I did a message search on ALE and see reference to PCALE and
occasionally other software that will receive the ALE mode.
And I've seen control software that will support scanning - like for a
Ten Tec 320D.
But I haven't seen software that will control a rig (preferably a Ten
Tec model) to Scan fo
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I did a message search on ALE and see reference to PCALE and
> occasionally other software that will receive the ALE mode.
>
> And I've seen control software that will support scanning - like
for a
> Ten Tec 320D.
>
> But
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there something out there that will both control a rig to scan for,
> and receive, ALE?
PCALE is a complete ALE controller that runs on a PC. It scans,
decodes, encodes, and keeps track of propagation between other ALE
sta
Bonnie,
Maybe I'm trying to take too much of a shortcut by asking the group
but I did visit the PCALE website and click on a few links.
My experience is that frequency "computer" control software has to be
written for each rig. For example, BandMaster will control a Paragon
but not an Argo V, DXLa
Hi Paul,
The radio control in PC-ALE at present is planned to be expanded upon
in the future based I work that I have done with MARS-ALE. Charles
and I have discussed the approach to be taken, when however it will
happen is unknown at this time.
In many but not all respects, the support for r
>However, when Scanning (and multi-channel Sounding which is not
> allowed under the current Part 97)
--
Steve , can you explain this a little further? I know sounding
without a control op is not legal, but what do you mean by the above ?
Andy K3UK
Fredonia, New York.
Skype Me : callto://an
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >However, when Scanning (and multi-channel Sounding which is not
> > allowed under the current Part 97)
> --
>
> Steve , can you explain this a little further? I know sounding
> without a control op is not leg
Hello All,
For most Amateurs, this particular topic is rather moot as their
stations can not even handle full multi-channel ALE operation in
receive, let alone transmit!
Anyhow, Bonnie's station can and so can mine, I use it daily in MARS
and SHARES, Bonnie and I have had this discussion in t
Hi Jeff,
I have the mfj-278 interface here,
brand new in the box with the manual but I haven't been able to locate it
yet. If and when I locate it I will let you know. Only one comment
about the jumper wiring, you won't believe it but if I can find it, I have tyhe
jumpers for several dif
Thanks Steve.
So, since I do not "sound" unless I am in the shack, I should be "OK"
as long as I do not allow PC-ALE to xmit if the freq is in use,
right?
Easier said than done, but since I often manually "sound" specfic
freqs, I should be OK. With Olivia and MT63 still often on the same
The contesting software, N1MM Logger, has set up a separate email list
for discussion of the digital modes and use of N1MM. Check it at
http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/N1MMLogger-Digital,
--
Andy K3UK
Fredonia, New York.
Skype Me : callto://andyobrien73
Also available via Echolink
Need a Dig
Hello All,
In my post on radio control and PC-ALE earlier I should has mentioned
a few other items.
Obviously any can place their radio into SPLIT VFO when PC-ALE or any
program (ScanCat, BeaconSee etc.) is directly controlling frequency
scanning where you want the program to be under PC cont
Hi Andy,
You really can't control the tool as far as being a control operator
is concerned even sitting there with you hands on the mouse/keyboard
ready to dump it if during multi-channel Sounding your station is
about to Sound and you hear the channel is busy and you want to stop
it, you mig
><
> However, in my personal opinion, any such operation as detailed in
> proceeding paragraph is not in keeping with FCC Part 97 as it
> currently exists within any sub bands by U.S
Steve, you and I have had this discussion before... and we
agreed to disagree on it :)
I pointed out that y
Hi Bonnie,
We are all entitled to our opinions and your statements are just
that, as are mine. I could but won't argue all or any of this with
you or anyone else Bonnie, its pointless and a waste of bandwidth.
As this is NOT an ALE focused forum as is HFlink, I only mentioned
FCC Part 97 on t
97.101(d) No amateur operator shall willfully or maliciously
interfere with or cause interference to any radio communication or
signal.
Allowing your station to transmit on a frequency already in use is a
clear violation of 97.101(d).
97.101(d) doesn't say "except if you're transmitting your
Hello All,
For those that have asked, the user and service manual on the TCI
8174 receiver has been posted in .PDF format by the Premium Receiver
folks, see:
http://kahuna.sdsu.edu/~mechtron/PremRxPage/ref_mans/tci8174/tci8174manual.pdf
These are very good units and are popping up more and mo
> Yes, the 735 requires a CI-V level converter. You can purchase third-
> party units for ~$30, or build one yourself for under $10; let me
> know if you want a schematic.
> The 735 has a longterm reliability problem with VFO capacitors; ask
> on the Icom reflector for the gory details.
>73,
Hi Doc,
I have and use my FT-890AT for ALE, it fails the SPLIT VFO test
(QS/S) but otherwise is a fine radio for ALE in single channel
operation and can be pressed into use for multi-channel within
reason, you would not want to use it 24/7 and tax those relays. As
far as TXCO is concerned, fr
Bill- This small type is hard to read. If you really want to
communicate- enlarge it. These old eyes tell me to reject anything this
small, and , really, I think it is a good idea to dump such junk,
unread. It's pointless.
So I usually do
Bill-W4BSG
bill.w7tvf wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> I have the mf
If some people would stop sending messages in HTML *and* other people
would stop choosing to view messages as HTML, we wouldn't have this problem.
Bill's message displays on my computer in the same size type as
everybody else's messages do.
Alan NV8A
On 03/25/06 11:43 pm Bill Aycock wrote:
>
Alan-
Since ham radio is not my whole world, I keep the ability to RECEIVE
HTML active. There is a lot of email traffic that is better that way. I
very rarely send any HTML, but I can. In fact, my email client is set to
ask me if I really meant to do it, as a precaution.
I still don't like small
22 matches
Mail list logo
