Hi John, Jean,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> From the screenshot you sent me offlist, I can see the source of our
> miscommunication. You are using alfresco from
> documentation.libreoffice.org while I am using it from
> alfresco.libreoffice.org. The views are indeed
Hi Javier,
2011/6/24 Javier Oscar Cordero-Pérez :
> No, I think I was missed out. Hehehe, no worries, I'll check the files
> calmly on the weekend.
> Att.
> Javier
Did you get the Alfresco account details I sent you yesterday to the
mail address you're using here?
--
David Nelson
--
Unsubscrib
No, I think I was missed out. Hehehe, no worries, I'll check the files
calmly on the weekend.
Att.
Javier
On 06/23/2011 10:16 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Have you been able to get a login yet? I have a feeling that there were a few
people asking and i worry that someone might have been missed
On 6/23/2011 9:00 PM, planas wrote:
John,
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 00:30 +0100, John Cleland wrote:
Hi
I used LibO 3.3 to produce a PDF file on windows 7. Opening the PDF using
Acrobat X on windows 7 and you are able to use both highlights and comments.
The review parts also seem enabled.
High
John,
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 00:30 +0100, John Cleland wrote:
> Hi
>
> I used LibO 3.3 to produce a PDF file on windows 7. Opening the PDF using
> Acrobat X on windows 7 and you are able to use both highlights and comments.
> The review parts also seem enabled.
>
> Highlights and comments def
You need not do anything for Commenting and Analysis as long as you are
employing Acrobat Pro--any version going back to either 6 or 7.
However, in order to enable a vanilla PDF for other users employing
Adobe Reader, open the desired PDF and go to the Comments menu (Comments
> Enable for Comm
On 6/23/2011 7:32 PM, John Cleland wrote:
Hi
Thanks Jean, David and Gary for you help.
It may be right, that I am looking at a different view. I thought
that Alfresco had been upgraded because suddenly it looked different.
I will email a screenshot.
Regards
John
-Original Message---
From the screenshot you sent me offlist, I can see the source of our
miscommunication. You are using alfresco from
documentation.libreoffice.org while I am using it from
alfresco.libreoffice.org. The views are indeed very different.
The view you are using appears to not have the Checkout option am
It's pretty after midnight local time here, so a last answer for
today...
On Friday, 24. June 2011 01:00:38 Gary Schnabl wrote:
> On 6/23/2011 5:16 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
> > ... [Offering enhanced PDF Manuals]
>
> > So finally, why don't you "just do it" yourself?
>
> Duh! I did that--while I
Hi John,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:32 AM, John Cleland wrote:
> Thanks Jean, David and Gary for you help.
You're welcome.
> It may be right, that I am looking at a different view. I thought that
> Alfresco had been upgraded because suddenly it looked different. I will
> email a screenshot.
Y
[applauds]
From: John Cleland
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Fri, 24 June, 2011 0:30:23
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] HTML versions of the Guides
Hi
I used LibO 3.3 to produce a PDF file on windows 7. Opening the PDF using
Acroba
Hi
Thanks Jean, David and Gary for you help.
It may be right, that I am looking at a different view. I thought that
Alfresco had been upgraded because suddenly it looked different. I will
email a screenshot.
Regards
John
-Original Message-
From: Jean Hollis Weber
Sent: Wednesda
Hi
I used LibO 3.3 to produce a PDF file on windows 7. Opening the PDF using
Acrobat X on windows 7 and you are able to use both highlights and comments.
The review parts also seem enabled.
Highlights and comments definitely save. It maybe that this is possible
already without Acrobat Pro.
On 6/23/2011 5:08 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 14:18 -0400, Gary Schnabl wrote:
Having the Review and Comment functionality on a PDF (to be done with
Adobe Reader) must be first imparted by Acrobat Pro to that file. Trust
me...
Gary is correct on this point.
As for doing
On 6/23/2011 5:16 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 20:29:38 Gary Schnabl wrote:
On 6/23/2011 1:44 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:53:12 Gary Schnabl wrote:
On 6/23/2011 12:44 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
Hi Gary,
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:35:27 Gary Schnabl w
Hi all,
just to inform you:
due to a variety of recommendations for UI themes to be used for
official screenshots I'd like to search for a consensus on *one*
consistent UI theme for screenshots to be used on
- documentation (and it's localizations)
- website
- marketing material
- press kit
-
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 20:29:38 Gary Schnabl wrote:
> On 6/23/2011 1:44 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
> > On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:53:12 Gary Schnabl wrote:
> >> On 6/23/2011 12:44 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
> >>> Hi Gary,
> >>>
> >>> On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:35:27 Gary Schnabl wrote:
> Ther
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 14:18 -0400, Gary Schnabl wrote:
> Having the Review and Comment functionality on a PDF (to be done with
> Adobe Reader) must be first imparted by Acrobat Pro to that file. Trust
> me...
Gary is correct on this point.
