On 2015-01-19 03:50, DaveG wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/114394/D-site/redesign/index.html
It would be better if the menu could become some kind of drop down. Look
at how Bootstrap is doing it [1]. The menu doesn't take up any more
horizontal space when it's expanded.
[1] http
On 2015-01-19 03:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Yes. Next step: fix it! :o) -- Andrei
A couple of years ago I started on writing a contribution document [1]
but never finished it. It might be a bit outdated now but it's mostly
correct and could be used as a starting point.
[1] https://dl.d
On 2015-01-19 03:18, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
TL;DR: I've uploaded new menu colors at http://erdani.com/d/, this time
aiming for a more martian red ethos. Please let me know.
I still like the original menu better.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2015-01-19 02:42, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Anyone like to do a quick proofread of the next edition of This Week in D?
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/jan-18.html
I'm not so sure if "Add support for compiling Objective-C code as extra
sources" is a major change. I would rather think it's mino
On 2015-01-19 04:17, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Yah. The ones I found were paid. My point is ddoc was there and fit the
job perfectly well.
libsass [1] is a C implementation of Sass. Original implementation of
Sass is in Ruby.
This is a confusion - css minification is a separate topic alto
On 2015-01-19 03:31, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
So now minification and gzipping are the culprit? I don't quite understand.
There are plenty existing web frameworks that already have solved, what
it seems like, all the problems you're trying to solve now. You're just
shooting them down becau
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message news:m9iee2$p14$1...@digitalmars.com...
I'm not so sure if "Add support for compiling Objective-C code as extra
sources" is a major change. I would rather think it's minor. Especially
since it won't really be visible to end users and the functionality is
poin
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 02:29:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
* Styling needs work :o).
Andrei
Personally I really like the spartan styling. I don't see any
need for a whole load of colourful background and heavy styling
etc. any more than I would on the page of a book.
The only
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 01:42:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Anyone like to do a quick proofread of the next edition of This
Week in D?
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/jan-18.html
Do NOT post this publically yet - it is just a draft, I want to
do the broad public release/announcement ei
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 18:34:36 -0800
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> With all this discussion on more dynamic content on dlang.org, I sat
> down (figuratively; I've been on a hike today) and thought - what is
> dynamic about D?
>
> So it hit me like a hammer:
>
> * Forum discussi
for those who may be interested, i put my dirty hack there:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14008
feel free to not use it.
Very nice work as the previous edition!
Some corrections, though:
* The number of merged PRs is incorrect, because it includes PRs
that have been merged before this week and only have new comments
on them. E.g.: [1]
* You may want to rename the second links in the Statistics
section to
31 is
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 16:41:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
[...]
I don't know. So what would be the replacement? BTW turns out
that dlangspec.pdf is downloaded quite a bit. -- Andrei
Bummer.
I never used it, so I figured I should give it a try before
attempting to kill it.
I didn'
On 1/18/2015 8:23 PM, deadalnix wrote:
IMO style is the role of the formater. Prompting the programmer with "don't
write this, write that instead" only crate reaction à la "If you know what I
meant, why don't you compile that you asshole ?"
Redundancy is built in to the language design on purpo
hello all
yesterday i took the liberty of asking a dear designer friend of
mine to help us have a better newsletter. luckily, he was able to
put some design together for it. please see it at
http://bit.ly/1DTLuPS and let us know what you guys think.
let's have some elegance with rock solid c
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 10:24:29 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Why don't we instead make use of a proper framework both on the
server side and client side. Personally I would go with Ruby on
Rails but I know that most of you here would hate that so a
better suggestion would probably be vibe.
19.01.2015 04:42, Adam D. Ruppe пишет:
Anyone like to do a quick proofread of the next edition of This Week in D?
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/jan-18.html
Do NOT post this publically yet - it is just a draft, I want to do the
broad public release/announcement either later tonight or first
On 1/18/15 10:57 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/18/2015 7:07 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 02:24:00 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/18/2015 12:46 AM, Brian Schott wrote:
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 08:40:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Sounds like a good idea. If I wasn't cl
On 1/17/15 3:33 AM, deadalnix wrote:
This is accepted :
auto fun(T)(T T) inout if(...) { ... }
This is not :
auto fun(T)(T T) if(...) inout { ... }
Is there a reason ?
I kind of agree with you. Because this is short for:
template fun(T) if(...) { auto fun(T t) inout {...}}
I think it makes
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 02:43:05 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 02:18:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
TL;DR: I've uploaded new menu colors at http://erdani.com/d/,
this time aiming for a more martian red ethos. Please let me
know.
