On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 01:47:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The one difference was Go's support for green threads. There's
no technical reason why D can't have green threads, it's just
that nobody has written the library code to do it.
Go can move stacks and extend them.
Go is closer to
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 04:37:34 UTC, jonaspm wrote:
Please, i need your help, I tried this:
write(Write p: );
readln(p);
p = chomp(p);
writeln(Write q: );
readln(q);
q = chomp(q);
but the result is:
Write p: Write q:
and doesn't pause to read keyboard input... what's wrong?
Thanks in
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 04:05:30 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
Programming is - for now - still a human activity, and what is
important in human activities may not always be measured, and
what may be easily measured is not always important. That
doesn't mean one should throw away the profiler
An old essay that may yet be relevant today at a time when
intellectual fashion has continued in the direction he was moved
to address in his speech.
there is a way to make a big improvement: it is still a pleasure
to do routine jobs if we have beautiful things to work with. For
example, a
On 3/26/2015 11:40 PM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
Go can move stacks and extend them.
That has no value on 64 bit systems, and is not a language issue (it's an
implementation issue).
Go is closer to having a low latency GC.
I.e. it
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 04:37:34 UTC, jonaspm wrote:
Please, i need your help, I tried this:
write(Write p: );
readln(p);
p = chomp(p);
writeln(Write q: );
readln(q);
q = chomp(q);
but the result is:
Write p: Write q:
and doesn't pause to read keyboard input... what's wrong?
Thanks in
On 3/27/2015 2:57 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
I think the way go handles interfaces and their composition would
require a few tricks in D and C++, but I am sure it can be done.
Interfaces can be done with D templates. It'll be compile time polymorphism
rather than run
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 09:44:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/27/2015 1:41 AM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 08:25:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The MMU makes it pointless. The virtual address space allows
for 4
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 19:32:53 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
The problem, as Andrei Alexandrescu pointed
out(http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mdtago$em9$1...@digitalmars.com?page=6#post-mduv1i:242169:241:40digitalmars.com),
is learning how to use them. Ideally you'd want to be able to
look at a
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14348
Issue ID: 14348
Summary: typeof(x).ident is not accepted as a symbol
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12152
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12152
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/91dd1ff1ec207d3510fc12808e8166c3f80dab05
fix Issue 12152 - Cannot
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14320
github-bugzi...@puremagic.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On 3/27/15 4:22 AM, tcak wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 05:17:03 UTC, jonaspm wrote:
but readln(p); isn't supposed to read input and store it into p?
Nope. Parameter is terminator character. Read string is returned from
the function. So, it would be like:
string p = readln();
readln
On 3/27/15 12:13 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 03:59:30 UTC, zhmt wrote:
The best way to do that is to separate the server modules into
independent processes. Then if one crashes, the others keep running
without fear of corruption.
So instead of server modules, try doing
Hmm... science exists only as long as we don't understand
something, then it disappears and only knowledge remains. Looks
like he talks about engineering, but calls it science.
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 21:02:56 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 20:40:50 UTC, Gary Willoughby
wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 19:37:06 UTC, extrawurst wrote:
i think it is already available on travis. this it what works
for me:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14348
yebblies yebbl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
--- Comment #1 from
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14320
--- Comment #2 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/6d4c8492fb3c9879b918560afbb29133625ca122
fix Issue 14320 - Improve
I'm currently updating the TextMate D bundle for D2. I have a couple of
questions for how to highlighting some specific code or how other
editors/IDE's highlight them.
* this in constructor
this () {}
In TextMate functions/methods are highlighted, should this be
highlighted as a keyword or
On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 03:11 -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 3/27/2015 2:57 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[…]
However, I cannot see this happening purely on volunteer,
hobbyist resource. We need to find an organization or three willing to
On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 10:14 +, via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[…]
Have you actually thought about these issues or done performance
tests?
