution. Maybe something like that should be added to
std.range.
What syntax do you suggest?
foreach (immutable sx, sy; unpack(s)) {...}
doing something
Le 23/05/2012 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
I have come across a dilemma.
Alex Rønne Petersen has a pull request changing some things in the GC to
pure. I think gc_collect() should be weak-pure, because it could
technically run on any memory allocation (which is already allowed in
pure
On 23-05-2012 13:48, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 05/23/12 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
it has no parameters and no return, marking it as pure makes it strong pure,
and an optimizing compiler can effectively remove the call completely!
Arguably a pure function not returning a value doesn't
On 23-05-2012 14:21, deadalnix wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
I have come across a dilemma.
Alex Rønne Petersen has a pull request changing some things in the GC to
pure. I think gc_collect() should be weak-pure, because it could
technically run on any memory
On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:21:42 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
I have come across a dilemma.
Alex Rønne Petersen has a pull request changing some things in the GC to
pure. I think gc_collect() should be weak-pure, because it could
On 23/05/12 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I have come across a dilemma.
Alex Rønne Petersen has a pull request changing some things in the GC to
pure. I think gc_collect() should be weak-pure, because it could
technically run on any memory allocation (which is already allowed in
pure
Don Clugston:
The real question being asked is, do we need something for
logical purity?
You mean something like @trusted_pure?
Note that we need the same thing for caching.
Regarding caching, memoization, weak references, and related
things, I prefer a more principled approach, like
Am 22.05.2012 22:38, schrieb Pragmatix:
Am 22.05.2012 21:59, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
I'm very curious how the vibe.d author would respond to the argument
against
embedded HTTP servers.
Ask him on :
news.rejectedsoftware.com
Just wanted to note that posting on the DFeed forum was not
On 23-05-2012 15:46, deadalnix wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 14:32, Alex Rønne Petersen a écrit :
On 23-05-2012 14:21, deadalnix wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
I have come across a dilemma.
Alex Rønne Petersen has a pull request changing some things in the
GC to
pure. I
Le 23/05/2012 14:32, Alex Rønne Petersen a écrit :
On 23-05-2012 14:21, deadalnix wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
I have come across a dilemma.
Alex Rønne Petersen has a pull request changing some things in the GC to
pure. I think gc_collect() should be weak-pure,
Just some beginner questions...
Does D have structural sharing of its immutable collections?
i.e. Can I make a copy of an immutable Map or List collection
with an extra (or mutated) member, and will the returned (new)
collection share most of it's structure with the earlier
collection.
Le 23/05/2012 14:35, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
On Wed, 23 May 2012 08:21:42 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
I have come across a dilemma.
Alex Rønne Petersen has a pull request changing some things in the GC to
pure. I
On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:17:43 -0400, Don Clugston d...@nospam.com wrote:
On 23/05/12 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I have come across a dilemma.
Alex Rønne Petersen has a pull request changing some things in the GC to
pure. I think gc_collect() should be weak-pure, because it could
Le 23/05/2012 15:47, Alex Rønne Petersen a écrit :
On 23-05-2012 15:46, deadalnix wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 14:32, Alex Rønne Petersen a écrit :
On 23-05-2012 14:21, deadalnix wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
I have come across a dilemma.
Alex Rønne Petersen has a pull
Le 23/05/2012 15:52, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
What if memory is tight, and the only way to get memory for this new
allocation is to collect from the main heap? This seems an odd
limitation, since strong-pure functions would not be affected by
collecting in the main heap *at all*.
-Steve
On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:52:31 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 14:35, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
Yes. Memory allocation and deallocation from a global heap is by
definition an impure operation (it affects global state). However, we
must make exceptions because
On 23-05-2012 15:17, Don Clugston wrote:
On 23/05/12 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I have come across a dilemma.
Alex Rønne Petersen has a pull request changing some things in the GC to
pure. I think gc_collect() should be weak-pure, because it could
technically run on any memory
Le 23/05/2012 15:57, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:52:31 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 14:35, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
Yes. Memory allocation and deallocation from a global heap is by
definition an impure operation (it affects global
On 23-05-2012 15:55, deadalnix wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 15:47, Alex Rønne Petersen a écrit :
On 23-05-2012 15:46, deadalnix wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 14:32, Alex Rønne Petersen a écrit :
On 23-05-2012 14:21, deadalnix wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
I have come across a
On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:56:58 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 15:52, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
What if memory is tight, and the only way to get memory for this new
allocation is to collect from the main heap? This seems an odd
limitation, since strong-pure
On 23-05-2012 16:03, deadalnix wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 15:57, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:52:31 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 14:35, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
Yes. Memory allocation and deallocation from a global heap is by
definition
Hi All.
