deadalnix wrote:
Sound nice. How can I use that on my computer ? What do I do
with the files ?
You need to move the files into their 'gtksourceview-3.0'
folders. On Linux (and other OS's should be similar), do:
1. find or create the following user directories:
Stepping back for a moment, I think we're facing two key issues here:
The first key issue is that the docs for std.benchmark don't adequately
explain Andre's intended charter/scope for it, it's methodology or the
rationale for its methodology. So people see benchmark and they think
oh, ok, for
On Friday, 21 September 2012 at 21:37:23 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 22:13:22 +0200
Paulo Pinto pj...@progtools.org wrote:
On Friday, 21 September 2012 at 19:09:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
The saddest thing is that people are paying big bucks for
this kind of
enterprise
On 2012-21-09 22:58:36, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/21/12 5:39 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
After your replay to one of Manu's post, I think I misunderstood the
std.benchmark module. I was thinking more of profiling. But are these
quite similar tasks, couldn't std.benchmark work for both?
On 2012-09-21, 21:29, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
A mentioned in the proposal (albeit not very clear) it requires
non-templated function definitions to include both type and param names.
If only one name is provided in a definition is always a param name.
Unfortunately this is a breaking change
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:37:46 -0700
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
The sad part is that so many of the commenters have no idea that
adjacent C literals are concatenated at compile-time. It's a very nice
way to put long strings in code and have it nicely indented, something
that is
Am Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:15:33 +0200
schrieb Jens Mueller jens.k.muel...@gmx.de:
I like the BOOST unit test library's approach, which has two types
of assert: BOOST_CHECK and BOOST_REQUIRE. After a BOOST_CHECK
fails, the test keeps running, but BOOST_REQUIRE throws an exception
to stop the
I just spent about 3 hours tracking down the strangest problem. Win64 exception
handling would work fine, but when I'd turn on -g, it would crash.
At first I thought I'm generating a bad object file with -g. But since dmd
isn't emitting any Win64 symbolic debug info, a check shows the object
On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 21:00 +0100, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
[…]
Isn't it worth someone from the LDC team discussing with the Ubuntu people
concerned (e.g. the person who decided to blacklist the package) and try and
get
their feedback and advice on packaging? My experience is that
On 2012-09-21 21:59, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think you have discovered a major issue. Ideas on how to attack this?
The standard way to solve this would be to move the initialization code
from a static constructor to a function what will be called and do the
initialization lazy. But
On 2012-09-21 22:57, Jens Mueller wrote:
Test::Unit, the default testing framework for Ruby on Rails prints a
dot for each successful test.
That is fine. But you don't need the name of the unittest then.
I'm just saying that different testing library to things differently.
There are
On 2012-09-21 23:11, Jens Mueller wrote:
But if you have an assert in some algorithm to ensure some invariant or
in a contract it will be handled by myUnitTestSpecificAssertHandler.
But I think that is not a drawback. Don't you want to no whenever an
assert is violated?
Oh, you mean like
On Friday, 21 September 2012 at 20:43:13 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, September 21, 2012 15:59:31 Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 9/19/12 4:11 PM, Øivind wrote:
New question for you :)
To register benchmarks, the 'scheduleForBenchmarking' mixin
inserts a
shared static
On 9/22/12 8:28 AM, Øivind wrote:
Is there a way to solve the dependency issue without forbidding static
constructors in modules with cyclic dependencies?
I think an idea just occurred to me. The rules for static ctors and
dtors were invented before import was allowed inside a scope. We could
On Saturday, 22 September 2012 at 13:03:06 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/22/12 8:28 AM, Øivind wrote:
Is there a way to solve the dependency issue without
forbidding static
constructors in modules with cyclic dependencies?
I think an idea just occurred to me. The rules for static
On Saturday, 22 September 2012 at 13:25:47 UTC, Øivind wrote:
On Saturday, 22 September 2012 at 13:03:06 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/22/12 8:28 AM, Øivind wrote:
Is there a way to solve the dependency issue without
forbidding static
constructors in modules with cyclic dependencies?
