Re: [discuss] Suggestion: Compress/repair funktion.

2005-03-22 Thread Kenny Lyngberg
I can tell u what it does, but not how it does it. For example: A db of 500 KB, can be kompressed, with a funtion i Access in MS office. So that this file now only is 350 KB big. I'm sry I can't be at more help. But there's gotta be someone else who ar missing this function? Anyway. Thx for a

[discuss] Re: annoying

2005-03-22 Thread Jack Naree
not to mention the bloody hidden hyperlinks from other links whcih get carried over when you're trying to put you bibliography numbers in (a chore in itself) On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:20:41 +, Jack Naree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hate the automatic formatting in Openoffice, it's so

[discuss] annoying

2005-03-22 Thread Jack Naree
I hate the automatic formatting in Openoffice, it's so annoying, MS Word is such a refreshing respite from the restrictiveness of OO. It's a prime example of a software made un-userfriendly by loading it with too many functions and features. Should just have a basic wordprocessor with all the

Re: [discuss] Telling the user what gets lost

2005-03-22 Thread =?iso-8859-15?Q?Lars_D=2E_Nood=E9n?=
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Arkady V.Belousov wrote: [...] dozen different foramts? There are Word 6/95, Word 97, Word 2000, Word XP and Word 2003. How may be over _five_ versions be dozen formats? Yes. Over a dozen different formats. Some are more incompatible some are less. All lost data or

Re: [discuss] Telling the user what gets lost

2005-03-22 Thread =?iso-8859-15?Q?Lars_D=2E_Nood=E9n?=
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Jonathon Blake wrote: [snip] Depending upon how one counts, Lars missed between five and 200 versions of word. I'm sure there are major differences in versions of RTF and document templates as well but I only focused on the suite of .doc formats. I think one quickly reaches

Re: [discuss] annoying

2005-03-22 Thread Jonathon Blake
CPH wrote: Almost all of your other points are also possible to change. The only thing that _might_ be an issue is slow opening in comparison to MSOffice. Everything else he complains about can be configured by the user. xan jonathon -- A Fork requires: Seven systems with: 1+ GHz

[discuss] Articles relvant to OOo Base

2005-03-22 Thread =?iso-8859-15?Q?Lars_D=2E_Nood=E9n?=
Most users of OOo will probably use either Postgresql or MySQL for a back end, so these articles might be interesting: Jan Stafford. Migration prep, part 1: When to switch from MS SQL to MySQL. SearchEnterpriseLinux. 21 Mar 2005.

Re: [discuss] Suggestion: Compress/repair funktion.

2005-03-22 Thread Joerg Barfurth
Hi Kenny, [Consider subscribing to the mailing lists you post to. Most replies only go to the list. Please reply to the list only.] Kenny Lyngberg wrote: I can tell u what it does, but not how it does it. For example: A db of 500 KB, can be kompressed, with a funtion i Access in MS office. So

[discuss] Important missing spreadsheet feature

2005-03-22 Thread Fabio
Dear developers, I find that there is one important missing feature in the spreadsheet program: The possibility to set the colums label in number format in substitution of letter format. This feature is very useful in many many cases. Thank you, and good work for this very good program!!!

Re: [discuss] annoying

2005-03-22 Thread Jack Naree
whinging insults look, there's nothing personal in the comments I made; i simply expressed frustration, admittedly when i was tired and approaching a deadline, but I did try to be specific about the problems I was having. my experience is that pleasant suggestions are less likely to be taken

Re: [discuss] Suggestion: Compress/repair funktion.

2005-03-22 Thread Mathias Bauer
Kenny Lyngberg wrote: I can tell u what it does, but not how it does it. For example: A db of 500 KB, can be kompressed, with a funtion i Access in MS office. So that this file now only is 350 KB big. This functionality is available in *every* program that stores data in an indexed file

[discuss] Re: Telling the user what gets lost

2005-03-22 Thread Rod Engelsman
Jonathon Blake wrote: And who is going to document the things that are lost for each version of Word, RTF, etc? I would imagine the engineers that built the filters would know what works and what doesn't. Unless they don't test their product. That and user feedback in IZ. Rod

[discuss] Default settings - was annoying

2005-03-22 Thread Mr Rigel Anrndt
My two cents LOL. Jack Naree I. Uh, well. How about this Would it be possible to setup a section of the options to allow the user to define some default settings about what actions are automaticaly taken with cut / paste / copy, formatting text, tables, and other elements? This might allow

Re: [discuss] Google Desktop Search can now search OOo files

2005-03-22 Thread Mr Rigel Anrndt
What gave me the impression was that the interactions betweean application and the Windows OS is based on OLE and not appropriate process. Remember that the kernel does not police applications, and how they communicate with eachother. It only protects itself and its child components(the windows

Re: [discuss] Re: Telling the user what gets lost

2005-03-22 Thread Jonathon Blake
Rod wrote: I would imagine the engineers that built the filters would know what works and what doesn't That would be true, if, and only if, the engineers wrote one filter for each of the various file formats that proclaims itself to be word doc, orRTF, or any of the other export choices OOo

Re: [discuss] Re: Telling the user what gets lost

2005-03-22 Thread Mr Rigel Anrndt
Jonathon Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rod wrote: I would imagine the engineers that built the filters would know what works and what doesn't That would be true, if, and only if, the engineers wrote one filter for each of the various file formats that proclaims itself to be word doc,

[discuss] RPMs?