Well I'd prefer less red-ish: ht
On 1/18/15 2:48 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/17/2015 6:19 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/17/15 5:05 PM, MattCoder wrote:
And please change that logo: http://dlang.org/images/d3.png is so early
90's. I don't mean anything wrong with that, but I don't think it fit in
the current standard.
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 11:57:51 UTC, Mengu wrote:
hello all
yesterday i took the liberty of asking a dear designer friend
of mine to help us have a better newsletter. luckily, he was
able to put some design together for it. please see it at
http://bit.ly/1DTLuPS and let us know what yo
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 12:00:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 10:24:29 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
Why don't we instead make use of a proper framework both on
the server side and client side. Personally I would go with
Ruby on Rails but I know that most of
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 13:43:28 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
Bootstrap or PureCSS are just a bunch of CSS helper classes to
quickly model a responsive and modern site.
It is basically pointless if you know CSS and browser
limitations. You need to view the site in the browsers you target
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 13:24:13 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 11:57:51 UTC, Mengu wrote:
hello all
yesterday i took the liberty of asking a dear designer friend
of mine to help us have a better newsletter. luckily, he was
able to put some design together for it. p
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 01:42:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/jan-18.html
I have some style suggestions.
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/mrfkLvq8/1/embedded/result/
CSS additions:
/* Space things out. */
body {line-height: 1.5em;}
h1 {border-bottom: none; m
On Saturday, 17 January 2015 at 17:32:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
In https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/778
I'm proposing replacing
http://dlang.org/comparison.html
with
http://erdani.com/d/comparison.html
The silly one-column comparison was a vestige of a multi-
Has anyone been in contact with Debian and Fedora packagers to see if
using Dub as a build system is acceptable to them for packaging? I know
Debian folk still prefer Autotools, but accept Make or SCons (but
definitely not Waf).
My suspicion is that Debian will deem it not acceptable, but this is
Framework doesn't really matter (though dog-fooding is desirable)
- it is a matter of maintainability. You may like RoR but how
many people in D community will be able to maintain such solution
if you disappear? I doubt many.
It is sad that Andrei wastes his time on such tasks but it is
hard
On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 19:45 +, ponce via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> By the way I finds DDoc suprinsingly apt for a static site
> generator. Markdown is great for writing content but without
> macros, no reuse.
My only comment is, which country is UT, this two letter combination is
not yet assig
Hi it's me again, I didn't know if you were getting the updates
from the other post, or, as I can imagine, you are just extremely
busy.
You said there was a license for redistributing the compiler?
What are the terms and if I agree how would I apply?
Thanks,
Ryan
(If you were getting updates
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 14:54:33 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 19:45 +, ponce via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
By the way I finds DDoc suprinsingly apt for a static site
generator. Markdown is great for writing content but without
macros, no reuse.
My o
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 08:14:58 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm not so sure if "Add support for compiling Objective-C code
as extra sources" is a major change. I would rather think it's
minor.
Yeah, the change itself is minor, but I'm hoping it might be
indicative more coming in the com
On 1/19/15 12:09 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-19 03:44, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Yes. Next step: fix it! :o) -- Andrei
A couple of years ago I started on writing a contribution document [1]
but never finished it. It might be a bit outdated now but it's mostly
correct and could be us
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 10:05:42 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
* The number of merged PRs is incorrect, because it includes
PRs that have been merged before this week and only have new
comments on them. E.g.: [1]
Ah, yes, fixed.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pulls?q=is%3A
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 12:40:12 UTC, Ivan Timokhin wrote:
> cat test.d
void main()
{
import std.stdio : writeln;
1.writeln;
}
> rdmd test.d
1
Huh, I'm pretty sure that didn't used to work. The nested
function case still doesn't work though so I'll fix it to just
talk about that
On 1/19/15 5:43 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Yep, run the site on vibe.d, I think this is what everybody wants.
Besides, vibe.d is already compiling all the html files.
I think that would be great. Who wants to champion this project? Our
webmaster is okay with it and can arrange a domain such a
On 1/19/15 6:54 AM, Dicebot wrote:
Framework doesn't really matter (though dog-fooding is desirable) - it
is a matter of maintainability. You may like RoR but how many people in
D community will be able to maintain such solution if you disappear? I
doubt many.
That's exactly right. That said, s
On 1/19/15 5:43 AM, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
Bootstrap or PureCSS are just a bunch of CSS helper classes to quickly
model a responsive and modern site. I would definitely use them.
