! -- Andrei
Just a FYI to everyone posting in this thread, this thread was
originally posted in 2015, and the first 7 posts were regarding
DConf 2015.
Thanks for pointing that out :) :)
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 00:54:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
John Colvin's experiment is great and we want to make it a full
success. Please post here feedback and suggestions for
tomorrow's DConf streaming. Thanks! -- Andrei
The chat for UStream is sporadic and mostly broken.
I
was
originally posted in 2015, and the first 7 posts were regarding
DConf 2015.
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 00:54:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
John Colvin's experiment is great and we want to make it a full
success. Please post here feedback and suggestions for
tomorrow's DConf streaming. Thanks! -- Andrei
I don't know if it's the camera or the streaming site
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 00:54:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
John Colvin's experiment is great and we want to make it a full
success. Please post here feedback and suggestions for
tomorrow's DConf streaming. Thanks! -- Andrei
There should be a prominent link on the dconf website
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 00:54:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
John Colvin's experiment is great and we want to make it a full
success. Please post here feedback and suggestions for
tomorrow's DConf streaming. Thanks! -- Andrei
Relevant post at Reddit :
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 03:17:20 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 28/05/2015 12:54 p.m., Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
John Colvin's experiment is great and we want to make it a
full success.
Please post here feedback and suggestions for tomorrow's DConf
streaming. Thanks! -- Andrei
Just a
On Monday, 8 February 2016 at 19:46:19 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
[snip]
This might be a stupid idea, but perhaps there's something useful
in it:
Determinism isn't the same thing as "one long chain of numbers
that everybody reads from".
It can be acceptable to seed a set of
On Monday, 8 February 2016 at 00:54:24 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Either they use more stack space, or they act normally after
their call is done and are deallocated normally (automatically,
unless they are passed outside of the scope where they were
generated).
It's that "passed outside of
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 22:06:31 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 21:22:13 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
I have been wondering about how allocators could help to deal
with these problems. Could you put forward a minimal example
of how you would see it
On Sunday, 7 February 2016 at 22:27:40 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 22:06:31 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
What you describe makes sense, but I don't quite follow what
you mean in one particular case:
Technically alloca simply returns the current sp, then
On 01/26/2016 02:07 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 23:34:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I see no problem with adding a category of rngs that are not forward.
Naming is of course the hardest problem in our community :o). A good
stard would be a /dev/random
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 12:07:59 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I think a pseudo-rng as a forward range is useful. It's good in
testing and experimentation to fork a sequence of pseudo-random
numbers, turn the clock back, etc. Essentially I see no harm in
it; it's always easy to make a
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 23:37:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 01/25/2016 05:05 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
One option would be to implement the basic RNG data structor à
la C++,
as a functor
That's semantically the same as an input range. -- Andrei
“Yes, but...” :-P
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 23:34:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I see no problem with adding a category of rngs that are not
forward. Naming is of course the hardest problem in our
community :o). A good stard would be a /dev/random wrapper. --
Andrei
It's not about different
Main problem is with both making it @safe and avoid unforced
allocations (i.e. allowing shared state to be kept on stack of
`main`).
Finally getting around to watching all the talks, all good stuff
:) Figured I'd make a thread talking about things I came across
and perhaps get into a discussion on them in detail.
Anyways I'm watching the talk with Joseph Wakeling involving RNG
and I wonder, is that still a problem or
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 13:05:46 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Finally getting around to watching all the talks, all good
stuff :) Figured I'd make a thread talking about things I came
across and perhaps get into a discussion on them in detail.
Anyways I'm watching the talk with Joseph
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 17:19:05 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Implementing the random algorithms/other wrappers as a class is
problematic because then you get into the hassle of potentially
having to new/free a lot of individual heap objects deep in the
inner loop of your program.
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 14:31:12 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
It's all the functionality that _wraps_ RNGs, such as random
algorithms like randomCover and randomSample, or a D equivalent
of C++'s random distributions. These need to also be reference
types (for their internal
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 15:38:45 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Hmm i wonder... If recognizes it as infinite, could it avoid
treating them as forward ranges? As a struct it still wouldn't
work, but as a class/reference type it would work then...
