Well maybe I missed something amazing about this, but it just seems to
be a big clunky remote, based on a early ipod design but just large
enough to ensure they can emboss a logo on it. What happened to
elegance in design?? :s
Buying a Nokia 770 would do the same but with more features right?
James_B;255899 Wrote:
> http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/
>
> QUOTE]
>
> Thanks for the link, but nor sure this does anything to answer my
> question.
--
Tradewind25
Geoff J.
Tradewind2
Can the text on the controller be made bigger?
Some of us here have less than stellar eyesight and variable font size
is a blessing.
--
NickP
NickP's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9123
View this
http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/
--
James_B
James_B's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11309
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41813
I have a Squeezebox 3. I wish to add one of the new Receivers in
another room, and ideally synchronize the two.
Can I achieve this with my current SB3 remote, or would I also need to
purchase one of the new Controllers?
(I think I read that the Receiver requires the Controller to configure
networ
For me, the main reason I'd like to see 802.11n support is for use
with the wireless bridging capability. I use that option on my SB3,
and plan to use it on the next SB3/SBR/whatever that I buy. Having
the additional bandwidth would be nice if I add a lot of stuff behind
the bridge, but for what
Pat Farrell wrote:
> Bizarroterl wrote:
>
>> I could complain how the duet controller doesn't have built in GPS, cell
>> phone, too big, too small, too expensive, wrong color, doesn't have a
>> built in browser, blah, blah, blah.
>>
>
> At the risk of going way OT here.
> What he said.
>
>
On 7-Jan-08, at 11:52 AM, stoobie-doo wrote:
>
> Any reason why the new devices aren't 802.11n draft 2.0 compliant.
> With
> most n routers, mixing g and n clients slows the whole network down.
I don't think this is true. At least, my early pre-n Belkin router
doesn't suffer, so I'd be surp
New product looks great, but I'm disappointed that it does not have a
keyboard (numeric like the SB remotes). I have played a lot with the
SONOS controller. Both the original SONOS interface (scrolling through
songs) and their new search interface (scrolling through the alphabet)
really stink.
pfarrell;255793 Wrote:
>
> Why can't I buy a cell phone that is good at being a cell phone?
> Why do *all* of the cell phones tout their ability to play MP3 files,
> display photos, and all sorts of stuff I don't want, and yet they have
>
> at best mediocre functionality as a phone?
>
> What
Bizarroterl wrote:
> I could complain how the duet controller doesn't have built in GPS, cell
> phone, too big, too small, too expensive, wrong color, doesn't have a
> built in browser, blah, blah, blah.
At the risk of going way OT here.
What he said.
Why can't I buy a cell phone that is good at
I could complain how the duet controller doesn't have built in GPS, cell
phone, too big, too small, too expensive, wrong color, doesn't have a
built in browser, blah, blah, blah.
but I like the design, it's quite a bit less expensive than the
alternatives, and it's just what I was looking for. I
meep;255745 Wrote:
> If the controller can control softsqueeze (?) save on the receiver and
> just plug your pc audio out into the car system? Or use a Nokia 770/800
> and get GPS as well?
>
> PeterI already have a GPS receiver, plus for car use I think the more
streamlined the user interface is
gorman;255743 Wrote:
> Is a setup like this reasonable/doable?
>
> 1 Car PC in the trunk running SqueezeCenter
> 1 Receiver in the trunk connected to the car's audio system
> 1 Controller in the car to control your music
If the controller can control softsqueeze (?) save on the receiver and
jus
Is a setup like this reasonable/doable?
1 Car PC in the trunk running SqueezeCenter
1 Receiver in the trunk connected to the car's audio system
1 Controller in the car to control your music
--
gorman
gorman's Profile: htt
It looks good but like the SB I think I will wait for Version 3
--
DaveBrennan
DaveBrennan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6357
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41
clarkgable;255713 Wrote:
> Question:
> Will the new remote by itself (without the receiver) replace my Nokia
> 800 web interface control?
Answer: Yes, but only for controlling your SBs, not general web
browsing like you can do with the Nokia 800.
