On 07.01.2016 16:36, welkam wrote:
On Thursday, 7 January 2016 at 10:58:49 UTC, anonymous wrote:
However, my stance at the moment is that the intro examples should
just be really short. The message is that you can do something useful
or cool in just a couple lines of code. That means outright re
On 07.01.2016 12:49, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
On Thursday, 7 January 2016 at 10:58:49 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Yeah, I also stripped some of its functionality (processing args
instead of stdin),
I sometimes use this box to quickly test something. Although I have
never had a use for args, I might in
On 07.01.2016 12:36, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
Understand. But IMO the main objective should be to demonstrate
expressiveness and productivity to newcomers, and therefore it is
crucial that the examples are understandable in its entirety by every
newbie. Someone unfamiliar to D's UFCS and template in
I am not sure.. But you can install this for jade syntax highlighting
(https://packagecontrol.io/packages/Jade)
On 07.01.2016 16:55, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I noticed that the buttons for the example cover the drop down menu for
Resources, if it's open.
Fixed, thanks.
On 07.01.2016 16:33, welkam wrote:
in http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
comunity, learn, documentation and packages are redundant. They either
should be in meniu or not on front page. And if there are redundant
links they should be in footer.
I'm not sure if redundancy is to be avoided here. I th
On Thursday, 7 January 2016 at 08:16:45 UTC, Yazan D wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 02:46:30 +, welkam wrote:
How left one is more readable than right?
http://i.imgur.com/7KiehRI.png
Tip: you can use Jade syntax highlighting for diet templates.
http://i.imgur.com/oaUkjGe.png am I doing some
On Thursday, 7 January 2016 at 10:58:49 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Yeah, I also stripped some of its functionality (processing
args instead of stdin),
I sometimes use this box to quickly test something. Although I
have never had a use for args, I might in the future. I found it
was nice to see tha
On 07.01.2016 10:02, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
About the "Your code here" box: I accidentally had your page and
dlang.org side-by-side with the same "Round floating point numbers"
example, only yours had the inline comments stripped.
Yeah, I also stripped some of its functionality (processing args
On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 02:46:30 +, welkam wrote:
> How left one is more readable than right? http://i.imgur.com/7KiehRI.png
Tip: you can use Jade syntax highlighting for diet templates.
On Thursday, 7 January 2016 at 02:46:30 UTC, welkam wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 January 2016 at 17:14:03 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
https://vibed.org/templates/diet
I am aware of it, but that is one more technology to learn and
how is it better?
How left one is more readable than right?
http://i.
On Wednesday, 6 January 2016 at 17:14:03 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
https://vibed.org/templates/diet
I am aware of it, but that is one more technology to learn and
how is it better?
How left one is more readable than right?
http://i.imgur.com/7KiehRI.png
On Wednesday, 6 January 2016 at 17:18:08 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Good, everybody want to get away from this. This was a mistake.
quoted for truth
On Wednesday, 6 January 2016 at 14:35:13 UTC, welkam wrote:
Here is how various languages are embedded in html
PHP: or
Ruby on rails: <% code %>
Django(python): {% code %}
Hack:
Good, everybody want to get away from this. This was a mistake.
On 2016-01-06 15:35, welkam wrote:
You are not making it more accessible by adding one more technology that
is not usually used for web development.
Here is how various languages are embedded in html
PHP: or
Ruby on rails: <% code %>
Django(python): {% code %}
Hack: in html and with structur
On Wednesday, 6 January 2016 at 11:35:12 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Also check out http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/ where I'm
currently working on the implementation. It's a little
different from the mockup, precisely because I'm trying not to
drop features/content.
