Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

- Original Message - > But since I have it on a flash drive I did install it on the laptop and > gave it a call other then my call and it worked fine. > > What do you think? > > I think even Ray Charles could see that. > > > Jose, if I'm wrong in any way - feel free to > jump in here and

RE: [digitalradio] Re: ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

Exactly, Skip. Well put. Dave Real radio bounces off the sky _ From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of KH6TY Sent: Wednesday, 02 June, 2010 17:38 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

I agree with Rein's concern. Given the actions of the author in the past, and the fact that he is not even part of the amateur radio community, I'd be very hesitant to use that mode in a program, not know knowing what other malicious code might be embedded in the ROS software. Except for the

Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

No need to worry from being banned from this list from me. That's not my style of moderating. Yes I can no longer use ROS for some reason. I did ask but that went unanswered. All I know is that he posted a updated version and when ask for my call the program would shut down if I recall. Never di

RE: [digitalradio] Re: ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

Rein, There are several (around a dozen I think) amateur operators that are "prohibited" from using ROS by having their call signs hard-coded into a persona-non-grata listing in ROS. I am proud to be one of those ops. This has been extensively documented on QRZ in the following thread:

Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

Dear Steinar, Very true. 73 Rein W6SZ -Original Message- >From: Steinar Aanesland >Sent: Jun 2, 2010 4:15 PM >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP > >Hi Rein > >let's forget about this "Mr. Ros wi

Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

your comments and nice words, John. > > I know it is so boring and OT. > > ( And Dave (G0DJA ) is your spam bin sufficient empty ) > > 73 Rein W6SZ > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > >> From: "John Becker, WØJAB" &g

Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

would not believe it! You can also contact me of the list or you and others, interested in ROS questions, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rosmodemusa/?yguid=1448749 73 Rein W6SZ -Original Message- >From: "John Becker, WØJAB" >Sent: Jun 2, 2010 3:25 PM >To: di

Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

Rein Really don't know what to say at this point. Still trying to understand why my call was added to the list of calls "not able" to use the ROS program. But since Jose will not say I'll just move on to things other then ROS. But I'm not the only one that this has happen to. No big deal I have

Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

OT. ( And Dave (G0DJA ) is your spam bin sufficient empty ) 73 Rein W6SZ -Original Message- >From: "John Becker, WØJAB" >Sent: Jun 1, 2010 6:51 PM >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP > >Rein > >D

Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

I have never seen this before in the amateur radio community. We have really started something here and I do not believe it is good. Rick KH2DF Sent from my iPhone On Jun 1, 2010, at 5:17 PM, "Rein A" wrote: Hello, Your request to join the ROSDigitalMode group was not approved. The moderator

Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

Rein Don't take it personal. For some reason even I got on his bad list. I did ask but never got an answer. Not sure but I think someone has been feeding bad info to him. Think he was told that I has said something that I really did not or it was misunderstood. John, W0JAB

Re: [digitalradio] Narrow SSTV guide on wiki

Who say's you can't teach an old dog new tricks.  Thanks Andy, this should be fun.  73, Chuck AC5PW Once a Marine... ...Always a Marine OOORAHHH ! Saepe Expertus - Semper Fidelis - Fratres Aeterni "Often Tested" - "Always Faithful" - "Brothers Forever"

Re: [digitalradio] Grid squares and Google Earth

The easiest way that I know of is to use Ham Radio Deluxe's log book. Make an ADIF file of the contacts you want to map, import them in to HRD log , and then right-click the QSOs and select the Google Earth option. It will ask if you want to map just one QSO, or ALL. Once mapped in Google Earth

Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista

ick - Original Message - From: charles <mailto:ac5p...@yahoo.com> standlee To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 10:13 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista I assume you mean from the audio out on the rig to the signalink. I

Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista

ick - Original Message - From: charles standlee To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 10:13 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista I assume you mean from the audio out on the rig to the signalink. I've sent in a request to

Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista

Chuck, I just validated your memerbship on the Multipsk page, welcome. Andy K3UK Hello Chuck, > > Could you ask the to the Multipsk group. > > Note: have you connected a jack to the USB sound card input. It is > compulsory with Vista > > 73 > Patrick > > - Original Message - > From: "ac5p

Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista

quot; - "Brothers Forever" From: Patrick Lindecker To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Cc: multi...@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, May 31, 2010 2:45:45 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista   Hello Chuck, Could you ask the to the Multipsk grou

Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista

Hello Chuck, Could you ask the to the Multipsk group. Note: have you connected a jack to the USB sound card input. It is compulsory with Vista 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "ac5pw10" To: Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 12:06 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk Signalink and Vista

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE400 and CCW w/LotW and eQSL?

