Re: [tdf-discuss] ODF and HTML 5

Do you have any contacts, links, infos about the proposal and status? I would really like to get involved! I think the first step is to integrate ODF into HTML5 as read only, editing could come later. But this is more political than technical. Cheers! Jaime On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:07, Ian Lyn

Re: [tdf-discuss] OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved

h wrote: > On 2 October 2011 23:41, Jaime R. Garza wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > Why isn't ODF added as an extension of HTML5? > > That is a very good idea. > > > This would define ODF as the defacto Web Standard for Files! > > > > An ideas

Re: [tdf-discuss] OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved

Hello All, Why isn't ODF added as an extension of HTML5? This would define ODF as the defacto Web Standard for Files! An ideas who could try to pursue such an agreement? Cheers! Jaime On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 03:17, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > The OASIS ODF 1.2 Committee Specification 01 has

[tdf-discuss] Does anyone know when is LO 3.4 going to be available on the Ubuntu PPA?

Hello, Does anyone know when is the 3.4 version going to be available in the Ubuntu PPA? Cheers! Jaime R. Garza -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: OpenOffice dead and burried?

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 20:22, plino wrote: > > ODF support is present in MS Office 2007 SP2 and MS Office 2010 (it > > even can be selected as default file format) so what would be your > > target? > > > MS Office 2003 and older? It does not look reasonable to me, > > because by the time we deve

Re: [tdf-discuss] My application was rejected, ;-(

that is non-trivial, please let me know. Cheers! Jaime R. Garza On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:10, sophie wrote: > Hi Jaime, > > On 04/05/2011 11:53, Jaime R. Garza wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> my application was rejected, apparently I haven't made non-trivial >&

[tdf-discuss] My application was rejected, ;-(

Hi all, my application was rejected, apparently I haven't made non-trivial contributions to the TDF. :-( -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentf

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Forums... again

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:13, wrote: > Hi again, > > Thanks to everyone who has expressed a balanced, objective opinion about > this. > > I don't want to spend a lot time here arguing about ads. I understand that > it's a sensitive subject, I'm sorry that some people disagree, and I > respect th

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Forums... again

> > >> David, > > I feel that this is wrong, not on your part as you are only following > directions. If this is the stand that the TDF wishes to take then there is > going to be a lot of support lost. > > I really find all this discussion ridiculous, it should not be allowed to make advertising f

Re: [tdf-discuss] Forums... again

> > >> I have some doubts as to whether the two products will diverge now that > Oracle has decided to end its involvement with OpenOffice.org . I suspect > that at some point rather than let OOo just whither and die it will merge > with The Document Foundation and the two will become essentially

Re: [tdf-discuss] Forums... again

I got the instruction in Polish, that is funny, because my wife is polish! ;-) Cheers! On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 20:55, adept techlists - kazar wrote: > Also, Andy, please have a look at internationalizing the email one gets > when one registers. It does not arrive in one's chosen language and, fo

Re: [tdf-discuss] LO & OO are not the only competitors of MSOffice... LO could also make a simple office suite that runs in Android & iOS

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 20:09, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > I just got my hands on the HTC desire us with android and as I was perusing > through the marketplace, I noticed open office writer available could we > fork that code and then merge any changes we have? Do you mean this one: http://tomtas

Re: [tdf-discuss] LO & OO are not the only competitors of MSOffice... LO could also make a simple office suite that runs in Android & iOS

For Android and iPhone it doesn't make sense to have the whole LO, only Clac, Writer & Impress are needed urgently! If LO manages to place those three apps for Android, ODF will gain momentum. Cheers! On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 21:01, todd rme wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Jonathan Aqu

Re: [tdf-discuss] LO & OO are not the only competitors of MSOffice... LO could also make a simple office suite that runs in Android & iOS

I have a statement from Thinkfree, that they will support ODF in the next version. On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:35, toki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/04/2011 22:11, Denny wrote: > > > When pointing out competitors, there are a lot more I think. > > One I would