--
aubuti
-
I have two setups:
In my apartment I have a Transporter connected via ethernet wire to a
mac with an external drive; the mac can also access my wireless
network.
In my country house I have an SB3 accessing music stored on a mac
wirelessly.
Question:
Will the new remote by itself (without the recei
nicky6;255670 Wrote:
> Hi!
>
> it seems everyone is really interested in the controller. Me however,
> is more interested in the sound quality. How does this new little black
> box called the Receiver fare against the ol' SB3 in terms of sound
> quality using the built-in DAC's (Wolfson vs BB)?
nicky6;255670 Wrote:
> Hi!
>
> it seems everyone is really interested in the controller. Me however,
> is more interested in the sound quality. How does this new little black
> box called the Receiver fare against the ol' SB3 in terms of sound
> quality using the built-in DAC's (Wolfson vs BB)?
nicky6;255670 Wrote:
> the controller is derived from the Useless DJ BadSound system ;)
I've seen this come up before. Let me answer: no, no, NO.
There is not a single line of code in the Squeezebox controller shared
with the Logitech Wireless DJ. The Squeezebox controller is engineered
entire
Hi!
it seems everyone is really interested in the controller. Me however,
is more interested in the sound quality. How does this new little black
box called the Receiver fare against the ol' SB3 in terms of sound
quality using the built-in DAC's (Wolfson vs BB)? And why did you go
with Wolfson ra
IRJ;255651 Wrote:
> I do not understand why the new SBR hasn't been enabled to be controlled
> by WiFi, to give users and especially long standing costomers a choice.
That's because it *is* enabled to be controlled by wifi. At the present
time you need the Controller for initial configuration of
>To control an SBR one needs the new $250.00 controller so going the new
route would cost me $400.00 for one extra SB(R).
Hopefully, this will quickly be addressed by Logitech or by the
community. I cannot imagine a reason the controller could not be setup
by plugging a PC to the Ethernet port.
IRJ wrote:
>
> Now they issue a new SB, the SBR, for an excellent $150.00. I became
> excited that I could pair with my original SBs and continue to control
> them all with my WiFi. Although some seem to think this is clunky, I
> find it highly satisfactory. But Nope! To conrol an SBR one needs th
IRJ;255651 Wrote:
> I still do not understand the SD pathway.
>
> For quite some time I have held off buying more SB(3)s as while I
> considered them excellent technically, I felt they had become rather
> over priced. I was hoping the morphing with Logitech's people would
> reduce the hardware c
Any reason why the new devices aren't 802.11n draft 2.0 compliant. With
most n routers, mixing g and n clients slows the whole network down. I
bet there are lots of people like me who would be relying on wifi for
the multi-room setups. It would be nice to have the higher speed and
lower risk of dr
I still do not understand the SD pathway.
For quite some time I have held off buying more SB(3)s as while I
considered them excellent technically, I felt they had become rather
over priced. I was hoping the morphing with Logitech's people would
reduce the hardware cost of these machines.
Now the
Mnyb;255569 Wrote:
> If my SB3 fails to conect to SN for some reason, isnt that a catch22 how
> do i piont it back SC (my computer) with the Controller ? do I have to
> bring forth the old remote or can future versions of SC7 take over from
> the serverside (i'm at 6.5.4 myself)
The Controller is
The specs list Apple Lossless as a supported format, and don't mention
transcoding. Does this mean that ALAC is now supported natively? I'd
love to have FFWD/REW support for Apple Lossless (drat iTunes for not
supporting FLAC).
--
jgs
--
CES starts today (I believe) and that is a very important platform for
launching new product, hence the timing.
I'm sure SD and Logitech decided to launch with the functionality that
is currently reliable.
Bear in mind that launch and shop availability can be some months
apart, and that in the i
thomsens;255541 Wrote:
> No offense to SD, but the initial explanation of "it cost us a lot to
> build, so it has to cost that much for you. Plus, we'll do the basic
> stuff to make the remote control work, but enabling the extra hw will
> be your responsibility to take care of" comes off as a l
If my SB3 fails to conect to SN for some reason, isnt that a catch22 how
do i piont it back SC (my computer) with the Controller ? do I have to
bring forth the old remote or can future versions of SC7 take over from
the serverside (i'm at 6.5.4 myself)
--
Mnyb
--
How will a transporter owner shift between a digital input or SC
without being conected to SC or SN. Or Controll volume etc.
