I didn't get to go, simply because I could not make the time for
it. (Isn't it always the way...) There are a few videos that
I'm specifically waiting for, but perhaps more importantly I look
forward to sharing them with specific people (the kind of people
who might be able to convince
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best
release schedule.
Andrei
I vote one video per day.
On 2013-05-12, 02:22, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a demand
or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion that they should all
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 08:55:03 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2013-05-12, 02:22, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely
suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not*
a demand
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely
suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a
demand
or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion
On 2013-05-11 22:50, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
He's serious. If you post them all at once, then each video gets minimal
impact. A lot of people will look at one, maybe two, and then not bother with
the rest, because all of them showed up at once, whereas if they're posted
over a longer period of
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely
suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a
demand
or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely
suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a
demand
or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 15:26:07 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/10/13 11:24 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-05-10 16:38, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Two a week.
Is there a reason for this?
Maximize impact.
Andrei
Well, just be careful because this could become a double edged
On 12-5-2013 10:47, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2013-05-12, 02:22, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a demand
or expectation, and
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 19:23:45 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 17:56:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
A general note about posting to reddit: it often happens that
posts from infrequent posters go to spam by means of some
automatic rule. When that happens you need to
On 5/12/13 9:14 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 5/12/13, Andrei Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best release schedule.
Let's take a quick poll on how often we should make new pull requests.
I say let's limit ourselves to only
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best
release schedule.
I kinda like the idea of one a day on monday/wednesday/friday.
It'd be paced kinda like a college class then, easy to remember
timing, and should keep
On 5/12/13 9:49 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best release
schedule.
I kinda like the idea of one a day on monday/wednesday/friday. It'd be
paced kinda like a college class then,
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 14:16:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/12/13 9:49 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best
release
schedule.
I kinda like the idea of one a day on
12-May-2013 17:49, Adam D. Ruppe пишет:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best release
schedule.
I kinda like the idea of one a day on monday/wednesday/friday. It'd be
paced kinda like a college class then,
On 05/12/2013 10:16 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I was also thinking mon/wed/fri would be a great schedule!
+1, Reasonable compromise
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 14:16:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I was also thinking mon/wed/fri would be a great schedule!
Andrei
+1
On 12/05/2013 01:22, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best release schedule.
Andrei
I think 2 a week is about right.
I watched Ali's twice, and might watch it again, I'm sure I've not taken
it all in yet!
If they are all released too quickly,
On 5/12/2013 3:49 AM, John Colvin wrote:
As frustrating as it is for non-attending enthusiasts like myself, I'd say stick
with the current schedule. The marketing checks out.
So far, it's been a big success on Reddit doing it this way. I've also seen a
number of comments on Reddit and Hacker
On 5/12/2013 7:16 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I was also thinking mon/wed/fri would be a great schedule!
That does fit in with the observed phenomenon that a posting on reddit has a
shelf life of about 2 days, and the statistics that posting on reddit on a
weekend dooms it.
On 5/11/2013 3:39 AM, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
a new version of Visual D is long overdue, so finally it is released. In
addition to the usual fixes of bugs and regressions, the major highlights of
this version are
This deserves a much higher profile. Few people know about it.
Can you write a
On Sat, 11 May 2013 20:22:57 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a
demand or expectation,
Am 08.05.2013 23:07, schrieb Mike Parker:
I was approached by GameDev.net before I left for the States to convert
my series on Binding D to C into an article for their new article
system. Now that I'm back home, I've gotten it done. What I didn't know
until now is that their system requires a
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 21:31:56 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
There used to be a time when I visited Flipcode (now dead) and
Gamedev almost everyday.
Nowadays, I just do boring enterprise software. :\
Flipcode had a brief revival a few months back, but sputtered out
again apparently. IIRC,
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 21:06:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/11/2013 1:07 PM, Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
I can get by with a hammer and nails too, but if I was a
professional roofer I'd
be an idiot not to use a nail gun. That's the problem with all
this focus on
boilerplate. An IDE does so
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 22:24:38 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
I'm not convinced. unique, like const or immutable, is
transitive. If foo
is unique, then so is foo.bar.
