Thanks, Andy.
WinWarbler was first released in July 2000, with monthly (or better)
updates since then.
Many PSK ops find WinWarbler's most useful capability to be
its "Station's Heard" window, which displays a list of all callsigns
decoded on the current band and the callsign of the station wi
Got him...
K3UK 599 599 K3U BK
K3UK TU XT2C UP
0204 UTC 40M.
Not an l new one but new for the band and mode. Thank you
Spotcollector and DX Joe !
Andy K3UK
On 1/14/07, Andrew O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hmmm, I have not heard them with my ears but came in the shack and
Hmmm, I have not heard them with my ears but came in the shack and
found my RTTY software (Multipsk had decoded them on 40M .
QSL SP1DTG TU XT2C UP
Too bad I did not have a robot set-up to work them while I was having dinner
--
Andy K3UK
Skype Me : callto://andyobrien73
www.obriensweb.com
Joe, I have derived both Contestia and RTTYM from Pawel's code. You
may look at the sources at http://pocketdigi.sourceforge.net
Try to revert the bits before they are fed to the baudot decoder.
73, Vojtech OK1IAK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote
Next week, we will enable the PSK-31 transponder on RAFT.
This transponder is 28.120 USB MHz PSK-31 SSB uplink and 2 meters FM down.
Both RAFT and ANDE (and PCSAT-1 this week) are working fine on orbit
for those with a big enough OSCAR satellite array to hear the weak 2
meter downlink. PCSAT-1 is
-- Forwarded message --
From: Vojtech Bubnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 14, 2007 12:34 PM
Hi gang.
I have added Olivia modes to PocketDigi. PocketDigi is a multimode
terminal software for Pocket PCs. It is freely downloadable from
http://pocketdigi.sourceforge.net
The softw
I hope to see you in the contest too Andrew.
Good luck
2007/1/14, Andrew O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-Thank you Joaquin, I hope to see you in the contest.
Andy K3UK
-- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com , EA4ZB
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey all:
>
> It is a great pleasure for me to in
-Thank you Joaquin, I hope to see you in the contest.
Andy K3UK
-- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, EA4ZB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey all:
>
> It is a great pleasure for me to invite to participate to them next EA
> PSK31 CONTEST 2007
>
> *EA PSK31 CONTEST 2007 *
>
>
Hey all:
It is a great pleasure for me to invite to participate to them next EA
PSK31 CONTEST 2007
*EA PSK31 CONTEST 2007 *
Sponsored by Unión de Radioaficionados Españoles (URE). The manager of the
contest is
EA4ZB.
*Participants: *Any licensed amateur station.
*Date: *From 16:00 UTC Ma
I'm not sure how long Winwarbler has been around, but it has to be
quite a few years since it was first released. I have not used it
frequently since I have tended to use Zakanaka, MixW, or Multispk
user over the years.
Because Multipsk works very well with the DX Lab Suit, I have
recently bee
It is apparent that you understand that ownership of a copyright
allows you to control its use, even if that control is to allow free
use, but your statement has a major semantic flaw--
The words "precise" and "legal" are incompatible and should never be
used in the same sentence.
That's why
Exactly. My personal experience, which I believe is nearly identical to
Frank's, is found in our doing the software defined radio code (which
is used now by thousands of radio amateurs and others) finds Simon's
fear is misplaced. However, it is a personal (if incorrect ;-) )
decision and
On Jan 13, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. wrote:
> - Separating the UI from the modems and rig control and using a
> protocol
> between them would make it easier to write platform-specific
> best-of-breed UIs. PSKCore.DLL is OK for this approach for
> Windows, but
> as it uses the Micr
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> No matter, the terms under which I use this code specifically disallow
> redistribution.
In other words, the *suppliers* of your support libraries have control
over the distribution rights of *your own* code?
Man, I
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Brickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Copyright and Open Source are not opposites. Copyright ownership is
> the precise legal foundation of, for example, the General Public
> License (GPL).
>
No matter, the terms under which I use this code specifically disall
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Spot on. I use a commercial library from Codejock - www.codejock.com
- this
> cannot be distributed. I also use other commercial libraries with
similar
> restrictions. I can only ship the runtime libraries or link th
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I suspect what Simon means is that the UI portion of his application
> contains code whose copyright is held by individuals other than him,
> thereby precluding release to open source without the holder's
> approval.
Spot
I suspect what Simon means is that the UI portion of his application
contains code whose copyright is held by individuals other than him,
thereby precluding release to open source without the holder's
approval.
Releasing an application to open source is easiest if one only
include components o
18 matches
Mail list logo