With the digital ins it's possible to use transporter as a dac/preamp
without being connected to anything ?
An ir applet is much needed for that otherwise you need two remo
earthbased;255515 Wrote:
> Harmony integration?
Now that I would buy!
--
jdc0730
jdc0730's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14872
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=4
sbjaerum;21 Wrote:
> There is currently a test applet that makes it possible to control
> SB/Transporter using the IR emitter on the Controller.
> I am sure it is possible to extend on that so that the Controller will
> act as a universal IR remote.
Adding just some simple IR learning would
I think the sticker shock is less pronounced if you think of it starting
from scratch with a multi room setup in mind. All of you with 3 or 4
SB3's have equal capability at almost the same cost.
In thinking through the target audience for the duet, I am not sure
that SD has yet hit the nail on t
stevek1006;255548 Wrote:
> That's interesting -- I did not see that anywhere in the specs. Still,
> the emitter does little good if we cannot program the remote for our
> equipment. Will that be possible?
There is currently a test applet that makes it possible to control
SB/Transporter using the
stevek1006;255548 Wrote:
> That's interesting -- I did not see that anywhere in the specs. Still,
> the emitter does little good if we cannot program the remote for our
> equipment. Will that be possible?
If someone writes an extension to the software to let you do it. This
someone may be Logitec
andyg;255535 Wrote:
> The controller does have an IR emitter.
That's interesting -- I did not see that anywhere in the specs. Still,
the emitter does little good if we cannot program the remote for our
equipment. Will that be possible?
--
stevek1006
-Steve
--
Stev
I'm in the it's too expensive camp as well. I think what's happened to
many of us is that we feel we've been offered a $300 remote control for
our SB3s and Transporters and clearly that's a lot of money for a
dedicated remote control (i.e., not a universal). No offense to SD,
but the initial exp
The controller does have an IR emitter.
--
andyg
andyg's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3292
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41813
___
GCFL;254822 Wrote:
> Please forgive me if this is posted in the incorrect location. I am
> currently running four zones via a Zon audio system in my home. I am
> seriously considering purchasing the Duet and plugging it in as one of
> the music sources so I can access streaming Internet radio,
Hi,
I think its a shame that the IR Blaster port has been removed.
That would be very useful to switch power on an amp (and control the
volume). So the whole thing could be hidden in a cabinet. Only the
controller would be visible.
Regards,
Michael
--
kunze
---
Peter;254876 Wrote:
> ModelCitizen wrote:
> > Phil Meyer;254852 Wrote:
> >
> >> What's the main benefits of the SqueezeBox Controller over a PDA?The
> interface is much slicker and much, much more responsive than the
> >>
> > web gui. The web gui is very clunky and slow in comparison (or
I also already have a SB3 and would like to have a remote like in the
Duet - but it does seem very expensive for what it will add to my
setup. Shame.
--
elziko
elziko's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?use
Rick B.;255500 Wrote:
> Me, too. I'm really disappointed. I already have an SB3 and the new
> remote is just what I'm looking for - but not at this price.
I must confess Im a little disappointed in the Duet as an existing
user. If starting from scratch I can see its a great piece of kit but
as
Greg Friedman;255246 Wrote:
>
> Had the controller debuted with a $150 price tag, I would have easily
> justified the purchase. At $299 it doesn't make sense to me.
>
Me, too. I'm really disappointed. I already have an SB3 and the new
remote is just what I'm looking for - but not at this pric
bhaagensen;255342 Wrote:
> [...] they have to start somewhere. They could have offered a client for
> e.g. the iphone, n800 and symbian, but multiplatform developement takes
> more time, [...]. Moreover the entire platform is open, so anyone is
> free to create a better and cheaper solution, or e
Peter;255463 Wrote:
> smg wrote:
> > Ive read somewhere, that like the SB3, the Controller is always on.
>
> > With my SB3, however, I can at least switch it off at the mains at
> the
> > end of day or when it isnt being used for an extended period.