That isn't true. Please read microsoft's paper.
In article hwqrlhegkcyapjoov...@forum.dlang.org, ma...@maxim-fomin.ru says...
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 06:35:56 UTC, Lars T. Kyllingstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 06:07:39 UTC, skeptical wrote:
What is a pull request? Thank you.
In article mailman.1200.1368283943.4724.digitalmar...@puremagic.com,
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx says...
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 01:00:40PM +0200, Mehrdad wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 07:47:34 UTC, skeptical wrote:
In article fnowiixgzpanettke...@forum.dlang.org,
pub...@kyllingen.net
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 06:07:39 UTC, skeptical wrote:
What is a pull request? Thank you.
A pull request is like a patch that is sent for review before
being applied to the source code tree.
It is specific to git. git pull is a command that retrieves and
applies that patch, so is
Am Sat, 11 May 2013 23:51:36 +0100
schrieb Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com:
I am more concerned from GDC's perspective of things. Especially
when it comes to building from hosts that may have phobos disabled
(this is a configure switch).
Indeed. Right now we can compile and run GDC on
On 5/11/2013 10:25 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
My thought was that you ensure (for the foreseeable future) that all D
versions of the compiler compile with the most recent C++ version of the
compiler.
That would likely mean the the D compiler sources must be compilable with 2.063.
On 5/11/2013 10:57 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Stupid inexpressive language are easier to write tools for, this is the very
reason why java have such a great tooling.
You run the risk of having a write-only language if the expressivity is in the
tools rather than the language.
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 08:40:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/11/2013 10:57 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Stupid inexpressive language are easier to write tools for,
this is the very
reason why java have such a great tooling.
You run the risk of having a write-only language if the
expressivity
This thread is hilarious.
This is like asking a car mechanic what an alternator is. Then
when he gives you a handbook explaining what one is, you throw it
back and spit fury in his face. Other people don't breathe to
cater to your every whim, especially when you reject more than
adequate
On 5/12/2013 1:42 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 08:40:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/11/2013 10:57 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Stupid inexpressive language are easier to write tools for, this is the very
reason why java have such a great tooling.
You run the risk of having a
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 22:11:25 UTC, Diggory wrote:
...
That provokes another argument about attribute inference,
off-topic one :) Must resist!
On 2013-05-12, 08:12, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 22:24:38 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
I'm not convinced. unique, like const or immutable, is transitive. If
foo
is unique, then so is foo.bar.
That isn't true. Please read microsoft's paper.
Done. *Mostly* transitive,
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 07:30:12 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 06:07:39 UTC, skeptical wrote:
What is a pull request? Thank you.
A pull request is like a patch that is sent for review before
being applied to the source code tree.
It is specific to git. git pull is a
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 09:10:35 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
Author of the thread is not interested in getting right answer.
I do not know why, but in usenet groups there is this kind of
trolling (asking naive questions to troll those who answer). I
met it for the first time in comp.lang.c
On 2013-05-12, 11:10, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2013-05-12, 08:12, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 22:24:38 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
I'm not convinced. unique, like const or immutable, is transitive. If
foo
is unique, then so is foo.bar.
That isn't true. Please read
On 2013-05-12, 05:16, Diggory wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 01:16:43 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
I believe you're overthinking this. First, what is global unique
variable?
A unique value will per definition have to be thread-local (if not,
other
threads have a reference to it, and it's
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 08:53:59 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/12/2013 1:42 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 08:40:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/11/2013 10:57 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Stupid inexpressive language are easier to write tools for,
this is the very
reason why
On 2013-05-12 05:50, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
That helps considerably, though if the compiler is old enough, that won't work
for Linux due to glibc changes and whatnot.
My experience is the other way around. Binaries built on newer version
of Linux doesn't work on older. But binaries built on
On 12 May 2013 10:39, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-05-12 05:50, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
That helps considerably, though if the compiler is old enough, that won't
work
for Linux due to glibc changes and whatnot.