I am aware of your work. I will f
On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 06:43:32 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Currently dlang.org has over 62KLOC of Ddoc source, so any
significant surgery on it will be a large effort. Dropping ddoc
means we'd need to use another templating engine (getting back
to raw html would be too much troub
On 06.01.2016 09:00, welkam wrote:
This reminded me when at work we got new design in html/css and had to
put it on the site. It looked better but lacked 1/3 of fields and
functionality. Then backend developers had to fix design and in the end
it was better than before but not as good as html/css
On Saturday, 19 December 2015 at 14:33:35 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
[1]
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ejpuwwlutklvlozyf...@forum.dlang.org
[2]
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/fdbnecqbemseocwzg...@forum.dlang.org
[3] http://www.googledrive.com/host/0B7UtafxGD9vESlB3aFBxcjNPOXM
This reminded me
On 2015-12-27 21:42, anonymous wrote:
The caret seems to be a bit high maybe, but otherwise that's how it's
supposed to look. Feel free to criticize, of course.
Aha, then there's no problem :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 27.12.2015 15:04, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7UtafxGD9vEQTVjeXZhSDdRZDA
The caret seems to be a bit high maybe, but otherwise that's how it's
supposed to look. Feel free to criticize, of course.
On 2015-12-27 13:06, anonymous wrote:
That's weird. Does it look bad?
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7UtafxGD9vEQTVjeXZhSDdRZDA
b) It would require Javascript, right?
I have no idea.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 26.12.2015 21:21, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
It does work, but it looks like it affected other bowers as well
(Firefox).
That's weird. Does it look bad?
BTW, I still think that a custom look would be better.
Something like the search field in Firefox. It has a the magnifier icon
which acts like
On 2015-12-26 18:27, anonymous wrote:
Does that mean I just have to add `-webkit-appearance: none;` to the
select element? Did that just now. Does it work?
It does work, but it looks like it affected other bowers as well
(Firefox). BTW, I still think that a custom look would be better.
Somet
On 26.12.2015 13:19, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
No, it's not a cache thing, the new top menu is there. What I mean is
that the Phobos documentation (for example) doesn't use the new design.
Same syntax colors for the syntax highlighting, same green color for the
Phobos docs and so on.
Yeah, I hadn'
On 25/12/15 15:04, anonymous wrote:
I don't know what you mean. Could this be a cache thing? Can you give a
specific example, maybe with a screenshot?
No, it's not a cache thing, the new top menu is there. What I mean is
that the Phobos documentation (for example) doesn't use the new design.
On Friday, 25 December 2015 at 14:04:36 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 25.12.2015 12:51, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Most of the pages do not seem to be updated.
I don't know what you mean. Could this be a cache thing? Can
you give a specific example, maybe with a screenshot?
The drop down in the searc
On 25.12.2015 12:51, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Most of the pages do not seem to be updated.
I don't know what you mean. Could this be a cache thing? Can you give a
specific example, maybe with a screenshot?
The drop down in the search fields looks very bad in Safari on OS X. I
think this is a g
On 24/12/15 20:33, anonymous wrote:
On 21.12.2015 14:58, anonymous wrote:
http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
On GitHub if people want to play around with it:
https://github.com/aG0aep6G/dlang.org/tree/Ivan-Smirnov's-redesign
That's a full clone of dlang.org in the new style. I just pasted it over
On 12/24/15 8:26 AM, Thomas Mader wrote:
On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 06:43:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Currently dlang.org has over 62KLOC of Ddoc source, so any significant
surgery on it will be a large effort. Dropping ddoc means we'd need to
use another templating engine (getting
On 12/24/15 2:33 PM, anonymous wrote:
This is a more proper implementation of the redesign than what I showed
before:
http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
https://github.com/aG0aep6G/dlang.org/tree/Ivan-Smirnov's-redesign
I like it a lot! -- Andrei
On 21.12.2015 14:58, anonymous wrote:
http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
On GitHub if people want to play around with it:
https://github.com/aG0aep6G/dlang.org/tree/Ivan-Smirnov's-redesign
That's a full clone of dlang.org in the new style. I just pasted it over
the old style, and hacked around on t
On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 06:43:32 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Currently dlang.org has over 62KLOC of Ddoc source, so any
significant surgery on it will be a large effort. Dropping ddoc
means we'd need to use another templating engine (getting back
to raw html would be too much troub
On 12/24/2015 01:14 AM, Thomas Mader wrote:
That is very reasonable I too think but isn't it a question of viewpoint?
