I just check std.json for parsing real numbers.
import std.json;
import std.stdio: writeln;
int main()
{
auto json = parseJSON("1.24E +1");
writeln(toJSON(&json));
return 0;
}
and
output: 12.4
It's bug or normal ?
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 06:53:12 UTC, Batuhan Göksu wrote:
d to make MongoDB database connection data extraction, data,
how do I do want to add
friends would appreciate if you help me in this regard.
Check if you can use the driver from vibe.d project, if it's not
possible, you can alwa
thanks
but how can I solve using vibe.d
I do not want to use your own server that hosts the very mass of
a framework vibe.d
How do I use the driver for MongoDB So the c
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 08:04:49 UTC, khurshid wrote:
I just check std.json for parsing real numbers.
import std.json;
import std.stdio: writeln;
int main()
{
auto json = parseJSON("1.24E +1");
writeln(toJSON(&json));
return 0;
}
and
output: 12
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 21:41:30 UTC, John Joyus wrote:
On 08/06/2013 04:55 PM, Carlos wrote:
It is called GtkD.
Are there any applications written with GtkD for Windows? Just
want to look at the screen shots. Thanks.
http://deoma-cmd.ru/en/SiteCreator.aspx
biggest what i see
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:11:07 UTC, MrSmith wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 08:04:49 UTC, khurshid wrote:
I just check std.json for parsing real numbers.
import std.json;
import std.stdio: writeln;
int main()
{
auto json = parseJSON("1.24E +1");
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 19:10:11 UTC, Borislav Kosharov
wrote:
Something strange happens when I do this:
unittest {
import std.array, std.string;
string s = "test";
//assert(s.toUpper.split("").join("-") == "T-E-S-T");
//"Memory allocation failed"
//[Finished in 26.5s]
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:05:14 UTC, Batuhan Göksu wrote:
thanks
but how can I solve using vibe.d
I do not want to use your own server that hosts the very mass
of a framework vibe.d
How do I use the driver for MongoDB So the c
It's not clear what you are asking, probably because of
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 22:36:39 UTC, Milvakili wrote:
Hi,
I can compile
void main(){
auto myRegx = regex(`(?!test)`);
}
however can not compile this one
void main(){
auto myRegx = ctRegex!(`(?!test)`);
}
code sample:http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/d38926f4
and get the following error:
...
std
std.json parseJSON has a bug,
// leading whitespaces
auto json = parseJSON("1 .000");
-- should throws, but it's success parsed as `1.000` .
Khurshid...
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 12:08:00 UTC, khurshid wrote:
std.json parseJSON has a bug,
// leading whitespaces
auto json = parseJSON("1
.000");
-- should throws, but it's success parsed as `1.000` .
Khurshid...
Or more...
auto
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 12:08:00 UTC, khurshid wrote:
std.json parseJSON has a bug,
// leading whitespaces
auto json = parseJSON("1
.000");
-- should throws, but it's success parsed as `1.000` .
Khurshid...
I think bug repor
Am 08.08.2013 14:15, schrieb khurshid:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 12:08:00 UTC, khurshid wrote:
>>
>> std.json parseJSON has a bug,
>>
>> // leading whitespaces
>> auto json = parseJSON("1 .000");
>>
>> -- should throws, but it's succes
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 12:08:00 UTC, khurshid wrote:
std.json parseJSON has a bug,
// leading whitespaces
auto json = parseJSON("1
.000");
-- should throws, but it's success parsed as `1.000` .
Khurshid...
I don't think thi
Tofu Ninja:
I don't think this is a bug, the json spec seems to indicate
that this is valid.
The JSON decode of the Python2.6.6 standard library seems to
refuse it:
import json
json.loads("1.000")
1.0
json.loads("1 .000")
Traceback (most recent call las
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 12:38:39 UTC, SteveGuo wrote:
I think bug reports should be here
http://forum.dlang.org/group/digitalmars.D.bugs
Actually, that only shows the activity on the bug tracker. New
issues should be reported here: http://d.puremagic.com/issues
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 12:38:39 UTC, SteveGuo wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 12:08:00 UTC, khurshid wrote:
std.json parseJSON has a bug,
// leading whitespaces
auto json = parseJSON("1
.000");
-- should throws, but it's
Am 08.08.2013 14:54, schrieb bearophile:
> Tofu Ninja:
>
>> I don't think this is a bug, the json spec seems to indicate that this
>> is valid.
>
>
> The JSON decode of the Python2.6.6 standard library seems to refuse it:
>
import json
json.loads("1.000")
> 1.0
json.loads("1
David:
If we follow an existing implementation, we should follow
JavaScript
In my opinion we should follow the formal JSON grammar.
Bye,
bearophile
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:49:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
In my opinion we should follow the formal JSON grammar.
This. Anyone who wants JavaScript behavior can use own
third-party library bust standard library must behave according
to published standards and specifications.
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 03:49:15PM +0200, bearophile wrote:
> David:
>
> >If we follow an existing implementation, we should follow
> >JavaScript
>
> In my opinion we should follow the formal JSON grammar.
[...]
+1.
T
--
Recently, our IT department hired a bug-fix engineer. He used to work f
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:05:56AM +0200, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> In Phobos pull request #1453 (Implement chunkBy.)[1], the topic of
> string lambda functions has again cropped up. I think we should
> clearly decide on some things regarding them. Questions such as; are
> they a worthwhile alternative
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:56:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:49:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
In my opinion we should follow the formal JSON grammar.
This. Anyone who wants JavaScript behavior can use own
third-party library bust standard library must behave accordi
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:56:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:49:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
In my opinion we should follow the formal JSON grammar.
This. Anyone who wants JavaScript behavior can use own
third-party library bust standard library must behave accordi
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 19:10:11 UTC, Borislav Kosharov
wrote:
Something strange happens when I do this:
unittest {
import std.array, std.string;
string s = "test";
//assert(s.toUpper.split("").join("-") == "T-E-S-T");
//"Memory allocation failed"
//[Finished in 26.5s]
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 08:04:49 UTC, khurshid wrote:
I just check std.json for parsing real numbers.
import std.json;
import std.stdio: writeln;
int main()
{
auto json = parseJSON("1.24E +1");
writeln(toJSON(&json));
return 0;
}
and
output: 12
On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 at 22:36:39 UTC, Milvakili wrote:
Hi,
I can compile
void main(){
auto myRegx = regex(`(?!test)`);
}
however can not compile this one
void main(){
auto myRegx = ctRegex!(`(?!test)`);
}
code sample:http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/d38926f4
and get the following error:
snip..
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:56:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:49:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
In my opinion we should follow the formal JSON grammar.
This. Anyone who wants JavaScript behavior can use own
third-party library bust standard library must behave accordi
> The real question is, is this worth fixing before std.serialize makes it
> in? There will likely be other bugs once/if that's accepted. I tried
> extending std.json in the past with static reflection, but that didn't
> make it in for this very reason.
Yep no one seems to care about std.json.
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:13:51 UTC, khurshid wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:11:07 UTC, MrSmith wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 08:04:49 UTC, khurshid wrote:
I just check std.json for parsing real numbers.
import std.json;
import std.stdio: writeln;
int main()
{
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:56:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:49:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
In my opinion we should follow the formal JSON grammar.
This. Anyone who wants JavaScript behavior can use own
third-party library bust standard library must behave accordi
Thank you friends, for now postponed the event MongoDB.
08-Aug-2013 02:36, Milvakili пишет:
Hi,
I can compile
void main(){
auto myRegx = regex(`(?!test)`);
}
however can not compile this one
void main(){
auto myRegx = ctRegex!(`(?!test)`);
}
Well, it should have said "sorry, unsupported yet" or something to that
extent. It's a bug regardless as
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:05:10 +0200
"Batuhan Göksu" wrote:
> thanks
>
> but how can I solve using vibe.d
>
> I do not want to use your own server that hosts the very mass of
> a framework vibe.d
>
> How do I use the driver for MongoDB So the c
You don't need to use all of vibe.d. Vibe.d is ve
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:17:38 +0200
"Tofu Ninja" wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:56:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> > On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:49:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> >> In my opinion we should follow the formal JSON grammar.
> >
> > This. Anyone who wants JavaScript behavior can
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 15:17:40 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
A formal grammar can be found here starting on page 202 but I
don't know enough about grammars to be able to interpret it.
http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Ecma-262.pdf
Im starting to become less sure if i
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:20:16 +0200
"Borislav Kosharov" wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:13:51 UTC, khurshid wrote:
> > On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:11:07 UTC, MrSmith wrote:
> >> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 08:04:49 UTC, khurshid wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I just check std.json for parsin
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 14:38:34 SteveGuo wrote:
> I think bug reports should be here
> http://forum.dlang.org/group/digitalmars.D.bugs
Please, never, never post to that list. It shouldn't even accept posts to it
(and it may not anymore, since I haven't seen anyone post to it for a while).
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:45:19AM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:17:38 +0200
> "Tofu Ninja" wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:56:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:49:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> > >> In my opinion we should follow th
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 15:15:44 UTC, David wrote:
The real question is, is this worth fixing before
std.serialize makes it
in? There will likely be other bugs once/if that's accepted. I
tried
extending std.json in the past with static reflection, but
that didn't
make it in for this very
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 05:20:16PM +0200, Borislav Kosharov wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:13:51 UTC, khurshid wrote:
> >On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:11:07 UTC, MrSmith wrote:
> >>On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 08:04:49 UTC, khurshid wrote:
> >>>
> >>>I just check std.json for parsin
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 07:29:56 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Seems this thread has quietened down. So, what is the conclusion? Seems
> like almost everyone concedes that silent deprecation is the way to go.
> We still support string lambdas in the background, but in public docs we
> promote the use of
On 08/08/2013 03:49 AM, John Colvin wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:05:14 UTC, Batuhan Göksu wrote:
> What languages are you fluent in?
Batuhan Göksu is a Turkish name! :) Batuhan, the Turkish D community is at
http://ddili.org/forum
Ali
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 09:52:05AM -0700, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Thursday, August 08, 2013 07:29:56 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> > Seems this thread has quietened down. So, what is the conclusion?
> > Seems like almost everyone concedes that silent deprecation is the
> > way to go. We still support s
After the latest Phobos update, I can't run the Phobos unittests
anymore; std.algorithm runs out of memory.
What do you guys think? Since we have package.d support now, I think
it's about time we split std.algorithm up into smaller pieces. As a
first stab at it, we could split it up according to
Can we have UFCS for templates?
e.g.,
T New(T, A...)(A args) { }
T t = T.New(args);
Note, in this case, the type parameter is substituted.
Am 08.08.2013 18:26, schrieb Lemonfiend:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 15:15:44 UTC, David wrote:
>>> The real question is, is this worth fixing before std.serialize makes it
>>> in? There will likely be other bugs once/if that's accepted. I tried
>>> extending std.json in the past with static re
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 15:45:22 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:17:38 +0200
"Tofu Ninja" wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:56:15 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 13:49:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
>> In my opinion we should follow the formal JSON
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:35:02 UTC, JS wrote:
Can we have UFCS for templates?
e.g.,
T New(T, A...)(A args) { }
T t = T.New(args);
Note, in this case, the type parameter is substituted.
That would be nice things to have, it would allow the
parse!type(...) to be turned into type.pa
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:35:02 UTC, JS wrote:
Can we have UFCS for templates?
e.g.,
T New(T, A...)(A args) { }
T t = T.New(args);
Note, in this case, the type parameter is substituted.
As always, providing motivating use case and advantage/cost
comparison is usual requirement to
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 19:35:01 JS wrote:
> Can we have UFCS for templates?
>
> e.g.,
>
> T New(T, A...)(A args) { }
>
>
> T t = T.New(args);
>
>
> Note, in this case, the type parameter is substituted.
