On Monday, 27 July 2020 at 16:58:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:39:32AM +, John Burton via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...]
I tried looking there for information and examples of getting
glfw3 statically linked into my program using LDC and didn't
really find anything.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:39:32AM +, John Burton via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> I tried looking there for information and examples of getting glfw3
> statically linked into my program using LDC and didn't really find
> anything.
>
> I wonder if adding a page for static linking tips
On Monday, 27 July 2020 at 11:39:32 UTC, John Burton wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 22:18:47 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:27:22PM +, tastyminerals via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...]
[...]
Why not? It's a *wiki*. Wikis are intended for the user
community
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 22:18:47 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:27:22PM +, tastyminerals via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: [...]
D wiki is badly outdated. This is not a fact but a gut feeling
after reading through some of its pages. I was wondering who's
owning
On Thursday, 16 July 2020 at 14:17:10 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
On Thursday, 16 July 2020 at 13:54:56 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Thursday, 16 July 2020 at 13:41:31 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Thursday, 16 July 2020 at 09:47:02 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
[...]
Since its based on WikiMedia, searched an came
On Thursday, 16 July 2020 at 13:54:56 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Thursday, 16 July 2020 at 13:41:31 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Thursday, 16 July 2020 at 09:47:02 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
[...]
Since its based on WikiMedia, searched an came up with this
[1] to embed in iframe
1.
On Thursday, 16 July 2020 at 13:41:31 UTC, aberba wrote:
On Thursday, 16 July 2020 at 09:47:02 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
[...]
Since its based on WikiMedia, searched an came up with this [1]
to embed in iframe
1. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Iframe
Also the D Tour uses
On Thursday, 16 July 2020 at 09:47:02 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
Is there a way to integrate some kind of "run this source code"
button into the D wiki using run.dlang.io?
If there isn't, it would be nice to add this kind of thing as
plugin with the possibility of also including the
Is there a way to integrate some kind of "run this source code"
button into the D wiki using run.dlang.io?
If there isn't, it would be nice to add this kind of thing as
plugin with the possibility of also including the editor so you
never need to leave the wiki. (like on the D Tour)
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:27:22PM +, tastyminerals via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
[...]
> D wiki is badly outdated. This is not a fact but a gut feeling after
> reading through some of its pages. I was wondering who's owning it
> myself but never actually dared to just go and upd
On Wednesday, 15 July 2020 at 16:04:56 UTC, aberba wrote:
So I'm looking to make changes to the D wiki but I'm not sure
who to talk to about such changes.
Currently: Move all other IDEs low-quality down (maybe to
Others) and focus on just the few that really works (IntelliJ,
Visual Studio
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 04:04:56PM +, aberba via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> So I'm looking to make changes to the D wiki but I'm not sure who to
> talk to about such changes.
>
> Currently: Move all other IDEs low-quality down (maybe to Others) and
> focus on just the few th
So I'm looking to make changes to the D wiki but I'm not sure who
to talk to about such changes.
Currently: Move all other IDEs low-quality down (maybe to Others)
and focus on just the few that really works (IntelliJ, Visual
Studio Code and Visual Studio). Instead of many options that
don't
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15725
Basile-z changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|b2.t...@gmx.com |
--
On Saturday, 9 July 2016 at 02:32:20 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
so far nothing appears in the usual pages and links but who
know this could happend.
Thanks, I cleaned it up and increased the CAPTCHA difficulty.
In the future, please do not tamper with spam pages in any way, I
had to intentionally
see https://wiki.dlang.org/Special:RecentChanges
e.g
https://wiki.dlang.org/G.m.a.i.l_tecH_suPPort_Numbner!!((1_..888..269..0130_))_Gmail_Enterprise_Customer_help_desk_support_Phone_Number
so far nothing appears in the usual pages and links but who know
this could happend.
Hi everyone,
I'm fairly new to D and am really excited about it.
I would like to see more examples of Windows programming in D, but the
repository indicated on the D wiki seems to be moved or deleted.
More info is here:
http://wiki.dlang.org/talk:D_for_Win32
Thanks!
--
With best regards from
On Wednesday, 5 August 2015 at 21:02:49 UTC, Andre Polykanine
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm fairly new to D and am really excited about it.
I would like to see more examples of Windows programming in D,
but the
repository indicated on the D wiki seems to be moved or deleted.