I see the dependency chain for a Website as follows:
1) HTML
2) HTML, CSS
3) HTML, CSS, Javascript
It seems that the dlang.org Homepage needs CSS and Javascript so 3 is
the mini
On Wednesday, 23 December 2015 at 17:22:25 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Yah. Overall I think a redesign is needed simply because it's
time. Second I think the particular redesign discussed here is
nice in many ways. Third I think I'm being reasonable if I ask
to introduce new or custom techn
On 12/23/2015 04:35 PM, wobbles wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 December 2015 at 17:22:25 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Third I think I'm being reasonable if I ask to introduce new or custom
technology dependencies only with good reason.
Andrei
I think that's very fair.
On your earlier point of g
On Wednesday, 23 December 2015 at 17:22:25 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Third I think I'm being reasonable if I ask to introduce new or
custom technology dependencies only with good reason.
Andrei
I think that's very fair.
On your earlier point of getting people to work on the website
a
On 12/23/15 4:59 AM, deadalnix wrote:
First question first, how do one create a template from a design so that
ddoc can generate using it ?
I don't understand this question. Ddoc is just pure macro expansion so
you can use it in many ways, including to generate a verbatim copy of
the input
(
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 16:58:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/22/2015 02:19 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-12-21 18:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
That's a large leap. I suggest using Ddoc instead of Sass
compact CSS
files, see the existing instance at
https://github.com/D
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 15:43:29 UTC, Dmitry wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 15:17:57 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
and a good web design should work in all these cases.
I agree. My message was that current design supports any size,
but new design does not support widescreens.
That
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 15:01:52 UTC, Dmitry wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 13:38:48 UTC, Charles wrote:
That's silliness, and not how percentages work at all. To
suggest that 95% of people that go to dlang.org have
widescreens because 95% of some other user base is nonsense.
1
On 12/22/2015 02:19 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-12-21 18:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
That's a large leap. I suggest using Ddoc instead of Sass compact CSS
files, see the existing instance at
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/blob/master/css/cssmenu.css.dd.
CoffeeSc
On 22.12.2015 16:43, Dmitry wrote:
I agree. My message was that current design supports any size, but new
design does not support widescreens.
There's a point where claiming more horizontal space doesn't improve the
usability of the site any more.
Yes, more stuff fits on one screen, but read
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 15:17:57 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
and a good web design should work in all these cases.
I agree. My message was that current design supports any size,
but new design does not support widescreens.
On 22.12.2015 16:01, Dmitry wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 13:38:48 UTC, Charles wrote:
[...]
To be fair, D's documentation uses a left-side menu, but it removes
the top level navigation (you have to press the logo).
Yep, new design has _same_ solution.
No, the mock-up doesn't provid
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 08:52:28 UTC, Dmitry wrote:
Yep, you are one of that 5%.
Me too.
Many programmers do not have. But other many programmers have.
I use multiple monitors, 16:9 and 4:3. All studios, where I
worked, uses multiple monitors. Most part of professional
developers, w
On 2015-12-22 16:05, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
The new logo design still struck me as the same brand when I first saw it.
It's the shape that you recognize (the D and the two moons). The rest is
just extra.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 14:57:22 UTC, Meta wrote:
If you don't know HTML then you probably shouldn't be doing
webdev.
Most the website is content articles, not web dev.
My ideal situation with the website would probably be a html
skeleton with ddoc in the contents, providing semantic
Let me preface this saying I'm mildly on the just-keep-ddoc side
of things
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 14:42:35 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
it's not in ddoc? Not everyone knows HTML.
If you don't know HTML, the ddoc macros the dlang.org site uses
will be pretty mysterious too. What is
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 13:38:48 UTC, Charles wrote:
That's silliness, and not how percentages work at all. To
suggest that 95% of people that go to dlang.org have
widescreens because 95% of some other user base is nonsense.
1) Do you have statistics of dlang.org?
2) Do you think that d
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 14:42:35 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 07:19:48 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
I have no interest in using Ddoc. If that's a requirement we
can close down the redesign idea completely.
