On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 12:39:43 -0500, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 02/01/2013 12:16 PM, Paul D. Anderson wrote:
> The DConf13 website is mostly "coming soon". That makes sense for the
> schedule, speakers, talks, etc., but I'd like to make travel plans.
>
> Venue? Which hotel?
>
> Cost of Registra
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:31:45 -0500, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 18 February 2013 at 01:02:43 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://digitalmars.com/d/download.html
The dlang.org site isn't updated yet, but the downloads are there.
Love the new release! Thanks to everyone who contributed. But I
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:55:21 -0500, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/17/2013 5:31 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
Love the new release! Thanks to everyone who contributed. But I just
want to
throw in my 2 cents about the new changelog format. It's impossible now
to tell
at a glance what the major changes/
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:44:18 -0500, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/17/2013 6:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Let me give you some examples of "new features"
std.array.replace compile error (string and immutable string)
There's no Duration.max
Document extern properly
etc
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:54:54 -0500, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/17/2013 7:36 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:44:18 -0500, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/17/2013 6:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Let me give you some examples of "new features"
std.arr
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:31:47 -0500, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/17/2013 10:18 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/17/2013 6:11 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Compare the earlier changelogs with the bugzilla entries.
It's EXACTLY THE SAME TEXT.
EXACTLY.
No it
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:32:50 -0400, Russel Winder
wrote:
PS http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/announce/ appears
to stop in 2012-12
http://forum.dlang.org/group/digitalmars.D.announce
Don't use that other thing any more.
-Steve
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 10:17:26 -0400, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 1 April 2013 at 21:05:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I know you are all Bieber fans, so you'll be please to know he will be
doing the Keynote. I happily cede the slot to him.
(P.S. Bieber has been an undercover D coder for quite
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 02:44:32 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 4/2/2013 11:28 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I would bet that that lyrics matches quite a lot of songs.
"EEIIOOAAHHEE..." --- every Led
Zeppelin song
No. Just, no.
It reminds me of this: h
On Wed, 08 May 2013 00:46:29 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Go to http://dconf.org/talks/bright.html
Andrei
Something is wrong with that site. It says "Publishing in progress, your
video will be available soon". Andrei's message was 6 hours ago, I don't
know what it has to do to p
On Sat, 11 May 2013 20:22:57 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a demand
or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion that
On Mon, 13 May 2013 14:35:14 -0400, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-05-13 18:04, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I am happy with any reasonable schedule, including the current. 3 a
week is max.
BTW, this whole "I need it now" mentality reminds me of my first days of
having a TiVo.
My
On Mon, 13 May 2013 17:43:01 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 5/13/13, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
In about 4 days, I remember coming home and seeing 4 more hours and
saying,
"aw crap, we have four hours of TV to watch" When it became a chore, we
deleted the "season pass
On Mon, 13 May 2013 17:43:01 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Anyway I wish this PR stunt was announce *beforehand*.
BTW, for comparison:
Dconf 2007: 8/25-8/27 2007
Slides posted: 7/10/2008
http://forum.dlang.org/post/g54ptt$2so2$1...@digitalmars.com
Reminds me of Lewis CK's "Everything
On Mon, 13 May 2013 17:43:01 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Anyway I wish this PR stunt was announce *beforehand*.
BTW, for comparison:
Dconf 2007: 8/25-8/27 2007
Videos posted: 7/10/2008
http://forum.dlang.org/post/g54ptt$2so2$1...@digitalmars.com
Reminds me of Lewis CK's "Everything
On Tue, 14 May 2013 20:26:36 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/14/13 7:24 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Still, 10 months seems crazy. As
somebody mentioned before, 1 month seems much more reasonable, 2 at
most.
With three a week we'll be done in five more weeks. Please explain why
On Thu, 23 May 2013 05:05:01 -0400, Don
wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 May 2013 at 20:36:20 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Join the dmd beta mailing list to keep up with the betas. This one is
pretty much good to go, unless something disastrous crops up.
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
Remai
On Thu, 23 May 2013 09:50:28 -0400, Artur Skawina
wrote:
On 05/23/13 15:12, Don wrote:
On Thursday, 23 May 2013 at 11:08:16 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
struct Packet(uint TYPE) {
immutable uint type = TYPE;
// ...
}
But that allows you to write:
auto w = Packet!(7)(6);
which sets
On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:16:13 -0400, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 23 May 2013 14:52, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Adding an initializer simply changes the default value from 0 to
whatever
you want. It's quite consistent IMO.
Don't think it makes sense in non-POD structs...