They shouldn't be forward ranges anyway,
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 17:19:05 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 15:38:45 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Hmm i wonder... If recognizes it as infinite, could it avoid
treating them as forward ranges? As a struct it still wouldn't
work, but as a
BTW, I apologize for the rather terse replies so far; busy day
:-) I'll try and write out a more complete summary of the
problem at some point in the near future (though it might have to
wait 'til the weekend).
Thanks for the interest in contributing to solving this problem
:-)
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 20:26:12 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
What about an alternative allocator? Specifically I'm thinking
in C's equivalent which is alloca (allocates directly on the
stack with the rest of the variables). If the constructor is a
function then that won't work; but if
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 21:20:09 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
I thought that too, for a long time, but I came to the
conclusion it's not the case.
That's fine if you're dealing with something whose behaviour is
meant to be deterministic, but if you call this with a
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 18:40:59 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
As long as the numbers are pseudo-random, then in theory,
there's no problem with a range of random numbers being a
forward range.
I thought that too, for a long time, but I came to the conclusion
it's not the case.
Here's
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 21:22:13 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 20:26:12 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
What about an alternative allocator? Specifically I'm
thinking in C's equivalent which is alloca (allocates directly
on the stack with the rest of the
On 01/25/2016 05:05 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
One option would be to implement the basic RNG data structor à la C++,
as a functor
That's semantically the same as an input range. -- Andrei
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 21:30:47 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
So in short, the RNG shouldn't be a range at all. Of course it
could be a struct (for sanity and other reasons), but not a
range.
I wonder then, assuming we remove RNG from being a range, the
a RNG could give out a delegate
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 22:06:31 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
Most likely alloca would have to be built into the compiler.
Here's a crash course in how the stack memory management works.
sp=stack pointer, bp=base pointer (more relevant pre 386).
An apology in advance: I have an early
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 21:30:47 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Monday, 25 January 2016 at 21:20:09 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
Right -- non-PRNGs must be input ranges by design. I came to
the conclusion that pseudo-RNGs need to be input ranges, but
that implement an alternative
On 01/25/2016 04:20 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
I thought that too, for a long time, but I came to the conclusion it's
not the case.
I see no problem with adding a category of rngs that are not forward.
Naming is of course the hardest problem in our community :o). A good
stard would
On Friday, 27 November 2015 at 12:20:03 UTC, Chris wrote:
Taking a break from bikeshedding:
DConf 2015 is still being advertised here:
http://wiki.dlang.org/
I think we need to update this.
Done, thanks.
Taking a break from bikeshedding:
DConf 2015 is still being advertised here:
http://wiki.dlang.org/
I think we need to update this.
On Friday, 27 November 2015 at 12:29:19 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Friday, 27 November 2015 at 12:20:03 UTC, Chris wrote:
Taking a break from bikeshedding:
DConf 2015 is still being advertised here:
http://wiki.dlang.org/
I think we need to update this.
Done, thanks.
Thank you.
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 14:20:17 UTC, wobbles wrote:
Yeah, the whole last 10 or so mins of Adams talk is almost
impossible to follow.
I haven't watched it at all yet, what part? I can probably just
fill you in in writing.
(Eventually, when I have a few hours to waste, I'll type up a
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 14:27:55 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 14:20:17 UTC, wobbles wrote:
Yeah, the whole last 10 or so mins of Adams talk is almost
impossible to follow.
I haven't watched it at all yet, what part? I can probably just
fill you in in writing.
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 10:54:16 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 10:30:00 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
[...]
Bummer, they didn't use the screen cap video I sent, so there's
no code shown or anything for quite long sections, which makes
it quite hard to follow :(
Who
On Friday, 10 July 2015 at 01:21:08 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 22:17:50 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
Wha?! I thought it was John Colvin that talked about OpenCL?
Was Adam talking about it as well?!
Cheers,
A.
My first reply was originally to John Colvin, but then wobbles
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 22:17:50 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
Wha?! I thought it was John Colvin that talked about OpenCL?
Was Adam talking about it as well?!
Cheers,
A.
My first reply was originally to John Colvin, but then wobbles
refers to Adam's talk as well. I was just referring to
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 22:17:50 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
Wha?! I thought it was John Colvin that talked about OpenCL?