OK. I'm sold on using D to develop an experimental hydrologic
modeling code, but I need a sparse linear algebra package. Has
anyone either developed such a package in D or linked to an
existing C or C++ library? There are a number of existing free
libraries out there, and I hate to
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 04:01:05 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
I hope this includes SNN.lib, which also uses ANSI functions...
Well, you can't fix C because C explicitly ignores string
encoding and thoughtlessly passes strings around without any
transcoding. Though, D bindings suggest that C
On Wed, 23 May 2012 10:03:01 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 15:57, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:52:31 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 14:35, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
Yes. Memory allocation and deallocation
Chris Dew:
Does D have structural sharing of its immutable collections?
i.e. Can I make a copy of an immutable Map or List collection
with an extra (or mutated) member, and will the returned (new)
collection share most of it's structure with the earlier
collection.
Currently Phobos
Le 23/05/2012 16:03, deadalnix a écrit :
Le 23/05/2012 15:57, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:52:31 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 14:35, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
Yes. Memory allocation and deallocation from a global heap is by
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 13:42:34 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
http://news.rejectedsoftware.com/
Looks like it runs on Node.js :)
Why so slow?
Thanks for your answer,
Chris.
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 14:35:31 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Chris Dew:
Does D have structural sharing of its immutable collections?
i.e. Can I make a copy of an immutable Map or List collection
with an extra (or mutated) member, and will the returned (new)
On 23-05-2012 16:42, deadalnix wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 16:03, deadalnix a écrit :
Le 23/05/2012 15:57, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:52:31 -0400, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 23/05/2012 14:35, Steven Schveighoffer a écrit :
Yes. Memory allocation and
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 14:35:31 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Chris Dew:
Does D have structural sharing of its immutable collections?
i.e. Can I make a copy of an immutable Map or List collection
with an extra (or mutated) member, and will the returned (new)
collection share most of it's
Greetings
I am trying to use Pegged for compile time parsing. The only issue I am
facing is with the compile time memory. I have a rather simple grammar,
mostly derived from the arithmetic.d example that comes bundled with Pegged.
I am wondering if the memory could be optimized by fine-tuning
You might want to check out https://github.com/cristicbz/scid
On 23/05/12 15:56, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 23-05-2012 15:17, Don Clugston wrote:
On 23/05/12 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I have come across a dilemma.
Alex Rønne Petersen has a pull request changing some things in the GC to
pure. I think gc_collect() should be weak-pure, because
I am trying to use Pegged for compile time parsing. The only issue I am
facing is with the compile time memory
dmd simply never frees any memory it allocates.
On 05/23/12 17:17, d coder wrote:
I am trying to use Pegged for compile time parsing. The only issue I am
facing is with the compile time memory. I have a rather simple grammar,
mostly derived from the arithmetic.d example that comes bundled with Pegged.
I am wondering if the memory could
On 23-05-2012 17:29, Don Clugston wrote:
On 23/05/12 15:56, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 23-05-2012 15:17, Don Clugston wrote:
On 23/05/12 05:22, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I have come across a dilemma.
Alex Rønne Petersen has a pull request changing some things in the
GC to
pure. I think
dmd simply never frees any memory it allocates.
Since GDC uses DMD front-end, I do not think I can get any relief by using
that too. Right?
On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:41:00 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen a...@lycus.org
wrote:
On 23-05-2012 17:29, Don Clugston wrote:
Not so. It's impossible for anything outside of a strongly pure function
to hold a pointer to memory allocated by the pure function.
Not sure I follow:
immutable(int)*
On 23 May 2012 16:55, d coder dlang.co...@gmail.com wrote:
dmd simply never frees any memory it allocates.
Since GDC uses DMD front-end, I do not think I can get any relief by using
that too. Right?
No relief am afraid. I do know of someone in the past using the Boehm
GC with GDC, which
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:16:19 +0200, Vic Kelson wrote:
Hi All.
OK. I'm sold on using D to develop an experimental hydrologic modeling
code, but I need a sparse linear algebra package. Has anyone either
developed such a package in D or linked to an existing C or C++ library?
There are a
On 05/23/12 17:50, d coder wrote:
and it got disqualified before i even had a chance to try it...
Are you using some alternative? :-)
I gave up on the idea of parsing at compile time.
I was using GDC, and recompiling any file that imported that module
was so slow that it made no
No relief am afraid. I do know of someone in the past using the Boehm
GC with GDC, which vastly improved memory consumption.
Didn't they try to enable the GC in dmd recently but it was a little
disaster?