Have you downloaded the configuration update for TQSL that supports a wide variety of extra modes. I'm not sure that ALE400 is included, but I know CONTESTIA is Log into your account on the LoTW website, go to "Your Account", then "Your Certificates"...click on the "Download current TQSL Confi

Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio: Facebook change. [a word about facebook]

No can do. facebook is one of those sites that "read" "write" and otherwise do things that most don't like to have done to their system. It would take me the better part of 1/2 hour to get past the "site is reading" or "writing" or trying whatever. Just to get to it. And I think I have told

RE: [digitalradio] Digitalradio: Facebook change.

I just removed my Facebook account. Simon Brown, HB9DRV http://sdr-radio.com > -Original Message- > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ian Wade G3NRW > > Good luck with your experimentation, but there's no way I'll sign up to > Facebo

Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio: Facebook change.

Andy, I rarely check my Facebook page (no teenagers here!) and only signed up with Facebook, at your request, but I'll give it a try. When I go to the page, I don't see where to write on the "Wall", or how to become a fan. What am I missing? 73 - Skip KH6TY

Re: [digitalradio] Digitalradio: Facebook change.

From: Andy obrien Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 Time: 06:34:43 > >Please consider become a "fan" (Facebook terminology) and >testing it out. I'm not fully sure how to link to it, but >http://www.facebook.com/pages/digitalradio/123270301037522 seems to >work. > >Andy K3UK > Hi Andy Good luck with you

Re: [digitalradio] About digital reception and SDR.

Thanks so much Simon. Really appreciated! On 5/27/10, Simon HB9DRV wrote: > Hi, > > > > If Windows 7 crashes with BSOD then it's a driver issue - I suggest serial > port or USB soundcard. > > > > If it's the program crashing shout at me - I've been *very* busy getting SDR > software written but

Re: [digitalradio] Digital Suite Performance

There is some discussion about the viability of ROS, as it appeasr to take up the same bandwidth as an SSB signal, thus defeating the reason to use digital. --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KH6TY wrote: > > > For extreme qrp you should also try out the new mode ros With 5 w > and a wi

Re: [digitalradio] mt63

Subject: Re: [digitalradio] mt63 On 5/26/2010 9:41 PM, Hal Stang wrote: If so What frequencies do they normally hang out on -80/40/20 meters? Hal Hal, Seems the majority of MT63 activity is on 20 meters - 14108.0 / 14109.0. It is sparse though. I do see some using the

RE: [digitalradio] About digital reception and SDR.

Hi, If Windows 7 crashes with BSOD then it's a driver issue - I suggest serial port or USB soundcard. If it's the program crashing shout at me - I've been *very* busy getting SDR software written but in maybe two weeks will be able to get back into the HRD suite. I'll get a dump file from

Re: [digitalradio] mt63

On 5/26/2010 9:41 PM, Hal Stang wrote: If so What frequencies do they normally hang out on -80/40/20 meters? Hal Hal, Seems the majority of MT63 activity is on 20 meters - 14108.0 / 14109.0. It is sparse though. I do see some using the 500Hz mode around 3586.0. I can meet you on 14108.0 if

Re: [digitalradio] mt63

If so What frequencies do they normally hang out on -80/40/20 meters? Hal - Original Message - From: obie47165 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 8:07 PM Subject: [digitalradio] mt63 Is there any activity on mt63 on 20 meters or is it far an

Re: [digitalradio] mt63

maybe one or two stations per day, tops. On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:07 PM, obie47165 wrote: > > > Is there any activity on mt63 on 20 meters or is it far and few between.. > > POB/K8LEN > > >

Re: [digitalradio] About digital reception and SDR.