Jacob, I really like the design, but how are others s
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 07:19:48 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
I have no interest in using Ddoc. If that's a requirement we
can close down the redesign idea completely.
Jacob, I really like the design, but how are others supposed to
contribute, e.g. those who come from the dmd side of thi
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 08:52:28 UTC, Dmitry wrote:
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 08:04:29 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
I use exclusively 4:3 and 3:4, 1600*1280, 1280*1024,
1024*1280, 1024*768 and 768*1024.
Yep, you are one of that 5%.
That's silliness, and not how percentages wo
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 08:04:29 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
I use exclusively 4:3 and 3:4, 1600*1280, 1280*1024, 1024*1280,
1024*768 and 768*1024.
Yep, you are one of that 5%.
Widescreen is for movies...
No.
Besides, many programmers with wide screen does not have
multiple moni
On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 at 06:38:24 UTC, Dmitry wrote:
Left-side menu. I don't like when site uses only half of screen
(is anybody still uses 1280*1024 and 1024*768 displays?
Statistic of November says that 5% and 2% of people). New
design prepared for 4:3, not for wide-screen displays
(1
On 2015-12-21 18:37, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
That's a large leap. I suggest using Ddoc instead of Sass compact CSS
files, see the existing instance at
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/blob/master/css/cssmenu.css.dd.
CoffeeScript sounds like a nice thing to add and is from
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 21:20:44 UTC, Bubbasaur wrote:
I want say that there are also people who most like the
current design.
Why? Reasons?
Basic things:
Left-side menu. I don't like when site uses only half of screen
(is anybody still uses 1280*1024 and 1024*768 displays? Statistic
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 19:43:35 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
IMO we should stay away from trans-plied languages like SCSS,
Less, and CoffeeScript, for several reasons
CoffeeScript is a no-no now that Babel (ES6) is around. But you
probably don't need all that since dlang is a pretty simpl
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 20:44:06 UTC, Dmitry wrote:
On Saturday, 19 December 2015 at 14:33:35 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
Here's another thread about redesign of dlang.org. I'm creating
I want say that there are also people who most like the current
design.
Why? Reasons?
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 19:54:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/21/2015 02:43 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
IMO we should stay away from trans-plied languages like SCSS,
Less, and
CoffeeScript, for several reasons
[snip]
That sounds reasonable. -- Andrei
Meanwhile, we could also co
On Saturday, 19 December 2015 at 14:33:35 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
Here's another thread about redesign of dlang.org. I'm creating
I want say that there are also people who most like the current
design.
On 12/21/2015 01:04 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 17:37:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
That's a large leap. I suggest using Ddoc instead of Sass compact CSS
files, see the existing instance at
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/blob/master/css/cssme
On 12/21/2015 02:43 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
IMO we should stay away from trans-plied languages like SCSS, Less, and
CoffeeScript, for several reasons
[snip]
That sounds reasonable. -- Andrei
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 17:37:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/21/2015 10:28 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
The original code is written in HTML, JavaScript and Less
(CSS). See
repository for build instructions [1]. If I move forward with
this I
would go with vibe.d. I would prefer Sa
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 17:52:39 UTC, BLM768 wrote:
We could use the :hover dropdowns as a fallback for the JS,
though. It might not be ideal, but isn't that basically the
definition of a fallback?
Yeah, but :hover dropdowns really suck. I'd prefer a fallback
link over them when given
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 17:37:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
That's a large leap. I suggest using Ddoc instead of Sass
compact CSS files, see the existing instance at
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/blob/master/css/cssmenu.css.dd.
Why is there a $(COLON) macro in
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 15:09:06 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Dedicated pages is a good idea and can be done trivially with
ddoc macros to avoid repetition of the content in the source.
It could also be a css :hover dropdown instead of JS, but I
hate drop downs on hover so I'd prefer the d
On 12/21/2015 10:28 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-12-21 15:13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Nice! A few questions.
What are the changes to the tooling used and the build process?