Re: [tdf-discuss] LO & OO are not the only competitors of MSOffice... LO could also make a simple office suite that runs in Android & iOS

On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 15:54, Charles-H. Schulz < charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org> wrote: > Hello Jaime, > > Le Sun, 3 Apr 2011 12:16:48 +0200, > "Jaime R. Garza" a écrit : > > > If you work for such a large corporation/entity, then perhaps your >

Re: [tdf-discuss] LO & OO are not the only competitors of MSOffice... LO could also make a simple office suite that runs in Android & iOS

On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:53, Valter Mura wrote: > In data giovedì 31 marzo 2011 17:32:45, Jaime R. Garza ha scritto: > > Please, don't top quote. > > This said, are any of you involved in business? If so, maybe you use a > Blackberry phone. > > So let's start

Re: [tdf-discuss] LO & OO are not the only competitors of MSOffice... LO could also make a simple office suite that runs in Android & iOS

focus on making those three 3 apps available as soon as possible for Android & iOS. (1) They plan to support ODF on the next version. (2) Yes, exactly as MSOffice ;-) On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 16:21, Stefan Weigel < stefan.wei...@bildungskreis.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Am 31.03.

[tdf-discuss] LO & OO are not the only competitors of MSOffice... LO could also make a simple office suite that runs in Android & iOS

runs everywhere, including iOS (iPhones & iPads) and Android phones and tablets. The name of this Office Suite is: Thinkfree <http://www.thinkfree.com/> It would be great if there was a simple version of LO with only these three apps and that would run under Android & iOS. Cheer

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Support for Office 2003 file formats (WordML, SpreadsheetML

, Peter Jentsch wrote: > On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 17:23:01 +0100, Jaime R. Garza wrote: > > Hi, > > I think I left out some important detail to at least make the question not > look completely braindead: > > LibO AFAIK currently supports at least 4 different MS file intercha

Re: [tdf-discuss] Support for Office 2003 file formats (WordML, SpreadsheetML

Hi Peter, I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion. You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format??? I don't really see any good reason for doing such a completely strategically wrong decision. Cheers! Jaime On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 16:36, Peter Jentsch wr

Re: [tdf-discuss] How difficult is it to port Libreoffice to theAndroid Tablets? Is there any plan yet?

eady been done. And if anybody have access to those assembly > > code. Or have clue where we should headed, please ring the bell. > > > > Cheers > > Chao > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > >> Cheers!

Re: [tdf-discuss] How difficult is it to port Libreoffice to theAndroid Tablets? Is there any plan yet?

Hello Alexandro, The difference is that if you separate all that, then anyone has the freedom of making their own UI (e.g. QT, GTK, Multitouch, etc.) If it's not separated, then everything has to be constantly ported or shared for new versions. Cheers! Jaime On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:16, Alexa

Re: [tdf-discuss] How difficult is it to port Libreoffice to theAndroid Tablets? Is there any plan yet?

Hello Mirek, now that I read in detail, both are only viewers, I'm talking about Office Suite functionality, not only viewers. Cheers! Jaime On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:56, Mirek M. wrote: > 2011/3/4 Jaime R. Garza > > > In my humble opinion it will be great to have the UI s

Re: [tdf-discuss] How difficult is it to port Libreoffice to theAndroid Tablets? Is there any plan yet?

Hello Mirek, Thanks for the infos but they are not under "The Document Foundation" umbrella, are they? will they? could they? Cheers! Jaime On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:56, Mirek M. wrote: > 2011/3/4 Jaime R. Garza > > > In my humble opinion it will be great to have the

Re: [tdf-discuss] How difficult is it to port Libreoffice to theAndroid Tablets? Is there any plan yet?