And how is the compiler supposed to know whether T is being passed as a
template a
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:37:37 UTC, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Just out of curiosity what is this sort of grammar format
called or what would one want to try to look up to understand
it? I just have seen it around a few times and never really
knew what it was about other than some how it descr
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:33:38 UTC, David wrote:
I made a pull request improving the API a few weeks ago,
no one seems to really care.
Phobos needs a new dictator.
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 08:24:19PM +0200, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:33:38 UTC, David wrote:
> >I made a pull request improving the API a few weeks ago,
> >no one seems to really care.
>
> Phobos needs a new dictator.
Or rather, Phobos needs more reviewers/committers.
Am 08.08.2013 20:24, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:33:38 UTC, David wrote:
>> I made a pull request improving the API a few weeks ago,
>> no one seems to really care.
>
> Phobos needs a new dictator.
Either that, or I will soon start my own standard lib and stop caring
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 16:05:56 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:20:16 +0200
"Borislav Kosharov" wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:13:51 UTC, khurshid wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:11:07 UTC, MrSmith wrote:
>> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 08:04:49 UT
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 08:46:15PM +0200, Borislav Kosharov wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 16:05:56 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:20:16 +0200
> >"Borislav Kosharov" wrote:
> >
> >>On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:13:51 UTC, khurshid wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, 8 Augus
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 18:46:17 UTC, Borislav Kosharov
wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 16:05:56 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:20:16 +0200
"Borislav Kosharov" wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:13:51 UTC, khurshid wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 18:31:52 UTC, David wrote:
Am 08.08.2013 20:24, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:33:38 UTC, David wrote:
I made a pull request improving the API a few weeks ago,
no one seems to really care.
Phobos needs a new dictator.
Either that, or I
I want to make a simple Vector struct class:
struct Vector {
alias _data this;
alias data!0 x, width;
alias data!1 y, height;
private:
@property float data(int i)() {
return _data[i];
}
@property void data(int i)(float value) {
_data[i] = value;
}
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 18:31:52 UTC, David wrote:
Am 08.08.2013 20:24, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:33:38 UTC, David wrote:
I made a pull request improving the API a few weeks ago,
no one seems to really care.
Phobos needs a new dictator.
Either that, or I
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 20:14:58 UTC, Borislav Kosharov
wrote:
I want to make a simple Vector struct class:
struct Vector {
alias _data this;
alias data!0 x, width;
alias data!1 y, height;
private:
@property float data(int i)() {
return _data[i];
}
@proper
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:15:28PM +0200, Tofu Ninja wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 18:31:52 UTC, David wrote:
> >Am 08.08.2013 20:24, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe:
> >>On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:33:38 UTC, David wrote:
> >>>I made a pull request improving the API a few weeks ago,
> >>>no on
Am 08.08.2013 22:15, schrieb Tofu Ninja:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 18:31:52 UTC, David wrote:
>> Am 08.08.2013 20:24, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe:
>>> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:33:38 UTC, David wrote:
I made a pull request improving the API a few weeks ago,
no one seems to really c
On 08/08/2013 11:46 AM, Borislav Kosharov wrote:
>>> > I wrote not a "1.24E+1", a "1 .24E +1" with leading >
spaces.
>>>
>>> Well what should it be if it's not 12.4?
>>
>> A syntax error.
>
> I don't think this would cause any problems. It would just throw syntax
> error because there i
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:40:45PM +0200, David wrote:
> Am 08.08.2013 22:15, schrieb Tofu Ninja:
[...]