On 2012-09-01, 18:20, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
The idea in a nutshell:
- specify a way attach tags to function declarations (to paint
functions)
- allow specifying is-a relation between tags (supertags and subtags).
- add restrict specification that allows user to enforce on a block of
On 2012-09-22, 15:28, Øivind wrote:
It gets a bit ugly maybe, but we could do a mix of the proposals that
have come before and this one, e.g. add a @nocycliccheck (or similar)
to the static constructor, and in that case only allow access to
current module and those imorted inside the ctor
On 2012-09-22 09:19:33 +, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com said:
I just spent about 3 hours tracking down the strangest problem. Win64
exception handling would work fine, but when I'd turn on -g, it would
crash.
At first I thought I'm generating a bad object file with -g. But
On 2012-09-22, 15:04, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/22/12 8:28 AM, Øivind wrote:
Is there a way to solve the dependency issue without forbidding static
constructors in modules with cyclic dependencies?
I think an idea just occurred to me. The rules for static ctors and
dtors were
On 19/09/2012 08:24, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-09-19 01:21, Rob T wrote:
Actually I find the __traits system a bit convoluted and inconsistent
with other similar features. There seems to be a real need to unify the
different methods of reflection in D.
For example, I can do this without
On 9/19/12 3:13 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-09-17 23:13, Jens Mueller wrote:
Post all feedback to this thread. Constructive feedback is very much
appreciated.
To conclude in more Andrei like words: Happy destruction!
* Why is scheduleForBenchmarking a string? Can't it be a template
You should keep a record of those anomalies somewhere, it might
prove useful as a starting point to investigating problems
future problems that might arise.
You are right. I think it is a good thing Walter took the time
out to write about this. In the absence of better documentation
this
- It is very strange that the documentation of printBenchmarks
uses
neither of the words average or minimum, and doesn't say
how many
trials are done I suppose the obvious interpretation is
that it
only does one trial, but then we wouldn't be having this
discussion
about averages and
On 18/09/2012 22:21, Rob T wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 September 2012 at 19:57:05 UTC, Ben Davis wrote:
Wild stab in the dark, but would something like this work:
void myfunction() {
int dummy;
auto self = __traits(parent, dummy);
}
though it would be better if something like
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 09:04:09 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/22/12 8:28 AM, Øivind wrote:
Is there a way to solve the dependency issue without forbidding static
constructors in modules with cyclic dependencies?
I think an idea just occurred to me. The rules for static ctors and
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-09-21 23:11, Jens Mueller wrote:
But if you have an assert in some algorithm to ensure some invariant or
in a contract it will be handled by myUnitTestSpecificAssertHandler.
But I think that is not a drawback. Don't you want to no whenever an
assert is
Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Fri, 21 Sep 2012 23:15:33 +0200
schrieb Jens Mueller jens.k.muel...@gmx.de:
I like the BOOST unit test library's approach, which has two types
of assert: BOOST_CHECK and BOOST_REQUIRE. After a BOOST_CHECK
fails, the test keeps running, but BOOST_REQUIRE throws
On 9/22/2012 6:37 AM, Michel Fortin wrote:
But there should be a reason why there's a jump there. Have you found it? If
you're just bypassing the jump you might be breaking something else. For
instance, this jump table might have been a mean to allow the debugger to more
easily break on
On Friday, 21 September 2012 at 19:47:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, September 21, 2012 15:20:49 monarch_dodra wrote:
#3
The only thing I'm having an issue with is save. IMO, it is
exceptionally dangerous to have a PRNG be a ForwardRange: It
should only be saved if you have a damn
Though Mint 13 is very similar to ubuntu 12, I cannot seem to get
the deb package to install. I get dependency errors on gcc,
gcc-mulitlib, and xdg-utils. apt-get assures me these are all
the latest version. Still, dpkg won't install dmd2.
