On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 12:38:31 UTC, mogu wrote:
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 03:19:52 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 00:38:24 UTC, mogu wrote:
编 可以是 编写 的缩写
编 could be short for 编写(write)
程 可以是 程序 的缩写
程 could be short for 程序(program)
编程 即 编写程序
So 编程 means writing programs a
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 15:04:52 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I recommend against building the pdf versions frequently
because that takes a lot of time.
Actually we have a problem in pdf versions. It seems that any
chinese character is replaced by '?', which may be an issure of
the prince :(
Plea
I should know this, but…
Is there an official D grammar (EBNF or otherwise) or is the language
defined by the DMD parser?
I am looking to continue Kingsley's DLanguage IntelliJ IDEA plugin and
for that it is necessary to have a grammar specification. Kingsley has
been working on one, but there ma
On 6/9/2016 5:30 AM, Johan Engelen wrote:
Hi all,
PR 5850 is proposing to add a predefined (reserved) version identifier for the
PS4 OS: "PS4" [1].
Thanks for your comment (preferably with an alternative suggestion in case you
don't like "PS4").
Thanks,
Johan
[1] https://github.com/dlang/dm
Our Project has already started at
https://github.com/DlangRen/Programming-in-D and has a mirror at
https://git.oschina.net/DlangRen/Programming-in-D in order to
increase the accessing speed in China.
As a complete forum-driven and noncommercial project, we are
seeking for more contributors who
Is anyone doing a "D in Action" with Manning?
--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk
London SW11
On Sunday, 12 June 2016 at 00:37:50 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 10:34:41 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 10:14:25 UTC, qznc wrote:
[...]
No, JS is here to stay, unfortunately.
Good news, take a look at asmjs.org
In the future you'll be able to c
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 10:34:41 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 10:14:25 UTC, qznc wrote:
[...]
No, JS is here to stay, unfortunately.
Good news, take a look at asmjs.org
In the future you'll be able to compile your D code into
javascript assembly, and run it in the b
I'd like to get the rest of winsock in druntime. I'm willing to
work on this and submit a PR but didn't want to work on something
if someone else was already doing it or if it turns out that we
don't actually want this in druntime.
We've discussed the best option moving forward here:
https:/
On 06/10/2016 12:17 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On 6/9/16 6:06 PM, Mathias Lang via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> To avoid the delegate being GC allocated, use `scope foo = (int i) { ...
>> }` at call site.
>
> Is that true? At one point in D's past, this ONLY worked if you passed a
> delegate to
Having DScript running in the browser and D on the server would
be an absolute dream to develop with. It might also turn a few
heads our way.
On 6/11/2016 3:07 AM, yawniek wrote:
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 22:01:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/10/2016 3:55 AM, Chris wrote:
> Cool. I'd love to see `DScript` one day - and replace JS once
and for all ...
> well ... just day dreaming ...
Dreams are reality:
https://github.com/DigitalM
http://www.roosterteeth.com/post/51267824
http://www.roosterteeth.com/post/51267824
http://www.roosterteeth.com/post/51267824
http://www.roosterteeth.com/post/51267824
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 19:20:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/11/16 12:31 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Are_you_ going to spend time going through every single page
in the
documentation, looking to see whether someone asked a question
and then
reply to them if the
On 6/11/16 12:31 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Are_you_ going to spend time going through every single page in the
documentation, looking to see whether someone asked a question and then
reply to them if they did?
I get notified by disqus for new posts. The basic idea is if we
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 18:27:19 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
I could go on, but this guy already did it way better that I
can:
https://www.infoq.com/presentations/functional-pros-cons
The part about monad starts 25mins in.
The guy is good.
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 18:36:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 10:14:25 UTC, qznc wrote:
I have given up hope for different browser languages than
Javascript. The problem is not finding a language. A lot of
people would love to have Lua, Python, or something
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 17:18:59 UTC, Observer wrote:
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 09:23:55 UTC, Chris wrote:
However, with `DScript` I meant a new scripting language that
can draw on the power of D, not necessarily a
re-implementation of JS. Adam[1] and ketmar[2] have already
worked on D
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 18:36:23 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 10:14:25 UTC, qznc wrote:
I have given up hope for different browser languages than
Javascript. The problem is not finding a language. A lot of
people would love to have Lua, Python, or something
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 10:14:25 UTC, qznc wrote:
I have given up hope for different browser languages than
Javascript. The problem is not finding a language. A lot of
people would love to have Lua, Python, or something else and it
has not happened yet. Dart was the most serious attempt. T
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 14:26:20 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
I give you a facsimile of a Haskell do block:
with(Maybe!int) {
return_(5).bind!(a => return_(a +
1)).shouldEqual(just(6));
nothing.bind!(a => return_(a + 1)).shouldEqual(nothing);
return_(8).bind!(a => n
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 17:21:18 UTC, Markus Pursche wrote:
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 17:09:59 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 14:37:23 UTC, Markus Pursche wrote:
If this is the case we would want to use Orbis.