More info is here:
http
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11676
Andrei Alexandrescu and...@erdani.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |D2
--
Would it please the D community to add a link to DLang.org on the
D Wiki sidebar? I think it would help navigating back and forth
between the two sites, but I, rightfully, don't have permission
to do so.
Thanks,
Mike
On Wednesday, 4 December 2013 at 01:52:14 UTC, Mike wrote:
Would it please the D community to add a link to DLang.org on
the D Wiki sidebar? I think it would help navigating back and
forth between the two sites, but I, rightfully, don't have
permission to do so.
Thanks,
Mike
Should have
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11676
Summary: Add a link to D Wiki Sidebar to take users back to
DLang.org
Product: D
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11676
Vladimir Panteleev thecybersha...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On 16.10.2013 14:33, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
* How complete is the debugging info for DMD-Win64? Is it fully
implemented, and/or are there any issues or limitations? (Rainer you are
likely the best to answer this one)
The stock compiler does not do the replacement '@' for '.' which
confuses
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 06:42:58 UTC, Rainer Schuetze
wrote:
On 16.10.2013 14:33, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
* How complete is the debugging info for DMD-Win64? Is it fully
implemented, and/or are there any issues or limitations?
(Rainer you are
likely the best to answer this one)
The
On 17.10.2013 08:47, evilrat wrote:
On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 06:42:58 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
On 16.10.2013 14:33, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
* How complete is the debugging info for DMD-Win64? Is it fully
implemented, and/or are there any issues or limitations? (Rainer you are
On 23/09/2013 20:50, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
I'm looking to begin adding integrated debugger support for the DDT IDE
pretty soon. With this in mind it would be desirable to have a view of
what level of D language debugger support is there for the various
combinations of platform+compiler+debugger.
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 12:33:07 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
Feel free to add/modify the information in that page.
I've added details for the DDD frontend and the WinDbg debugger
supplied in the D compiler zip file.
On 26/09/2013 16:13, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-09-26 14:22, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Why would that be nice? It saves you the small hassle of downloading
GCC+GDB+GDC into it's own installation. With precompiled binaries for
your platform, that should take only 15 minutes of your time and then
On 2013-09-27 12:52, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Blocks is a C language extension by Apple. I suspect that Modules is the
same, although I couldn't google it quickly. Therefore this doesn't
really affect pure D development. Rather, it's significance would be the
same as of the use case of using Mac
On 26.09.2013 14:30, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 26/09/2013 09:06, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
I'm not that pessimistic. Every decent debugger on Windows understands
PDB as there are standard libraries to use them. I guess they can be
used (after conveting debug information with cv2pdb for win32) as
On Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 18:34:14 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 14:46:20 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
What are the implications? Does this mean you canr create a
breakpoint for a given source file line?
I have tried that. But want I do know is that
On 2013-09-25 16:46, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
* Line numbers don't work. Probably some issue with incorrect DWARF
generated
What are the implications? Does this mean you canr create a breakpoint
for a given source file line?
Hmm, I was wrong. Line numbers do work, including stack trace and
On 2013-09-26 09:27, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
I can confirm that line numbers are missing from the traces, but at
least something like:
(lldb) b test.d:12
Breakpoint 1: where = test_dmd-head_g`D4test3mooFZi + 8, address =
0x000113a0
works correctly, and with tabbed
On 25.09.2013 17:12, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 24/09/2013 07:16, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
On 23.09.2013 21:50, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
For DMD+Windows, is there only good debugger support with VisualD? :-(
And how well does that work with 32/64 bit platform variations?
Current options that I
On Thursday, 26 September 2013 at 08:02:52 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2013-09-26 09:27, Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
I can confirm that line numbers are missing from the traces,
but at
least something like:
(lldb) b test.d:12
Breakpoint 1: where = test_dmd-head_g`D4test3mooFZi + 8,
On 25/09/2013 18:09, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Sep 25, 2013, at 7:46 AM, Bruno Medeiros brunodomedeiros+...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 24/09/2013 07:19, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-09-23 21:50, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
(what about Mac though?)
The sate of debugging on Mac OS X is worse than on Linux.
On 26/09/2013 09:06, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
I'm not that pessimistic. Every decent debugger on Windows understands
PDB as there are standard libraries to use them. I guess they can be
used (after conveting debug information with cv2pdb for win32) as much
as Visual Studio. The visualization
On 2013-09-26 14:22, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Why would that be nice? It saves you the small hassle of downloading
GCC+GDB+GDC into it's own installation. With precompiled binaries for
your platform, that should take only 15 minutes of your time and then
you're set (well, a bit again when you want
On Sep 25, 2013 7:35 PM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 14:46:20 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Ehhh? What's up with Mac OS X and all those outdated operating system
managed installations? (I'm referring to the similar issues with had with
the JVM)
Apple
On 2013-09-26 20:17, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I have a sneaky suspicion that it's gcc-4.1 and gdb version that works
with that compiler that is in macports. Though that is just heresay - I
don't /actually/ know.