The Go team certainly have, and have changed their goroutine model twice
because of it. No matter what they do in Go 0.0 →1.4, 1.5 onwards will
be
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 10:37:01 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
The question is though what should happen in D. If Vibe.d
fibres are a
single threaded system, then they are not suitable for the
actor,
dataflow, CSP implementation needed in D since that must sit on
a kernel
thread pool where
On 3/27/2015 12:37 AM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 06:53:01 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/26/2015 11:40 PM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
Go can move stacks and
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10925
Walter Bright bugzi...@digitalmars.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 18:47 -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On 3/26/2015 12:40 PM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
(Almost) All publicity is good publicity.
I attended a presentation at NWCPP on Go last week. I have never written a Go
program, so
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14322
Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 13:48:20 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 11:47:59 UTC, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
Try `dub upgrade --force-remove` followed by `dub build
--force`
For the love of God, please put this on the github page under
troubleshooting. It happens quite a lot.
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 00:50:34 UTC, Hugo wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 12:29:03 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 12:21:23 UTC, Hugo wrote:
Also, can anyone provide a similar example but using little
endian order? If only to contrast differences between
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 08:25:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The MMU makes it pointless. The virtual address space allows
for 4 billion goroutines with 4 billion bytes each of stack.
If you fragment the memory space you cannot use recursive page
tables? If you want to address more than
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 08:26:51 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 17:41:58 UTC, w0rp wrote:
If enough people are interested and have a few suggestions for
some features they like which aren't crazy massive feature
lists, I'd be willing to expand it a bit, add some
On 3/27/2015 1:41 AM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 08:25:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The MMU makes it pointless. The virtual address space allows for 4 billion
goroutines with 4 billion bytes each of stack.
If you
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 06:53:01 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/26/2015 11:40 PM, Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com wrote:
Go can move stacks and extend them.
That has no value on 64 bit systems,
It has.
and is not a language issue (it's an
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 03:46:49 UTC, zhmt wrote:
class A
{
void test()
{
writeln(test);
}
}
try
{
A a = null;
a.test();
}catch(Throwable
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 05:17:03 UTC, jonaspm wrote:
but readln(p); isn't supposed to read input and store it into p?
Nope. Parameter is terminator character. Read string is returned
from the function. So, it would be like:
string p = readln();
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 08:41:40 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
tables? If you want to address more than 512GB you need to move
to 1MiB pages.
Actually, it is 2MiB.
Also keep in mind that there is an advantage to having very small
stacks (e.g. 1-2K) when you do simulations.
zhmt:
In short words, I want to catch something like
NullPointerException.
Is this possible?
One solution is to add null tests to D in nonrelease mode. A
better solution is to modify D to remove all or most chances of
dereferencing null pointers and class references.
Bye,
bearophile
On 2015-03-26 12:23, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d wrote:
One idea I'd like to see is to enhance scope(failure) to allow it to
catch a specific type of exception which would allow us to e.g. log
the exception message and potentially re-throw the exception. All of
this without having to nest
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 01:53:22 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 01:37:45AM +, Vladimir Panteleev
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 22:23:12 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
New idea:
bool ordered(pred = a b)(T...)(T values)
So... isSorted for
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 17:41:58 UTC, w0rp wrote:
If enough people are interested and have a few suggestions for
some features they like which aren't crazy massive feature
lists, I'd be willing to expand it a bit, add some
documentation, and offer it as a DUB package.
Very nice!
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 22:30:15 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 21:00:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/30ad8b/why_gos_design_is_a_disservice_to_intelligent/
Andrei
Downplaying other languages makes the D
It looks like in perform() method curl option is set:
p.curl.set(CurlOption.customrequest, DELETE);
but is never reset and all requests after DELETE are DELETE too
(even if asked for POST).
Am 27.03.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Walter Bright:
On 3/27/2015 2:57 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
Aren't green threads now given the label fibres?
My understanding of fibers is they are all in one thread. Go's green
threads can be in multiple threads, the same thread, and
Solved by a workaround:
// before anything else in method call()
http.handle.set(CurlOption.customrequest, cast(void*) null);
http.clearRequestHeaders();
Hope this will help is anyone else has this problem.
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 21:00:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/30ad8b/why_gos_design_is_a_disservice_to_intelligent/
Andrei
If Go community is what they believe they are - intelligent. They
would not blame D community for this article,
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 12:15:03 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 27.03.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Walter Bright:
On 3/27/2015 2:57 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
Aren't green threads now given the label fibres?
My understanding of fibers is they are all in one thread. Go's
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 03:53:36 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
That kind of articles are bad for the image of the D community
Nick S:
No. Just...no.
I'm honestly *really* tired of general society's (seemingly?)
increasing intolerance FOR intolerance.
Some things ARE bad. Some ideas are
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 10:34:58 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I'm currently updating the TextMate D bundle for D2. I have a
couple of questions for how to highlighting some specific code
or how other editors/IDE's highlight them.
* this in constructor
this () {}
In TextMate
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 21:36:56 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 19:45:19 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 19:32:53 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
...snip...
So tl;dr; make the template constraints in ddoc less prominent?
The new library reference preview
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 22:05:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 3/26/15 2:23 PM, Jake The Baker wrote:
But until
people stop acting like little children and think seriously
about
the problems, goals, and solutions then who the heck knows what
to do?
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 22:33:33 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:28:13 +, Jake The Baker wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 07:06:50 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 16:56:32 +, Jake The Baker wrote:
Do *you know what progress is?
one important part of
On 06/03/2015 17:37, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
A new version of DDT is out. Improvements to the semantic engine,
important fixes:
https://github.com/bruno-medeiros/DDT/releases/tag/Release_0.11.0
There has also been some big internal changes lately, so these latest
releases might be a bit more
On 2015-03-25 10:17:00 +, Bienlein said:
I recently made a pull request for a go tool and spent about half an
hour trying to find some function to test whether an array contains a
particular element.
There are libraries for this like gen:
http://clipperhouse.github.io/gen. But it also
On 2015-03-26 01:04:03 +, Freddy said:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 00:11:05 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 22:12:04 UTC, Freddy wrote:
D-style Variadic Functions found here:http://dlang.org/function.html
seem entirely out classed by Variadic Function Templates. Can
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 14:10:22 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-03-27 15:03, Chris wrote:
Well, it _is_ a keyword. You cannot write a function called
this, nor
can you use it as a variable name. So yes, it's a keyword =
reserved.
It depends on how you see it. It's also a special
On 2015-03-27 13:33, Chris wrote:
Am using Textadept, the highlighting is as follows:
highlighted as keyword:
this()
Why is this highlighted as a keyword? I was more leaning to highlight it
as a method. What about the parameter in a copy constructor?
__traits
What about the
On 2015-03-23 09:45:39 +, Dicebot said:
I think this was not intended and is simply a side effect of limited D
call graph analysis. Relaxing that limitation makes sense to me because
unused impure function can be used for compile-time reflection or
returned from pure function as a result
On 2015-03-27 15:03, Chris wrote:
Well, it _is_ a keyword. You cannot write a function called this, nor
can you use it as a variable name. So yes, it's a keyword = reserved.
It depends on how you see it. It's also a special method that just
happens to use a keyword as its name. It doesn't
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 10:10:37 UTC, Dominikus Dittes
Scherkl wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 19:32:53 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
But when it comes to heavily templated functions -
understanding the signature is HARD. It's hard enough for the
top programmers that can handle the complex
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 13:07:30 UTC, Panke wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 21:36:56 UTC, rumbu wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 19:45:19 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 19:32:53 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
...snip...
So tl;dr; make the template constraints in
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 13:58:03 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-03-27 13:33, Chris wrote:
Am using Textadept, the highlighting is as follows:
highlighted as keyword:
this()
Why is this highlighted as a keyword? I was more leaning to
highlight it as a method.
