On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 05:44:16 UTC, Rob T wrote:
One issue I immediately ran into, is when I run bub incorrectly
it hangs after writing the bail message to console. ctrl-c
does not kill it, and I have to run a process kill commandto
terminate.
CTRL-Z works for me. I think it expects
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 21:15:34 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Jun 26, 2013 9:00 PM, Joakim joa...@airpost.net wrote:
This is flat wrong. I suggest you read the Artistic license,
it was
chosen for a reason, ie it allows closing of source as long as
you provide
the original, unmodified
On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 07:32:32 UTC, eles wrote:
CTRL-Z works for me. I think it expects input.
Ignore it. It just suspends it.
On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 03:20:37 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
I've read (almost), everything, so I hope I won't miss a point
here:
a) I've heard about MSVC, Red Hat, Qt, Linux and so on. From my
understanding, none of the projects mentionned have gone from
free (as in
free beer) to
Hm, bub.. Sounds like it should work with 'dub' nicely ;)
Looks promising and I'd really love to see some build tool other
then rdmd getting to the point it can be called standard.
Makefile's sometimes are just too inconvenient.
On 27 June 2013 09:21, Joakim joa...@airpost.net wrote:
But lets assume that you are right and the optimization patches I'm talking
about would tend to end up only in the backend. In that case, the frontend
would not have any closed patches and the paid version of dmd would simply
have a
On 27 June 2013 09:53, Joakim joa...@airpost.net wrote:
those involved with the D compiler can decide if this would be a worthwhile
direction. From their silence so far, I can only assume that they are not
interested in rousing the ire of the freetards and will simply maintain the
status quo
Joakim, el 26 de June a las 17:52 me escribiste:
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 11:08:17 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Joakim, el 25 de June a las 23:37 me escribiste:
I don't know the views of the key contributors, but I wonder if
they
would have such a knee-jerk reaction against any
On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 08:21:12 UTC, Joakim wrote:
I'm familiar with its arguments from a summary, not
particularly interested in reading the whole thing.
You know, I think I see what your problem is ... :-)
As I said earlier, I'm done with this debate.
There is no point talking to people who make blatantly ignorant
statements like, Binary blobs are the exception rather than the
rule in Linux, and many hardware vendors would flat out say 'no'
to doing any support on them. This assertion is so
On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 13:18:01 UTC, Joakim wrote:
As I said earlier, I'm done with this debate.
There is no point talking to people who make blatantly ignorant
statements like, Binary blobs are the exception rather than
the rule in Linux, and many hardware vendors would flat out say
On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 13:18:01 UTC, Joakim wrote:
There is no point talking to people who make blatantly ignorant
statements
Yeah, I keep wondering why someone even bothered to waste time
explaining all this to someone who is incapable of both providing
own reasoning and studying
On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 13:25:06 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 13:18:01 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Look, I get it, you guys are religious zealots- you tip your
hand when you allude to ethical or moral reasons for using
open source, a crazy idea if there ever was one- and
On 27 June 2013 14:40, Joakim joa...@airpost.net wrote:
On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 13:25:06 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 13:18:01 UTC, Joakim wrote:
Look, I get it, you guys are religious zealots- you tip your hand when
you allude to ethical or moral reasons for
On 6/26/13 5:10 PM, Graham St Jack wrote:
Bottom-up-build (bub) is a build system written in D which supports
building of large C/C++/D projects.
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1h6p2w/bottomupbuild_a_build_system_for_ccd/
Andrei
Andrei Alexandrescu:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1fpw2r/dconf_2013_day_2_talk_5_a_precise_garbage/
Another thing to keep in account while designing a more precise
garbage collection is a possible special casing for Algebraic
(and Variant, and more generally for some
On 27 June 2013 14:17, Joakim joa...@airpost.net wrote:
As I said earlier, I'm done with this debate.
There is no point talking to people who make blatantly ignorant statements
like, Binary blobs are the exception rather than the rule in Linux, and
many hardware vendors would flat out say
-You could start taking donations and hire some people to work on
D.
This doesn't work as it's a volunteer project. Why should someone
get paid when others give their time for free? It would create
conflict while being a less effective application of funds, D
already gets more than one or
On 6/27/13, ixid nuacco...@gmail.com wrote:
-You could start taking donations and hire some people to work on
A better use of the money is another D conference which has
been a huge success and generated both ideas and much greater
interest and exposure for D.
Yes, and some better glue for the
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:44:07 +0200, Rob T wrote:
This build system seems to be very well suited for building complex
large projects in a sensible way.
I successfully tested the example build on Debian linux. I will
definitely explore this further using one of my own projects.
One issue I
On Thursday, 27 June 2013 at 21:39:28 UTC, ixid wrote:
-You could start taking donations and hire some people to work
on
D.
This doesn't work as it's a volunteer project. Why should
someone get paid when others give their time for free? It would
create conflict while being a less effective
21 matches
Mail list logo