In my humble opinion it will be great to have the UI separated from all the rest. Think of WebKit in the Browser! That would allow to have a QT UI, a GTK UI, a Multitouch UI, etc. On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 02:52, Chaosun wrote: > Well, I had a quite long chat with tml_ regarding the porting to And

Re: [tdf-discuss] How difficult is it to port Libreoffice to the Android Tablets? Is there any plan yet?

n Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:35, Robert Nagy wrote: > If gtk is available on Android then it would not be that hard, otherwise > the whole UI has to be ported to what Android is using. > > On (2011-03-03 11:21), Jaime R. Garza wrote: > > Hello, > > > > just wondering, how

[tdf-discuss] How difficult is it to port Libreoffice to the Android Tablets? Is there any plan yet?

Hello, just wondering, how difficult is it to port LibreOffice to the Android Tablets? Is there any plan already? Cheers! Jaime -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list

Re: [tdf-discuss] Oracle Contributor Agreement and LibreOffice contributions

I think it's inevitable that more and more differences of opinion will arise, so I also believe LO should start their own independent path. Just my 2c, ;-) Jaime On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 16:51, Phil Hibbs wrote: > Kohei: > > That's the wrong assumption I was trying to point out. It's not alway

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: missing debs on ppa

Hi all, > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:33:23 +0100 > "Jaime R. Garza" wrote: > > > I think a lot of people though it was an official LibreOffice PPA for > > Ubuntu, not an official Canonical package: > > > > > http://www.silicongadget.com/guides/softwa

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: missing debs on ppa

Dear Bjoern, I think a lot of people though it was an official LibreOffice PPA for Ubuntu, not an official Canonical package: http://www.silicongadget.com/guides/software-guides/office-suites/install-libreoffice-on-ubuntu-using-the-official-repository/2097/

[tdf-discuss] Hyperlinks are not saved on PPT files

;t know if it's already filed as a bug, but it definitely should be. Cheers! Jaime R. Garza -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Re: [tdf-discuss] Congratulations & my suggestion for the next versions

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 23:15, Andy Brown wrote: > On Thu Jan 27 2011 14:03:35 GMT-0800 (PST) Jaime R. Garza wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Are you talking about a public free cloud? Nobody needs to offer that, as >> I >> say, any desktop can work as it's own se

Re: [tdf-discuss] Congratulations & my suggestion for the next versions

eers! On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 22:39, Andy Brown wrote: > On Thu Jan 27 2011 13:32:42 GMT-0800 (PST) Jaime R. Garza wrote: > >> Exactly, that's my point, having a HTML5 GUI, you can install it locally >> or >> in the cloud. You can always install it in a desktop for

Re: [tdf-discuss] Congratulations & my suggestion for the next versions

Exactly, that's my point, having a HTML5 GUI, you can install it locally or in the cloud. You can always install it in a desktop for offline usage. On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 21:07, Zaphod Feeblejocks wrote: > >1 - Port to a Web based interface (HTML5) > > > > As I said before I real

[tdf-discuss] Congratulations & my suggestion for the next versions

Hello all, I'm very happy with the release of LibreOffice, and I want to congratulate all of you for the great job done!! Now I would like to make some suggestions for the next versions: Priority Suggestion 1 - Notification of updates and updates with patches, instead o

Re: [tdf-discuss] Automatic Update / Update info

ntfoundation.org> wrote: > [ please fix your e-mail quoting ] > > Hi, > > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 03:57:54PM +0100, Jaime R. Garza wrote: > > You also need Admin rights to install under Windows, but that's not the > > point. The point is that the user should be n

Re: [tdf-discuss] Automatic Update / Update info

Hallo Rene, You also need Admin rights to install under Windows, but that's not the point. The point is that the user should be notified that there is a new version. If he or she can install it, that's not our problem. Schöne Grüsse / Cheers / Saludos Jaime On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:41, Rene

Re: [tdf-discuss] Automatic Update / Update info

re can be updated > >> exist a lot on the mac but here Jaime was mentioning one specific > >> feature of LibreOffice that notifies the user directly and, possibly, > >> updates LibO by itself. > >> > >> best, > >> Charles. > >> > >> Le