Simon - A little off topic, but I have scoured the internet and forums and I cannot find a fix for Windows 7 crashing with DM 780. I am a loyal fan of the software and have donated as well. Can you point me in the right direction? Frank KD8FIP On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Simon HB9DRV wrote:

Re: [digitalradio] What mean "Too Wide"?

24.05.2010 22:45, Rick Westerfield kirjutas: This would be a general definition that perhaps not everyone could fully agree on: Too Wide: takes up too much spectrum bandwidth for the amount of information delivered or the speed of the information's delivery. Rick, academically you are

Re: [digitalradio] SSTV AMPLIFIER

Is this for a FM or SSB transmitter ?  If FM then any amp should do.  If you are using a SSB transmitter and feeding it the audio for SSTV then you need an amp  that is linear.  I would guess that most of your sstv transmissions are  not too long (say less than 30 seconds) so the duty cycle

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400: Ready for next stage ?

Yes. On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Jon Maguire wrote: > > > Andy, > > We can do all this in Multipsk, right? No need for PCALE etal? > > 73... Jon W1MNK > > > On 5/22/2010 8:34 AM, Andy obrien wrote: > > > > With dozens of NEW ALE 400 operators in the past week since K2MO's QST > article, I w

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400: Ready for next stage ?

Andy, We can do all this in Multipsk, right? No need for PCALE etal? 73... Jon W1MNK On 5/22/2010 8:34 AM, Andy obrien wrote: With dozens of NEW ALE 400 operators in the past week since K2MO's QST article, I wonder if the new ALE 400 enthusiasGs are now ready for the next logical stage in ALE

RE: [digitalradio] What mean "Too Wide"?

This would be a general definition that perhaps not everyone could fully agree on: Too Wide: takes up too much spectrum bandwidth for the amount of information delivered or the speed of the information's delivery. Poor or disturbed propagation constrains all of us into fewer bands for

Re: [digitalradio] Any point in sending Wrap files via ALE 400?

Tony, we should play around with this when we get time. the person i sent a WRAP file to did not know what to do with it, so I am still not sure if it really worked. Andy K3UK On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 6:46 AM, KH6TY wrote: > > > With WRAP, you can compress the file and reduce the transmission t

Re: [digitalradio] Any point in sending Wrap files via ALE 400?

With WRAP, you can compress the file and reduce the transmission time significantly in many cases. 73 - Skip KH6TY Tony wrote: Andy, I sent a Wrap file via ALE400 today. Is that just a waste of time since ALE 400 already has error correction ? It would seem redundant if the inte

Re: [digitalradio] Any point in sending Wrap files via ALE 400?

Andy, I sent a Wrap file via ALE400 today. Is that just a waste of time since ALE 400 already has error correction ? It would seem redundant if the intent was to make sure the file was received without error. Is there are value to sending Wrap files via ALE 400? Assuming that Wrap wor

Re: [digitalradio] Mobile CW

I don't think we should encourage texting or CW while driving! All attention needs to be your driving. Driving is dangerous enough even with full attention. Pull over to the side of the road and text or CW please. We don't need another silent key. Mark / Jordan I certainly appreciate your conc

Re: [digitalradio] Change of Email Address

As moderator of a number of yahoo list I can tell you first hand you have to make the change yourself. No one here can do it for you. At 12:40 PM 5/23/2010, you wrote: >We are changing our email address from >laz...@earthlink.net >to l

Re: [digitalradio] southern indiana sstv

Can you give us your Six digit grid square? That might help out some. Plus what mode - SSB or FM? Looking you up beased on your address in QRZ, your a 'little' too far for me on a 'normal' day. But I do see your active on 6m also by your edited qrz write up...:) There is also June VHF QSO Par

Re: [digitalradio] Mobile CW

On 23-May-10 05:14, Tony wrote: That would be much more convenient Andy. The only problem is having to pause when making sharp turns; not an issue on the highway. Patrick remembed reading about a ham who used a specialized set of false teeth to send code! Can you imagine the looks he got with