The original code is written in HTML, JavaScript and Less (CSS). See
repository for build instructions [1]. If
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 13:58:30 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 19.12.2015 15:33, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
http://www.googledrive.com/host/0B7UtafxGD9vESlB3aFBxcjNPOXM
I know you wait for Walter's and Andrei's approval on this
before investing more work. That's very reasonable. Luckily,
I'm no
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 16:50:31 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Possibly, but the whole thing still needs to be implemented
properly. I just added all the CSS from the mock-up on top of
the existing stuff. We don't want to keep it that way.
Guess who wrote a program to clean that up semi-automat
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 16:50:31 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On 21.12.2015 16:45, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Let's not underestimate, but let's not overestimate either,
I'm pretty
confident these bugs could all be fixed in a day of tweaking,
probably
less than that. It looks reasonable right now.
On 21.12.2015 16:45, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Let's not underestimate, but let's not overestimate either, I'm pretty
confident these bugs could all be fixed in a day of tweaking, probably
less than that. It looks reasonable right now.
Possibly, but the whole thing still needs to be implemented prop
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 15:07:18 UTC, anonymous wrote:
It's definitely very buggy. This is nowhere near releasable
quality.
Let's not underestimate, but let's not overestimate either, I'm
pretty confident these bugs could all be fixed in a day of
tweaking, probably less than that. It l
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 15:28:44 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
The original code is written in HTML, JavaScript and Less
(CSS). See repository for build instructions [1]. If I move
forward with this I would go with vibe.d.
+1
On 2015-12-21 15:13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Nice! A few questions.
What are the changes to the tooling used and the build process?
The original code is written in HTML, JavaScript and Less (CSS). See
repository for build instructions [1]. If I move forward with this I
would go with vibe
On 2015-12-21 14:58, anonymous wrote:
On 19.12.2015 15:33, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
http://www.googledrive.com/host/0B7UtafxGD9vESlB3aFBxcjNPOXM
I know you wait for Walter's and Andrei's approval on this before
investing more work. That's very reasonable. Luckily, I'm not so
reasonable ;)
http:/
On 2015-12-21 14:40, wobbles wrote:
On that - have you had any contact / discussion with Walter and/or
Andrei about this?
No, I just put this out there to see what happens.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 15:07:05 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 15:01:16 UTC, JohnCK wrote:
Unfortunately it's buggy, like for example in 1024x768px it
doesn't looks good:
Yeah, the header wraps on my computer on 1280 too, but these
are mild bugs that can be f
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 05:14:34 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Worth noting that this design modifies the logo, which Walter
vetoed during the previous redesign.
I don't want to be harsh with Walter, but I think he should
minding with language design.
You know... look that all compan
On 21.12.2015 15:46, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Huh, that's mildly buggy but I'm actually pretty impressed with it.
It's definitely very buggy. This is nowhere near releasable quality. I
put this up so that we have a better preview of the thing. I always feel
like mock-ups glance over the pain poin
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 14:54:45 UTC, anonymous wrote:
I guess, we'd set up dedicated pages as alternatives for the
drop-down menus. They could be copies of the little overview
snippets from the home page, or just lists of links.
Dedicated pages is a good idea and can be done trivially
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 15:01:16 UTC, JohnCK wrote:
Unfortunately it's buggy, like for example in 1024x768px it
doesn't looks good:
Yeah, the header wraps on my computer on 1280 too, but these are
mild bugs that can be fixed with a little css adjustment.
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 14:46:23 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 13:58:30 UTC, anonymous wrote:
I know you wait for Walter's and Andrei's approval on this
before investing more work. That's very reasonable. Luckily,
I'm not so reasonable ;)
http://d-ag0aep6g.rh
On 21.12.2015 15:13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
What are the changes to the tooling used and the build process?
Uh, none? I'm not sure if I understand the question. It's just DDoc,
CSS, etc, as usual.
Is there a reasonable decay if javascript is disabled?