Was Adam talking about it as well?!
No, I didn't, I just briefly showed off the code of my api
explorer and http client wrapping by jsvar.
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 14:54:50 UTC, wobbles wrote:
After the last slide in your presentation, you begin to give a
demo of the code. From then on, nothing on screen is shown :/
The stuff about OpenCL
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 22:17:50 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 22:02:47 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 14:54:50 UTC, wobbles wrote:
After the last slide in your presentation, you begin to give
a demo of the code. From then on, nothing on screen is
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 22:02:47 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 14:54:50 UTC, wobbles wrote:
After the last slide in your presentation, you begin to give a
demo of the code. From then on, nothing on screen is shown :/
The stuff about OpenCL
Wha?! I thought it was John
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 10:30:00 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu
--
Keynote: Generic Programming Must Go
dconf link: http://dconf.org/2015/talks/alexandrescu.html
video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCrVYYlFTrA
Adam Ruppe
Dynamic Types in D
dconf
Andrei Alexandrescu
--
Keynote: Generic Programming Must Go
dconf link: http://dconf.org/2015/talks/alexandrescu.html
video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCrVYYlFTrA
Adam Ruppe
Dynamic Types in D
dconf link: http://dconf.org/2015/talks/ruppe.html
video link:
On 7/8/15 6:29 AM, ZombineDev wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu
--
Keynote: Generic Programming Must Go
dconf link: http://dconf.org/2015/talks/alexandrescu.html
video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCrVYYlFTrA
Found my talk on reddit already:
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 10:54:16 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Bummer, they didn't use the screen cap video I sent, so there's
no code shown or anything for quite long sections, which makes
it quite hard to follow :(
Who would be the best person to contact about this?
I guess that would be
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 10:30:00 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu
--
Title: Keynote: Generic Programming Must Go
DConf link: http://dconf.org/2015/talks/alexandrescu.html
Video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCrVYYlFTrA
Adam Ruppe
Title: Dynamic
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 13:56:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Found my talk on reddit already:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3cjr4v/generic_programming_must_go/
What, reddit still exists after its disaster last week? ;)
- Jonathan M Davis
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 13:56:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/8/15 6:29 AM, ZombineDev wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu
--
Keynote: Generic Programming Must Go
dconf link: http://dconf.org/2015/talks/alexandrescu.html
video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCrVYYlFTrA
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 14:58:19 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Can you post last week's TWiD also, the interview with Dmitry?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3ck3ru/interview_with_dmitry_olshansky_author_of_ds/
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 13:56:37 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/8/15 6:29 AM, ZombineDev wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu
--
Keynote: Generic Programming Must Go
dconf link: http://dconf.org/2015/talks/alexandrescu.html
video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCrVYYlFTrA
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 16:26:31 UTC, QAston wrote:
Looks like you've destroyed C++ concepts with this talk.
Yes. Certainly, while concepts may have their uses, there are
cases where they simply don't work, and if you try and make all
metaprogramming conform to them, you're going to
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 16:26:31 UTC, QAston wrote:
Looks like you've destroyed C++ concepts with this talk.
It's kind of unfortunate for C++ because D has the benefit of
hindsight. Ranges instead of iterators, DbI instead of
Concepts/Generic Programming, static if/version/templates
Great! :-)
You know, I think I'm slightly disappointed they cut the moment
when the USB presentation controller cut out early in my talk. I
kind of thought that was fun. :-P
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 10:30:00 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
All released talks are on this playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL12FA104E02ABE730
I have also create playlist which includes only dconf 2015 videos
for easier sharing :
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 10:54:16 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Bummer, they didn't use the screen cap video I sent, so there's
no code shown or anything for quite long sections, which makes
it quite hard to follow :(
Who would be the best person to contact about this?
I was just going to
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 22:20:08 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
Hey I didn't really have an equivalent of transients in D,
it was more a general statement that there are cases where you
can still get functional purity using mutable state rather than
adhering to a strict functional approach.