Re: [tdf-discuss] Automatic Update / Update info

fies users when another software can be updated > exist a lot on the mac but here Jaime was mentioning one specific > feature of LibreOffice that notifies the user directly and, possibly, > updates LibO by itself. > > best, > Charles. > > Le Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:06:46 +0100,

Re: [tdf-discuss] Automatic Update / Update info

oundation.org> wrote: > It does work only for stable releases (unless we dumped that update > component???) . Anyway, if you have any ideas on the implementation of > such a feature, you're welcome to upload a patch :-) > > Best, > > Charles. > > > Le Mon, 24 J

Re: [tdf-discuss] Automatic Update / Update info

ll the old version. But there's an alert on > the desktop that notifies the user when there's a new version (same > with extensions btw). > > Best, > Charles. > > > Le Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:08:58 +0100, > "Jaime R. Garza" a écrit : > > > Why no

Re: [tdf-discuss] Automatic Update / Update info

! On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:09, Charles-H. Schulz < charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org> wrote: > Hello Jaime, > > > Le Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:49:03 +0100, > "Jaime R. Garza" a écrit : > > > Hello all, > > > > for when is it planned to have Auto

[tdf-discuss] Automatic Update / Update info

Hello all, for when is it planned to have Automatic Update for Windows & Mac LibreOffice, for Linux usually makes no sense? My opinion, the user should be able to decide if it's completely Automatic, or they only get an info pop window, offering a one click update. Cheers! Jaime -- Unsubscrib

Re: [tdf-discuss] Features enterprises will love to have in LibreOffice

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:15, Christophe Strobbe < christophe.stro...@esat.kuleuven.be> wrote: > > > At 11:48 19/01/2011, Jaime R. Garza wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I believe the best feature for the enterprise will be to port LibreOffice >> to >>

Re: [tdf-discuss] Features enterprises will love to have in LibreOffice

Hello, I believe the best feature for the enterprise will be to port LibreOffice to HTML5, this could be also installed locally in the clients, needing just a browser to run. If LibreOffice doesn't go in direction WebBased, it will be soon irrelevant in the enterprise (as soon as Google Docs, MS

Re: [steering-discuss] irc

Definitely, 1 for support, 1 for development! On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 19:11, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > As a Kubuntu user they have 2 separate channels it helps to facilitate > focusing on development discussion bug fixing etc with out the distraction > of having to provide support as well. > > >

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: LibreOffice version for Android platform

Hello Tom, My name is Jaime. I would be really interested in using the backend for a Chrome Extension. I hope it's ok that I contact you in the next days to ask you for details. Cheers! Jaime R. Garza On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 08:36, Tom Tasche wrote: Hello, > > My name is Tom

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

main reason is interoperabilty and platform independence. With ann HTML5 Office suite, you just need a browser, and you can even install it locally. Now LO develops several versionsfor different platforms, which cost more resources. On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 18:46, RGB ES wrote: > 2011/1/6 Jaime

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

Well for a reader is not such a big deal if it's HTML5 or nor, but if there were a Office Suite, like Microsoft Docs & Google Docs, that should be in HTML5! But apparently no one has started such a thing and no one seems to be interested. IBM is working on one and Oracle is already offering one, at

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

i think it would be great to have a HTML5 LO, which will only need a browser. The could be installed locallz or on a server. There would only be need for one version that supports the 4 major browsers. At least we should start with a ODF reader, it doesn't have to be a plugin, it can be a HTML5 ap

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice version for Android platform

Why not make a browser extension for Chrome & Firefox? So that any device running a browser can read directly ODF Files. Cheers! Jaime R. Garza On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 06:24, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote: > 2011/1/6 Fabián Rodríguez : > > I am told the OpenOffice Document Reader versi

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

ti be installed, probably giving the option by installation to select the individual appliciations: Writer(Text P.), Calc(Spreadsheet), Impress(Presentations),..., Thunderbird(E-Mail), Lightning(Calendar). Cheers! Jaime R. Garza On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 15:22, Christophe Strobbe < christo

Re: [tdf-discuss] Bug in LibreOffice RC2 (Impress)

I tried it on Linux Mint 10 with LO 3.3 RC2, the color is fine, just the gradient is different. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 14:58, Axel Reimer wrote: > Hello, > > I just opened an old presentation and recognized a display bug. > > Reproduction: > 1. Create a new Impress Presentation > 2. Draw a rect

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Co-working with Moz, etc

ecause it is by nature platform independent and you can install it locally. Cheers! Jaime R. Garza On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 01:03, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Jaime I believe on previous posts on this thread or another one that TDF is > working on getting Google to support the ODF format.