I understand the wisdom seems to be to just use
Can someone please tell me why the following code gives these
errors?
Error: class main.BirdZoo use of main.VertebrateZoo.take(Animal
animal_) hidden by BirdZoo is deprecated
Error: class main.ParrotZoo use of main.VertebrateZoo.take(Animal
animal_) hidden by ParrotZoo is deprecated
///
On Saturday, 22 September 2012 at 07:48:02 UTC, Gor Gyolchanyan
wrote:
Can someone please tell me why the following code gives these
errors?
Error: class main.BirdZoo use of main.VertebrateZoo.take(Animal
animal_) hidden by BirdZoo is deprecated
Error: class main.ParrotZoo use of
On 9/22/12, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
But why the compiler would now require that you do that, I
don't know. If that's the way that thnigs currently are, it starts to become
a bit odd that the base class functions aren't automatically available.
http://dlang.org/hijack.html
On 9/22/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
using the alias
But I do think this can be further improved in the language. Take this
for example:
import std.stdio;
class Foo
{
void meth(double) { writeln(Foo.meth); }
}
class Bar : Foo
{
alias super.meth meth;
void
On 9/22/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Now let's say the Doo clas removes the meth overload and the alias:
Sorry that should be the Bar class.
On 9/22/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
I would prefer if super.alias meant to take overloads of all base
classes into account.
Although this would be kind of counter-intuitive since 'super' already
means the direct base class.
On 21.9.2012 19:01, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Perhaps declaring the associative array as shared. An alternative
would be to serialize the aa, pass it to another thread, and deserialize
it. That would though create a copy.
Hi Jacob,
thanks for the hint. Making it shared sounds a bit fishy to me.
On 2012-09-22 11:24, Martin Drasar wrote:
thanks for the hint. Making it shared sounds a bit fishy to me. My
intention is to pass some read only data, that are in fact thread local
and there is no real need to make them shared.
The whole point of thread local data is that it's only accessible
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 12:30:30 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Looking at your original example I don't understand why the immutable aa
won't work. That's the whole point of immutable, it's safe to share
among threads. It's probably a bug somewhere. I think someone else can
answer these
On 22.9.2012 13:19, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The problem with immutable is probably due to this bug:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5538
And casting to shared probably won't work due to this bug:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6585
std.variant needs quite
Am Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:30:30 +0200
schrieb Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com:
On 2012-09-22 11:24, Martin Drasar wrote:
thanks for the hint. Making it shared sounds a bit fishy to me. My
intention is to pass some read only data, that are in fact thread
local and there is no real need to make
On 22.9.2012 13:50, Johannes Pfau wrote:
1. Declare it as shared
There's also __gshared.
Yup, that works.
Thanks
What does the message in the subject mean?
Here's a testcase (tested on dmd 2.060 on win7 32-bit):
import core.exception;
import core.runtime; // comment out this, and no stacktrace is
printed
void myAssertHandler(string file, size_t line, string msg = null)
{ }
static this() {
Privilege instruction is an assembly instruction which can be
executed only at a certain executive process context, typically
os kernel. AFAIK assert(false) was claimed to be implemented by
dmd as a halt instruction, which is privileged one.
However, compiled code shows that dmd generates int
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 21:19:27 Maxim Fomin wrote:
Privilege instruction is an assembly instruction which can be
executed only at a certain executive process context, typically
os kernel. AFAIK assert(false) was claimed to be implemented by
dmd as a halt instruction, which is
Hi!
This works as expected:
string cmd = dmd src/xyz.d;
int i = system(cmd);
But this not:
string[] cmd;
cmd ~= src/xyz.d;
int i = execvp(dmd,cmd);
Of course, dmd is in PATH (Win7).
What is wrong here?
tia Peter
On Sunday, September 23, 2012 00:53:48 Peter Sommerfeld wrote:
Hi!
