>>>AA6YQ comments below
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of J. Moen
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 10:11 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Statement on Withdrawal of Support for ROS
(K3UK S
n HF", though.
>
> 73,
>
> Dave, AA6YQ
>
> -Original Message-
> From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
> Behalf Of J. Moen
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 1:04 PM
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Subje
Well said Alan
I agree, going to the FCC anytime is marching the hobby one step closer to
the grave.
From: Alan Barrow
Reply-To:
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:06:56 -0500
To:
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Statement on Withdrawal of Support for ROS
(K3UK Sked Pages)
pd4u_dares
Ok hang on
I just read the statement. Doesn't it say that use of spread spectrum is
not permitted below such and such a band. However I see reasonably no
different a spread spectrum exists to the USB /lsb/ 20m packet, amtor/
pactor etc etc i.e. 2.4khz or less (and AM is that very wide ) tha
view of
amateur radio."
AMEN.
Jim - K6JM
- Original Message -
From: Alan Barrow
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 8:06 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Statement on Withdrawal of Support for ROS
(K3UK Sked Pages)
pd4u_dares wrot
From: Alan Barrow
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 8:06 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Statement on Withdrawal of Support for ROS
(K3UK Sked Pages)
pd4u_dares wrote:
> ... considering legal action ... has an apparent plan ... may have
u
Pst! Marc! Uh, 'scuse me but the only one uttering such thoughts thus far
is
YOU. No one else, just YOU. You might want to cool down the dramatics and
take a breath, less you attract others with the same flair and end up creating
a
self-fulfilling prophecy.
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN
Gang:
I am out of here for now, will try again in a month when the smoke settles..
Fred
CIW649/VE3FAL
CFARS Member
SATERN Member
SATERN Amateur Radio Liaison Officer
DEC Amethyst District ARES
Try Hamspots, PSKreporter, and K3UK Sked Page
http://www.obriensw
Alan Barrow wrote:
> And think real hard next time before calling the FCC. Ham radio was the
> net loser in this episode. We are already viewed as squabbling children
> at the FCC, and this type of episode just reinforces that view of
> amateur radio.
And so it was in the UK over the endless deba
pd4u_dares wrote:
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Toby Burnett" <..> But to
> be honest I don'' t think I shall bother too now as there seems much to much
> grief happening from this.
>> Like I say, it seemed a fair experimental mode but it is wider than <..>
>> It'd be nice to see
pd4u_dares wrote:
> Though I have some doubts that there actually was a "debate". There have been
> arguments as in all debates. But the figurative meaning of the "arguments"
> was getting the overhand over the literal meaning of arguments in a
> debate...HIHI
Marc, on many occasions I have ha
I really don't think there any "ROS haters". ROS is a mode that is fun
to use and works well. There may be some who complain that it interferes
with the NCDXF beacon network, but the suggested frequency was then
moved upward, in the true spirit of cooperation.
However, there is a misconception
In spite of temperaments (my roots are spanish somewhere in the past) it
has gone to extremes it never should have got even near to. Statements
like "FCC will have to pay me to see my code", the threat of legal
action to someone who just was looking for his own spectrum management
administra
pd4u_dares wrote:
> ... considering legal action ... has an apparent plan ... may have
> understandably frustrated Jose
>
I really have mixed feelings about how this all played out as well.
While I don't agree with ban lists, I can see where the software author
could get very frustrated at wha
Marc,
I'm not saying that, I'd be happy to support ROS and I do think it's a
rather good experimental mode. Ok so it is wide but as I said "experimental
I think Jose did a fantastic job of making a software package for a
completely new type of ham radio mode. BUT,
The debate is getting out o
WELL SAID
73 de
Ron W4LDE
On 3/3/2010 10:36 AM, pd4u_dares wrote:
... considering legal action ... has an apparent plan ... may have
understandably frustrated Jose
---
So as far as I understand it the developer with a Spanish temperament
is understandably frustrated by actions of s
16 matches
Mail list logo
