--- Harv Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/18/05, Per <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > I am wondering if Linux WINE will run Airmail?
> If
> > > someone knows or has done
> > > > this, I'd like to know. Airmail is a great
> little
> > > GUI that does anything
> > > > you need
On 6/18/05, Per <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am wondering if Linux WINE will run Airmail? If
> someone knows or has done
> > this, I'd like to know. Airmail is a great little
> GUI that does anything
> > you need to do. If working with an external
> device that will do Pactor.
Sure,
> > I am wondering if Linux WINE will run Airmail? If
> someone knows or has done
> > this, I'd like to know. Airmail is a great little
> GUI that does anything
> > you need to do. If working with an external
> device that will do Pactor.
Sure, I'm running it now.
Either associate exe files wi
>
> http://www.airmail2000.com/
>
>
> I am wondering if Linux WINE will run Airmail? If someone knows or has done
> this, I'd like to know. Airmail is a great little GUI that does anything
> you need to do. If working with an external device that will do Pactor.
I've heard it mention
Title: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Question about HF-email
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Bill Vodall WA7NWP
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 5:13 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Joel Kolstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "ab2kt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...The unifying theme has been an aversion to Microsoft
> and
> > Windows.
>
> I've just never understood this...But, technically speaking,
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "ab2kt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As the Linux software has developed, and the possibility of moving
> away from Windows has progressed, a surprising number of
technically
> super-competent hams have started coming out of the woodwork to
pound
> on the code
Hi again Walt,
I'll try to keep this brief. :-)
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's no rush to create another HF modem in open source...and I
think that
> most of those hams who are working in open source are also working
man
Paul-
Thank you much for this cogent explanation of the use of the word "robust"
in the digital RF context. I have rarely read a better explanation of ANY
such concept. Your post might be digested to "good, professional programming".
Your post is Very Good, but others seem to be less careful in
m:)
73,
Rick, KV9U
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joel Kolstad
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 09:44
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Question about HF-email
OK, I'll re-phrase that as Pactor III just being &q
>
> My "picture" was using Ham Radio in emergency situations, or in remote
> locations - ships at sea, mountain tops, jungle settings, etc. Sure,
> we have Satellite Phone these days. But that's not like sending one
> email communiqué to a group (of say 20 people). And I figure providing
> communi
Thank you for your comments. I'm learning a lot from this.
My "picture" was using Ham Radio in emergency situations, or in remote
locations - ships at sea, mountain tops, jungle settings, etc. Sure,
we have Satellite Phone these days. But that's not like sending one
email communiqué to a group (of
Joel, you have made the claim below:
"You don't have to use Pactor III (the mode that SCS -- and only SCS -
- supports); it's just arguably the most robust, fastest mode out
there."
I know English fairly well, but this use of the word "robust" is not clear
to me. Can you give me a definition relat
Title: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Question about HF-email
Just a few comments on what Joel brought up...
There's no rush to create another HF modem in open source...and I think that most of those hams who are working in open source are also working many hours at their regular jobs so ti
Our experience with the SDR-1000 software has been very illuminating.
As the Linux software has developed, and the possibility of moving
away from Windows has progressed, a surprising number of technically
super-competent hams have started coming out of the woodwork to pound
on the code. The unifyi
Hi Walt,
> Quating Joel Kolstad...
> "You don't have to use Pactor III (the mode that SCS -- and only
SCS -
> - supports); it's just arguably the most robust, fastest mode out
> there."
>
> I disagree...even WinLink's KN6KB's test show that this is not
true.
OK, I'll re-phrase that as P
Title: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Question about HF-email
Quating Joel Kolstad...
"You don't have to use Pactor III (the mode that SCS -- and only SCS -
- supports); it's just arguably the most robust, fastest mode out
there."
I disagree...even WinLink's KN
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> And why is that? Is the open source community just not as
competent as
> a private developer such as SCS?
I think they're potentially as competent, but they're approaching a
technically difficult problem and the n
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was kinda interested in HF-email until I found out I must buy a
> "pactor" modem, either used or from SCS. As that one company is the
> only source of hardware, it seems more a monopoly than free market.
You don't have to u
19 matches
Mail list logo