Have
On Thu, 23 May 2013 11:07:16 -0400, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 23 May 2013 at 14:58:01 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Seems like const qualifier for members is simply ignored inside the
ctor, it should only be ignored until it is set, or until it is used.
I am quite sure I have seen it
On Thu, 23 May 2013 11:14:47 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2013 11:07:16 -0400, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 23 May 2013 at 14:58:01 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Seems like const qualifier for members is simply ignored inside the
ctor, it should only be ignored
On Thu, 23 May 2013 11:36:00 -0400, Artur Skawina
wrote:
If it wasn't clear - it is about the _language_, not what some compiler
currently happens to do. Being able to mutate /initialized/ immutables
is a bad idea. IOW you should not be able to modify 'Packet.type' above.
The immutable isn'
On Thu, 23 May 2013 12:09:26 -0400, Don
wrote:
On Thursday, 23 May 2013 at 13:52:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2013 05:05:01 -0400, Don
wrote:
On Tuesday, 21 May 2013 at 20:36:20 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Join the dmd beta mailing list to keep up with the betas
On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:42:30 -0400, Artur Skawina
wrote:
On 05/23/13 18:26, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2013 11:36:00 -0400, Artur Skawina
wrote:
If it wasn't clear - it is about the _language_, not what some compiler
currently happens to do. Being able to m
On Thu, 23 May 2013 17:06:57 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:42:30 -0400, Artur Skawina
wrote:
For example you couldn't then do this:
struct Packet(uint TY) { /*...*/immutable uint type=TY; immutable ubyte
len=PLen(TY); /*...*/ }
auto PProcess(PT)(
On Thu, 23 May 2013 19:03:25 -0400, Artur Skawina
wrote:
On 05/23/13 23:06, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
compiles:
struct S
{
const int x;
this(int n)
{
x = n;
}
}
It's the 'const int x = 42;' case we're talking about. *That* one does
not
compile
On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:01:19 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 5/23/2013 2:05 AM, Don wrote:
NO NO NO NO. I am violently opposed to this release.
This beta contains the worst language misfeature of all time. It's
silently
snuck in under the guise of a bugfix.
Don has an excellent point. H
On Thu, 23 May 2013 21:56:47 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 5/23/2013 5:56 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/23/2013 5:35 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
What about making it an error UNLESS you pass a compiler flag. The
user will be
informed, and the new behavior (which I find useful) is
On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:38:32 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 5/23/2013 7:38 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This is one change where ALL code broken by this change
is fixable with a simple solution, and at some point, people will have
to deal
with this.
Yes, but it is not so urgent as
On Fri, 24 May 2013 07:57:51 -0400, Don
wrote:
On Friday, 24 May 2013 at 10:55:09 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 05/24/13 02:33, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2013 19:03:25 -0400, Artur Skawina
wrote:
On 05/23/13 23:06, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
compiles:
struct S
On Fri, 24 May 2013 09:54:20 -0400, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 24 May 2013 at 13:46:49 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This was ALWAYS the case.
struct S
{
int x = 5; // sets S.init.x to 5
}
As far as I understand Don, this behavior should be considered
misleading too, it does not
On Fri, 24 May 2013 17:13:22 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Can it be seen without a Facebook account?
Yes.
-Steve
On Wed, 29 May 2013 22:12:54 -0400, Diggory wrote:
With regard to the last point in the talk where Walter was suggesting
not calling finalizers on objects whose code has been unloaded - would
it not make more sense to simply call all the finalizers before
unloading the library?
In fact,
On Thu, 30 May 2013 11:16:28 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
For the full story, mosey to the redesigned changelog:
http://dlang.org/changelog.html
Holy changelog! That is awesome.
Please send kudos to whoever took the time to create that.
-Steve
On Fri, 31 May 2013 14:13:30 -0400, Piotr Szturmaj
wrote:
W dniu 31.05.2013 19:05, Jonathan M Davis pisze:
On Friday, May 31, 2013 13:59:24 Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
About streams: there is some phobos support for streams, though
it seems not finalized.
Everything stream-related which is cu
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:19:20 -0400, Anthony Goins
wrote:
Will there be video for Andrew Edwards?
IIRC, Andrew specifically requested not to be videotaped. I'm having
trouble finding the link where that was stated.
A shame too, he did a good job!
-Steve
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:21:31 -0400, John Colvin
wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 18:47:35 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/11/2013 8:28 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
It is great stuff, solar power is almost free money if you can wait 20
years for
it.
Yeah, but you'll have to replace it befor
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:44:35 -0400, John Colvin
wrote:
It's not ready to roll out as the energy of the future, but in certain
circumstances it's a good deal for an individual.