I guess, we'd set up dedicated pa
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 13:58:30 UTC, anonymous wrote:
I know you wait for Walter's and Andrei's approval on this
before investing more work. That's very reasonable. Luckily,
I'm not so reasonable ;)
http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
Huh, that's mildly buggy but I'm actually pretty impre
On 12/21/2015 08:58 AM, anonymous wrote:
On 19.12.2015 15:33, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
http://www.googledrive.com/host/0B7UtafxGD9vESlB3aFBxcjNPOXM
I know you wait for Walter's and Andrei's approval on this before
investing more work. That's very reasonable. Luckily, I'm not so
reasonable ;)
htt
On 19.12.2015 15:33, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
http://www.googledrive.com/host/0B7UtafxGD9vESlB3aFBxcjNPOXM
I know you wait for Walter's and Andrei's approval on this before
investing more work. That's very reasonable. Luckily, I'm not so
reasonable ;)
http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/
On GitHub
On Sunday, 20 December 2015 at 13:50:53 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-12-20 06:12, Charles wrote:
kind of a neat project here... mind if I help out?
Sure, that would be great. Although I don't really want to do
anything until Walter and Andrei approve the design.
On that - have you ha
On 2015-12-21 09:47, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
Nice! A few suggestions:
1. Red is an attention-seeking colour, so it usually a good idea to use
it more sparingly. But if you use it on links, make sure you only use it
on "clickable" items. Right now some icons and text are red, but
non-clickabl
On Saturday, 19 December 2015 at 14:33:35 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
Thoughts?
Wow.
I really like it. Clearly better than the actual design
+1 for me.
On 2015-12-21 09:12, Sean Campbell wrote:
It only removes the border, so that it better integrates with the top menu.
The difference between the two seem trivial?
Actually it has changed the red color and I think it removes the gloss
effect. But the shape of the D and the two moons is the sam
On Saturday, 19 December 2015 at 14:33:35 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
Thoughts?
Fantastic. +1.
The editable and runnable code on the existing homepage is a nice
touch.
That should find its way into the new homepage.
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 08:47:48 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
idea to use it more sparingly. But if you use it on links, make
sure you only use it on "clickable" items.
I personally prefer black text with coloured underline on links.
Easier on the eyes:
http://www.w3.org/
On Saturday, 19 December 2015 at 14:33:35 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
The redesign is just a mock of the start page and a Phobos
documentation page. No Ddoc, vibe.d or similar is used. Only
HTML, JavaScript and Less (CSS). It's not a functioning site,
it's only to show the design.
Nice! A few
On Saturday, 19 December 2015 at 14:33:35 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
Thoughts?
[1]
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ejpuwwlutklvlozyf...@forum.dlang.org
[2]
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/fdbnecqbemseocwzg...@forum.dlang.org
[3] http://www.googledrive.com/host/0B7UtafxGD9vESlB3aFBxcjNPOXM
IMHO
On 2015-12-21 06:14, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Worth noting that this design modifies the logo, which Walter vetoed
during the previous redesign.
Yeah... But as I have tried to explain, it's common for companies to
have different version of the same logo for different use cases. I think
this
On 2015-12-21 00:20, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
I'd like to see a more complete menu in the new layout to get a better
feel for it. It certainly looks the part with the small set of key
features of dlang on display. But how will it fair showing the entire
language or library referenc
On Monday, 21 December 2015 at 05:14:34 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Sunday, 20 December 2015 at 13:50:53 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2015-12-20 06:12, Charles wrote:
kind of a neat project here... mind if I help out?
Sure, that would be great. Although I don't really want to do
anyt
On Sunday, 20 December 2015 at 13:50:53 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-12-20 06:12, Charles wrote:
kind of a neat project here... mind if I help out?
Sure, that would be great. Although I don't really want to do
anything until Walter and Andrei approve the design.
Worth noting that thi
PLEASE! For the sake of everything that is good and right in this world,
let this be a thing!
I don't even care about the drop-downs. This is categorically superior
to the current site in every relevant way.
Clean, modern, user-friendly, and mobile-friendly design. Easily
accessible to both
1 - 100 of 528 matches
Mail list logo