As Seb also pointed out on GitHub, I've seen LLVM u
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 17:09:59 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
with Orbis I would have had no idea what the code was about
+1
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 16:50:15 UTC, qznc wrote:
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 14:26:20 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Why? Because I could, I don't plan on using this for anything
serious. I think "with" is my favourite D feature right now. I
also wrote the Writer and State monads (not that D ne
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 14:57:11 UTC, ArturG wrote:
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 14:26:20 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Why? Because I could, I don't plan on using this for anything
serious. I think "with" is my favourite D feature right now. I
also wrote the Writer and State monads (not that
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 17:09:59 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 14:37:23 UTC, Markus Pursche wrote:
If this is the case we would want to use Orbis.
As Seb also pointed out on GitHub, I've seen LLVM use "PS4"
internally, and it always seemed rather natural to me. O
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 09:23:55 UTC, Chris wrote:
However, with `DScript` I meant a new scripting language that
can draw on the power of D, not necessarily a re-implementation
of JS. Adam[1] and ketmar[2] have already worked on D based
scripting languages. I wonder, if there is interest i
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 14:37:23 UTC, Markus Pursche wrote:
If this is the case we would want to use Orbis.
As Seb also pointed out on GitHub, I've seen LLVM use "PS4"
internally, and it always seemed rather natural to me. On the
other hand, with Orbis I would have had no idea what the cod
On 06/06/2016 04:15 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
3. Have one lightweight D realized cross platform IDE. Qt us probably
the best widget set to use for this. My model here is LiteIDE which is
a Qt-based Go IDE realized in C++. It should of course be realized in
Go, but there are no Q
https://github.com/dlang/D-Blog-Theme
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 14:26:20 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Why? Because I could, I don't plan on using this for anything
serious. I think "with" is my favourite D feature right now. I
also wrote the Writer and State monads (not that D needs them):
I also tried this. Instead of Write and Sta
On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 23:05:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/7/2016 2:28 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I can attest that figuring out why something isn't inferred
@safe isn't always
easy, and the "slap a @safe: tag at the top" isn't always
going to help.
Having a -safe compiler switch
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 14:26:20 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
Why? Because I could, I don't plan on using this for anything
serious. I think "with" is my favourite D feature right now. I
also wrote the Writer and State monads (not that D needs them):
https://github.com/atilaneves/felix
At
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 13:41:32 UTC, ketmar wrote:
i'd also say: "JIT it from the start!" targeting LibJIT is very
easy, and you will have nice machine code for x86, x86_64 and
ARM, plus IR interpreter for any other "unsupported" arch.
Yes, I was thinking along the same lines. JIT from t
I give you a facsimile of a Haskell do block:
with(Maybe!int) {
return_(5).bind!(a => return_(a +
1)).shouldEqual(just(6));
nothing.bind!(a => return_(a + 1)).shouldEqual(nothing);
return_(8).bind!(a => nothing).bind!(a => return_(a +
1)).shouldEqual(nothing);
On Tuesday, 7 June 2016 at 20:41:21 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
In principle, I think that you're very right that @safe needs
to be implemented as a whitelist. Security in general does not
work as a blacklist, and I think that @safe has the same
problem. The problem is code breakage. Even assu
p.p.s. i'm slowly working on my own SSA-based codegen library
too. no timelines are set, tho.
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 12:19:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
LOL. 10x that would be cheap in the US, and I don't think that
your average school will let folks sit in on courses (though
some will). For your average college in the US, I would only
expect anyone to take classes if they're ac
i'd also say: "JIT it from the start!" targeting LibJIT is very
easy, and you will have nice machine code for x86, x86_64 and
ARM, plus IR interpreter for any other "unsupported" arch.
p.s. i did a D wrapper for LibJIT, it is in DACS repo. i also
talked with LibJIT maintainer, and that wrapper may be included
in next LibJIT release.
On 04/16/2016 07:38 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
> Am 15.04.2016 um 22:38 schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
>> Say you're on https://dlang.org/library/std/range/primitives.html and
>> try to find your way to https://dlang.org/library/std/range.html.
>>
>> Clicking on "range" in the navigation panel doesn't h
On 06/11/2016 02:24 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> I'm fine with generating the docs with ddox if that works better, but I sure
> hope that we're not going to then change how we're doing the actual
> documenattion in the source files except that if ddox is smart enough that
> we do
On 06/11/2016 02:31 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>> > > But the problem is, people will ask questions on these forums, and
>>> > > likely will not get answers.
>> >
>> > Why not? -- Andrei
> Are _you_ going to spend time going through every single page in the
> documentation, look
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 12:31:28 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
I really don't see how it's tractable to have hundreds (if not
thousands) of pages on dlang.org where someone could ask a
question.
Wouldn't that be solved by automatically posting the question to
Learn with a link?
On 06/10/2016 07:33 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I'm a bit bummed about that. I like it. Is my understanding incorrect
> that disqus is fairly established by now?
You need to create an account with a pay-by-data company to even post
something.