It's not a good deal for the taxpayers who have to subsidize it to make it
a good deal for the individual. Wo
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:18:09 -0400, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 19:38:13 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I have to laugh at this. "Solar is *almost* free money *if* you can
wait 20 years"
A 20 year payback time is no big deal to me, the house won't p
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:51:53 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/11/2013 1:18 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 19:38:13 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I have to laugh at this. "Solar is *almost* free money *if* you can
wait 20
years"
A 20 year payback time
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:29:45 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/11/2013 2:19 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Define financially better off :)
You have mo' moolah. Is their any other definition?
Cash is not always the only consideration. Equity has value. Quality of
living has
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:51:08 -0400, John Colvin
wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 19:54:34 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:44:35 -0400, John Colvin
wrote:
It's not ready to roll out as the energy of the future, but in certain
circumstances it's a
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:36:11 -0400, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 21:55:48 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
...and if you sell it, unless you own multiple houses, you're now
homeless. And housing prices are up, so getting a new house will erase
the gains you got from selling
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:29:17 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/11/2013 6:54 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Property will ALWAYS have
value, even if almost everything else goes to shit.
Unless you buy in Detroit! (And that's far from the only such example.
Many small towns in Am
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:40:29 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/11/2013 6:54 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
My profit on my first condo, which I bought in '99 and sold in '05 was
150% of
the *purchase price*. Minus the 6% commission :) Although, it was
only 3%
because a fam
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:20:30 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> But you can continue to live in an underwater-mortgage house if you
can pay for it.
Yes, but we are talking about the financial difference between owning vs
renting.
Right, but my point is, if
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:33:26 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/13/2013 6:58 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Home ownership is much simpler than playing with stocks,
I have to strongly disagree about that. Buying/selling a stock is a
mouse click. Tax accounting is a one liner. Buying
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:10:06 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/13/2013 11:25 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I meant much simpler to predict/easier to come out ahead. Sheesh, so
much
literalism here :)
I'm going to disagree with that one, too!
Consider an S&P 500 index stock,
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:48:12 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/13/2013 12:56 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:10:06 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/13/2013 11:25 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I meant much simpler to predict/easier to come out ahead. Sheesh, so
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 19:18:58 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/13/2013 1:56 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I will when you can show me a stock you can live in :P
Again, we were talking about the financial pros and cons of buying a
house vs renting. The utility issue is therefore moot
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 05:12:09 -0400, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-06-14 10:58, bearophile wrote:
So I suggested to offer the tools, but not a complete built-in solution.
I agree. You can get quite far with what we have now and library
support. Perhaps we could have a couple of different i
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:16:22 -0400, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-06-14 17:13, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
With @UDAs, we have a lot of unrealized power for unit tests.
I have asked for ModuleInfo to contain an rtInfo member [1], like
TypeInfo does. With that, and possibly splitting the
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:19:14 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 6/17/13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
youtube: http://youtube.com/watch?v=ntdKZWSiJdY
There seems to be some audio glitching every couple of seconds (at the
beginning). I've noticed this in other videos as well. It's mostly
minim
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:53:40 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/24/2013 6:27 AM, Michel Fortin wrote:
Finally, there is a couple of features that were added to Objective-C
since then
that should be added to the todo list to keep feature parity. Some of
those, if
implemented right, could ben
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:25:40 -0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 6/24/2013 11:03 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
All data members in Objective-C are private. So the object can control
when it
gives out this data, and take appropriate actions. AFAIK, ARC does not
worry
about internal
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:36:50 -0400, Suliman wrote:
Could anybody explain the practical side of this project? Where it can
be helpful?
First, you should quote the bit of the post that you are responding to.
Since you responded to my post, I will answer.
Objective C is the main developmen
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:10:19 -0400, bearophile
wrote:
Jacob Carlborg:
I don't think it adds much complexity. If you don't use extern
(Objective-C) you don't need to learn it.
D books must be bigger, D programmers must read those parts of the
books, the error messages become more comple
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 15:51:32 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 21:05:41 CJS wrote:
In the talk Andrei seems to mentions that D's associative arrays
are lacking in performance somehow. I'm very new to D, but it's
not obvious to me what the shortcoming is. I assume it's t
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 21:43:53 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
But I think that they key issue with swapping out
the implementation is not whether you can swap out the implementation
for your
whole program but rather being able to choose different implementations
for
different parts of your
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 21:43:53 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 19:20:47 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
No, the main issue is the current one is runtime-only, and so simple
function calls such as toHash and opCmp cannot be inlined.