My experience is the other way around. Binaries built on newer
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 09:10:56 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2013-05-12, 08:12, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 22:24:38 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
I'm not convinced. unique, like const or immutable, is
transitive. If foo
is unique, then so is foo.bar.
That isn't true.
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:35:07 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
10-May-2013 01:32, Nick Sabalausky пишет:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 10:26:46 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 5/9/13 10:26 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
With all this focus on technicalities, we forgot
RAFFI CHOWDHURY
British Airways Direct Umrah flights Non-stop
Depart: BA 133 10MAY LHRJED-2150 0715
Return: BA 132 18MAY JEDLHR-0855 1300
Cheap Flights to Jeddah
British Airways Direct Umrah flights Non-stop
Depart: BA 133 10MAY LHRJED-2150 0715
Return: BA 132 25MAY JEDLHR-0855 1300
Cheap
Cheap Flights to Jeddah fr £150 + tax
Find direct flights to Jeddah at rock-bottom prices try Islam
Freedom today!
Many of our consolidated Umrah airfares are substantially less
than the lowest published fare purchased directly from airlines.
Most of our airfares are block airlines tickets,
RAFFI CHOWDURY
Islam Freedom division of Holy Makkah
34 Green Street
London
E7 8BZ
Main Tel: 0203 432 9692 / 0207 112 8819
Tech Tel: 0208 472 5593
Main Fax: 0208 552 1600
Main Email: sa...@islamfreedom.com
Online: Send us a request
Islam Freedom division of Holy Makkah
548 Coventry Road
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 09:48:58 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Depends... statically linked binaries will probably always work
on the
latest version, dynamic link and then you've got yourself a
'this
libstdc++v5 doesn't exist anymore' problem.
I am picturing a Linux workstation with the Post-It
On 12 May 2013 11:08, w0rp devw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 09:48:58 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Depends... statically linked binaries will probably always work on the
latest version, dynamic link and then you've got yourself a 'this
libstdc++v5 doesn't exist anymore' problem.
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 09:48:58 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 12 May 2013 10:39, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-05-12 05:50, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
That helps considerably, though if the compiler is old
enough, that won't
work
for Linux due to glibc changes and whatnot.
My
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9122
Is anyone working on this or know of a work around, it is
breaking my project and I can't move on until its fixed.
On 2013-05-12, 11:50, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 09:10:56 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2013-05-12, 08:12, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 22:24:38 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
I'm not convinced. unique, like const or immutable, is transitive. If
foo
is unique,
On 12 May 2013 11:39, John Colvin john.loughran.col...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 09:48:58 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 12 May 2013 10:39, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-05-12 05:50, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
That helps considerably, though if the compiler is old
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 10:49:40 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9122
Is anyone working on this or know of a work around, it is
breaking my project and I can't move on until its fixed.
see
On 05/12/2013 05:59 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 19:04:31 -0400
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Friday, May 10, 2013 14:31:00 H. S. Teoh wrote:
As they say in information theory: it is the stuff that stands out,
that is different from the rest, that carries
You may wish to take a look at Rust for inspiration. Rust has
unique (~) pointers and has made some interesting choices there.
Their ~pointers imply ownership. I'm not sure this could be
(efficiently) duplicated in a library for D (Rust has significant
compiler support for its pointer types)
On 5/12/13 5:10 AM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2013-05-12, 08:12, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 22:24:38 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
I'm not convinced. unique, like const or immutable, is transitive. If
foo
is unique, then so is foo.bar.
That isn't true. Please read microsoft's
On 5/12/13 5:32 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 08:53:59 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/12/2013 1:42 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 08:40:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/11/2013 10:57 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Stupid inexpressive language are easier to write tools
On 5/12/13 5:50 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 09:10:56 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2013-05-12, 08:12, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 22:24:38 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
I'm not convinced. unique, like const or immutable, is transitive.