Besides, any web developer worth his salt knows one or the other. And
with all the tutorials they got, it is not har
Thanks everybody for your help!
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 14:22:12 UTC, anonymous wrote:
I have some style suggestions.
Cool, thanks! file:///home/me/d/this-week/web/jan-18.html
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:23:25 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
file:///home/me/d/this-week/web/jan-18.html
oops you obviously can't see that lol
well, it'll be in the live folder soon enough anyway...
On 1/18/15 7:19 PM, tcak wrote:
Red colour is hard to work with generally. It takes too much attention.
It goes well with white and grey colours. Though, here is some colours
for you to try:
https://color.adobe.com/create/color-wheel/?base=2&rule=Custom&selected=4&name=My%20Color%20Theme&mode=rg
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 15:31 +, ponce via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
>
> Dunno, maybe an US person would tell if "Utah" would be
> preferable to "UT".
I guess it depends if you want non USA people to know the location. I
appreciate that everyone inside the USA knows all the state codes, and
kno
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 14:48:32 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Has anyone been in contact with Debian and Fedora packagers to
see if
using Dub as a build system is acceptable to them for
packaging? I know
Debian folk still prefer Autotools, but accept Make or SCons
(but
def
On 1/18/15 7:19 PM, MattCoder wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 03:01:44 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
No personal aspect to this. What hex colors did you use? --
background-color: #6E6E6E;
And I cleaned:
#cssmenu > ul > li > a {
font-size: 14px;
display: block;
backgroun
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 11:57:51 UTC, Mengu wrote:
yesterday i took the liberty of asking a dear designer friend
of mine to help us have a better newsletter. luckily, he was
Cool, thanks! I combined the two suggestions to form this:
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/jan-18.html
Final d
On 1/19/15 2:49 AM, Mathias LANG wrote:
On Sunday, 18 January 2015 at 16:41:36 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[...]
I don't know. So what would be the replacement? BTW turns out that
dlangspec.pdf is downloaded quite a bit. -- Andrei
Bummer.
I never used it, so I figured I should give it a tr
On 1/18/15 6:50 PM, DaveG wrote:
Here's where I'm at. The menus don't use javascript (except when the
screen gets so small it needs a button to open the navigation, the
button uses js). It scales with screen size and should work on mobile
(untested) - I changed doctype to html5 and added metata
On 1/19/15 8:37 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 11:57:51 UTC, Mengu wrote:
yesterday i took the liberty of asking a dear designer friend of mine
to help us have a better newsletter. luckily, he was
Cool, thanks! I combined the two suggestions to form this:
http://arsdn
On 1/19/15 12:33 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-19 03:31, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
So now minification and gzipping are the culprit? I don't quite
understand.
There are plenty existing web frameworks that already have solved, what
it seems like, all the problems you're trying to solve
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 14:54:36 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
It is sad that Andrei wastes his time on such tasks but it is
hard to find volunteers for such unpleasant things. I'd
personally avoid it at all costs :)
Uhm, if you insist on home grown macros, and provide no
consistent semantic mark
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:40:38 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
We seem to have the problem that every time we want to release
on Sunday evening, we end up releasing on Monday morning.
Nah, last time we didn't release until Tuesday! If the pattern
keeps up, we'll be on time next week. (
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:37:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 11:57:51 UTC, Mengu wrote:
yesterday i took the liberty of asking a dear designer friend
of mine to help us have a better newsletter. luckily, he was
Cool, thanks! I combined the two suggestions to
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:46:08 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
There's a typo in the From The Past section
s/demonstrats/demonstrates
hit refresh, it should be fixed you might see a cached version
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 01:42:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Anyone like to do a quick proofread of the next edition of This
Week in D?
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/jan-18.html
Do NOT post this publically yet - it is just a draft, I want to
do the broad public release/announcement ei
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:46:41 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
Hey Mengu you could share those icons from his demonstration
(Calendar, statistic): http://i.imgur.com/VRmCwCT.png
And other potential headers too. I could have cut them out of the
image but since there's only the two, I figured that
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:46:41 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:37:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 11:57:51 UTC, Mengu wrote:
yesterday i took the liberty of asking a dear designer friend
of mine to help us have a better newsletter. lucki
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:38:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
But that's beside the point. This seems to suggest the choice
is "if we didn't have to build the mobi and pdf, the road is
clear to using Great Framework(tm)". There are a few issues
with that, such as nobody seems to agre
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:47:05 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:46:08 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
There's a typo in the From The Past section
s/demonstrats/demonstrates
hit refresh, it should be fixed you might see a cached version
oh yep, the new version looks gr
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 14:48:32 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Has anyone been in contact with Debian and Fedora packagers to
see if
using Dub as a build system is acceptable to them for
packaging? I know
Debian folk still prefer Autotools, but accept Make or SCons
(but
def
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 07:56:39 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-19 03:50, DaveG wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/114394/D-site/redesign/index.html
It would be better if the menu could become some kind of drop
down. Look at how Bootstrap is doing it [1]. The menu doesn'
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 17:00:19 UTC, DaveG wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 07:56:39 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2015-01-19 03:50, DaveG wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/114394/D-site/redesign/index.html
It would be better if the menu could become some kind of drop
do
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 01:42:58 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Anyone like to do a quick proofread of the next edition of This
Week in D?