Re: [digitalradio] Mobile CW

ony wrote: From: Tony Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Mobile CW To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, May 23, 2010, 3:14 AM     Hal/Tony, I wonder if the serious CW mobile operators might invent some CW sending capability from there steer

Re: [digitalradio] Mobile CW

t; From: "Tony"mailto:DXDX%40optonline.net>> >> To:<mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>> >> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 3:53 AM >> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Speech-to-Text for the Handicapped >> >> >> >>> On 5/21/2010 3:28 A

Re: [digitalradio] NUE PSK31 Modem

Andy, did you look at http://en.wordpress.com/tag/nue-psk/ ? On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 6:17 AM, AC TALBOT wrote: > > > Does anyone have a valid web address for the NUE PSK31 Modem now. All > the ones found on a Google search seem to be broken > > Andy > www.g4jnt.com > > >

RE: [digitalradio] Mobile CW

I found one really good place to put a paddle; between the seats under the hand-brake lever, for cars that have that setup. I've considered the shift lever -- if that's on the floor -- so one may rest his hand on the control and still reach down for keying. I would not think the steering wheel acc

Re: [digitalradio] Speech-to-Text for the Handicapped

went with the flow. I used to send the cw correction, then cw "just hit bump in road hi hi" the receiving hams got a big kick out of it. Hope to work you. hal WD4MDA - Original Message - From: "Tony" To: Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 5:00 AM Subject: Re: [digita

Re: [digitalradio] Speech-to-Text for the Handicapped

a first for me! Tony -K2MO > - Original Message - > From: "Tony" > To: > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 3:53 AM > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Speech-to-Text for the Handicapped > > > >> On 5/21/2010 3:28 AM, Hal Stang wrote: >> >>>

Re: [digitalradio] Speech-to-Text for the Handicapped

Thanks Tony I appreciate. And will let you know when I am on "the Road" LOL. I worked mobile CW for years. LOL. 73, thanks for your time. Hal WD4MDA - Original Message - From: "Tony" To: Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 3:53 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Speech-to-Text

Re: [digitalradio] Speech-to-Text for the Handicapped

On 5/21/2010 3:28 AM, Hal Stang wrote: > All, > I am setting up my mobile rig again(icom 706/High Sierra > Screwdriver/Ameritron amp). I wonder if you could run ALE400 or other > digital modes from the mobile using speech recognition software??? > Hal > WD4MDA > Hal, Skip Teller can answer y

Re: [digitalradio] Speech-to-Text for the Handicapped

All, I am setting up my mobile rig again(icom 706/High Sierra Screwdriver/Ameritron amp). I wonder if you could run ALE400 or other digital modes from the mobile using speech recognition software??? Hal WD4MDA - Original Message - From: "Tony" To: Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:41 PM

Re: [digitalradio] Speech-to-Text for the Handicapped

On 5/20/2010 8:02 PM, KH6TY wrote: > Tony, > > I am not sure what you mean, but you can use Dragon Software's Naturally > Speaking, version 10, and dictate into the TX window of most programs > (such as DigiPan, and fldigi, and maybe even Multipsk I didn't know that Skip - thanks for passing that

Re: [digitalradio] Speech-to-Text for the Handicapped

Tony, I am not sure what you mean, but you can use Dragon Software's Naturally Speaking, version 10, and dictate into the TX window of most programs (such as DigiPan, and fldigi, and maybe even Multipsk (although have not tested it with Multipsk) and not have to type. However, Naturally Speaki

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

! Best 73's ! De Nick - LZ1ZM >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Patrick Lindecker" >> To: >> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 3:23 PM >> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400 >> >> >>&

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

Hello Hal, For details about beacon: http://f6cte.free.fr/The_ARQ_FAE_beacon_easy_with_Multipsk.doc 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: Hal Stang To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:45 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400 Patrick

Re: [digitalradio] Transmitting in ALE400

Hello, Once "Answer" pushed, if it is not a selective call, Multipsk must detect the CQ and automatically transmits to establish the handshaking with the "Master". If you did not transmit, it means that the CQ was not decoded. Here are some hints: - It is strongly recommended to calibrate the

