That would be very nice Simon.
- Original Message -
From: Simon Brown
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] cluster.dynalias.org
It's running now, albeit a tad slow.
Nice to see a digital modes cluster,
Hi!
Bear in mind that W1AW transmissions are scheduled!
The ARRL assumes that most of the US Hams are aware of the scheduled
Bulletins.
Regards
On 12/13/06, kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was parked on 3581 USB tonight and heard W1AW start up with CW. Not
a QRL? to be heard. I saw
Chris KW6H wrote:
Some prefer to change this situation (I'm one of them: I prefer that
the stay be granted, and that automatic data stations remain legal
betwen 3.620 and 3.635), but there is no basis for a claim that
the rules do not say what in fact they plainly do say.
The terms
It doesnt matter if they are scheduled or not. The rules state that if a
frequency is in use, you will NOT intefere with ongoing transmissions on it.
Many of us are aware they have scheduled transmissions. I do NOT remember the
dates/times/freqs and should not have to, if I do not want to
Salomao,
There is no such thing as a scheduled transmission in the FCC rules.
No one operator or organization can be above the law. ARRL has discussed
this in the past since they do receive some flak on this kind of
operation. They know that they are really not operating in a fully legal
W1AW has come up on top of me a number of times
while I was engaged in a QSO.
No QRL... no nothing.
Maybe I should just publicly post my operating schedule
and just come up on top of whomever is there when the
scheduled time arrives.
Hey, I'll post my schedule a month in advance, so, you
guys
I will not say that their broadcast is not needed. Indeed, when I was
overseas, I listened to it from time to time, to find out if their were
special events such as expeditions I didnt know about. Now- most all of us
have computers, but there are still places in the world that computer
Very interesting, Simon.
So, being a hard-core windows user, where can I find DM780 software, and does
this support other modes besides PSK?
I'm a big OLIVIA fan...
Thanks for doing so much for the ham community. There are times when it may not
seem appreciated, but there are many of
The hidden transmitter on any band and especially HF is always going to be a
problem. It is not only a problem for us, but also in the commercial and
military communications world.
As hard as we try, as operators and using smart software, we will not overcome
the problem.
We then are left
Hi John,
The software currently runs PSK, will eventually run all common digital modes.
I have a small closed group of testers, it's integrated with HRD, here's a
picture or two: http://gallery.ham-radio.ch/main.php?g2_itemId=9832 .
General beta in January.
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
-
The problem can be overcome, Walt; it requires equipping each station
with a busy frequency detector.
Attended stations already have a busy frequency detector: the
operator.
Unattended stations must be augmented to detect activity on the
frequencies they use for transmission and never
KV9U wrote:
They also have claimed that the W1AW operator listens on each
frequency and can tweak the frequency if necessary. I am not sure if
this is true or not and it would be very difficult to do this since
they simulcast on some many frequencies at once.
Are you sure? I have never
HMMM By whom is C being QRMd. You didnt say who he is hearing as QRM. I am
assuming that C is hearing either A or B or even both? In this case, if A
and B were already in QSO, then C and D should QSY to start their QSO
elsewhere.
If the C and D QSO was already underway, and A and B started up,
A B hear each other but dont' hear C D. But C hears either or both A and B.
If C is receiving D, then A or B is QRMing C.
Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Danny Douglas
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 12:22 PM
To:
The problem with QRP is that the QRP operator is NOT the one having to do
all the work.
Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all
DX 2-6 years each
.
QSL LOTW-buro- direct
As courtesty I upload to eQSL but if you
use that - also pls upload to LOTW
or
Walt,
If neither A nor B can hear either C or D, then generally speaking that
also means that C and D cannot hear A or B and there would be no
interference problem. There may be rare cases of one way skip, but
nothing can do anything about that.
The hidden transmitter effect occurs when you
The scenario where neither A or B can hear C or D, but that C or D
are QRM'd by transmissions from A or B is indeed possible, but is
relatively infrequent. No one expects A or B -- whether they are
attended or unattended -- to suspend transmission to avoid QRMing a
station that neither can
Unless I am having a senior moment, I recall that they said the operator
listened on the frequency and if there was anything on that frequency,
he would move the frequency slightly to not interfere.
Maybe that has changed based upon another comment that the FCC allows
them to interfere,
Hello Andy,
Just an information about Multipsk or Mixw...and Commander.
The global control may be summarized according to the following diagram:
MULTIPSK (DDE TX)--(DDE RX) COMMANDER--COM--CAT SYSTEM--TRANSCEIVER
MULTIPSK (DDE RX)--(DDE TX) COMMANDER--COM--CAT SYSTEM--TRANSCEIVER
The DDE link is
I am gearing up for sending images via MFSK upon 12/15/06. What pixel
sizes are recommended for MFSK images? Been so many years since I did
it I no longer remember.
de Roger W6VZV
jgorman01 wrote:
This occurs without any operator intervention, it is done
automatically by the pactor modem's internal software. A real great
operational system for the amateur bands isn't it?
Jim WA0LYK
No it is not. Good explanation of the problem.
de Roger W6VZV
Hello, Bonnie:
I'm glad to see in your latest post that you have toned down your rhetoric. I
assume from
your earlier sallies that you have some standing within this group, but it
shouldn't lead to
harumphing about comments that may not be exactly precise in discussing what is
abstruse
Just so you are aware. There are some of us who don't think that Winlink
2000 is the answer to our prayers.
Most of NTS Digital is still running Classic Winlink 2.9 which doesn't
offer internet forwarding and relies upon direct forwarding from each
Winlink
NTSD station via RF. We favor
What is the best means by which we may quickly encourage
the FCC to *NOT* stay their rule?
Sure would hate for them to do so based on representations
of a few that it would be OK with the majority.
Is there a preferred E-mail address at the FCC for such
matters?
By Friday, there will be no non
320x256 takes about 4 minutes on MFSK16. 160x128 is more reasonable.
-Joe, N8FQ
Bill McLaughlin wrote:
I believe 320x256 is the standard ... anything over 400x300 will
not make use of the slant and shift corrections. Again I am not sure
but think it can go as large as 1600x1200 but not
25 matches
Mail list logo