On 06/11/2016 03:02 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On 06/10/2016 07:33 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I'm a bit bummed about that. I like it. Is my understanding incorrect
>> that disqus is fairly established by now?
>
> You need to create an account with a pay-by-data company to even post
> somethi
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 12:44:54 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 15:29:01 UTC, Chris wrote:
DScript. Your scripting language already fulfills things that
were on my wishlist (easy D interop).
hey, both GML and DACS has some of that too! ;-)
VM["print"] = (string s) { writel
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 17:09:18 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
Whatever you read, the writer didn't really know what they were
talking about. At least not in general, and if they were
talking of the Javaverse as a whole. Java 8 features such as
lambda expressions, Streams, method references, et
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 15:29:01 UTC, Chris wrote:
DScript. Your scripting language already fulfills things that
were on my wishlist (easy D interop).
hey, both GML and DACS has some of that too! ;-)
VM["print"] = (string s) { writeln(s); };
VM["add"] = (int a, int b) => a+b;
wow, now we c
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 03:19:52 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 00:38:24 UTC, mogu wrote:
编 可以是 编写 的缩写
编 could be short for 编写(write)
程 可以是 程序 的缩写
程 could be short for 程序(program)
编程 即 编写程序
So 编程 means writing programs aka programming.
谢谢你纠正我，说中文不容易的。
哪里哪里，中文的确很难，但同时也是最有魅
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 15:35:32 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 15:14:02 UTC, ketmar wrote:
1. this is heavily OT. ;-)
I didn't forget to mark it! :-)
2. you may take a look at my gml engine. it has clearly
separated language parser and AST builder (gaem.parser), and
AST-
On Saturday, June 11, 2016 08:45:08 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 6/10/16 5:46 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> > On 6/10/16 1:33 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >> On 6/10/16 3:17 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> >>> I'd want to disable or replace discourse before we make it our of
On Saturday, June 11, 2016 08:48:53 Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 6/11/16 5:16 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> > On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 17:33:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >> I should add that it would be valuable to keep the ddoc build as well.
> >
> > We need DDoc
On Saturday, June 11, 2016 08:06:21 Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 18:59:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > then as it is later. In some ways, it would actually be very
> > beneficial to actually go back to school to study that stuff
> > after having pro
On Thursday, 9 June 2016 at 23:53:33 UTC, BBasile wrote:
On Thursday, 9 June 2016 at 21:02:26 UTC, maik klein wrote:
I am currently writing a task system and I have this case
where I want to send a delegate to a different thread but this
delegate also captures a variable. I use this to implemen
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 00:23:13 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
2016-06-10 1:20 GMT+02:00 maik klein via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>:
Did you try to send a native delegate ? I would be very
surprised if you were allowed to do so.
That is what I am currently doing and it at lea
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 10:14:25 UTC, qznc wrote:
Do you want a scripting language in general or a browser
language?
I have given up hope for different browser languages than
Javascript. The problem is not finding a language. A lot of
people would love to have Lua, Python, or something
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 09:23:55 UTC, Chris wrote:
However, with `DScript` I meant a new scripting language that
can draw on the power of D, not necessarily a re-implementation
of JS. Adam[1] and ketmar[2] have already worked on D based
scripting languages. I wonder, if there is interest
On Saturday, 11 June 2016 at 09:23:55 UTC, Chris wrote:
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 22:01:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/10/2016 3:55 AM, Chris wrote:
> Cool. I'd love to see `DScript` one day - and replace JS once
and for all ...
> well ... just day dreaming ...
Dreams are reality:
https://
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 22:01:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/10/2016 3:55 AM, Chris wrote:
> Cool. I'd love to see `DScript` one day - and replace JS once
and for all ...
> well ... just day dreaming ...
Dreams are reality:
https://github.com/DigitalMars/DMDScript
unfortunately this is
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 22:01:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/10/2016 3:55 AM, Chris wrote:
> Cool. I'd love to see `DScript` one day - and replace JS once
and for all ...
> well ... just day dreaming ...
Dreams are reality:
https://github.com/DigitalMars/DMDScript
Thanks for opening a n
On 6/11/16 5:16 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 17:33:01 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I should add that it would be valuable to keep the ddoc build as well.
We need DDoc anyway for the website itself, as well as formats other
than the website (e.g. CHM and HTML file
On 6/10/16 5:46 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 6/10/16 1:33 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/10/16 3:17 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
I'd want to disable or replace discourse before we make it our official
documentation. We could easily self-host some commenting functionality
if deemed necessa
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 22:01:53 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/10/2016 3:55 AM, Chris wrote:
> Cool. I'd love to see `DScript` one day - and replace JS once
and for all ...
> well ... just day dreaming ...
Dreams are reality:
https://github.com/DigitalMars/DMDScript
You have 2 readme fil
On Friday, 10 June 2016 at 18:59:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
then as it is later. In some ways, it would actually be very
beneficial to actually go back to school to study that stuff
after having programmed professionally for a while, but that's
a pain to pull off time-wise, and the classes
65 matches
Mail list logo