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE 400

Hello Howard, > MultiPSK = Yick Ugg, can't stand to even look at the user interface. I dont understand "Yick Ugg" but I suppose that it is not a compliment. In French, we say "Les goûts et les couleurs ne se discutent pas". It means that if you don't like it you don't use it, that's all. No need

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

quot; > To: > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 3:23 PM > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400 > > >> Hello Nick, >> >> Look at this paper: >> >> http://f6cte.free.fr/ALE_and_ALE400_easy_with_Multipsk.doc >> >> 73 >> Patrick >> &g

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 3:00 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400 Hello Stang, >where I type, it sends. You have an option to send only when you type the "Enter" key (to fix errors for example). >Also in QSB there appea

Re: [digitalradio] Signal on 20m

C5O) Skype-Russell.Blair Hell Field #300 DRCC #55 30m Dig-group #693 From: Art To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu, May 20, 2010 10:06:00 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Signal on 20m   Olivia On 5/20/2010 10:56 AM, Russell Blair wrote:   >What is the

Re: [digitalradio] Signal on 20m

Olivia On 5/20/2010 10:56 AM, Russell Blair wrote: What is the mode that is on 14.074.45 on the Kenwood USB Russell NC5O 1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door! 2- A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everythi

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE 400

Howard, There is no installer, so why should there be an unistaller! Please read the Multipsk help to understand how simple it is to run Multipsk. You can "install" it in a directory, or just run multipsk.exe from the unzipped folder. Nothing could be simpler, and even "installers" sometimes

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE 400

Howard, once you get used to it, you can understand why there are so many buttons and colors (to try and group). Just concentrate on the QSO after you have pushed the button you need and it will not feel so unfriendly. There is more to Patrick's program than any other and it is hard to handle a

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

Hello Nick, Look at this paper: http://f6cte.free.fr/ALE_and_ALE400_easy_with_Multipsk.doc 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: "Nikola Nikolov" To: ; "Andy obrien" Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 6:08 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400 > What about tho

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

disconnection. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: H Stang To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 9:42 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400 Chuck, I saw your email and went to 14074 but didn't hear or see you. Band was ruff. just finishe

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

What about those having not access to QST and still wishing to try out ALE 400 ? Best 73's! De Nick - LZ1ZM On Wed, 19 May 2010 04:15:39 +0300, Andy obrien wrote: > June QST > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:07 PM, wb4...@teara.org > wrote: > >> >> >> At 05:56 PM 5/18/2010 -, you wrote: >>

Re: [digitalradio] Balcony Antenna via ALE-400

Good one Tony. I was thinking about voice activated ALE 400. Dictating in to a speech to text application.. Could be interesting. On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Tony wrote: > > > Andy, > > Here's an unusual ALE-400 contact... > > Tony -K2MO > > "K2MO DE WB0VGI > > "My first time on ALE

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

June QST On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:07 PM, wb4...@teara.org wrote: > > > At 05:56 PM 5/18/2010 -, you wrote: > >Is anybody on to tinker with ALE400?? It's 1751Z I'm monitoring 14074.00 > and will monitor most of the rest of the day. > > > >I'm still trying to figure it out so please bear with

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

At 05:56 PM 5/18/2010 -, you wrote: >Is anybody on to tinker with ALE400?? It's 1751Z I'm monitoring 14074.00 and will monitor most of the rest of the day. > >I'm still trying to figure it out so please bear with me till then. > >73, Chuck AC5PW I know this is probably an old question... but i

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

___ From: "John Becker, WØJAB" To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tue, May 18, 2010 3:56:41 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400   I was wondering what that noise was. Guess the pactor did not bother you.

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

From: H Stang To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tue, May 18, 2010 2:42:37 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400   Chuck, I saw your email and went to 14074 but didn't hear or see you.  Band was ruff. just finished two ALE 400 QSO's with KEIAF AND WB2LMV.  QSB aplenty. I am

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

I was wondering what that noise was. Guess the pactor did not bother you.