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/jan-18.html
Some typos:
"happing" -> "happening"
"mobile devices,and more" -> "mobile devices, and more" (space)
"for
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 17:02:04 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Some typos:
thanks! You can tell I typed it last night on my laptop, my
laptop keyboard and I don't get along very well.
And with that, I'm announcing it officially!
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/sftxzrfmqtnhmgmvw...@forum.dlang.o
On 1/19/15 8:57 AM, Mathias LANG wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:38:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
But that's beside the point. This seems to suggest the choice is "if
we didn't have to build the mobi and pdf, the road is clear to using
Great Framework(tm)". There are a few issues w
On 1/19/15 1:33 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 02:29:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* Styling needs work :o).
Andrei
Personally I really like the spartan styling. I don't see any need for a
whole load of colourful background and heavy styling etc. any more than
I wo
Ok I'm afraid to ask this and sound like annoying person, but
according to my sign: "their 'attention to detail' is for a
reason: to help others".
So:
Would be strange with get rid of ":" in this text:
"This Week in D: " ?
Because everytime that I look to it, this D: look like a sad
face.
On 1/19/15 9:17 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 9:07 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 17:02:04 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Some typos:
thanks! You can tell I typed it last night on my laptop, my laptop
keyboard and I don't get along very well.
And with that, I'm ann
On 1/19/15 9:07 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 17:02:04 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Some typos:
thanks! You can tell I typed it last night on my laptop, my laptop
keyboard and I don't get along very well.
And with that, I'm announcing it officially!
http://forum.dlang.org/t
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 17:13:35 UTC, MattCoder wrote:
Would be strange with get rid of ":" in this text:
Yeah, it isn't needed now that there's a line break, so I'll
remove it.
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 17:19:06 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Thanks for also submitting to Reddit and Twitter! When doing
the latter please use #dlang so it shows up in filters. --
Andrei
Yeah, I realized that after hitting send. I'm still somewhat new
to twittering at all and forget
On 1/19/15 9:21 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 17:19:06 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Thanks for also submitting to Reddit and Twitter! When doing the
latter please use #dlang so it shows up in filters. -- Andrei
Yeah, I realized that after hitting send. I'm still som
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 16:44:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/18/15 6:50 PM, DaveG wrote:
Here's where I'm at. The menus don't use javascript (except
when the
screen gets so small it needs a button to open the navigation,
the
button uses js). It scales with screen size and shou
"Ryan" wrote in message news:vtrhuhssdzcthekqc...@forum.dlang.org...
Hi it's me again, I didn't know if you were getting the updates
from the other post, or, as I can imagine, you are just extremely
busy.
You said there was a license for redistributing the compiler?
What are the terms and i
On 1/19/15 1:42 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:33 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-19 03:31, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
So now minification and gzipping are the culprit? I don't quite
understand.
There are plenty existing web frameworks that already have solved, what
it see
On 1/19/15 11:30 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 15:31 +, ponce via Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
Dunno, maybe an US person would tell if "Utah" would be
preferable to "UT".
I guess it depends if you want non USA people to know the location. I
appreciate that e
Please review:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/784. Comments
should go there. Thanks!
Andrei
On 1/19/15 9:55 AM, Ary Borenszweig wrote:
On 1/19/15 1:42 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/19/15 12:33 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-19 03:31, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
So now minification and gzipping are the culprit? I don't quite
understand.
There are plenty existing web fram
On 1/19/15 9:37 AM, DaveG wrote:
I need to fix a few things tonight. Also, is there some way to know what
the current page is when generating the html? It would be nice to know
what page you are currently on. Actually now that I think of it, with
sub-navigation I also need to know the parent so i
On 1/19/2015 7:23 AM, Ryan wrote:
Hi it's me again, I didn't know if you were getting the updates from the other
post, or, as I can imagine, you are just extremely busy.