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Co-working with Moz, etc

further installation necessary. Enterprises could make only one installation on a huge server and anyone could use it directly from the browser, and Cloud companies like Amazon could just upload an image and make it available for all their customers. Cheers! Jaime R. Garza On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at

Re: [tdf-discuss] Do not support writing to OOXML format

As many already said, OOXML r/w support is already there, if you don't like it, then develop a way to disable it. Someone already developed it, and that's why it is there already. Why can anyone think that they can remove any functionality that is already there? It is a pain in th a... to do the

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format

gh I think it would be nice to be able to export to the transitional formats too, I agree that it a pain in the a But that's how MS is playing with the Open Standards and we have to win them in their own game. Cheers! Jaime R. Garza On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 23:29, Barbara Duprey wrote

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

tied integration with something like ULTEO (www.ulteo.com) that allows office directly into the browser without any installation necessary. On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 21:08, Lee Hyde wrote: > On 01/01/11 19:42, Jaime R. Garza wrote: > > But why only for Thunderbird? > > > > Why not

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc

But why only for Thunderbird? Why not make an open container (or just modularize the existing one with a well defined interface) to will allow any application to use the resources (e.g. dictionaries) and have full integration with all LO resources? On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 20:36, Lee Hyde wrote:

Re: [tdf-discuss] Co-working with Moz, etc (was:Do not support writing to OOXML format)

You had some very good ideas, my comments about them: About Google, they have a proprietary File Format, as for now, they only support ODT and ODS. So I'm wondering why they don't support other ODF File Formats. It would be good if someone could talk with them about that. Also, it would be great

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format

ll MS File Formats. It's not about being arrogant, or making a point, is about winning market-share, and if we don't understand that, we already lost the race. Cheers! Jaime R. Garza On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 01:10, Robert Holtzman wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:35:24AM +00

[tdf-discuss] Re: Digest of discuss@documentfoundation.org issue 142 (3894-3923)

tes. Maybe there should be a cloud HTML5 based office suite developed by the Document Foundation!? Just something to think about! Cheers! Jaime R. Garza > Dear all, > > In a few hours the year 2010 will come to an end. While I don't think > there's any reason to panic abou

[tdf-discuss] Re: Digest of discuss@documentfoundation.org issue 140 (3843-3863)

Hello, I just want to inform you all that docx, pptx, xlsx, etc is not the same as the "ISO OOXML" which was saddly accepted as an "ISO standard". The currently used OOXML format is a completely proprietary XML based format. And the specification of the OOXML "ISO Standard" is so complex and long

[tdf-discuss] Re: Digest of discuss@documentfoundation.org issue 127 (3742-3762)

As many others already commented, I believe it's time that LibreOffice changes the names of some of the individual applications, my humble proposal: Write Spread Present Draw Formula Base Cheers! Jaime R. Garza -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Ar

[tdf-discuss] Can someone tell me who is developing the ODF viewer?

Hello All, I would like to have contact with the developers of the ODF viewer. I would like to port the functionality into Firefox/Chomium Extensions. Cheers! Jaime R. Garza -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org

[tdf-discuss] ODF viewer Extension for Chromium/Firefox

Hello all, I would like to start the development of a ODF viewer Extension for Chromium/Firefox. I know there is an ODF Viewer already, I want to probably port it to an extension that could be installed to Firefox & Chromium. Would anybody like to help me? Cheers, Jaime R. G