This works as expected:
string cmd = dmd src/xyz.d;
int i = system(cmd);
But this not:
string[] cmd;
cmd ~= src/xyz.d;
int i = execvp(dmd,cmd);
Of course, dmd is in PATH (Win7).
What is wrong
On 9/23/12, Peter Sommerfeld nore...@rubrica.at wrote:
What is wrong here?
string[] cmd;
cmd ~= dmd;
cmd ~= src/xyz.d;
int i = execvp(dmd,cmd);
1st arg should always be the app name, even though apps typically
ignore/skip the first arg.
On Sunday, September 23, 2012 01:12:34 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 9/23/12, Peter Sommerfeld nore...@rubrica.at wrote:
What is wrong here?
string[] cmd;
cmd ~= dmd;
cmd ~= src/xyz.d;
int i = execvp(dmd,cmd);
1st arg should always be the app name, even though apps typically
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 16:10:11 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Now, looking at the docs for std.process.execvp, they seem to think that the
exec functions are going to return, but that's not what the man pages for
the C functions (which they're calling) say, nor is it how they behave.
The
On 9/23/12, Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
I'd be very surprised if you were correct about this.
I was wrong, it's for a different reason:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3027320/why-first-arg-to-execve-must-be-path-to-executable
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Peter Sommerfeld wrote:
This works as expected:
string cmd = dmd src/xyz.d;
int i = system(cmd);
But this not:
string[] cmd;
cmd ~= src/xyz.d;
int i = execvp(dmd,cmd);
Of course, dmd is in PATH (Win7).
What is wrong here?
Please elaborate on what
I'm trying to test whether a template argument is the type returned by
takeExactly, and I haven't been able to sort out the template voodoo required
yet. It would be a lot easier if I had a variable to work with, but I just
have the type, and the fancy is expression required to pull it off is
Jonathan M Davis:
So, clearly I don't have the is expression right, and this is
seriously pushing the edge of my knowledge of is expressions.
So, any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
I have done some tries, but I have failed, I am sorry :-)
The is() syntax is a part of D good to burn on a
On Sunday, September 23, 2012 02:57:36 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
So, clearly I don't have the is expression right, and this is
seriously pushing the edge of my knowledge of is expressions.
So, any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
I have done some tries, but I have failed, I
Hello,
I am trying to figure out how templates work and tried to define
the
following template to define vertices of any dimension and
operations
on them.
import std.stdio;
import std.random;
import std.range;
import std.conv;
import std.math;
/*
* T must be one of the floating point types
On Sunday, 23 September 2012 at 04:03:28 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, September 23, 2012 05:49:06 Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
Hello,
clip
Before anything, I'd question why you declared vt at all. If
all you're
putting in it is a single struct, then just templatize the
struct
On Sunday, 23 September 2012 at 04:51:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, September 23, 2012 06:37:30 Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
One question. Is there any way to get the function template to
deduce the type of T from the vertices I pass, so that I can
call:
euclid_dist(v1, v2) )
instead
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8706
Summary: Tool reference page
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: websites
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8496
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|(Regression 2.060) |Assignment of function
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8387
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Cousens daniel...@bigpond.com 2012-09-22 03:24:53
PDT ---
*** Issue 8547 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8547
Daniel Cousens daniel...@bigpond.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8496
--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2012-09-22 03:26:34 PDT ---
I'd like to update sample code.
alias extern (C) void function() FP;
void main()
{
FP fp = (){};
fp = (){};
}
The fp declaration and assignment should
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8680
--- Comment #10 from ent...@cantab.net 2012-09-22 07:09:23 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
listdir was deprecated for a very good reason. Would you now kindly consider
the steps to fold this into a Range.
Oh wow, I didn't realise dirEntries
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8496
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #3
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8686
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8707
Summary: Internal error: ../ztc/cod1.c 1689
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8708
Summary: Documentation for std.process.exec family is
inaccurate
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8475
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8150
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1
71 matches
Mail list logo