Yeah. That's a big problem. We r
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 22:02:11 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 21:54:08 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 21:43:53 -0400, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> But I think that they key issue with swapping out
> the implementation is not whether you can sw
I fixed the bug in your bug fix announcement :)
-Steve
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:06:31 -0500, Andrew Edwards
wrote:
On 1/21/14, 6:02 PM, Jordi Sayol wrote:
El 21/01/14 23:29, Brad Anderson ha escrit:
#.###.~b# ==> 2.065.b1 // beta
#.###.~rc# ==> 2.065.rc1 // release candidate
#.###.0 ==> 2.065.0 // initial release
#.###.#
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:27:43 -0500, Dejan Lekic
wrote:
On Friday, 24 January 2014 at 18:00:29 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
On Thursday, 23 January 2014 at 17:38:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Congratulations to Dmitry! (His github ID is blackwhale.)
Andrei
Can't you go to prison for that?
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:01:50 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/4/14, 3:34 PM, extrawurst wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 February 2014 at 20:53:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
In wake of this announcement, we decided to keep registration opened
at pre-registration costs until we publish a prog
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:09:21 -0500, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
TLS, dynamic cast, profiling, static this/static ~this, assert, -cov,
-profile, class == and synchronized all rely on druntime code.
Also, D classes will fail to link without Object.
I think classes heavily depend on druntime, I be
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:07:35 -0500, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
"1100110" wrote in message news:ldl6v6$255r$1...@digitalmars.com...
I dont know enough about TLS to comment really. Thoughts?
It's probably platform dependent, I guess it should work everywhere that
C supports TLS.
I'm 90% sure
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:46:19 -0500, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 15:34:16 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I think classes heavily depend on druntime, I believe Walter was
indicating they would not be allowed (which trivially excludes class ==)
My problem with
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:39:24 -0500, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-02-14 16:42, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I'm 90% sure that MacOS does not natively support TLS, and uses the
core.Thread class to store it.
OS X support TLS natively since 10.7, but DMD still uses emulated TLS on
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 07:33:04 -0500, Jakob Ovrum
wrote:
On Friday, 14 February 2014 at 15:56:16 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Classes are typically written with an expectation that the GC will
clean them up. I don't think you can just get rid of that expectation.
A class wr
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 23:53:19 -0500, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, 16 February 2014 at 02:57:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I think that the best and quickest approach at this time is to disallow
classes. They are not trivial. If we can figure out a clean
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 06:46:53 -0500, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Sunday, 16 February 2014 at 11:43:22 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
In D1 Tango added a new method, "dispose", to Object. This method is
called when an object is destroyed either when calling "delete" or when
going out of scope for s
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:18:12 -0500, Elie Morisse
wrote:
Isn't this a bit premature?
The idea is controversial, if you read the thread Andrei and Walter
wanted to postpone it:
I convinced Walter of my view on this, so he won't work on it. I trust
that at least between the two of us we c
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:12:39 -0500, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-02-16 21:51, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Right, but there is no obligation to follow this pattern. One is free to
just not do anything, and the GC will clean up your garbage.
I was replying to the issue that it'
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:25:05 -0500, Baz wrote:
Ahahahahaahhahahahahahaha$80...
They just put 19 000 000 000 $ for a web app.
Are you kiddin us ?
JERK.MASSIVE DOUCHE.FUCK.
Sorry, I know this is trolling, but I just have to respond.
Fixing a bug in an open source project with very minor
Last year, at the conference, after the sessions everyone met up at the
Aloft hotel near Facebook's HQ to have passionate and fruitful discussions
about D and I think a lot of good came out of it.
As someone who was NOT staying at Aloft (and who was fortunate enough to
have a speaker taxiin
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:55:02 -0500, deadalnix wrote:
On Friday, 21 February 2014 at 20:35:12 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Friday, 21 February 2014 at 20:34:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
dlang.org and dconf.org now support https,
https://dlang.org
https://dconf.org
Note that this is a self-signed c
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:29:51 -0500, Walter Bright
wrote:
Looks like we need to do something about this:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1ytfc5/d_2065_released_with_396_fixes_and_improvements/cfnmkih
At a minimum, add it to the changelog. Or possibly remove that change.
I thin
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:09:39 -0500, Meta wrote:
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 21:00:53 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I think the change should go (if it was intentional).
IIRC, opCmp was required in D1 and older versions of D2, because hash
collisions were stored in a tree instead of a
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:23:45 -0500, Meta wrote:
Ah, I see. I got the impression that he thought it was a deliberate
change, which is why he was so irate. Maybe someone should mention this
in the thread.