On 23-05-2012 17:56, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:41:00 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen
a...@lycus..org wrote:
On 23-05-2012 17:29, Don Clugston wrote:
Not so. It's impossible for anything outside of a strongly pure function
to hold a pointer to memory allocated by the pure
On Wed, 23 May 2012 12:22:39 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen a...@lycus.org
wrote:
On 23-05-2012 17:56, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:41:00 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen
a...@lycus..org wrote:
On 23-05-2012 17:29, Don Clugston wrote:
Not so. It's impossible for anything
On 5/23/12, Artur Skawina art.08...@gmail.com wrote:
I was using GDC, and recompiling any file that imported that module
was so slow that it made no sense to do things like that
Have you guys tried to use asModule?
https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged/wiki/Grammars-as-D-Modules
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-05-22 21:45, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com
mailto:d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-05-21 21:48, Andrew Wiley wrote:
Gee, thanks for your enthusiastic support
Le 23/05/2012 17:29, Don Clugston a écrit :
There's a huge difference between a global collection *may* be
performed from a pure function vs it *must* be possible to force a
global collection from a pure function.
Thank you !
Le 23/05/2012 18:22, Alex Rønne Petersen a écrit :
On 23-05-2012 17:56, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 11:41:00 -0400, Alex Rønne Petersen
a...@lycus..org wrote:
On 23-05-2012 17:29, Don Clugston wrote:
Not so. It's impossible for anything outside of a strongly pure
Have you guys tried to use asModule?
https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud/Pegged/wiki/Grammars-as-D-Modules
Thanks for the idea. I just gave it a try and the memory came down by about
50%. Additionally the compilation became much faster.
But that might still not be enough :-( I will try to
But that might still not be enough
Some 50-100MB additional memory is getting consumed by the compiler each
time I parse a simple expression like foo 32;. In the end, if I parse
20 such expressions, the memory usage tops 2GB even while using asModule.
Regards
- Puneet
On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:05:21 +0200, Roman D. Boiko r...@d-coding.com wrote:
I need some immutable collections for my D Compiler Tools project,
namely linked list, red-black tree, and possibly some others.
So I'm going to create them for my use, and later generalize. I've
created a project
On 23.05.2012 22:18, simendsjo wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:05:21 +0200, Roman D. Boiko r...@d-coding.com wrote:
I need some immutable collections for my D Compiler Tools project,
namely linked list, red-black tree, and possibly some others.
So I'm going to create them for my use, and later
mixin template logIt()
{
static shared this()
{
log(typeof(this).stringof ~ init);
}
static shared ~this()
{
log(typeof(this).stringof ~ deinit);
}
}
Try shared static this() and it won't run as a class constructor.
http://dlang.org/class.html#StaticConstructor
mixin template logIt()
{
static shared this()
{
log(typeof(this).stringof ~ init);
}
static shared ~this()
{
log(typeof(this).stringof ~ deinit);
}
}
Try shared static this() and it won't run as a class constructor.
http://dlang.org/class.html#StaticConstructor
On Tue, 22 May 2012 20:47:33 +0200, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ha yes, it is on the website.
You'll find here an article about that, and how Go do much better
because of goroutines :
http://blog.bitcartel.com/2012/05/nodejs-cpu-blocking-thing.html
I'd be very interested to know
On Wed, 23 May 2012 20:18:54 +0200, simendsjo simend...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:05:21 +0200, Roman D. Boiko r...@d-coding.com
wrote:
I need some immutable collections for my D Compiler Tools project,
namely linked list, red-black tree, and possibly some others.
So I'm
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 18:18:55 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:05:21 +0200, Roman D. Boiko
r...@d-coding.com wrote:
I need some immutable collections for my D Compiler Tools
project, namely linked list, red-black tree, and possibly some
others.
So I'm going to create them
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 18:24:28 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 20:18:54 +0200, simendsjo
simend...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:05:21 +0200, Roman D. Boiko
r...@d-coding.com wrote:
I need some immutable collections for my D Compiler Tools
project, namely linked
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 18:21:42 Trass3r wrote:
No relief am afraid. I do know of someone in the past using the Boehm
GC with GDC, which vastly improved memory consumption.
Didn't they try to enable the GC in dmd recently but it was a little
disaster?
Yeah. It hurt compile times
On 23/05/2012 15:16, Kagamin wrote:
snip
Well, you can't fix C because C explicitly ignores string encoding and
thoughtlessly
passes strings around without any transcoding. Though, D bindings suggest that
C functions
accept utf-8 strings
A lot of C functions do. Indeed, this is one of the
On 23/05/2012 16:05, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
snip
I need some immutable collections for my D Compiler Tools project, namely
linked list,
red-black tree, and possibly some others.
snip
What's the point of an immutable red-black tree?