On Wednesday, 8 July 2015 at 02:53:06 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Saturday, 4 July 2015 at 01:13:52 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
I've raised
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dconf.org/pull/85 to
have the dconf website point to these urls. Andrei please
consider merging once you've done
On Saturday, 4 July 2015 at 01:13:52 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
I've raised
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dconf.org/pull/85 to
have the dconf website point to these urls. Andrei please
consider merging once you've done unpacking all the boxes :-)
Cheers,
A.
Andy, I just watched
On Friday, 3 July 2015 at 02:04:20 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It looks like they re-edited Chuck's talk and reposted it (so
the old link is invalid):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTJnkF0H6S8
- Jonathan M Davis
I'm really glad this has happened. The original was very hard to
follow.
On Friday, 3 July 2015 at 02:11:05 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
It looks like the UVU folks posted some more.
Andy Smith
--
Title: Hedge Fund Development Case Study
dconf link: http://dconf.org/2015/talks/smith.html
video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KBhb0iWsWQ
Jonathan M
It looks like they re-edited Chuck's talk and reposted it (so the
old link is invalid):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTJnkF0H6S8
- Jonathan M Davis
It looks like the UVU folks posted some more.
Andy Smith
--
Title: Hedge Fund Development Case Study
dconf link: http://dconf.org/2015/talks/smith.html
video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KBhb0iWsWQ
Jonathan M Davis
Title: Introduction to Ranges
dconf link:
There have been a few responses agreeing with me. Chucks talk
was
awesome but the current edit doesn't do it justice. Is there
any way
this can be fed back to UVU/Chuck etc.?
Did so. -- Andrei
Cheers!
A.
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 19:03:11 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
I don't want to sound negative but the editing of Chuck's talk
could be a lot better IMHO. Round about 30:00 he describes a
code example which isn't shown in the video!. He's making
multiple references to lines/code etc. that were
On 6/27/15 6:37 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 19:03:11 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
I don't want to sound negative but the editing of Chuck's talk could
be a lot better IMHO. Round about 30:00 he describes a code example
which isn't shown in the video!. He's making multiple
On Saturday, 27 June 2015 at 13:59:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/27/15 6:37 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
There have been a few responses agreeing with me. Chucks talk
was
awesome but the current edit doesn't do it justice. Is there
any way
this can be fed back to UVU/Chuck etc.?
Did
Please continue to spread the love (twitter, reddit, hackernews,
facebook, your blog...):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmRmfoKxMCE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W6uhX6AITM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W6uhX6AITM
Andrei
On 6/26/15 9:28 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 15:54:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Please continue to spread the love (twitter, reddit, hackernews,
facebook, your blog...):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmRmfoKxMCE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W6uhX6AITM
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 16:42:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/26/15 9:28 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 15:54:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Please continue to spread the love (twitter, reddit,
hackernews,
facebook, your blog...):
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 18:43:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/26/15 11:03 AM, extrawurst wrote:
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 16:42:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/26/15 9:28 AM, Gary Willoughby wrote:
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 15:54:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Please
On 6/26/15 12:03 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
I don't want to sound negative but the editing of Chuck's talk could be
a lot better IMHO. Round about 30:00 he describes a code example which
isn't shown in the video!. He's making multiple references to lines/code
etc. that were visible to the attendees
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 19:03:11 UTC, Andy Smith wrote:
I don't want to sound negative but the editing of Chuck's talk
could be a lot better IMHO. Round about 30:00 he describes a
code example which isn't shown in the video!. He's making
multiple references to lines/code etc. that were
I don't want to sound negative but the editing of Chuck's talk
could be a lot better IMHO. Round about 30:00 he describes a code
example which isn't shown in the video!. He's making multiple
references to lines/code etc. that were visible to the attendees
at the conference but aren't visible
On 6/26/2015 1:13 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 15:54:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Please continue to spread the love (twitter, reddit, hackernews, facebook,
your blog...):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmRmfoKxMCE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W6uhX6AITM
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 20:32:56 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Monday morning is probably a better time, due to Reddit usage
patterns. Weekends tend to not get nearly so much traffic.
Also, I completely spaced that I'll be on the road all day and
not back until Tuesday. It'll have to be
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 20:14:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3axgwn/d_language_runtime_klickverbot_dconf_2015/
David, could you please post an AMA there?