Macports contains the GCC 4.2 - 4.9 and GDB 7.6 and GDB 6.3.50 with
Apple
On 24/09/2013 14:42, eles wrote:
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 23:45:12 UTC, eles wrote:
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 19:50:35 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
OTOG, simple quetsion: how to install/update DDT plugin to the git
HEAD version?
Found that. Could you, please, tag the different
On 23/09/2013 23:57, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 23 September 2013 20:50, Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeiros+...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking to begin adding integrated debugger support for the DDT IDE
pretty soon. With this in mind it would be desirable to have a view of what
level of D language
On 25/09/2013 14:45, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
Perhaps I described it incorrectly then. What I mean is that most
references and displays of D symbols are made using proper D names, and
not mangled names (as you might get if you run it through a pure C/C++
debugger). I've haven't yet seen something
On 25 September 2013 14:45, Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeiros+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/09/2013 23:57, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 23 September 2013 20:50, Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeiros+...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking to begin adding integrated debugger support for the DDT IDE
pretty soon. With
On 24/09/2013 07:19, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-09-23 21:50, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
(what about Mac though?)
The sate of debugging on Mac OS X is worse than on Linux. There are a
couple of problems:
* D symbols need to be prefixed with an extra underscore
* The GDB system debugger is
On 24/09/2013 07:16, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
On 23.09.2013 21:50, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
For DMD+Windows, is there only good debugger support with VisualD? :-(
And how well does that work with 32/64 bit platform variations?
Current options that I know of for Windows:
-
On Sep 25, 2013, at 7:46 AM, Bruno Medeiros brunodomedeiros+...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 24/09/2013 07:19, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-09-23 21:50, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
(what about Mac though?)
The sate of debugging on Mac OS X is worse than on Linux. There are a
couple of problems:
*
On Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 14:46:20 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
Ehhh? What's up with Mac OS X and all those outdated operating
system managed installations? (I'm referring to the similar
issues with had with the JVM)
Apple has abandoned the GCC tool chain. They're betting all on
the
On Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 17:09:32 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
Probably. But it would be nice if this worked with the
compiler that ships with OSX. And for what it's worth, gcc
on OSX isn't GCC any more either. It's a wrapper around the
LLVM C compiler.
Technically it's the GCC
On Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 18:34:14 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
I have tried that.
Should have been: I haven't tried that.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 14:38:27 UTC, Iain Buclaw
wrote:
On 25 September 2013 14:45, Bruno Medeiros
Perhaps I described it incorrectly then. What I mean is that
most references
and displays of D symbols are made using proper D names, and
not mangled
names (as you might get if you
On 23.09.2013 21:50, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
For DMD+Windows, is there only good debugger support with VisualD? :-(
And how well does that work with 32/64 bit platform variations?
Current options that I know of for Windows:
- DMD/Win32+windbg(1996): This is a version of windbg from 1996 with
On 2013-09-23 21:50, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
(what about Mac though?)
The sate of debugging on Mac OS X is worse than on Linux. There are a
couple of problems:
* D symbols need to be prefixed with an extra underscore
* The GDB system debugger is very old. It doesn't have the D patches the
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 22:57:27 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
GDB doesn't understand D mangling. We currently leverage the
use of
setting pretty-print names for debugging purposes, but you
require to
put the names in 'quotation.marks' - I will fix this sometime
this year... maybe. :)
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 23:45:12 UTC, eles wrote:
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 19:50:35 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
OTOG, simple quetsion: how to install/update DDT plugin to the
git HEAD version?
Found that. Could you, please, tag the different releaseed
versions, it is helpful
On 24 September 2013 14:31, Wyatt wyatt@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 22:57:27 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
GDB doesn't understand D mangling. We currently leverage the use of
setting pretty-print names for debugging purposes, but you require to
put the names in
On 24/09/13 00:57, Iain Buclaw wrote:
GDB doesn't understand D mangling. We currently leverage the use of
setting pretty-print names for debugging purposes, but you require to
put the names in 'quotation.marks' - I will fix this sometime this
year... maybe. :)
When I asked about the
On 24 September 2013 18:19, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 24/09/13 00:57, Iain Buclaw wrote:
GDB doesn't understand D mangling. We currently leverage the use of
setting pretty-print names for debugging purposes, but you require to
put the names in
On 24/09/13 19:28, Iain Buclaw wrote:
... are we talking about the same mangling issue here?