Well, it _is_ a
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 12:15:03 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
distribution across the cores, but in most scenarios the number
of concurrent tasks should be high enough to keep all cores
busy anyhow. There are also additional costs for moving fibers
(synchronization, cache misses).
It is a
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 14:02:55 UTC, CraigDillabaugh wrote:
clip
If the function inputs are trivial (ie. takes an integer or
basic
string) then this isn't an issue. But for functions taking
complex
inputs it can be a bit baffling for someone new to the language.
I must admit when I was
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 08:43:56 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Think of it as compile-time arguments and run-time arguments.
First set of parenthesis are compile-time, second are run-time.
The parenthesis are optional for compile-time arguments iff
there's only one of them.
I really
Looked also in the source code to find out that startsWith is
locale sensitive, something ignored in phobos.
Why would I need a locale for startsWith? Please file a bug, if
that's actually needed for unicode strings.
On 2015-03-27 05:34:59 +, zhmt said:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 04:13:01 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 03:59:30 UTC, zhmt wrote:
The best way to do that is to separate the server modules into
independent processes. Then if one crashes, the others keep running
[skip]
I'm not a native English speaker, but a range can start with a
needle? Where is the haystack? :)
Yes the output is awful, but that does not imply some kind of
concepts is needed to make the documentation easier to
understand. And Python's startsWith makes no use of a protocol.
See
On 2015-03-26 19:32:51 +, Idan Arye said:
There is a discussion about D vs Go going on in several threads(yey for
multithreading!), and one thread is about an article by Gary Willoughby
that claims that Go is not suitable for sophisticated
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 14:18:33 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 12:15:03 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
distribution across the cores, but in most scenarios the
number of concurrent tasks should be high enough to keep all
cores busy anyhow. There are also additional
The task seemed very simple. But I'm stuck.
I want to:
1234567890123.0 to 1234567890123
1.23 to 1.23
1.234567 to 1.2346.
With format string %.4f i get 1.2300 for 1.23.
With %g i get 1.23456789e+12 for 1234567890123.0.
I can not believe that it is not implemented. What did I miss?
Personal preferences:
* this in constructor
this () {}
In TextMate functions/methods are highlighted, should this be
highlighted as a keyword or as a method?
method
* this in copy constructor
this (this) {}
The this parameter, should that be highlighted as a keyword
or as a parameter?
What Shammah has said. Your proposal is not a proper replacement,
it has very different effect on a binary. It could be possible to
reimplement D-style varargs on top of C-style varargs + manual
RTTI usage but not with template variadics.
Regarding the scscscshghshshshhswarzThing, here we discuss the
readability and accessibility of the documentation, not the
power of the library. Every other language will use a variation
of sortBy instead of the scscshwcwscThing. I'm happy that D
has in the default lib functions like
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 14:29:05 UTC, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
On 2015-03-23 09:45:39 +, Dicebot said:
I think this was not intended and is simply a side effect of limited
D call graph analysis. Relaxing that
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14349
Issue ID: 14349
Summary: String imports with subpaths don't work on Windows
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14350
Issue ID: 14350
Summary: Unit test failures are not displayed in Windows GUI
programs
Product: D
Version: D2
Hardware: All
OS: Windows
Status: NEW
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14350
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull
---
On 3/27/15 11:02 AM, akaDemik wrote:
The task seemed very simple. But I'm stuck.
I want to:
1234567890123.0 to 1234567890123
1.23 to 1.23
1.234567 to 1.2346.
With format string %.4f i get 1.2300 for 1.23.
With %g i get 1.23456789e+12 for 1234567890123.0.
I can not believe that it is not
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14349
bb.t...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bb.t...@gmx.com
--
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 12:11:33 UTC, Stefan wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 10:50:06 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 10:23:58 UTC, Stefan wrote:
..
