Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-10-06 Thread Amnesiac
Interesting thread... and I'm thinking of a new AV receiver I recently came across xAP for home automation and there is a plug-in already for SC 7.x http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/Software/xAP-Plug-in-v2.2.0-for-SqueezeCenter-Rleased.html General information here: http://www.xapautomation.

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-10-06 Thread flacfan
The SB3's interface is way better that Denon's I'd always prefer using the SB3 to the Denon, but occasionally I'd like to. In addition if the SC is a DLNA server it would probably be able to serve not only audio but also pictures to my PS3 for example. -- flacfan ---

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-10-05 Thread chinablues
Agreed. I hadn't read 5091, but now that I have, I understand. dan -- chinablues chinablues's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7955 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-10-05 Thread MrSinatra
b/c you now have the SBC. the SBC is the tie in, as explained in 5091. SBC or not, its backwards thinking to think that making the pgm more useful means less people will buy the hardware. people have a PS3 ANYWAY, or even the denon. this feature would expose them to the SB world. -- MrSinat

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-10-05 Thread chinablues
If Squeezecenter could control music flow to eg, Denon's range of Networked Audio devices does this not imply the death of Squeezboxes? Why have a transporter, squeezebox, duet receiver or boom when you can stream wirelessly directly to one of these: http://www.usa.denon.com/ProductDetails/netwo

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-10-02 Thread flacfan
I voted for 5091 :-) It's been filed a long time ago, though. Hopefully it will get on the new features list soon. -- flacfan flacfan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17385 View this thread: http:

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-10-01 Thread MrSinatra
and isn't that crazy? why should you have to use something else when you already have SC? SC should support DLNA b/c the SBC is the natural tie in. join bugzilla, and vote for it, and spread the word. i plan to push hard for this after 7.3 is out. http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-10-01 Thread flacfan
MrSinatra;345806 Wrote: > does the Denon support DLNA? > > there's a enh request to get that into SC. i see no good reason for > someone to object to that support. Denon uses DLNA for streaming. I would love if SC would support DLNA and UPNP. I sometimes like to stream either to my Denon 3808

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-09-30 Thread MrSinatra
does the Denon support DLNA? there's a enh request to get that into SC. i see no good reason for someone to object to that support. -- MrSinatra www.LION-Radio.org Using: Squeezebox2 (primary) / SBR (secondary) / SBC - w/SC 7.3b - Win XP Pro SP3 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - D-Link DIR-655 -

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-09-30 Thread Bruce Hartley
Yay ! I've proved to myself. a) The Squeezecontroller is capable of controlling the Denon Receiver b) I can write it ! I've hacked the Doomsday demo app to mute and un-mute the amplifier using http commands. So I can presumably expand from there to full one way functionality. Ideally I'd liked

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-09-29 Thread flacfan
There's a little program for Windows that can act as a nice interface and alternative to Denon's Web GUI. http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=949351 There has not been much development lately though. It basically communicates via Telnet. Kinda what one would want SC to do. Also, you

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-09-29 Thread Mark Lanctot
Bruce Hartley;345217 Wrote: > I figured either: > a) I get the SBC to send the commands to the receiver. > Initially volume up & down, and power on / off would be more than > enough. I believe someone has worked on getting LIRC ported to the SBC, but it didn't seem to get too far. There is an L

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-09-29 Thread Bruce Hartley
The receiver will accept command either by Telnet or by HTTP through it's network port. I figured either: a) I get the SBC to send the commands to the receiver. Initially volume up & down, and power on / off would be more than enough. b) I get the SBC to send commands to the Squeezecenter server

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-09-29 Thread Mark Lanctot
Bruce Hartley;344720 Wrote: > Just got myself a squeezebox controller and this question has occurred > to me again. > How easy is it to get Squeezecenter to control my Denon Reciver using > it's telnet interface ? With the SBC/SBR this would be hard. The SBR has no way to interface with the rec

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2008-09-27 Thread Bruce Hartley
Just got myself a squeezebox controller and this question has occurred to me again. How easy is it to get Squeezecenter to control my Denon Reciver using it's telnet interface ? -- Bruce Hartley Bruce Hartley's Profile: ht

Re: [slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2006-01-06 Thread Mark Lanctot
First I've got to say this sounds amazingly cool - controlling both a Squeezebox and a receiver through SlimServer. And you could have the receiver connected to the network using the Squeezebox wireless bridging feature! While the operation would be through a fairly simple parser, the GUI wo

[slim] Network control of AV Receiver

2006-01-06 Thread Bruce Hartley
Just got myself a Denon AVR-4306, one of it's novel features is a network connection. There is a web interface that allows you to control the amp. My thinking is to investigate the network control protocol, then somehow to get slimserver to control it. What do you guys think? Does anyone else