> >
> > Does this mean that the controller c
The reciever is "always on"... appart from when you pull the plug :)
The remote us usually on, and goes into power save when not in use (the
accelerometer wakes it up when you pick it up, very cool). You can
switch it off though. The home button acts as a power button as well.
Holding it down wil
smg wrote:
> I’ve read somewhere, that like the SB3, the Controller is always on.
> With my SB3, however, I can at least switch it off at the mains at the
> end of day or when it isn’t being used for an extended period.
>
> Does this mean that the controller can’t be switched off at all?
>
Yes
Ive read somewhere, that like the SB3, the Controller is always on.
With my SB3, however, I can at least switch it off at the mains at the
end of day or when it isnt being used for an extended period.
Does this mean that the controller cant be switched off at all?
--
smg
--
> The new hardware doesn't add any new requirements to your host setup,
> but running SqueezeCenter 7.0 might. I don't know the status of
> running SC7 on QNAP, but if it runs well there, then the new hardware
> should work fine.
flipflip has SC7 running on the Diskstations, which are similar de
Ian_F;255366 Wrote:
> Thanks for the prompt reply Dean. I'll just sit tight for now then. I
> don't believe anyone has SC7 up and running on the QNAP yet but I've
> been away from the scene for a few weeks so I may be mistaken. It won't
> be a show stopper if I do have to upgrade it. Boys and the
seanadams;255393 Wrote:
> //
> // 5. I am considering loading my library (and a bunch of other stuff
> I'd like to see stored safely in a RAID array) onto a Buffalo
> TeraServer (or similar) NAS. Any special trick to get the Duet to work
> with that? Is the Buffalo a good choice or does someone h
//1. Does the Controller also work with Transporter?
Yes
//2. If so, does that mean the "party mode" thing would also work with
a Transporter and a Receiver?
Yes
//3. Is there any limitation on the size of a music library that the
controller can deal with?
No
// 4. Am I right in thinking th
Hello. Congrats on your launch! Was considering Sonos recently, but was
delighted to discover what Slim Devices has been up to. Then I refresh
the site and find the Duet announcement -- sweet! Having the controller
will significantly boost the WAF (Wife Acceptance Factor) for Slim
Devices! Glad I
Mnyb;254877 Wrote:
> There are stupendeus price hikes if one sees the European prices :-(
> at
> http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/speakers_audio/wireless_music_systems/
>
> Qucik calc for the swedish prices including 25% VAT:
>
> 399$*6.2031*1.25=3094 SEK
> The suggested logitech price 3999 SE
Bradley;254766 Wrote:
> What about if you just bought the controller and not the receiver?
> Would the SB3's provide the same functionality?
I see the answer to this is "YES" - very good!
What about the reverse? Would my existing "SlimRemote" (PDA based) [or
even Moose or SlimServer for that m
dean blackketter;255357 Wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008, at 3:40 PM, Ian_F wrote:
> > First of all, congratulations on the announcement of the new product
>
> > (s).
> > I've no doubt there are some very worried people over at Sonos HQ!
> >
> > Looking through the specs (under the System requirements
>
On Jan 6, 2008, at 3:40 PM, Ian_F wrote:
> First of all, congratulations on the announcement of the new product
> (s).
> I've no doubt there are some very worried people over at Sonos HQ!
>
> Looking through the specs (under the System requirements
> '_on_this_page_' (http://www.slimdevices.com/p
mvalera;254681 Wrote:
> Some really really big pics for those who want them (The LCD is
> simulated):
> http://www.slimdevices.com/images/jive/jive_beauty_large.jpg
Good choice of music!
--
Timothy Stockman
Timothy Stockm
First of all, congratulations on the announcement of the new product(s).
I've no doubt there are some very worried people over at Sonos HQ!
Looking through the specs (under the System requirements
'_on_this_page_' (http://www.slimdevices.com/pi_duet.html)) I see
you're quoting 256MB of RAM as a r
Greg Friedman;255246 Wrote:
>
> On the other hand, the Nokia N800 has all of these capabilities of the
> controller and much more (touch screen, built-in camera for video
> conferencing, FM radio, Opera, multiple expansion slots, ...). The N800
> currently retails for as low as $239. With its to
Sadly these this restriction will mean I will refrain from buying more
slimdevices until it is lifted (or hacked). I need more machines. In
the meantime I AM at risk of looking towards other products. Don't mean
to be unpleasant, but that's my perspective.