Re: [digitalradio] ALE 400

Chuck, I saw your email and went to 14074 but didn't hear or see you. Band was ruff. just finished two ALE 400 QSO's with KEIAF AND WB2LMV. QSB aplenty. I am in the same mode of trying to figure it out. It is getting a little easir.. I have made 5 ALE400 contacts in the last two days. I may ha

Re: [digitalradio] The Mode Report

Very nice Andy... 73 Frank YV4GJN - Original Message - From: Andy obrien To: digitalradio Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:53 AM Subject: [digitalradio] The Mode Report Modes detected and call ID's received over last 24-36 hours RS ID 19:33:08 UTC ALE400 2632 Hz 19

Re: [digitalradio] 6M WSPR in the U.S.

C5O) Skype-Russell.Blair Hell Field #300 DRCC #55 30m Dig-group #693 From: Jon Maguire To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, May 17, 2010 8:08:58 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 6M WSPR in the U.S.   Russell, Look on the left side about half way down. The frequ

Re: [digitalradio] 6M WSPR in the U.S.

Russell, Look on the left side about half way down. The frequencies are there http://wsprnet.org/drupal/ . 73... Jon W1MNK On 5/17/2010 6:49 PM, Russell Blair wrote: Whats is the WSPR dial frequency in the U.S. ? Russell NC5O 1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a r

Re: [digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] ALE 400 coming out of the woodwork

Hi Phil, Thanks for my first contact. I couldn't believe it! This past two weeks I have made my first Olivia,Contestia,Hell (I worked PSK31 for a good while 2 years ago) . I work the Votar contest 6 contacts LOL. Worked the Hell contest Saturday morning 13 contacts. I am moving upward.

Re: [digitalradio] 50.260 signal

g you have. > - Gerald Ford > > > " IN GOD WE TRUST " > > > Russell Blair (NC5O) > Skype-Russell.Blair > Hell Field #300 > DRCC #55 > 30m Dig-group #693 > > > -- > *From:* Tony > *To:* digitalradio@yahoogro

Re: [digitalradio] 50.260 signal

OD WE TRUST " Russell Blair (NC5O) Skype-Russell.Blair Hell Field #300 DRCC #55 30m Dig-group #693 From: Tony To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, May 17, 2010 3:27:46 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 50.260 signal   Hello Russel, > someone

Re: [digitalradio] 50.260 signal

Hello Russel, > someone is on 50.260 with a signal that I cant decode must be calling CQ antone know this signal. > Russell NC5O It's probably one of two WSJT modes; JT6M or FSK441. The frequency is used for meteor scatter as well as other propagation modes. See http://www.pingjockey.net/c

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE 400 coming out of the woodwork

On 5/16/2010 6:13 PM, n9dsj wrote: I used ALE400 once :) Have you in the log more than once Bill : ) Countless meteor scatter contacts on 50MHz as well! Tony -K2MO --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com , Andy obrien wrote: > > Hey folks, MULTIPL

RE: [digitalradio] New SCS Email Program For Pactor

Oh great! Those who have complained about the WinLink system Pactor interference haven't seen anything yet!Once this new product gets into the hands of every ham who wants to operate his own private email server we could see a huge increase in Pactor messaging stations all over the place

Re: [digitalradio] Re: The RS ID Weekend

On 5/16/2010 3:11 AM, Andy obrien wrote: ALE 400 "won" in the RS ID sweepestakes, so far this weekend. I stayed mostly on 20M today (Saturday), Here are the modes my software automtiacally detected. 5 modes. I did not use my SDR , will use Sunday. Andy K3UK Nice job Andy. I'll give it a shot to

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE 400 coming out of the woodwork

Hello Jim, > but does it need a better signal than, say, Olivia to get through? The minimum S/N is around -12 dB. It is comparable to the minimum S/N for Olivia 32-1000 or Olivia 8-500. However, below -11 dB, repetitions begin. 73 Patrick - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Saturday

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ALE 400 coming out of the woodwork

my subjective view , Jim, is that it is "almost" as robust as Olivia under common weak signal conditions. Andy K3UK On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM, wrote: > > > That's good to hear. I have had only a couple of ALE-400 QSOs > but both were very pleasant. I would be participating in this > wee