That's a bug. You'll notice that if an exception is thrown in
main() (or anything called from it),
On 2015-03-27 16:04, Dicebot wrote:
not at all. The fact it is reserved is already denoted by __, otherwise
it is just another vairable/symbol.
Doesn't this symbol also have special semantics?
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 15:23:56 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-03-27 16:04, Dicebot wrote:
not at all. The fact it is reserved is already denoted by __,
otherwise
it is just another vairable/symbol.
Doesn't this symbol also have special semantics?
A more pragmatical view would
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 14:29:05 UTC, Shammah Chancellor
wrote:
Pure functions returning impure functions. *BOOM* My brain
just exploded.
-Shammah
I am not sure when this would happen, but why disallow it ?
Am 27.03.2015 um 17:06 schrieb Dicebot:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 15:28:31 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
No... E.g.:
On the same thread:
1. fiber A receives request and queries DB (async)
2. fiber B computes for 1 second
3. fiber A sends response.
Latency: 1 second even if all the other
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 16:27:48 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I have no interest in arguing with you, just calling out
especially harmful lies that may mislead random readers.
Nice one. I am sure your attitude is very helpful for D.
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 16:20:28 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 16:09:08 UTC, Chris wrote:
It need not be new, it needs to be good. That's all. I don't
understand this obsession people have with new things, as if
they were automatically good only because they
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9826
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Am 27.03.2015 um 17:31 schrieb Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 16:18:33 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
So what happens if 10 requests come in at the same time? Does moving
things around still help you? No.
Load balancing is
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 22:41:01 UTC, Mike Wey wrote:
Shortly after the last release, GtkD has been updated for GTK+
3.16.
Thank you, that's awesome :)
Can't wait for my distro to get updated to start playing with
this.
I'd be tempted to go way back to the very root of the problem
starting with Tony Hoare again. Eliminate null as a possibility.
That's a whole other subject, though.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14232
--- Comment #21 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com ---
Commit pushed to stable at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/9edd2223950b919a201cf104601f877283cca2bf
Merge pull request #4458
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 19:45:19 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 19:32:53 UTC, Idan Arye wrote:
...snip...
So tl;dr; make the template constraints in ddoc less prominent?
The new library reference preview under Resources seems to
already have this (example:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 14:29:05 UTC, Shammah Chancellor
wrote:
On 2015-03-23 09:45:39 +, Dicebot said:
I think this was not intended and is simply a side effect of
limited D call graph analysis. Relaxing that limitation makes
sense to me because unused impure function can be used for
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 16:40:14 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 16:27:48 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
I have no interest in arguing with you, just calling out
especially harmful lies that may mislead random readers.
Nice one. I am sure your attitude is very helpful for
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 14:39:48 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
Looked also in the source code to find out that startsWith is
locale sensitive, something ignored in phobos.
Why would I need a locale for startsWith? Please file a bug, if
that's actually needed for unicode strings.
Because
On 2015-03-14 23:15:34 +, Brian Schott said:
First, a disclaimer: I am an idiot for starting this thread.
Moving on...
I'm working on a list of configuration options for dfmt - a formatter
for D source code.
So far I have the following:
* Insert spaces between if, while, for, foreach,
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 16:18:33 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
So what happens if 10 requests come in at the same time? Does
moving things around still help you? No.
Load balancing is probabilistic in nature. Caching also makes it
unlikely that you get 10 successive high computation requests.
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14343
Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||pull, rejects-valid
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 15:28:31 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
No... E.g.:
On the same thread:
1. fiber A receives request and queries DB (async)
2. fiber B computes for 1 second
3. fiber A sends response.
Latency: 1 second even if all the other threads are free.
This is a problem of
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 15:54:31 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 12:48:04 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
My personal opinion about the article - people may hate D
equally for being too pragmatic. That
Yeah, well, both the D/Go communities use the term pragmatic
to
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