Done. I didn't even see your prompt before I did so. ;)
- David
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 20:43:07 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
He briefly mentions rtinfo then says it's not part of the talk,
is RTinfo actually used for anything? AFAICT it's just a dummy
value at the moment.
Yes, it is just a dummy value in the upstream druntime repo, but
people have been
On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 18:43:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It is planned inasmuch people send pull requests for it. --
Andrei
A pull request was submitted a couple of days ago.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dconf.org/pull/81
I added these new videos today.
There's work
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 22:47:03 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znjesAXEEqw
Brian: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmFyB9e7edw
Daniel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5daHGXSetXk
I've only just started watching but the editing seems to be
well done so
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 06:18:30 UTC, Philpax wrote:
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 22:47:03 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znjesAXEEqw
Brian: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmFyB9e7edw
Daniel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5daHGXSetXk
I've only just
On 6/24/15 4:43 PM, rsw0x wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 20:14:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3axgwn/d_language_runtime_klickverbot_dconf_2015/
David, could you please post an AMA there?
He briefly mentions rtinfo then says it's not part of
On Wednesday, 24 June 2015 at 20:14:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3axgwn/d_language_runtime_klickverbot_dconf_2015/
David, could you please post an AMA there?
He briefly mentions rtinfo then says it's not part of the talk,
is RTinfo actually used
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/3axgwn/d_language_runtime_klickverbot_dconf_2015/
David, could you please post an AMA there?
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 07:41:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/23/15 12:29 AM, Baz wrote:
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 22:47:03 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znjesAXEEqw
Brian: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmFyB9e7edw
Daniel:
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 22:47:03 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znjesAXEEqw
Brian: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmFyB9e7edw
Daniel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5daHGXSetXk
I've only just started watching but the editing seems to be
well done so
On 6/23/15 12:29 AM, Baz wrote:
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 22:47:03 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znjesAXEEqw
Brian: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmFyB9e7edw
Daniel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5daHGXSetXk
I've only just started watching but the
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 22:47:03 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znjesAXEEqw
Brian: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmFyB9e7edw
Daniel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5daHGXSetXk
I've only just started watching but the editing seems to be
well done so
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com
Předmět:Re: Walter, Brian, and Daniel's DConf 2015 talks are up
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 22:47:03 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znjesAXEEqw
Brian: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmFyB9e7edw
Daniel: https://www.youtube.com
On Friday, 19 June 2015 at 22:47:03 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote:
Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znjesAXEEqw
Brian: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmFyB9e7edw
Daniel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5daHGXSetXk
I've only just started watching but the editing seems to be
well done so
Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znjesAXEEqw
Brian: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmFyB9e7edw
Daniel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5daHGXSetXk
I've only just started watching but the editing seems to be well
done so thanks to UVU for that.
On 6/14/15 5:42 AM, Frank Fuente wrote:
Any news of the release date for the video from DConf 2015?
Got word from Chuck that they've had an urgent project until now.
They're starting working on the videos this week and will make them
available one by one as each is ready. -- Andrei
Hi,
Any news of the release date for the video from DConf 2015?
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 14:27:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/14/15 5:42 AM, Frank Fuente wrote:
Any news of the release date for the video from DConf 2015?
Got word from Chuck that they've had an urgent project until
now. They're starting working on the videos this week
I sliced videos with DConf 2015 2 June, but the uploading lasted
as you can see a very long time :)
https://cloud.mail.ru/public/BSZs/PZDbRcGrH
Video cut stamp-based John Colvin:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/sujyaurgyfumoiimi...@forum.dlang.org
On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 19:26:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/1/2015 5:39 AM, Dicebot wrote:
- Moving fibers between threads (though there is some hope
that Liran managed to
convince Walter it is a bad idea)
You two have made a good case. I'm on the fence :-)
I moved this into an
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 04:03:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/may-31.html
Well done, thanks!
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 04:03:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
http://arsdnet.net/this-week-in-d/may-31.html
The rest of DConf will be reported within the next two weeks,
then I'd like to follow up with the speakers to see if they
have anything else they'd like to expand on and attendees if
1 - 100 of 361 matches
Mail list logo