2005-03-22 Thread Donald Goldthwaite
Hi, I just want to weigh in on your decision to use RPM's only for the 2.0 beta version. I've been using this software ever since it was first released and I was using star office before that. I have been happy to have an office suite that allows the easy transfer between formats, and the

Re: [discuss] submitting issues with attachments?

2005-03-22 Thread CPHennessy
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 04:33, Mr Rigel Anrndt wrote: Is it possible to submit issues with attachments to issie/bug-zilla on openoffice.org web site bug report form? I installed a screen capture utility to resolve any confusion for developers as to the course of actions taken, profiling

Re: [discuss] annoying

2005-03-22 Thread Mr Rigel Anrndt
You mentioned something earlier about our company. We don't work for a company. Most and or all of us are volunteers working for free during our free time. If you have concerns about a free product(you get what you pay for)... Then feel free to go out and buy Microsoft Office at $300.00 plus

Re: [discuss] Speed of OOo beta

2005-03-22 Thread Daniel Carrera
For me it's all over the place. Most pre-release versions have been slow as a glacier. It's been frustrating. But the one I have running right now is actually faster than 1.x. So I can hope that it's some sort of debugging code that is slowing it down. Cheers, Daniel. On Mon, Mar 21, 2005

Re: [discuss] annoying

2005-03-22 Thread Mr Rigel Anrndt
Christian Einfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 22 March 2005 02:06, CPHennessy wrote: On Tuesday 22 March 2005 02:20, Jack Naree wrote: [ MODERATED ] *** I hate the automatic formatting in Openoffice, it's so annoying, MS Word is such a refreshing respite from

[discuss] Love at first site

2005-03-22 Thread Ovi Anton
Hello discuss, I am an Acces 97 end user and I looked for an equivalent (on 602 suite, koffice, Open Office 1.4.., etc.) for a long time ago, when started to search others OS and I found Linux distributions. Today, I installed the Open Office 2.0 version and I was surprised to

[discuss] Footnotes, symbols and line spacing

2005-03-22 Thread Josep Barcons
Good morning, I am using OpenOffice to write my PhD. I share at all your philosophy, and I am satisfied with the apllications, although in the last days I have had several problems when opening and trying to change the format of some chapters (I send you error reports). These are my ideas for

Re: [discuss] RPMs?

2005-03-22 Thread Eugene Wong
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 23:32:57 +, CPHennessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only problem with a download not being available in the correct package format for Slackware is that no one was willing to help. Can you help with this ? Actually, I'm not sure that I agree with that. I tried to

Re: [discuss] RPMs?

2005-03-22 Thread Daniel Carrera
Eugene Wong wrote: Actually, I'm not sure that I agree with that. I tried to form the Sets Project. It was called something else eventually, if I recall correctly. In the project we were supposed to create various types of download files, but it was really hard to find space to store these

[discuss] Re: annoying

2005-03-22 Thread Bill Sharpe
Jonathon Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CPH wrote: Almost all of your other points are also possible to change. The only thing that _might_ be an issue is slow opening in comparison to MSOffice. Everything else he complains about can be configured by the

[discuss] Managed Code

2005-03-22 Thread Mr Rigel Anrndt
This may be better directed at the Developer Community but I thought I'd start simple, so as not get to get laughed off the list. Can any developers who subscribe to this list and the developers list and have participation in the OOo development tell me if: A: There are any plans to upgrade

Re: [discuss] Managed Code

2005-03-22 Thread Travis Beaty
Hi! I'm not on the development team, but the idea of moving to .NET / Mono would be quite interesting. I'm not sure how doable it would be considering the large code investment they have in their current system, though. I would like to hear some official opinions, though. The developer

Re: [discuss] Managed Code

2005-03-22 Thread =?iso-8859-15?Q?Lars_D=2E_Nood=E9n?=
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Mr Rigel Anrndt wrote: [...] A: There are any plans to upgrade the OOo backbone to support the .NET framework? B: There are any plans to upgrade the memory and file handling to managed code? Could you please provide some links providing concise, low buzzword density