> > It is really bad that people are actually talking about starting
> > there own standard lib, I wasn't around for the whole phobos vs
> > tango thing but from what I hear, it wasn't pretty. If
Am Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:15:28 +0200
schrieb "Tofu Ninja" :
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 18:31:52 UTC, David wrote:
> > Am 08.08.2013 20:24, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe:
> >> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:33:38 UTC, David wrote:
> >>> I made a pull request improving the API a few weeks ago,
> >>> no
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 21:40:46 UTC, David wrote:
Am 08.08.2013 22:15, schrieb Tofu Ninja:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 18:31:52 UTC, David wrote:
Am 08.08.2013 20:24, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:33:38 UTC, David wrote:
I made a pull request improving the A
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 22:19:28 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
I'd like to explain the special issue we have with std.json -
as far as I understand it:
*snip*
This actually brings up the main beefs I have with the phobos dev
process:
1) your requirements list should be prominently document
Am 09.08.2013 00:19, schrieb Johannes Pfau:
> Am Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:15:28 +0200
> schrieb "Tofu Ninja" :
>
>> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 18:31:52 UTC, David wrote:
>>> Am 08.08.2013 20:24, schrieb Adam D. Ruppe:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:33:38 UTC, David wrote:
> I made a pull
On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 20:46:15 +0200
"Borislav Kosharov" wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 16:05:56 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:20:16 +0200
> > "Borislav Kosharov" wrote:
> >
> >> On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 10:13:51 UTC, khurshid wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I wrote not
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:55:04 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:35:02 UTC, JS wrote:
Can we have UFCS for templates?
e.g.,
T New(T, A...)(A args) { }
T t = T.New(args);
Note, in this case, the type parameter is substituted.
As always, providing motivating use
According to the review queue, there there are 5 items that are
currently ready for review. There was even a thread a while back
about starting another formal review, where both Jacob Carlborg
and Brian Schott said they're ready for review:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/gjonxudcdiwrlkgww...@for
On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:34:31 UTC, JS wrote:
Are you not smart enough to come up with use cases yourself?
This is not some extremely rare thing that might be used 1 in
10^100.
It's not his proposal. The burden of proof is on you.
On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:53:18 UTC, Tyler Jameson Little
wrote:
According to the review queue, there there are 5 items that are
currently ready for review. There was even a thread a while
back about starting another formal review, where both Jacob
Carlborg and Brian Schott said they're re
On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:57:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:34:31 UTC, JS wrote:
Are you not smart enough to come up with use cases yourself?
This is not some extremely rare thing that might be used 1 in
10^100.
It's not his proposal. The burden of proof is on
I suggest that change keyword *for_each* to *for* since *for* is
clear enough and
less letters, like C++11 does.
So instead of:
T t = New!T(args)
you would like:
T t = T.New(args)
Is that it?
On Friday, August 09, 2013 05:29:05 JS wrote:
> On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:57:21 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> > On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:34:31 UTC, JS wrote:
> >> Are you not smart enough to come up with use cases yourself?
> >> This is not some extremely rare thing that might be used 1 in
>
On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 03:41:56 UTC, barryharris wrote:
So instead of:
T t = New!T(args)
you would like:
T t = T.New(args)
Is that it?
Never mind, I read your original post again...
Note, in this case, the type parameter is substituted.
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:35:02 UTC, JS wrote:
Can we have UFCS for templates?
e.g.,
T New(T, A...)(A args) { }
T t = T.New(args);
Note, in this case, the type parameter is substituted.
Actually, what is wrong with New!T(args)? This works fine for me:
T t = New!T(args) ??
templat
auto test2 = New!AnotherTest("test2", 20);
oops, should read:
auto test2 = New!AnotherTest(20);
-1 for me anyway for the following reason:
A.function(args)// I know A is a function value parameter
function!A(args)// I know A is a template type parameter
functi
I've been making some progress on a project called DCD[1], which
is D's answer to Go's Gocode[2]. It's a command-line
client/server autocompletion program for D built off the same
lexer/parser/ast code that powers DScanner.
I'd like to get some help writing integration scripts for the
editors
On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:53:18 UTC, Tyler Jameson Little
wrote:
I havn't seen anything in this mailing list (except the above
and one by Walter Bright) for a while, and I haven't seen any
pull requests for any of the items in the review queue.
I haven't come back to std.serialize since t
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 06:53:12 UTC, Batuhan Göksu wrote:
d to make MongoDB database connection data extraction, data,
how do I do want to add
friends would appreciate if you help me in this regard.
I have my own D mongodb driver, which depends only on D and
phobos, but it is not finis
85 matches
Mail list logo