If foo
is unique, then
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 13:07:15 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/12/13 5:50 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 09:10:56 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2013-05-12, 08:12, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 22:24:38 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas
wrote:
I'm not convinced.
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 13:04:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Looks like text to me. http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/. Did I
look at the wrong product?
Yes, it is text based, but you can do many manipulation you can't
do with a regular text presentation.
This is text++
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 08:48:28 UTC, w0rp wrote:
This thread is hilarious.
This is like asking a car mechanic what an alternator is. Then
when he gives you a handbook explaining what one is, you throw
it back and spit fury in his face. Other people don't breathe
to cater to your every
Hello,
At some point I found a nice dashboard for D-programming-language on
github showing all pull requests for all projects together (dmd, phobos,
tools...). Now I can't find it to save my life. Does anyone know how to
get that?
Thanks,
Andrei
On 5/12/13 10:29 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Hello,
At some point I found a nice dashboard for D-programming-language on
github showing all pull requests for all projects together (dmd, phobos,
tools...). Now I can't find it to save my life. Does anyone know how to
get that?
Thanks,
Andrei
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 14:30:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Found it from memory but there's no link to it!
https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language/dashboard/pulls
Andrei
It is actually a private dashboard equivalent to
ttps://github.com/dashboard/pulls , at least
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 14:29:15 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
At some point I found a nice dashboard for
D-programming-language on github showing all pull requests for
all projects together (dmd, phobos, tools...). Now I can't find
it to save my life. Does anyone know how to get that?
On 5/12/13 10:42 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 14:29:15 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
At some point I found a nice dashboard for D-programming-language on
github showing all pull requests for all projects together (dmd,
phobos, tools...). Now I can't find it to save my
On 5/12/13 10:32 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 14:30:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Found it from memory but there's no link to it!
https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language/dashboard/pulls
Andrei
It is actually a private dashboard equivalent to
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 15:06:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/12/13 10:32 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 14:30:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Found it from memory but there's no link to it!
https://github.com/organizations/D-Programming-Language/dashboard/pulls
I'm thinking we should rename D-programming-language on github with
dlang. While we're at it, project d-programming-language.org should be
renamed dlang.org.
This may cause disruption. Thoughts?
Andrei
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 15:08:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm thinking we should rename D-programming-language on github
with dlang. While we're at it, project
d-programming-language.org should be renamed dlang.org.
This may cause disruption. Thoughts?
Andrei
I always thought
I always agree that short good name is better than long ones.
At least to me, changing git remote setting is not so much laborious.
Kenji Hara
2013/5/13 Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
I'm thinking we should rename D-programming-language on github with dlang.
While we're at
On 12 May 2013 14:14, deadalnix deadal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 13:04:31 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Looks like text to me. http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/**. Did I look at
the wrong product?
Yes, it is text based, but you can do many manipulation you can't do with
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 03:58:04 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
The nicest thing of all, IMO, about not strictly needing all
that
support software is that basic things like
editing/navigating/opening/closing code is always and forever
100%
unobstructed by things like startup delays and keyboard
On 05/11/2013 05:06 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
I didn't say an IDE was bad for D, I only said that if you need an IDE
to generate boilerplate for you, then there's something wrong with the
language.
IDE's have lots of other valuable uses.
Two points. One, the person I responded to (and quoted
On 05/12/2013 11:14 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 15:08:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm thinking we should rename D-programming-language on github with
dlang. While we're at it, project d-programming-language.org should be
renamed dlang.org.
This may cause
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 15:08:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm thinking we should rename D-programming-language on github
with dlang. While we're at it, project
d-programming-language.org should be renamed dlang.org.
This may cause disruption. Thoughts?
Andrei
I would go even
On Sun, 12 May 2013 12:56:45 -0400
Matt Soucy mso...@csh.rit.edu wrote:
On 05/12/2013 11:14 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 15:08:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm thinking we should rename D-programming-language on github with
dlang. While we're at it, project
On 5/12/2013 9:42 AM, Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
Second, in the QA session of your talk, you said, I'm sorely tempted to say
that real men don't use IDEs...
