Joe
I think there is a misunderstanding about what we running
ALE are doing with it.
We do *NOT* stop on every frequency that we scan to
transmit a signal or call but do scan a given list of them
for other calling us or a call for the net.
Can we QRM a on going QSO? Sure can. And that could
Bonnie,
For some reason I am not understanding clearly what you have been
saying. Previously you said that ALE is not being used to frequency hop.
What is your definition of frequency hopping vs. transmitting on a
series of channels? (As I stated earlier, this has no connection with FHSS).
Dave,
If a sound card implementation worked well, it would not be difficult to
move the Winlink 2000 system towards SCAMP. During the beta testing
about a year and a half ago, several PMBO's were readily set up to
handle SCAMP (Sound Card Amateur Messaging Protocol). It would not have
been
Just saw this, replacement for R9000 WOW! Wonder if they will sell it here?
http://www.onjapan.net/2006/hamfair/dsc9.jpg
http://ndl-dx.se/icom_r9500/
has pdf brochure
James Z
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW
For some reason I am not understanding clearly what you have been
saying. Previously you said that ALE is not being used to frequency hop.
What is your definition of frequency hopping vs. transmitting on a
series of channels? (As I stated earlier, this has no connection with FHSS).
You
I think there is some confusion over frequency hopping, so I will throw
my 2 uneducated cents into the discussion. My limited experience is
with MARS-ALE, and I have been using it for only a month or so. The
term frequency hopping as I understand it, relates to changing
frequencies very quickly
A question I have always wondered about on HF.
How do you prevent the hidden transmitter effect?
I don't think you can unless all stations transmit a To list each time they
transmit...i.e. K5ABC, W6PK, W3INI, WA4HPE DE K7XYZ. Then you know that even
though you may not be hearing all of the
Mostly, ALE is used to initiate a QSO that then happens using
some other method such as SSB voice, psk, fsk, ofdm, or mfsk.
With ALE, there are no shifting gears, no pounding away,
and no long-winded CQs or extended calling such as traditional
voice, image, digi texting, Pactor, RTTY, or
If the pops or bursts of ALE is the turkey gobble sound, then this
is not a minor point of interference. If a person was on a frequency
that has been claimed by the ALE enthusiasts as their frequency, and a
few dozen users are sending the 8psk signal every so often, that would
be intolerable
Any data mode will work with WinLink if the WinLink station is set up to
receive that mode and the interface can send an emulated a telnet port
connection to the WinLink server over the Internet.
WinLink isn't fancy, it just works.
Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 05:50:18 -, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, Chas, please tell me more about Kenwood's ALE standards,
because I was not yet aware that Kenwood had an ALE radio.
Hams use the MIL STD 188-141 ALE, and that is the one that is found
embedded in the Micom,
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason I am not understanding clearly what you have
been saying. Previously you said that ALE is not being used to
frequency hop.
Hi Rick,
I'm not quite sure why you are talking about frequency hopping.
Say for the moment that 100 Hams are pinging, what happens
when 10,000 Hams are pinging and they are doing so on the
same bands they now frequent?
doc, KD4E
At that point, you would call it a RTTY DX contest :)
Bonnie KQ6XA
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to
doc, KD4E wrote:
At what threshold of Ham usage does this pinging of Ham
frequencies move from a minor factor to a major one?
Say for the moment that 100 Hams are pinging, what happens
when 10,000 Hams are pinging and they are doing so on the
same bands they now frequent?
Then you would
14 matches
Mail list logo