As for doing that, Gary states elsewhere that it's a q
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 22:26:34 David Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Nino Novak
wrote:
> > BTW: What we are looking for is a collaborative editing tool. Does
> > Alfresco provide such a tool?
>
> Well, if you count the ability for a document to be checked out by a
> team m
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> thanks for the hint. I used that chapter and created the short howto out of
> it. I
> uploaded it in the file format pdf to the new extension-template-website. It
> is
> currently here: http://extensions2.libreoffice.org/help-
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:31 PM, planas wrote:
>> Most places that have any kind of leaflet, posters or documentation to
>> download
>> want to have some control over the way it looks. Sadly there is not an
>> adequate
>> Open Document Format so people use PDF. Since PDF is so widely used
Hi Nino,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
> BTW: What we are looking for is a collaborative editing tool. Does
> Alfresco provide such a tool?
Well, if you count the ability for a document to be checked out by a
team member and marked as such until checked in, then yes. Plus,
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 10:25:36 David Nelson wrote:
> Hi Nino,
>
> Sorry I got there late. If you need any help with Alfresco, please do
> feel free to buzz me.
Thanks, David.
At first glance, all seems self-explaining, so I'll return to you (or
the list) if I can't solve something myself.
Hi
Is the minor editing of pdf files a Reader functionality or must you use
Acrobat to have it. The best way is to test it on pdf file exported from
LO. Also, I believe most people are looking for a copy of the
documentation for reference not study. Thus, exporting from LO would be
the easiest ans
Gary
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 13:43 -0400, Gary Schnabl wrote:
> On 6/23/2011 1:25 PM, planas wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:04 +0200, C wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 18:53, Gary Schnabl wrote:
> > Therefore, I suggest that every OOo/LO PDF file be so converted by
> > Adobe A
On 6/23/2011 1:59 PM, planas wrote:
Hi
Is the minor editing of pdf files a Reader functionality or must you use
Acrobat to have it. The best way is to test it on pdf file exported from
LO. Also, I believe most people are looking for a copy of the
documentation for reference not study. Thus, expo
On 6/23/2011 1:44 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:53:12 Gary Schnabl wrote:
On 6/23/2011 12:44 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
Hi Gary,
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:35:27 Gary Schnabl wrote:
Therefore, I suggest that every OOo/LO PDF file be so converted by
Adobe Acrobat Profession
On 6/23/2011 2:15 PM, planas wrote:
Gary
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 13:43 -0400, Gary Schnabl wrote:
On 6/23/2011 1:25 PM, planas wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:04 +0200, C wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 18:53, Gary Schnabl wrote:
Therefore, I suggest that every OOo/LO PDF file be so convert
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 19:50:49 Gary Schnabl wrote:
> On 6/23/2011 1:44 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
> > On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:53:12 Gary Schnabl wrote:
> >> On 6/23/2011 12:44 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
> >>> Hi Gary,
> >>>
> >>> On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:35:27 Gary Schnabl wrote:
> Ther
On 6/23/2011 1:44 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:53:12 Gary Schnabl wrote:
On 6/23/2011 12:44 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
Hi Gary,
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:35:27 Gary Schnabl wrote:
Therefore, I suggest that every OOo/LO PDF file be so converted by
Adobe Acrobat Profession
On 6/23/2011 1:31 PM, C wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 19:15, Gary Schnabl wrote:
It may be a nice-to-have feature, but due to cost and OS restrictions,
it will probably remain a nice-to-have.
It costs the users absolutely NOTHING, I repeat NOTHING, as long as any
version of Adobe Reader that
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:53:12 Gary Schnabl wrote:
> On 6/23/2011 12:44 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
> > Hi Gary,
> >
> > On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:35:27 Gary Schnabl wrote:
> >> Therefore, I suggest that every OOo/LO PDF file be so converted by
> >> Adobe Acrobat Professional afterward, prior t
On 6/23/2011 1:25 PM, planas wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:04 +0200, C wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 18:53, Gary Schnabl wrote:
Therefore, I suggest that every OOo/LO PDF file be so converted by
Adobe Acrobat Professional afterward, prior to release so that
OOo/LO users will have that extr
Windows users might desire to take advantage of a one-day-only free
giveaway of a Window utility...
BTW, I come across a fair number of giveaways and deeply-discounted
hardware and software items through this source. Haste is usually
required for most items, as they rapidly sell out. But there
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 19:15, Gary Schnabl wrote:
>> It may be a nice-to-have feature, but due to cost and OS restrictions,
>> it will probably remain a nice-to-have.
>>
>
> It costs the users absolutely NOTHING, I repeat NOTHING, as long as any
> version of Adobe Reader that was released within
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:04 +0200, C wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 18:53, Gary Schnabl wrote:
> >>> Therefore, I suggest that every OOo/LO PDF file be so converted by
> >>> Adobe Acrobat Professional afterward, prior to release so that
> >>> OOo/LO users will have that extra functionality.