Yes, but I said that as a joke.
The fixation on boilerplate as to why people
need IDEs is just a symptom of the more general sentiment.
On 5/12/2013 2:32 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 08:53:59 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/12/2013 1:42 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 08:40:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/11/2013 10:57 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Stupid inexpressive language are easier to write
On 5/12/2013 8:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm thinking we should rename D-programming-language on github with dlang. While
we're at it, project d-programming-language.org should be renamed dlang.org.
This may cause disruption. Thoughts?
It'll also cause disruption in that google won't
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 18:11:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/12/2013 8:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm thinking we should rename D-programming-language on github
with dlang. While
we're at it, project d-programming-language.org should be
renamed dlang.org.
This may cause
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 15:08:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I'm thinking we should rename D-programming-language on github
with dlang. While we're at it, project
d-programming-language.org should be renamed dlang.org.
This may cause disruption. Thoughts?
Andrei
They are painfully
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 18:09:59 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I think that is irrelevant to my point. A language doesn't have
to be text based.
Textual format have proven theur usefullness again and again.
Programming languages, json, xml, even dark stuff like LLVM IR
have a textual
On 5/12/2013 11:15 AM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 18:11:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
It'll also cause disruption in that google won't find it when searching for d
programming.
There should really be a README in the root of the repo so that GitHub displays
some information
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 18:42:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 18:09:59 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I think that is irrelevant to my point. A language doesn't
have to be text based.
Textual format have proven theur usefullness again and again.
Programming languages, json,
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5693345
30-Apr-2013 23:17, Jonathan M Davis пишет:
On Tuesday, April 30, 2013 15:13:14 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
Unicode -- can't be done on character by character basis
Sure it can. It operates on dchar.
Getting back to this.
Sure it can't - I'd hate to break the illusion but the keyword is e.g.
On Sun, 12 May 2013 18:35:25 +0200
Juan Manuel Cabo juanmanuel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 03:58:04 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
The nicest thing of all, IMO, about not strictly needing all
that
support software is that basic things like
On Sun, 12 May 2013 14:16:18 +0200
Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 05/12/2013 05:59 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 19:04:31 -0400
Jonathan M Davis jmdavisp...@gmx.com wrote:
On Friday, May 10, 2013 14:31:00 H. S. Teoh wrote:
As they say in information theory: it
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in message
news:kmnk08$3qr$1...@digitalmars.com...
On 5/11/2013 10:25 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
My thought was that you ensure (for the foreseeable future) that all D
versions of the compiler compile with the most recent C++ version of the
On 05/12/2013 02:08 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/12/2013 9:42 AM, Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
Second, in the QA session of your talk, you said, I'm sorely tempted
to say
that real men don't use IDEs...
Yes, but I said that as a joke.
It was said jokingly, but I have very little doubt it
28-Apr-2013 20:56, Jesse Phillips пишет:
This is a replacement module for the current std.uni by Dmitry
Olshansky. The std.uni module provides an implementation of fundamental
Unicode algorithms and data structures.
To use this module, install 2.63 beta, import uni; and not std.uni,
compile two
On 5/12/2013 6:01 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Bartosz, Walter and I reached a similar design a few years ago. We just thought
it complicates things too much for what it does.
I've been working in the background on a scheme that can infer uniqueness. The
beauty of it is it will not require
13-May-2013 00:28, Walter Bright пишет:
On 5/12/2013 6:01 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Bartosz, Walter and I reached a similar design a few years ago. We
just thought
it complicates things too much for what it does.
I've been working in the background on a scheme that can infer
uniqueness.
There is need for mysql-native
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/mysql-native to support both
Vibe.d's sockets and Phobos sockets.
First, a little background (feel free to skip ahead if you wish):
Steve Teale's original version of mysql-native only supported
On 5/12/2013 1:48 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
13-May-2013 00:28, Walter Bright пишет:
On 5/12/2013 6:01 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Bartosz, Walter and I reached a similar design a few years ago. We
just thought
it complicates things too much for what it does.
I've been working in the
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