--
IRJ
---
Yes, the controller and receiver will be available separately, as well
as together. The web site has prices for them individually as well as
combined. $150 SBR, $300 SBC, $400 both.
On Jan 6, 2008 4:35 PM, lreinstein
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> dean blackketter;255088 Wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 200
dean blackketter;255088 Wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008, at 2:36 AM, Phil Meyer wrote:
> > How long will the Controller's full battery charge last?
> That depends on the usage. Constant usage is around 3 hours now, but
>
> that's without any power management at all. When the screen dims
> and the
They have a 30 day no questions asked return policy, unless things
have changed, so I don't see why you couldn't.
On Jan 6, 2008 4:24 PM, lreinstein
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Congrats...this looks amazing!
> > My problem--
> > I just bought the SB3 (arrived only last week!) but LOVE the desig
They've stated elsewhere that this restriction may not always exist,
but it does right now. Probably it simplifies things for them, which
is important at the initial product launch.
Also, pet peeve of mine, "to beg the question" does not mean "to raise
the question"... Although I guess it will c
mvalera;254681 Wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that we have launched the all new Squeezebox
> Duet!
>
> Squeezebox Duet lets you listen to the music you love in any room in
> your home. Access millions of songs even when your computer is off.
> The multi-room controller with 2.4-inch color di
Video from CES by Engadget
http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/
However, it doesn't really do it justice.
--
Paul Webster
Paul Webster
http://www.lastfm.com/user/BondJamesBond
Paul Webster's
scrosland;255176 Wrote:
> Surely the new Jive software stack could be made to run on the Nokia
> tablets? Then we'd have the benefit of a decent tablet with browser and
> so on, and a decent Squeezebox controller all in one.
>
> Simon
This is exactly what I wish they'd done.
Had the controller
On Jan 6, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Fifer wrote:
> But not one -per- SBR? (Can you have a setup with one controller and
> multiple receivers?)
Right. One Controller can set up and control any number of Receivers.
-dena
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.s
dean blackketter;255195 Wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008, at 10:14 AM, IRJ wrote:
> > I need some clarification.
> >
> > If I have say an existing SB1 or 2 or 3, can I add a new SBR and
> > control both from my existing WiFi PDA?
> At this time you need a Squeezebox Controller to set up a Squeezebox
> R
But not one -per- SBR? (Can you have a setup with one controller and
multiple receivers?)
--
Fifer
Fifer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=639
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showth
On Jan 6, 2008, at 10:14 AM, IRJ wrote:
> I need some clarification.
>
> If I have say an existing SB1 or 2 or 3, can I add a new SBR and
> control both from my existing WiFi PDA?
At this time you need a Squeezebox Controller to set up a Squeezebox
Receiver.
___
I loved the initial product since it was focussed on high sound quality
with interesting features like an open source client/server.
The new commander look to me as a mere wifi micro PDA, ideally
one could control any streaming media server with
any form of computing device with communication fa
When will the controller be aviable as a separate item then ? is there a
release date decided
--
Mnyb
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/sho
mortslim;255016 Wrote:
> I also want to follow up on the comments that the new controller is
> better than a pda (e.g. the nokia web tablets - 770, 800, 810)
>
> If the idea is to have something handheld rather than a desktop or
> laptop computer to control the receiver, then looking at form fac
Mnyb;255165 Wrote:
> How much bandwitdh will the controller use over the wifi ?
Not much. It is only downloading lists in text form, plus small
graphics for the covert art. It would be roughly equivalent to browsing
simple web pages from a wireless laptop.
> Is there any risc off audiable droop
How much bandwitdh will the controller use over the wifi ?
Is there any risc off audiable droopouts when scrolling with the
controller ? just a thougth
--
Mnyb
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?useri
macintoys.nl;254874 Wrote:
> Are you sure? I hope so! But the controller and the receiver both have
> 64MB Ram. Isn't that used for indexing or so?