The whole point of a red-black tree is to facilitate fast
On 22/05/2012 19:24, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
snip
* in D it's too easy to make a mistake by passing UTF-8 string pointer
to such function
That's just as easy in almost any language. It's part of why so many websites have
character encoding bugs.
snip
And last but not least:
- *W were
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 15:27:54 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
You might want to check out https://github.com/cristicbz/scid
I had found scid. For some of my work, BLAS and LAPACK are fine
(full matrices), and I can use it for small problems on this
project. But for large problems, I need a
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 18:39:02 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 23/05/2012 16:05, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
snip
I need some immutable collections for my D Compiler Tools
project, namely linked list,
red-black tree, and possibly some others.
snip
What's the point of an immutable red-black
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 16:12:40 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:16:19 +0200, Vic Kelson wrote:
Hi All.
OK. I'm sold on using D to develop an experimental hydrologic
modeling
code, but I need a sparse linear algebra package. Has anyone
either
developed such a package in
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 18:39:02 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
When the tree is immutable, only lookup speed is of any real
relevance, so you might as well create a perfectly balanced
binary tree. Or even better, an array.
An array does not facilitate sharing common subsets between
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 18:51:32 UTC, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
Immutable collections in most cases have the same performance
characteristics as mutable ones. Space consumption may be
higher, but not necessarily.
Instead of mutating a collection, a new one is returned each
time you add or
Didn't they try to enable the GC in dmd recently but it was a little
disaster?
Yeah. It hurt compile times considerably. I'm not sure what the current
plan is, other than leaving it like it is for now.
What about good old properly managing the memory manually?
At least for new code and
In WinAPI we have: LoadLibraryA/W, but not GetProcAddressA/W
because PE COFF limitations exists.
Walter Bright
The user can decide what to use or not use from it.
+1. For me LoadLibraryA works well.
256 max path
It's FS limitation.
I agree that a D implementation would be cool, but perhaps I'll just
bite the bullet and try to convert headers for an existing library.
Never done that before...
It's not that hard to convert C headers.
Just put an extern(C): at the top of the module, run some regex's to
convert common
On 23.05.2012 23:29, Michael wrote:
In WinAPI we have: LoadLibraryA/W, but not GetProcAddressA/W because PE
COFF limitations exists.
Walter Bright
The user can decide what to use or not use from it.
+1. For me LoadLibraryA works well.
256 max path
It's FS limitation.
Nope. Quoting random
On 2012-05-23 17:36, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 at 18:33:38 UTC, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
I'm reviewing text right now
Posted an updated version, but it is still a draft:
http://d-coding.com/2012/05/23/dct-use-cases-revised.html
That's a lot better :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Wed, 23 May 2012 14:32:57 -0400, Roman D. Boiko r...@d-coding.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 May 2012 at 18:24:28 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 20:18:54 +0200, simendsjo simend...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 17:05:21 +0200, Roman D. Boiko r...@d-coding.com
wrote:
I
On 2012-05-23 19:11, Andrew Wiley wrote:
Ultimately, it doesn't really change the number of steps required:
(Foo - Bar means a compiler that runs on Foo and outputs binaries that
run on Bar)
Standard cross compiler sequence:
1. Compile DC (Foo - Bar) on Foo using the existing DC (Foo - Foo)
2.
On 2012-05-23 20:34, Stewart Gordon wrote:
What is C encoding?
Since C doesn't really have a concept of encodings it would be whatever
a given application/library decides it is.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 5/22/2012 9:13 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Macs computers are the first laptops reliable enough to be handled as
an appliance - e.g. the sleep mode works well enough that I can casually lift
the laptop off the couch while watching TV, open it, google for something, and
close it, all within
approximately 32,000 characters...
I know it ;) But it's platform specific kung-fu.
On 24.05.2012 0:13, Michael wrote:
approximately 32,000 characters...
I know it ;) But it's platform specific kung-fu.
It's the only game in M$ town ;)
--
Dmitry Olshansky
On May 23, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
3. erratic issues with sharing directories. Sharing was simple with XP - one
click to share, another to unshare. Win7 has a maze of dialog boxes and
alternate ways of doing it, some work, some don't, and no
On Wed, 23 May 2012 16:04:30 -0400, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Win7 has enough problems that I'm forced to keep my old WinXP machine
operating:
1. can't run 16 bit programs
Really, have no sympathy there :)
-Steve
On Tue, 22 May 2012 06:54:23 -0400, Nick Sabalausky
seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com wrote:
Oh, so it's that time of the week again already? Time for MS to change
their
minds once again on which is cool and uncool: straight vs curved?
Egads, it's like they're spinning their wheels just
On Thursday, 17 May 2012 at 15:54:05 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/17/2012 6:38 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Any chance this asm file can be written in D with asm block?
No.
What's the 'official' tool that was used to compile the
checked-in obj?
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