You said there was a license for redistributing the compiler? What are the terms
and if I agree how would I apply?
Thanks,
Ry
On 19/01/15 02:42, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Anyone like to do a quick proofread of the next edition of This Week in D?
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/jan-18.html
I think your location for the D meetup has a typo, it should be the Melbourne
Canteen (you're missing the final n:
On 19/01/15 20:23, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 19/01/15 02:42, Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Anyone like to do a quick proofread of the next edition of This Week in D?
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/jan-18.html
I think your location for the D meetup has a t
On 2015-01-19 18:00, DaveG wrote:
The vertical menu expanded from the top works well with relatively few
items (in the case of bootstrap, eight). Personally, I don't think that
method works well with many items (we currently show 13, and up to 26
when expanded). It is particularly weird when the
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 19:47:25 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-01-19 18:00, DaveG wrote:
The vertical menu expanded from the top works well with
relatively few
items (in the case of bootstrap, eight). Personally, I don't
think that
method works well with many items (we currently sho
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 13:21 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
> It is the same format as previous years (i.e. Menlo Park, CA). If you
> are having trouble, look at the google map embedded in the venue tab.
Sorry, but I think you are missing the point I am making.
PS Due t
Interesting Interview.
http://interviews.slashdot.org/story/15/01/19/159242/interviews-alexander-stepanov-and-daniel-e-rose-answer-your-questions
NA
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 18:46:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Should we pull my stuff so the others come on top of it?
I'm new to git (and github) so I don't know the process. I just
cloned your branch locally and have been working off that. I
assume I can fork master and push my cha
On 2015-01-19 16:57, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I think that would be great. Who wants to champion this project? Our
webmaster is okay with it and can arrange a domain such as new.dlang.org
to work the kinks out.
Takers?
I would like to but I have too many other projects going on right now.
On 2015-01-19 15:54, Dicebot wrote:
Framework doesn't really matter (though dog-fooding is desirable) - it
is a matter of maintainability. You may like RoR but how many people in
D community will be able to maintain such solution if you disappear? I
doubt many.
I said like 100 times now that vi
On 2015-01-19 13:00, "Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
" wrote:
I would suggest you avoid frameworks since they go out of fashion fairly
quickly and makes maintenance dependent on individuals (with framework
knowledge). jQuery adds little value since browsers are fairly
standards-compliant
On 2015-01-19 16:47, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Yeah, the change itself is minor, but I'm hoping it might be indicative
more coming in the coming months; adding it to the test cases means we
might have significant stuff to test soon.
Then we can wait until there's actually anything useful added.
--
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins
with keyword. "def" of "func". e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) -> typeOfResult;
easier to read and PARSE. Next D version may allow--with
compatability of old syntad (C like where typeOfResult
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:51:02 +
"Alexey T. via Digitalmars-d" wrote:
> Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins
> with keyword. "def" of "func". e.g.
>
> func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
> or
> func myName(params...) -> typeOfResult;
>
> easier to read and PARS
Hi, sorry don't know in which part to post this.
SynWrite editor can have DCD integration. But I miss Python guy
who can make this work. (Not small work, but not hard, in Python
it's doable in some days with my help; I don't know Python cool).
Who can know such guy who knows Py and can help w
Better that next D version (next MAJOR version) can support such
syntax. (Old syntax may be compatible too but "deprecated").
What developers think..
NA:
http://interviews.slashdot.org/story/15/01/19/159242/interviews-alexander-stepanov-and-daniel-e-rose-answer-your-questions
I am glad to see that the field of programming languages is far
from done :-)
Alex>After STL was accepted into the standard in 1994, I started
thinking about desig
On Monday, 19 January 2015 at 21:06:40 UTC, Alexey T. wrote:
Better that next D version (next MAJOR version) can support such
syntax. (Old syntax may be compatible too but "deprecated").
What developers think..
I have a feeling you might get some strong opposition to this
idea *Brace Yourself
On 1/19/15 1:25 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 17 January 2015 at 18:30:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Does that do a lot of moving stuff to a separate module? I have to say
that after porting a bunch of code from 2.065 to 2.067.1 at work, I'm
less keen about renaming stuff than I used to.
On 1/19/15 12:51 PM, Alexey T. wrote:
Will be much easier to read Source, if func declarataion begins with
keyword. "def" of "func". e.g.
func myName(params.): typeOfResult;
or
func myName(params...) -> typeOfResult;
easier to read and PARSE. Next D version may allow--with compatability
of
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