That is inadvertently very misleading and will be rephrased. The
controller has 64 mega_bytes_, but the Receiver, Squeezebox and
Transporter are all
I need some clarification.
If I have say an existing SB1 or 2 or 3, can I add a new SBR and
control both from my existing WiFi PDA?
--
IRJ
IRJ's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7031
View this thre
A possibillity, would be if logitech could offer some kind off
"preconfig" service untill SC gets the abillity to set IP in SBR
--
Mnyb
Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143
View this thread:
bretonfou;255058 Wrote:
>
> Before i had a squeezebox, i enjoyed it but i broke down after 18
> monthes and there is no way to fix it and the warranty is over.
>
>
> The advantage of using something else than what logitec sell is that it
> can be repaired.
>
>
How long ago did it break down
mortslim;255008 Wrote:
> I also assume that your own computer can control the new receiver so you
> really don't need any remote (neither the new one nor the old one).
Once it's setup on the network, yes. It will basically look like any
other player to either the new controller or the SqueezeCen
mecouc;255022 Wrote:
> The new controller doesn't seem to have enough buttons.
>
> How would I use it to type a search when there are no alphanumeric
> buttons? It doesn't have a touch screen for that does it? No.. can't
> do... else there'd be no buttons at all.
Text entry is via the scroll w
I loved the initial product since it was focussed on high sound quality
with interesting features like an open source client/server.
The new commander look to me as a mere wifi micro PDA, ideally
one could control any streaming media server with
any form of computing device with communication fa
mortslim;255036 Wrote:
> It seems that logitech passed out some of these new units to some
> existing customers as beta testers who apparently kept the secret till
> the official announcement.
>
> I would like to be on the beta tester list when the next iteration
> appears three years hence :)
F
It seems that logitech passed out some of these new units to some
existing customers as beta testers who apparently kept the secret till
the official announcement.
I would like to be on the beta tester list when the next iteration
appears three years hence :)
--
mortslim
--
mrfantasy;255028 Wrote:
> They have said that, and I can see why it has to be true for a wireless
> connection (you need to identify a network) but if you connect it to
> your wired network, there'd be no technical reason why it couldn't DHCP
> an address and then identify a SqueezeCenter, and le
mkozlows;255018 Wrote:
> Logitech people have said that you need the Controller for setup, and a
> Receiver by itself is not a functioning configuration. (I think;
> correct me if I'm wrong.)
They have said that, and I can see why it has to be true for a wireless
connection (you need to identif
mortslim;255008 Wrote:
> I also assume that your own computer can control the new receiver so you
> really don't need any remote (neither the new one nor the old one).
Logitech people have said that you need the Controller for setup, and a
Receiver by itself is not a functioning configuration.
The new controller doesn't seem to have enough buttons.
How would I use it to type a search when there are no alphanumeric
buttons? It doesn't have a touch screen for that does it? No.. can't
do... else there'd be no buttons at all.
--
mecouc
--
"the Controller? It doesn't manage the collection locally, but
communicates with SqueezeCenter. It will only keep those items in
memory which are to be displayed."
Anyone knows if it remember this when you powered off the server ? or
does it have to cache these thing's every time the server start
I also want to follow up on the comments that the new controller is
better than a pda (e.g. the nokia web tablets - 770, 800, 810)
If the idea is to have something handheld rather than a desktop or
laptop computer to control the receiver, then looking at form factor,
the nokia line seem to beat t
"the Controller? It doesn't manage the collection locally, but
communicates with SqueezeCenter. It will only keep those items in
memory which are to be displayed."
Thus from what the above quote implies and what can be gleaned from
other posts, it seems that the controller communicates either wit
I also assume that your own computer can control the new receiver so you
really don't need any remote (neither the new one nor the old one).
--
mortslim
mortslim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1
Well, Logitech.com is only showing the duet on the UK site. One of the
Slim guys (forgot which one) has already said the items will not be
generally available separately, but will be direct from them and
certain internet partners
BUT, Slim Devices only ship to the Americas - which means the r
501 - 600 of 648 matches
Mail list logo