What dmd does is not the same as gdc... :)
I wondered if you'd inherited something from the frontend ... :-)
On 24 September 2013 19:14, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net wrote:
On 24/09/13 19:28, Iain Buclaw wrote:
... are we talking about the same mangling issue here?
What dmd does is not the same as gdc... :)
I wondered if you'd inherited something from the frontend ... :-)
What about Win64 and VS Debugger?
I'm looking to begin adding integrated debugger support for the DDT IDE
pretty soon. With this in mind it would be desirable to have a view of
what level of D language debugger support is there for the various
combinations of platform+compiler+debugger.
This information would be quite
On 23 September 2013 20:50, Bruno Medeiros
brunodomedeiros+...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking to begin adding integrated debugger support for the DDT IDE
pretty soon. With this in mind it would be desirable to have a view of what
level of D language debugger support is there for the various
On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 19:50:35 UTC, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
Is debugger support with DMD+Linux+GDB as good as it is with
GDC?
I could test with GDC and DMD on Linux (for GDB).
OTOG, simple quetsion: how to install/update DDT plugin to the
git HEAD version?
On 11/21/12, Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote:
http://dwiki.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net/
Whoever added those icons, they look awesome! It's already much more
user-friendly than prowiki.
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 14:52:33 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 10:41:33 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 11/22/12, r_m_r r_...@mailinator.com wrote:
I just modified the Main_Page
and added the WhySwitch page (content copied from the old
wiki:
On 2012-11-23 12:56, tn wrote:
Fix for the font size issue:
http://dwiki.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net/User:Tmn/vector.css
(Taken from here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Common.css)
Looks good.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Friday, 23 November 2012 at 11:56:58 UTC, tn wrote:
Fix for the font size issue:
http://dwiki.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net/User:Tmn/vector.css
(Taken from here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Common.css)
Applied, thanks.
On 2012-11-23 15:06, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Applied, thanks.
Looks much better, thanks.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 11/23/12, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2012-11-23 15:06, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Applied, thanks.
Looks much better, thanks.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Looks perfect now. Thanks guys.
On 11/23/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks perfect now. Thanks guys.
I think maybe we should do another one of those logo contests
(https://github.com/eegg/d-brand) to get a better looking logo for the
wiki and dlang.org. I don't really like the current one (anyone else
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 11/23/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks perfect now. Thanks guys.
I think maybe we should do another one of those logo contests
(https://github.com/eegg/d-brand) to get a better looking logo for
On Friday, 23 November 2012 at 17:24:30 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
What about something based off my povray D-man model?
D-man? Seriously? ;)
David
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 06:26:52PM +0100, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Friday, 23 November 2012 at 17:24:30 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
What about something based off my povray D-man model?
D-man? Seriously? ;)
[...]
Why not? Java had Duke, so D has D-Man. :)
T
--
Caffeine underflow. Brain
On Wednesday, 21 November 2012 at 22:22:02 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
Here's something to start with:
http://dwiki.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net/
Could you please set up a robots.txt which disables indexing
until this has become officially adopted, and moved to its final
address?
Also,
On 11/22/12, r_m_r r_...@mailinator.com wrote:
I just modified the Main_Page
and added the WhySwitch page (content copied from the old wiki:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi).
Is it possible to increase the default font size for D syntax highlighting?
This is what it looks like, it's
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 10:41:33 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Is it possible to increase the default font size for D syntax
highlighting?
I don't think I can change the font size directly.
The CSS style for that pre tag is generated by the
SyntaxHighlight GeSHi extension as shown
On 11/22/12, r_m_r r_...@mailinator.com wrote:
I don't think I can change the font size directly.
Sorry, I should have quoted Vladimir, not you.
On 11/22/12, r_m_r r_...@mailinator.com wrote:
BTW The code displays fine on my browser.
Which browser? It displays the same for me on Firefox and
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 10:16:53 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 November 2012 at 22:22:02 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
Here's something to start with:
http://dwiki.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net/
Could you please set up a robots.txt which disables indexing
until this
On 11/22/12, Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote:
Does it look better now?
Nope, still the same.
