On 5/16/06, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One reason for not making the arguments always be evaluated is that in
> the current setup, you have ways to do both things: evaluate prior to
> render or evaluate once at import. If QuerySets were always called, you
> would lose the
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 22:28 -0400, Jay Parlar wrote:
> I'm experiencing some odd behaviour with the 'extra_context' field
> used by the generic views.
>
> I have an 'info_dict' in my urls.py that I *want* to define like this:
>
> info_dict = {
> 'queryset': Post.objects.all(),
>
> Is your house built on an old burial ground? Because I'm willing to
> entertain the possibility your computer might be possessed. :-)
>
>
Hmm. Sometimes it's seems so but I'm pretty sure that's not the case. ;)
> How are you running the webserver? Via 'manage.py runserver' or some
> other
Hi Todd,
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 22:06 -0400, Todd O'Bryan wrote:
> Given that the Documentation directs people to the download page to
> download something that doesn't exist, it might be worth it to either:
> a. update the documentation to reflect the fact that the release is
> not currently
I'm experiencing some odd behaviour with the 'extra_context' field
used by the generic views.
I have an 'info_dict' in my urls.py that I *want* to define like this:
info_dict = {
'queryset': Post.objects.all(),
'date_field': 'date',
'extra_context':
> Cutting and pasting your code into a clean project directory with the
> same Django code revision as yours, this all works for me. So, as you
> suspect, the problem is not with your code as written.
>
> Can you try the same experiment: start a new app and cut and paste the
> code as written
While it's great that the documentation has been updated to 0.92 (or
0.95 or whatever), it'd be nice to be able to download that version. :-)
Todd
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users"
Given that the Documentation directs people to the download page to download something that doesn't exist, it might be worth it to either: a. update the documentation to reflect the fact that the release is not currently there, b. create a beta release for people to use, or c. choose some other
On 5/16/06, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just checked in Subversion and it looks like version 0.92 or 0.95
> was never tagged as a release version. Is that correct?
That is correct. When the magic-removal branch was merged into the
main Django trunk, Adrian announced that once
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 20:13 -0500, Chris Moffitt wrote:
[...]
> I created a brand new app from scratch (including a new MYSQL database)
> copied just my models.py file over, typed the code and got the same result!
>
> I even tried the suggestion of clearing out all of the old .pyc files
> and
On 5/17/06, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just checked in Subversion and it looks like version 0.92 or 0.95was never tagged as a release version. Is that correct?Yes. This is correct.Just to make this perfectly clear, and head off the confusion that seems to be reigning:
The only
agreed :)
On 5/16/06, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/17/06, Todd O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I just checked in Subversion and it looks like version 0.92 or 0.95
> > was never tagged as a release version. Is that correct?
>
> Yes. This is correct.
>
> Just
Hi Jay,
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:24 -0400, Jay Parlar wrote:
> As an example, say I'm building a blogging app, and I want a right
> sidebar that always shows the last X post titles. What's the best way
> to template this?
>
> I've though of something like the following in a base.html:
>
>
>
I just checked in Subversion and it looks like version 0.92 or 0.95
was never tagged as a release version. Is that correct?
On May 16, 2006, at 9:05 PM, Todd O'Bryan wrote:
>
> While it's great that the documentation has been updated to 0.92 (or
> 0.95 or whatever), it'd be nice to be able to
On 5/17/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/16/06, Elver Loho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Let's take the poll sample. We've got the vote() view going on.
> >
> > choice.votes += 1
> > choice.save()
> >
> > Suppose we've got thread1 and thread2 going on (high-load website):
gabor wrote:
>
> for example, with the reverse_lookup test models, this query fails:
>
> >>> User.objects.get(poll__question__exact="What's the first question?")
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>File "", line 1, in ?
>File "/Users/gabor/src/django/django/db/models/manager.py",
On 5/16/06, Elver Loho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's take the poll sample. We've got the vote() view going on.
>
> choice.votes += 1
> choice.save()
>
> Suppose we've got thread1 and thread2 going on (high-load website):
>
> choice.votes is originally 16
>
> thread1.choice.votes += 1
>
hi,
(from-svn (today) django), postgres
reverse-lookups on foreign keys does not work for me.
i even created a new empty project, and copied the example models from:
http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/db_api/
into it, and tried the example reverse-query, and it did not work :-(
then
As an example, say I'm building a blogging app, and I want a right
sidebar that always shows the last X post titles. What's the best way
to template this?
I've though of something like the following in a base.html:
{% block sidebar %}
{% last_posts_list %}
{% endblock %}
Where
I have been hosted with these guys: http://www.bytemark.co.uk/ for
quite some time. I started out with them when they were a young
startup, and I can highly recommend them if you're looking for "full
control" solution.
They are a UK-based company, and they provide a very reliable "Virtual
If you haven't done it already be sure to try this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/django-users@googlegroups.com/msg06631.html
It's a problem with svn updates leaving old .pyc files lying around.
I noticed strange problems a couple of times that were fixed with this,
so now I do it routinely after
Ok. This was the problem:
1- A anterior instance of the webserver was in memory. This happend
when I try to debug it from Komodo (I don't know that is not possible,
or at least, is not simple).
That mean that I run another instance of it and get 2 separate
responses, depending if I let it open
On 5/16/06, Facundo Casco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I have this structure provs = {'0134': ['PSM', 0], '0135': ['GRAN',
> 0]} that I need to access from a template.
> [...]
> what I need is
>
> 0134 PSM 0
This should do the trick:
{% for prov in provs.items %}
{{ prov.0 }} {{ prov.1.0 }}
On 5/16/06, Jay Parlar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/16/06, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Jay Parlar wrote:
> >
> > >Hmm... So let me get this straight... When someone does an upload via
> > >my form, Django *temporarily* stores it in my uploads directory, with
> > >the
Hi,
This question is yet unsolved (for me). Does "order_with_respect_to"
have a widget in the admin interface (nothing seems to change). And
does it have an API, something like: object.move_up()
object.move_down() object.move_first() object.move_last(). And when I
delete an item, the bigger
On Tuesday 16 May 2006 02:48, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> Thinking out loud a bit here, more as a reminder to myself: but I
> wonder _why_ this worked? If you have no __str__ method, it will fall
> back to __repr__, so you should have been seeing the same output
> regardless. Are we stomping on
Hi, I have this structure provs = {'0134': ['PSM', 0], '0135': ['GRAN',
0]} that I need to access from a template.
What I have in the template is:
{% for prov in provs %}
{{prov}} {{prov.0}} {{prov.1}}
{% endfor %}
it outputs
0134 0 1
what I need is
0134 PSM 0
Can someone tell me what
exactly, thanx
english isn't my first language, sorry.
Perhaps we'll have group and user ldap storage?
:)
On 5/16/06, gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Joseph Kocherhans wrote:
> > On 5/16/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> the multi-auth branch targets some kind of 100%
On 5/16/06, gabor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Joseph Kocherhans wrote:
> > On 5/16/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> the multi-auth branch targets some kind of 100% external auth? because
> >> i've seen some approach using ldap+django users
> >
> > I'm not sure what you mean
Joseph Kocherhans wrote:
> On 5/16/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> the multi-auth branch targets some kind of 100% external auth? because
>> i've seen some approach using ldap+django users
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "100% external" but the backends that
> get used are
Jay Parlar wrote:
>Alright, let me see if I understand it this time: If you upload a file
>that's already been uploaded, then Django will lose the association to
>the old one, and it will essentially be sitting orphaned on the disk?
>
>
Exactly.
>For my use case, I actually want to keep every
On May 16, 2006, at 8:25 AM, Bill de hÓra wrote:
> Which is to say in Java land we used to start with manager classes and
> wish for generic DB APIs (like, we did that for *years*, until
> Hibernate/Ibatis came along). I've never seen any interesting db-
> backed
> app not need to go round
On 5/16/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the multi-auth branch targets some kind of 100% external auth? because
> i've seen some approach using ldap+django users
I'm not sure what you mean by "100% external" but the backends that
get used are controlled by the
the multi-auth branch targets some kind of 100% external auth? because
i've seen some approach using ldap+django users
On 5/16/06, Joseph Kocherhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/16/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone have news about it? progress, etc
>
> The
Joseph Kocherhans wrote:
> On 5/16/06, Filipe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Do you think I'll find difficulties in using model classes with my own
>> data persistency logic? In such case, will I loose other features
>> besides the ORMapping itself? (I've read something about loosing
>>
On 5/16/06, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jay Parlar wrote:
>
> >Hmm... So let me get this straight... When someone does an upload via
> >my form, Django *temporarily* stores it in my uploads directory, with
> >the "_" at the end of the filename, right?
> >
> No. It tries to save
On 5/16/06, Filipe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you think I'll find difficulties in using model classes with my own
> data persistency logic? In such case, will I loose other features
> besides the ORMapping itself? (I've read something about loosing
> autogenerated admin pages, form
I have been using Dreanhost for share webhosting service for a few
months already but I found out it is very unreliable. If there is a
higher traffic my site goes down. From the beginnig I was happy - no
problem - but now when more users come to my site - problems repeat
all over and over again.
Malcom, thank you for the reply
L.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
On 5/16/06, Douglas Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have news about it? progress, etc
The implementation is pretty much finished and committed. I have most
of the docs written, but I still need to review and commit them.
Someone has already written an LDAP backend and posted it
lcaamano wrote:
> We're not using Django yet but I think I have a good idea of how we'd
> use it in our framework. I'll try to summarize that in a few
> paragraphs, which hopefully will give you another idea of how to deal
> with the problem you present.
>
> We use two modules per table, one
Does anyone have news about it? progress, etc
thnx
Douglas
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
Is there a way to chain languages in the i18n interface?
We're using a custom Interchange tag right now to do i18n in our
webstore. We support Estonian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Russian, and
English. The language chaining goes something like this:
if locale is estonian:
print i18n(message,
I just migrated to m-r having used inheritance in my models.
I was seeing this behaviour
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_frm/thread/13a94a5ac9b5ff8a/f6fbcdd419ddf89e?q=page+not+found=1#f6fbcdd419ddf89e
only when I stumbled across your comment, did I realize that m-r does
not
> Scaffold Script maybe useful to you:
> http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/ScaffoldScript
At a first glance, this pretty much looks like what I need. I'll try it out.
> anyway I suggest looking at generic views, they make append\update easy.
> I found this tutorial useful:
>
Elver Loho wrote:
> Hiya!
>
> Someone raised this question in the comments of the 4th tutorial and
> it's been bugging me to no end.
>
> Let's take the poll sample. We've got the vote() view going on.
>
> choice.votes += 1
> choice.save()
>
> Suppose we've got thread1 and thread2 going on
I fear to get into trouble if I choose to use inspectdb, there are a
lot of composited primary keys and many-to many-relations in this DB (I
know that the ORM in Django supports m-to-m relations, but knowing it
is usually a sensible point in ORMs, I would prefer not to use an ORM
just yet).
Hi Phil,
I was already using the "new" syntax - so that wasn't the source of my
problem.
Honestly i still don't know the cause of the problem but by today it
resolved by itself. Suddenly my objects contain the correct methods...
I updated my trunk revision to latest (2917 as i write), that's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I came across this in Django's documentation:
> (http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/model_api/#many-to-one-relationships)
>
> (...)
> limit_choices_to:
> A dictionary of lookup arguments and values (...)that limit
> the available admin choices for this
Hiya!
Someone raised this question in the comments of the 4th tutorial and
it's been bugging me to no end.
Let's take the poll sample. We've got the vote() view going on.
choice.votes += 1
choice.save()
Suppose we've got thread1 and thread2 going on (high-load website):
choice.votes is
I came across this in Django's documentation:
(http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/model_api/#many-to-one-relationships)
(...)
limit_choices_to:
A dictionary of lookup arguments and values (...)that limit
the available admin choices for this object.
Instead of a dictionary this
It may not be exactly related to the problem you're having, but worth checking:
I was having some difficulty checking the right syntax for use when
referencing many-to-many fields recently, and noticed that the syntax
has changed from what is currently documented. You can find a chart
Hi,
I am experiencing exactly the same error with the same trunk revision
(2909). On irc no-one could really reproduce my django's behavior...
I posted yesterday on this list (topic: "ManyToManyField reverse lookup
not working"), but still don't have no clue why it doesn't work for me.
Looking
Hi,
> Yes. Have a look at this post from Adrian:
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_frm/thread/500d8cebe1f0c4e1/751e204668a0fdca?q=caching+questions=1#751e204668a0fdca
>
> He describes how URLs are stored in the cache and how to invalidate
> them. The original poster in that
Hello Gunnar,
I am sorry, that was kind of a copy error -- in my model names
maxlength is correctly set and it validates without errors.
I still have no clue why no reverse lookup methods are added.
derelm
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
Good question - short answer is it's not anything I tried to do, so I
don't know...
Cheers,
Tone
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi guys,
Sidestep question about 'limit_choices_to':
is it possible to limit choices of a foreign key according to
the value of another field in my model?
In your example, the value 'Administration' is hard-coded...
Thanks.
>
> Sorry Q,
> I forgot to add the WorkGroup definition;
>
> class
Hi!
Scaffold Script maybe useful to you:
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/ScaffoldScript
anyway I suggest looking at generic views, they make append\update easy.
I found this tutorial useful:
http://www.postneo.com/2005/08/17/django-generic-views-crud
On 5/15/06, Alexandre CONRAD <[EMAIL
Hello,
I cannot validate your model (python manage.py validate) since the Tag's name
has no maxlength. What happens if you add it?
Gunnar
Am Montag, 15. Mai 2006 18:49 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> hi,
>
> i am using this set of models:
> # -*- encoding: utf-8 -*-
> from django.db import
Sorry Q,
I forgot to add the WorkGroup definition;
class WorkGroup(models.Model):
groupName = models.CharField(maxlength=50)
def __str__(self):
return "%s" % self.groupName
That's where the 'groupName' is coming from in my lookup.
I'm using rev 2900 (ie the merged MR trunk) so
thanks malcolm,
I had prepared the necessary database changes in a script a while ago
turns out the documentation has changed since then... :-)
following the steps in the updated
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/RemovingTheMagic#Databasechangesyoullneedtomake
and everything works!!
thanks,
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 00:21 -0700, frank h. wrote:
> Hi I just migrated to magic-removal and everything seems fine (my views
> work etc)
When you say you "migrated to magic-removal", did you also follow the
database change insructions on this page:
Hi I just migrated to magic-removal and everything seems fine (my views
work etc)
...except that when I try to login into the admin app, I get an error
about
OperationalError at /admin/
(1054, "Unknown column 'django_content_type.model' in 'field list'")
Request Method: GET
Request URL:
63 matches
Mail list logo