I did, but I have a feeling it won't help :)
-Steve
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:28:42 -0500, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
"Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
news:op.xbs1naiueav7ka@stevens-macbook-pro.local...
A wild wild guess is that there was code in the compiler that used to
require it (after all, it was required a long time
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:11:46 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I would suggest a proper interim fix is to only reject key types that
define opEquals, but not opCmp. Then switch to using equals in druntime.
Sorry, I meant define opCmp but not opEquals. Some types can be compared
for
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:33:05 -0500, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 2/25/2014 2:28 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
Walter + Andrei did it, and it was completely intentional, and it was
known that
it would break code.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3054
It was intended to only break
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:12:41 -0500, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
The thing is that the compiler complains about a deceleration looking
like this:
struct TagIndex
{
uint tag, index;
}
If the compiler generates opEquals and opCmp, then it's guaranteed
opEquals(x, y) is equivalent to opCmp(
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 11:37:48 -0500, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
As some of you might know, I've been working on a D book over the last
few months. It is now available as "coming soon" on the publisher's
website:
http://www.packtpub.com/discover-advantages-of-programming-in-d-cookbook/book
I w
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:22:13 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Last year, at the conference, after the sessions everyone met up at the
Aloft hotel near Facebook's HQ to have passionate and fruitful
discussions about D and I think a lot of good came out of it.
As someone who wa
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:09:49 -0500, Alessandro Stamatto
wrote:
Damn!
No spoilers about the mysterious Scott Meyers talk, what is the last
thing D needs?!?!?! Curious! 8-)
I'm uncertain if the "last thing D needs" is more like "A kick in the
crotch is the last thing you need" or is it m
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 16:31:42 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
http://dconf.org
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1zguvg/dconf_2014_publishes_schedule_opens_early_bird/
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7336616
https://twitter.com/D_Programming/status/440600316887584768
A l
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:59:26 -0400, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Friday, 21 February 2014 at 15:22:14 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Last year, at the conference, after the sessions everyone met up at the
Aloft hotel near Facebook's HQ to have passionate and fruitful
discussions
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 21:50:09 -0400, Mike Parker wrote:
On 3/19/2014 7:56 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:59:26 -0400, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Just to be clear, we're talking about this, right?
http://www.aloftsiliconvalley.com/
Yep, that is where we gat
On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 03:01:18 -0400, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Hi everyone,
It is my great pleasure to announce a new feature addition to the tool
Digger.
Digger's goal is to be able to build D versions from any point in D's
history. As it has already conquered the present (building D f
On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 08:34:24 -0400, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 04/01/2014 12:01 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
It is my great pleasure to announce a new feature addition to the tool
Digger.
Impressive but have you tried DustMite:
https://github.com/CyberShadow/DustMite/wiki
pssst: I think V
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote
> Yigal Chripun wrote:
>> Walter Bright Wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.036.zip
>>>
>>> The 2.0 version splits phobos into druntime and phobos libraries
>>> (thanks to Sean Kelly). This will enable both
"Bill Baxter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Walter Bright
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.036.zip
>>
>> The 2.0 version splits phobos into drunti
"KennyTM~" wrote
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Walter Bright
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.036.zip
>>>
>>> The 2.0 version splits phobos into druntime and phobos libraries (thanks
>>
"Walter Bright" wrote
> Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> one big issue: druntime only supported with phobos using D2.
>
> That's because the druntime support is a breaking change for Phobos users.
Yes, I wasn't suggesting it should be done for D1, what I was sayi
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote
> Correx:
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rmc/allowing_unicode_operators_in_d_similarly_to/
>
> Andrei
>
No thanks. Please let's only use operators that are on the keys of my
keyboard. I don't fancy having to type key digraphs or trigraphs to try a
"Jarrett Billingsley" wrote
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Steven Schveighoffer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Why can't the emacs module solution work that was used for the cheverons?
>
> Bcause not everyone uses emacs?
Including myself ;)
But I r
"davidl" wrote
>? Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:36:29 +0800,Steven Schveighoffer
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??:
>
>> "Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote
>>> Correx:
>>>
>>> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/78rmc/allowing_unicode_operators_
"Bill Baxter" wrote
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:37 AM, ore-sama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Bill Baxter Wrote:
>>
>>> (like I haven't been able to figure out how to get the
>>> DOS console in Windows to display UTF-8)
>>
>> Console is a legacy technology (you even still call it "DOS"), why expect
1 - 100 of 1054 matches
Mail list logo
