Hi,
Before I begin: I'm using newforms-admin r7508, which is a couple of
commits after the qs-rf update.
Here's my stack trace:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/var/www/mydomain/project/django/core/handlers/base.py", line
82, in get_response
response = callback(request,
It's beyond me why they would classify PHP as a web framework, and on
top of that, include CakePHP in the comparison as well... Other than
that, it's hardly an independant and unbiased review, coming from the
authors of web2py themselves.
A thing that does seem handy is their integrated ticketing
So qs-rf hit trunk and was merged into nfa on the same day! That's
excellent news, both for me and for django. Thanks so much for your
efforts Malcolm (and Brosner for the quick merge)!
regards,
Simon
Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> I merged queryset-refactor into trunk just now. This was changeset
@ Malcolm: I know, I didn't mean you'd need 31 separate Apache
processes at once. Most browsers only download a few files at once per
subdomain, but that usually still involves spawning new Apache
processes. How many is dependent on many factors of course. In the end
I still believe that
> Well, I have another server available now ;)
And you're using it for serving static content I hope? Your previous
setup with Apache serving everything with KeepAlive off can bring many
a server to its knees. If you serve a html page with for example 30
css, js and image files, you make a
Yes, apache needs that line for virtualhosting to work at all. If it
is not provided, apache just picks the first virtualhost it finds and
sends requests its way, regardless of Host header.
regards,
Simon
On Oct 20, 11:36 am, Wiley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham,
>
> I am not to my
Hello,
Has anyone gotten the file upload progress bar from ticket #4165 to
work in safari? It works great in IE and FF, but so far no luck on
safari. For some reason the xmlhttp requests get stuck on readyState 1
when a file upload is in progress. When I run them without a file
upload, the
I'm working on a sort of integrated email system where an
OutboundEmail can be sent to any number of Users. So naturally my
OutboundEmail model has an m2m relationship to User.
Today I've been fiddling with permissions on the User model. To my
amazement I need "change" permissions on
Why not use relative paths in your css files? They're relative to the
css file, not the html file, so you can do url(../images/diag.gif).
I'm assuming that all media files are on the same host and that only
the base media directory name is adapted to the svn version though.
regards,
Simon
On
Hi,
You'll want to take a look at ticket #2070 [1] for streaming uploads.
It has a working patch that will make it to trunk pretty soon I think.
I'm not sure how you would handle streaming uploads directly to a S3
bucket, but it shouldn't be too hard to hack the patch from the
ticket.
[1]
I'm a bit plagued by slow running tests as well, but i'm using an
acceptable workaround (for my uses). This workaround assumes that you
run your tests per app and that you only need to test a newly created
test case.
The idea is to use your keyboard interrupt to stop the test suite
after your
If your situation allows it, you could de-normalize and save the count
result in a separate table. Then you need to adjust the count whenever
you add / delete a row ofcourse.
If you're a database purist I might have made your stomach turn,
however :)
regards,
Simon
On Jun 7, 8:19 pm, Paul
I'm having some trouble solving a newforms problem that other people
must have run into as well. Feel free to share solutions or
workarounds if any.
Let's say I have a RegistrationForm that is used for registering new
users. It has the usual 'name', 'email', ... etc fields. When a new
user
,
Simon
On May 18, 12:55 pm, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, should have refreshed before replying...I had placed a test_a,
> test_z, test_zz in a particulartestclass and they ran
> alphabetically, but that was probably a coincidence apparently.
>
> Too bad this can't
As far as i know, select_related doesn't work across reverse
relationships. Sometimes it's possible to just query the base model to
achieve the same results, but not always.
Maybe its a good feature for the query.py rewrite, but i'm thinking it
could get ugly pretty fast. It would require a new
Great stuff again Malcolm. Perhaps it should be rehashed a bit and put
in the newforms docs under 'custom validation' ?
Just a thought :)
regards,
Simon
On May 22, 12:11 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 14:00 -0500, Tim Chase wrote:
> > > What is the
Apparently I can't see very far... Unit tests do not run in reversed
order. It appears to be alphabetically ordered.
I'm still wondering how to abort the test runner without losing my
stack traces though.
Regards,
Simon
On May 18, 11:26 am, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi a
ssell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 5/18/07, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi all,
>
> > I have unit tests for a particular app that take about 2 minutes to
> > complete. Needless to say, adding new unit tests to this
Hi all,
I have unit tests for a particular app that take about 2 minutes to
complete. Needless to say, adding new unit tests to this app and
running them is a time consuming process. I know that the old unit
tests will succeed and am basically only interested in the results for
the new unit
Ah brilliant. That would do the trick indeed.
Every now and then hidden gems like this one pop up that have been in
trunk all along, but somehow escaped my attention.
Thanks all
Simon
On May 4, 1:58 am, SmileyChris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You could write a function that takes Django's
tures of Django that
> there is little processing done to the actual request.
>
> Cheers,
> Mike Axiak
>
> 1:http://www.php-security.org/MOPB/MOPB-03-2007.html
>
> On May 3, 11:58 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at
, 12:22 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 10:03 +, simonbun wrote:
> > I've "svn up -r #"d through all the revisions and it seems 4905
> > causes it. Wich is the first import of the code.
>
> > Normally more people
to what my cause it? I've tried deactivation psyco
(grasping at straws here), but no change.
On Apr 20, 11:58 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 09:31 +, simonbun wrote:
> > I think this is going to weird you out even more. I wrapped it
Ofcourse it could always be a problem with this dev server, but it's
been in use for a couple of years without any problems. Its a pretty
standard debian woody setup with python2.4.4 and django over apache2.2
and mod_python3.2.10.
On Apr 20, 11:31 am, simonbun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
a problem with trunk, somewhere somehow.
Very weird error indeed, especially because after 2-3 requests the
problem goes away.
On Apr 20, 10:16 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 07:04 +, simonbun wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> > I'm gett
Hi all,
I'm getting a weird intermittent exception since i updated django from
trunk yesterday. When I reload apache and request any page I get an
exception for about 3 times, and then after that all goes as intended.
It seems to be a problem with the delayed_loader that replaces each
real_*
I think that most people that ask for "ajax integration" want to see
javascript helpers, as seen in many other frameworks. They're looking
for things like for example {% auto_complete_tag .. params ..%}; wich
would render an input box with the necessary javascript (inline..)
that makes it
Indeed, this feature is important to me too. I'm planning to implement
it myself, but obviously only after the newforms admin is finished.
I'll post it as a patch when it's done.
regards,
Simon
On Mar 12, 1:11 am, "jfagnani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I could add two foreignkey fields to
Good stuff! I am going to be needing this at some point and now i have
a good base to start from.
I have one enhancement that is very important to me (and should be to
everyone). Seeing as this is the type of filter that would be used in
blog comments for example, i would add a rel="nofollow"
This kind of translation support is something django really needs in my
opinion. If this gets implemented together with the unicode conversion
by the time 1.0 gets rolled out, i'd be very, very happy.
I've read your blog post and i do have some remarks. I think it's
better not to put the
The problem with getting the last record's id and using it, is that
someone might have inserted yet another record while you're still
working on the previous one.
For single user scenario's it's ok, or if you're using table level
write locking. Yet afaik, its generally a bad idea.
Exactly... and on that note: http://www.whitehouse.gov/robots.txt
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To
32 matches
Mail list logo