Re: [digitalradio] Re: CALL ID via PSKReporter

Thanks Phil. I think the one issue is something you don't have control over, that is the Call ID that is decoded actually being sent to PSK Reporter. In Multipsk the decoded call ID is stored (by user option) in a txt file. As far as i can tell, this is not automatically sent to PSK Reporter un

Re: [digitalradio] ROS MF-7 IS OUT THERE ! (And less than 100 Hz wide)

good news, nice to see this mode make good progress. Andy K3UK On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, graham787 wrote: > > > After a series of successful test transmissions, the latest version of > ROS-3-6-1 (at the moment) now has the MF mode included , this allows live > key board qso's at a data r

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Network 105 / Multipsk

On 5/14/2010 4:50 PM, sholtofish wrote: Tony, It would be interesting to experiment with packet over nvis paths too. The higher signal to noise ratio typical with nvis would really speed throughput. Maybe you could devise a simulation It would be interesting Sholto. In addition to high sig

Re: [digitalradio] Re: CALL ID via PSKReporter

Hello to all, The Multipsk version to use for Call ID must be either the 4.16 or the 4.17 but not inferior because, i changed some specifications and added some possibilities (Prop ID, Text ID inside the generic Call ID system...). It's now stable but not completly compatible with the first Cal

Re: [digitalradio] Network 105 / Multipsk

nd a lot of fun. I have had some nice QSOs with hams from Russia, Europe and South America I could not have heard on HF directly. 73 Sholto -- - Original Message - From: "Tony" mailto:DXDX%40optonline.net>> To: mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.co

Re: [digitalradio] QST article by K2MO on ALE 400

On 5/13/2010 7:40 PM, Andy obrien wrote: Good work Tony, nice to see your QST article on ALE 400. If any of our members have just read the article and are looking to try, I will be active tonight on the usual ALE 400 channels. Andy K3UK Thanks Andy. Tony -K2MO __ Information f

Re: [digitalradio] Opposing 60M proposal

James French writes: > Can it be 'justified' to 'clog up' a new band with allowing ANY digital > mode, > and I am also including digitized voice into this, just to have it be there? > Why not use what is already staged and developed and on the bands that > already > have the allocations?

RE: [digitalradio] Opposing 60M proposal

You have repeatedly used the term, " Clog Up ". Have you listened to 60M at all? I rarely hear ANY ham traffic on any of the 5 channels whenever I look. Given the light usage already in place, I do not see an issue with adding digital modes. Ed K7AAT ==

Re: [digitalradio] Opposing 60M proposal

On Tuesday 11 May 2010 05:12:07 you wrote: > From: Andy obrien > Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 Time: 21:18:20 > > >I will probably suggest that they authorize PS31, MFSK16 and Winmor > >500 if they are going to get mode specific. > >Andy K3UK > > Andy > > Does the FCC *really* have to specify all th

Re: [digitalradio] in need of a USB to DB9 cable

Get an RS-232 to USB converter (inexpensive). I don't believe there is such a thing as an RS-232 - USB cable. Brian Denley http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html - Original Message - From: ""John Becker, WØJAB"" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 11:52 AM Subject: [digitalradio] i

Re: [digitalradio] QRV 14065-14115 : SDR RS-ID Skimmer

Re: SDR RS-ID Skimmer Interesting concept Andy; I'd like to see an SDR RSID Skimmer linked to PSK Reporter. The Reed Solomon identifiers have greater sensitivity than the majority of digital modes and their detection capabilities would allow us to see more QRP signals on the map. In addition t

Re: [digitalradio] Fwd: [30MDG] Help NEEDED with a Signallink USB

The SignaLink USB is not a rig control device, it's only an audio device. It has a built in VOX circuit to do the keying. Rig control must be done with a separate device. If you got the audio to show up, you are there. On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Andy obrien wrote: > > > > > -- Fo

Re: [digitalradio] Slow Scan TV Pictures from Space

I wish the operating times were a little wider. I'm disappointed to realize that it won't even be making a pass over my QTH while they are operating SSTV. :( On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Trevor . wrote: > > > The Radio Amateurs on the International Space Station (ISS) will be > transmitting

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >