Enjoy!
Besides the noise, I did!
Great talk!
And thanks for your efforts to make LDC a success.
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 02:51:51 UTC, Nick B wrote:
Hi
Can any one advise when we can expect the conference talks (and
perhaps the slides as well) to available to download or via
Utube
?
I saw some of the streamed talks, but would love to view the
rest.
The MC said initially that
On Sunday, 3 November 2013 at 05:27:24 UTC, evilrat wrote:
https://github.com/evilrat666/directx-d
this is it. i think i can't continue on this one anymore, nor do
i have time, nor passion. i've made a lot of work and meet
(almost) no interest. i will be stay in contact, so any pull
request
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 19:58:10 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 5/6/2014 9:11 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 12:40:48 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Any way to see the TOC?
Hmm, not on the website yet but here it is.
[snip]
Sounds awesome!
Jus got mail from PacktPub: D
Walter Bright, el 26 de May a las 11:09 me escribiste:
On 5/26/2014 10:30 AM, w0rp wrote:
On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 17:06:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Youtube has solved all these problems - why not use it?
You can view .webm directly in recent Firefox or Chrome versions on Windows,
you
an
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 10:00:01 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 19:58:10 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 5/6/2014 9:11 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 12:40:48 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Any way to see the TOC?
Hmm, not on the website yet but here it
Kai Nacke:
In the same folder are also the videos of the other LLVM
related talk.
I have appreciated the An approach for energy consumption
analysis of programs using LLVM talk, they even have an
annotation that statically enforces a certain function to consume
less than a specified amount
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 10:00:01 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 19:58:10 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 5/6/2014 9:11 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 12:40:48 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Any way to see the TOC?
Hmm, not on the website yet but here it
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 11:43:32 UTC, Kozzi wrote:
I am reading it now, but there is a lot of errata :(.
What do you mean?
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 11:43:32 UTC, Kozzi wrote:
I am reading it now, but there is a lot of errata :(.
Well that's a good thing about PDF, because you can fix it and
update the version online.
Matheus.
I mean there is a lot of typo (for e.g. multiple ';' chars at the end of
line, import std.stdio : writeln;;;)
on page 2,6,8,10,14 ...
On page 19:
static Vector fromPoint(float[2] point) {
import std.math;
Vector v;
float x = point[0];
float y= point[1];
v.magnitude = sqrt(x ^^ 2 + y ^^ 2);
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 11:57:05 UTC, Daniel Kozak via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I mean there is a lot of typo (for e.g. multiple ';' chars at
the end of line, import std.stdio : writeln;;;)
Blargh, the code got screwed up something nasty through the
revision process (chapter 6
On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 05:59:35 UTC, Kai Nacke wrote:
[..]
http://video.fosdem.org/2014/K4401/Sunday/LDC_the_LLVMbased_D_compiler.webm
I can't watch this on my iPhone.
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 12:05:43 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 11:57:05 UTC, Daniel Kozak via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I mean there is a lot of typo (for e.g. multiple ';' chars at
the end of line, import std.stdio : writeln;;;)
Blargh, the code got screwed up
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 12:59:59 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 12:05:43 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 11:57:05 UTC, Daniel Kozak via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I mean there is a lot of typo (for e.g. multiple ';' chars at
the end of line, import
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 13:27:56 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
Will epub version be available too?
Yeah, I think it is already on the packt website.
apparently to stay on top of reddit for awhile.
Explain plz
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/26m8hy/scott_meyers_dconf_2014_keynote_the_last_thing_d/
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (search that page, if not found
click More and search again)
https://www.facebook.com/dlang.org/posts/855022447844771
On 5/27/14, 12:41 AM, Nick B wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 07:14:54 UTC, Joakim wrote:
The MC said initially that they'd have them up in a day or two most
likely, then Andrei said he wanted to stagger their release over a
couple weeks like he did last time, apparently to stay on top of
On 5/27/2014 12:42 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/26m8hy/scott_meyers_dconf_2014_keynote_the_last_thing_d/
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (search that page, if not found
click More and search again)
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 16:42:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/26m8hy/scott_meyers_dconf_2014_keynote_the_last_thing_d/
Thanks, is it possible to put it on Youtube as well? Ustream
stutters every second from where I am which makes me feel
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 16:38:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
http://www.packtpub.com/discover-advantages-of-programming-in-d-cookbook/book
I just agreed with Packt to write a foreword for the book. --
Andrei
I just read the foreword. It's great!
Great, but I think this should be on youtube too, reasons for
this is the possibility to change resolution and other features
like subtitles for foreigners etc.
Matheus.
That was brilliant. I think Scott made two very good points. D
needs people like himself to educate others, and that D should
focus on behaviour which makes sense not only in a particular
context, but with respect to the other contexts. (Which is what
C++ lacks greatly.)
On 5/27/14, 2:57 PM, w0rp wrote:
That was brilliant. I think Scott made two very good points. D needs
people like himself to educate others, and that D should focus on
behaviour which makes sense not only in a particular context, but with
respect to the other contexts. (Which is what C++ lacks
On Tue, 27 May 2014 14:57:46 -0400, w0rp devw...@gmail.com wrote:
That was brilliant. I think Scott made two very good points. D needs
people like himself to educate others
I think you misunderstood that point ;) He was saying to make D so that we
DON'T need specialists like himself that
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 19:44:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Really? What I got out of it was that D doesn't need people
like him because his job is to explain the inconsistencies of
the language. By designing a consistent language in the first
place, people can readily understand it in all
On Tue, 27 May 2014 16:11:12 -0400, w0rp devw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 19:43:57 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2014 14:57:46 -0400, w0rp devw...@gmail.com wrote:
That was brilliant. I think Scott made two very good points. D needs
people like himself
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 20:11:13 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 19:43:57 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2014 14:57:46 -0400, w0rp devw...@gmail.com
wrote:
That was brilliant. I think Scott made two very good points.
D needs people like himself to educate
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 21:16:34 UTC, Chris Nicholson-Sauls
wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 20:11:13 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 19:43:57 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2014 14:57:46 -0400, w0rp devw...@gmail.com
wrote:
That was brilliant. I think Scott
On 5/27/2014 2:22 PM, w0rp wrote:
I'm actually a native speaker of 25 years and I didn't get it at first. Natural
language communicates ideas approximately.
What bugs me is when people say:
I could care less.
when they mean:
I couldn't care less.
and:
If you think that, you have
On 5/27/2014 6:10 PM, Johannes Totz wrote:
On 27/05/2014 18:43, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 16:42:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Ali Çehreli, el 27 de May a las 10:40 me escribiste:
On 05/27/2014 09:18 AM, Suliman wrote:
apparently to stay on top of reddit for awhile.
Explain plz
A benefit of releasing the presentations slowly is to enable
constant exposure to DConf in the coming weeks, as opposed to making
all
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 23:08:01 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
I think they should be uploaded all ASAP and then you can do
official announcements in reddit or wherever you thinks it's
best to promote the language.
Aye, we could also, if we want some new thing to post to reddit
each time,
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 23:08:01 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Ali Çehreli, el 27 de May a las 10:40 me escribiste:
On 05/27/2014 09:18 AM, Suliman wrote:
apparently to stay on top of reddit for awhile.
Explain plz
A benefit of releasing the presentations slowly is to enable
constant
Brian Schott, el 27 de May a las 20:03 me escribiste:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 19:44:01 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Really? What I got out of it was that D doesn't need people like
him because his job is to explain the inconsistencies of the
language. By designing a consistent language in the
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 22:10:02 UTC, Johannes Totz wrote:
Thanks, is it possible to put it on Youtube as well? Ustream
stutters
every second from where I am which makes me feel sorry for the
speaker…
http://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/ helps with the stutter.
+1
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 23:48:44 UTC, currysoup wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 23:08:01 UTC, Leandro Lucarella
wrote:
Ali Çehreli, el 27 de May a las 10:40 me escribiste:
On 05/27/2014 09:18 AM, Suliman wrote:
apparently to stay on top of reddit for awhile.
Explain plz
A benefit of
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 16:42:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/26m8hy/scott_meyers_dconf_2014_keynote_the_last_thing_d/
https://news.ycombinator.com/newest (search that page, if not
found click More and search again)
I did a translation of most of the code in the slides.
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/72b5cfcb72e4
I'm planning to transform it into blog post (or series). Right now it just
has some scratch notes. Feel free to let me know everything I got wrong.
That's a good idea. I think most of us did that while
On Wednesday, 28 May 2014 at 05:30:18 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I did a translation of most of the code in the slides.
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/72b5cfcb72e4
I'm planning to transform it into blog post (or series). Right
now it just
has some scratch notes. Feel free
On 05/27/2014 02:12 AM, chuck wrote:
Would anyone be interested in a collaboration forum? I am thinking of
starting one on Proboards to aid in development/collaboration between
developers on D and libraries/bindings. Reading through the posts, I
have seen that several people have created small
On 27/05/2014 6:48 p.m., simendsjo wrote:
On 05/27/2014 02:12 AM, chuck wrote:
Would anyone be interested in a collaboration forum? I am thinking of
starting one on Proboards to aid in development/collaboration between
developers on D and libraries/bindings. Reading through the posts, I
have
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 02:52:48 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
I've been looking at the GC and found that the main problem is
that there's no clear information about the pointers. At least
smart pointers have some info inside them but GC pointers are
completely plain 4-8 bytes and nothing else.
Hello,
note that D is still very new to me.
The documentation for
http://dlang.org/phobos/core_runtime.html#.Runtime.loadLibrary is
a bit too terse to answer my question.
I would like to know if it would allow to use Object.factory()
with the classes defined in the loaded library and if
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2013-06-10 18:34, Manu wrote:
On 11 June 2013 02:26, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com mailto:d...@me.com
wrote:
On 2013-06-10 17:40, David Nadlinger wrote:
Let me try to summarize it in code:
---
Hello dear D fellows :D,
The problem boils down to this.
I try to write a Software which should be as compact as possible.
This means that i don't like to use any exception handling (which
appears to be hardly integrated into the language, not that good
for demoscene/OS dev stuff).
So i ran
ok I found a old thread about it, just delete this thread please
Dne Tue, 27 May 2014 14:02:04 +0200 Qox via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com napsal(a):
ok I found a old thread about it, just delete this thread please
This is mail list so it is not possible to delete thread. Btw, can you
post link to the thread which you find.
The thread is
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/dtcxszysceiopzwew...@forum.dlang.org?page=1
Title scope(exit) without exception handling?
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3181
Daniel asked me to use this. And it works.
Use something like:
union U
{
void delegate(int) dg;
struct
{
void* ptr;
void function(int) funcptr;
}
}
U u;
u.dg = dg;
u.funcptr = ...;
u.ptr = ...;
Regards
- Puneet
nothrow doesn't seem to work with the recent dmd compiler :(
I know it because _d_local_unwind2() is still called.
Seems as if I need another more ugly (but still nicer than C++)
solution. Mixins which jump on an error to a label...hell I love
low level languages (Java is in this sense crap
Ofcourse this doesn't look that maintainable to me...well, then
the C++ struct destructor way???
On 5/27/2014 9:07 PM, Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Dne Tue, 27 May 2014 14:02:04 +0200 Qox via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com napsal(a):
ok I found a old thread about it, just delete this thread please
This is mail list so it is not possible to delete thread. Btw, can
On 5/27/2014 9:43 PM, Qox wrote:
nothrow doesn't seem to work with the recent dmd compiler :(
I know it because _d_local_unwind2() is still called.
notrhow doesn't turn off exception handling. It just doesn't allow you
to throw from a particular function. From inside a nothrow function, you
The terms system level programming and garbage collection are
mutually exclusive, but I see the value in GC. However, I cannot
really come up with a single situation where I don't know what
kind of allocator I have used when accessing a pointer.
I think it makes a lot of sense to think in the
sounds a bit like C++ handling to me, for me *personally* it
misses also the point about nothrow, because it gurantues
nothing...which is like in C++ and imho bad...
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 03:26:33 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
On 2014-05-26 23:19, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Etienne Cimon wrote in message
news:lm0um0$tgh$1...@digitalmars.com...
I think everything everywhere would have to change for this
to be
possible.
Sounds like never gonna happen.
In
On 2014-05-27 3:56 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 64 bit platform 8 bytes is sufficient if you control the allocator:
1. Avoid allocating non-GC memory from specific address range.
2. Set a max-size for GC allocated objects.
Then the test becomes this:
On 2014-05-27 9:52 AM, Idan Arye wrote:
Please, no apostrophe. It'll mess syntax highlighters, and possible
indenters.
How about #?
void# ptr;
void## ptr2 = ptr;
assert(sizeof(ptr) == size_t + 3);
assert(szptr_t == sizeof(ptr));
szptr_t ptr2Val = cast(szptr_t) ptr;
char magicNum =
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 13:58:26 UTC, Etienne wrote:
That's true, though you still need the thread ID for references
to pointers and you need to be able to pass those pointers to C.
I am not really sure how useful references to gc-pointers is. I
certainly would trade them in for multiple
On Mon, 26 May 2014 19:03:22 -0400, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:54:47PM -0700, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, 24 May 2014 21:39:14 -0700, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
On
On 2014-05-27 10:18 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 13:58:26 UTC, Etienne wrote:
That's true, though you still need the thread ID for references to
pointers and you need to be able to pass those pointers to C.
I am not really sure
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 13:24:08 UTC, Qox wrote:
sounds a bit like C++ handling to me, for me *personally* it
misses also the point about nothrow, because it gurantues
nothing...which is like in C++ and imho bad...
It guarantees at compile time that your function will not throw
an
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 14:42:34 UTC, Etienne wrote:
I think the GC is the future of D considering it's embedded to
the very core of the language, and compatibility with C code is
... elementary.
Well, but then I think you should be required to do manual
tracking while it is being
Considering something like this:
auto stuff = [1, 2, 3];
struct Foo
{
typeof(stuff.filter!(a != 2)) foo;
this(int = 0)
{
// assume we must initialize foo in ctor,
// for instance because it needs ctor args;
// in this
Luís Marques:
If the language allowed foo to be declared using auto (which
would be deduced from the assignment in the ctor), that would
be nice, right?
This is a kind of flow typing, it's rather useful but it
introduces several complexities, so I think it's now too much
late to add it to
On Saturday, 24 May 2014 at 23:37:44 UTC, aliyome wrote:
On Saturday, 24 May 2014 at 20:34:03 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Saturday, 24 May 2014 at 17:40:29 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
I'm looking forward to the YouTube reruns for the talks I
still missed. (I still can't believe I missed
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 15:06:53 UTC, bearophile wrote:
BTW, why doesn't this example work with lambdas (a = a != 2)
instead of a string mixin (a != 2)?
I think lambda instantiations defines a different type. So it's
incompatible.
Incompatible with what? I meant changing it in both the
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 15:40:04 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 15:06:53 UTC, bearophile wrote:
BTW, why doesn't this example work with lambdas (a = a != 2)
instead of a string mixin (a != 2)?
I think lambda instantiations defines a different type. So
it's
On 2014-05-27 10:54 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 14:42:34 UTC, Etienne wrote:
I think the GC is the future of D considering it's embedded to the
very core of the language, and compatibility with C code is ...
elementary.
Well,
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 16:47:38 UTC, Etienne wrote:
You're right, it's obviously easier to keep it as the same
pointer syntax but hijack the stdlib malloc functions to
forcibly go through the GC.
That is an option, and having a hijacked malloc would probably
also make it possible to
On 2014-05-27 9:06 AM, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it makes a lot of sense to think in the direction of the post of
Etienne and have allocator based pointer types. With a template heavy
coding style it becomes less problematic than in a language like C.
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 15:06:53 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Luís Marques:
If the language allowed foo to be declared using auto (which
would be deduced from the assignment in the ctor), that would
be nice, right?
This is a kind of flow typing, it's rather useful but it
introduces several
On 5/27/14, 6:26 AM, Idan Arye wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 15:40:04 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 15:06:53 UTC, bearophile wrote:
BTW, why doesn't this example work with lambdas (a = a != 2)
instead of a string mixin (a != 2)?
I think lambda instantiations defines
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 17:23:24 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Not necessarily. The first assignment of a member in a
constructor is already treated as special, so I guess we're
halfway there.
That's what I was thinking. *crosses fingers*
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 17:22:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I think there was either or both a discussion and a bug report
on this, but can't find either. Basically we need to clarify
what it means to compare two function literals for equality. --
Andrei
I remember the thread where
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 13:06:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
...However, I cannot really come up with a single situation
where I don't know what kind of allocator I have used when
accessing a pointer
Heap allocation in D is up to the user. Can you imagine something
like
On 5/27/14, 7:51 AM, Meta wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 17:22:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think there was either or both a discussion and a bug report on
this, but can't find either. Basically we need to clarify what it
means to compare two function literals for equality. -- Andrei
On 5/27/14, 7:59 AM, MachMit wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 13:06:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
...However, I cannot really come up with a single situation where I
don't know what kind of allocator I have used when accessing a
pointer
Heap allocation in D is up to the user. Can
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 08:17:26AM -1000, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 5/27/14, 7:51 AM, Meta wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 17:22:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think there was either or both a discussion and a bug report on
this, but can't find either. Basically
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 18:19:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/27/14, 7:59 AM, MachMit wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 13:06:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
...However, I cannot really come up with a single situation
where I
don't know what kind of allocator I have used when
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 18:19:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Is there a white paper available for FastMM? Couldn't find any.
http://sourceforge.net/p/fastmm/code/HEAD/tree/FastMM4_Readme.txt
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 18:54:05 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Honestly, I don't see the need even for alpha-renaming -- I
can't
imagine a use case where you'd want to do something like that.
I think
straight up hashing of the function body is Good Enough(tm).
T
Hashing the
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 18:19:14 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/27/14, 7:59 AM, MachMit wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 13:06:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
...However, I cannot really come up with a single situation
where I
don't know what kind of allocator I have used when
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 19:39:23 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
Hashing the function body is not enough - you must also
consider the closure!
template Template(alias func){
bool Template=func();
}
void foo(){
int a;
writeln(Template!(()=is(typeof(a) : char)));
Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com writes:
On 5/25/14, 7:54 AM, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 24 May 2014 at 17:58:08 UTC, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
As discussed a little at the conference, the auto-tester is almost always
hardware
On 5/27/14, 1:41 PM, Jerry via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com writes:
On 5/25/14, 7:54 AM, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Saturday, 24 May 2014 at 17:58:08 UTC, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote:
As discussed a little at the
On 5/24/2014 5:19 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 24/05/14 19:46, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d wrote:
An initial PR for Hash_DRBG being struct-based and directly part of
std.random
I think that's up to you. I don't want to hold you back here, but
equally, I feel
On Monday, 26 May 2014 at 20:58:22 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
I've recent fixed a few warnings in D here:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3543
At the end of the thread I asked:
Should I continue fixing GLUE, BACK and ROOT or focus on
remaining warnings in DMD?
but Walter has
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 20:02:34 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 19:39:23 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
Hashing the function body is not enough - you must also
consider the closure!
template Template(alias func){
bool Template=func();
}
void foo(){
int a;
On 5/24/2014 10:57 AM, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote:
At this point, I'd MUCH rather have hardware that doesn't live in my house.
I've got too many already.
That's why god made garages :-)
I like the specs. idea. The forum is at
http://d-language-and-libs.proboards.com
On Tuesday, 27 May 2014 at 23:18:12 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
Well, it won't work for the example that opened this
thread(converted to use lambdas).
As for limiting the delegate version to ones that use @pure and
@nogc, take another look at my example. The lambdas don't
allocate anything so
Hi,
D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is
like towards D3?
Suminda
Suminda Dharmasena wrote in message
news:dgufafcodplrxrqcg...@forum.dlang.org...
Hi,
D2 has been out for a while. Looking to see what the roadmap is like
towards D3?
Suminda
No.
On Thursday, 15 May 2014 at 12:28:47 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
But as long as there can be false pointers, no matter how
improbable, there can be no guaranteed destruction, which was
my point. Maybe it becomes acceptable at very low
probabilities, but it's still a gamble...
A couple of not
http://wiki.dlang.org/Win32_DLLs_in_D - maybe, it's of some help
Hello :)
AFAIK, Higher-level library support is planned for next release
(v2.066) [1].
Meanwhile, you'll have to rely on your own exported factory
functions to create objects instead of Object.factory().
1 : http://wiki.dlang.org/Agenda#high-level_shared_library_support
On Saturday, 24 May 2014 at 08:54:53 UTC, ponce wrote:
Hi David,
Learning programming, learning D and learning 3D are 3
significant endeavours.
You might want to begin with http://www.basic4gl.net/ which
will get you going with 3D, quite a topic in itself.
Then learn D regardless :)
So,
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