On 11/22/12, Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote:
That would be because your browser is using Courier New for the
monospace CSS font family, which is notable for
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 15:18:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 11/22/12, Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net
wrote:
Does it look better now?
Nope, still the same.
Can you try a force-refresh or clearing the browser cache?
What web browser and operating system do you
On 2012-11-22 15:52, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
That would be because your browser is using Courier New for the
monospace CSS font family, which is notable for being smaller than other
fonts at the same font sizes.
I've overridden the definition to use the same CSS as the forum
(basically, try
On 11/22/12, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
It looks really small in Firefox on Mac OS X as well. It has the
following style according to firebug:
On Chrome (on win32) it looks ok though.
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 18:13:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2012-11-22 15:52, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
That would be because your browser is using Courier New for the
monospace CSS font family, which is notable for being smaller
than other
fonts at the same font sizes.
I've
On 2012-11-22 20:35, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Do code examples on Wikipedia look fine for you (e.g.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_(programming_language)#Metaprogramming )?
Yes, they do. I'm now looking at the computed font size in firebug. On
wikipedia it says 12.8px. On the new D wiki
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 13:15:30 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Thursday, 22 November 2012 at 10:16:53 UTC, David Nadlinger
Also, how »stable« can we expect that instance to be?
As stable as forum.dlang.org.
Do you make backups?
Automatic daily incremental offsite backups are
On 11/16/12, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 11/14/2012 11:33 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
But if the D community is interested in
just a MediaWiki setup on the same server as the D forum (with me taking
care of
maintenance), I could look into that.
I don't know how much
On Friday, 16 November 2012 at 03:01:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/14/2012 11:33 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
But if the D community is interested in
just a MediaWiki setup on the same server as the D forum (with
me taking care of
maintenance), I could look into that.
I don't know how
On Wednesday, 21 November 2012 at 22:22:02 UTC, Vladimir
Panteleev wrote:
Here's something to start with:
http://dwiki.kimsufi.thecybershadow.net/
Thank you. :)
MediaWiki seems pretty easy to use. I just modified the Main_Page
and added the WhySwitch page (content copied from the old wiki:
On 11/15/12, Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net wrote:
I'd love to look into writing a wiki syntax converter to move all
the content from ProWiki to a new MediaWiki instance
Well even if we don't have that we will have an opportunity to review
and update outdated articles.
On Thursday, 15 November 2012 at 08:28:09 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 11/15/12, Vladimir Panteleev vladi...@thecybershadow.net
wrote:
I'd love to look into writing a wiki syntax converter to move
all
the content from ProWiki to a new MediaWiki instance
Well even if we don't have that we
On 11/14/2012 11:33 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
But if the D community is interested in
just a MediaWiki setup on the same server as the D forum (with me taking care of
maintenance), I could look into that.
I don't know how much everyone else is interested in that, but I am.
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 21:45:50 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/13/2012 11:26 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
The only question raised by my suggestion is hosting. I
don't know what
infrastructure dlang.org is hosted on right now, and if
Buna Andrei,
I initiated a discussion[1] about the state of the D wiki[2].
[1] http://forum.dlang.org/thread/k6jak1$quh$1...@digitalmars.com
[2] http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d
There were three people agreeing that the current wiki engine might be a
cause for the bad state of the content. Nobody
On 11/13/12 3:23 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
Buna Andrei,
I initiated a discussion[1] about the state of the D wiki[2].
[1] http://forum.dlang.org/thread/k6jak1$quh$1...@digitalmars.com
[2] http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d
There were three people agreeing that the current wiki engine might be a
cause
On 11/13/12, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote:
Now we need a decision on this issue
I think we need a proper discussion and a vote, not a decision yet. We
should try and evaluate the wikis that are out there before settling
for github right away. For one thing http://prowiki.org is pretty
fast,
On 11/13/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
The biggest problem I see with prowiki
is the spamming issue.
Another big issue is it's lack of syntax highlighting. gollum wins
there, but other wikis might support D too. I'm not sure which do
though.
On Tuesday, 13 November 2012 at 16:20:38 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 11/13/12, Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote:
The biggest problem I see with prowiki
is the spamming issue.
Another big issue is it's lack of syntax highlighting. gollum
wins
there, but other wikis might
On 11/13/12, Aleksandar Ruzicic krckooras...@gmail.com wrote:
Syntax highlighting is not a problem as highlight.js [1] can be
easily added
It doesn't work in older browsers.
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