> >
On 6/23/2011 1:04 PM, C wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 18:53, Gary Schnabl wrote:
Therefore, I suggest that every OOo/LO PDF file be so converted by
Adobe Acrobat Professional afterward, prior to release so that
OOo/LO users will have that extra functionality.
What purpose do you want this fun
Hi :)
Lol. Ok, so if anyone has time then it can be done but the ODTs have that sort
of functionality anyway and it slightly defeats the purpose of providing a pdf.
A nice layer of extra icing if anyone has time :)
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Gary Schnabl
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 18:53, Gary Schnabl wrote:
>>> Therefore, I suggest that every OOo/LO PDF file be so converted by
>>> Adobe Acrobat Professional afterward, prior to release so that
>>> OOo/LO users will have that extra functionality.
>>
>> What purpose do you want this functionality for?
>
On 6/23/2011 12:44 PM, Nino Novak wrote:
Hi Gary,
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:35:27 Gary Schnabl wrote:
Therefore, I suggest that every OOo/LO PDF file be so converted by
Adobe Acrobat Professional afterward, prior to release so that
OOo/LO users will have that extra functionality.
What pur
Hi Gary,
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 18:35:27 Gary Schnabl wrote:
> Therefore, I suggest that every OOo/LO PDF file be so converted by
> Adobe Acrobat Professional afterward, prior to release so that
> OOo/LO users will have that extra functionality.
What purpose do you want this functionality fo
On 6/23/2011 11:31 AM, planas wrote:
Hi
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 10:41 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Most places that have any kind of leaflet, posters or documentation to download
want to have some control over the way it looks. Sadly there is not an adequate
Open Document Format so people use
Hi Jean, *,
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 23:25:07 schrieb Jean Hollis Weber:
> On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 19:36 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > in the last days I managed to create a new environment for an extension
> > repository. There are some duties left for the new repo. I think it
Hi
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 17:09 +0200, C wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 16:55, Nino Novak wrote:
> > So my statement would be:
> > Stay with ODF as master (as long as there is not a more conveniant
> > solution) and try to offer PDF /and/ HTML in addition. Ideally, the PDF
> > and HTML conversi
Hi
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 10:41 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Most places that have any kind of leaflet, posters or documentation to
> download
> want to have some control over the way it looks. Sadly there is not an
> adequate
> Open Document Format so people use PDF. Since PDF is so w
From: planas
To: documentation@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thu, 23 June, 2011 16:16:48
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] HTML versions of the Guides
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 04:27 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
> Le 2011-06-23 02:30, David Nelson a écrit :
> >
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 04:27 -0400, Marc Paré wrote:
> Le 2011-06-23 02:30, David Nelson a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > My 2 cents would be that the best format for guides is .odt, plus a
> > publication of the user-ready version in PDF.
> >
> > I don't think an HTML version would really be a useful ide
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 16:55, Nino Novak wrote:
> So my statement would be:
> Stay with ODF as master (as long as there is not a more conveniant
> solution) and try to offer PDF /and/ HTML in addition. Ideally, the PDF
> and HTML conversion should be done as automatically as possible, so no
> nee
On Thursday, 23. June 2011 16:13:56 Marc Paré wrote:
> We are essentially saying the same thing. For necessary files where
> the ODF cannot be read due to the inability of having LibreOffice
> installed to read ODF files then falling back on .pdf's is fine.
PDF has a different purpose: to show a
Hi :)
You have 6 seconds and 3 mouse-clicks to grab & hold a persons attention before
they leave the website. Demanding that they download and install an unfamiliar
product pushes people away unless the entire process is completed in under that
time.
People on an early visit may just open d
Hi :)
Have you been able to get a login yet? I have a feeling that there were a few
people asking and i worry that someone might have been missed out. I should
have tried tracking this better.
Apols and regards from
Tom :)
From: Javier Oscar Cordero-Pérez
Le 2011-06-23 04:35, Jean Weber a écrit :
I will chime in as well. I would rather see the ODF versions first and the
.pdf only if needed. We are, after all, telling people that we have the best
office suite on earth, so let's prove it! It does work!. I would even go as
far as not publishing any .
Hi :)
Most places that have any kind of leaflet, posters or documentation to download
want to have some control over the way it looks. Sadly there is not an
adequate
Open Document Format so people use PDF. Since PDF is so widely used it forces
everyone to use it. I don't think we can make a
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
> Marc, please see my earlier note about the importance and necessity of
> providing PDFs.
Yeah, I'd agree with Jean about it being important to provide PDFs.
Past discussions on this list led to a consensus that ODF's .odt
format is the bes
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 18:27, Marc Paré wrote:
> Le 2011-06-23 02:30, David Nelson a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> My 2 cents would be that the best format for guides is .odt, plus a
>> publication of the user-ready version in PDF.
>>
>> I don't think an HTML version would really be a useful idea.
>>
>
Le 2011-06-23 02:30, David Nelson a écrit :
Hi,
My 2 cents would be that the best format for guides is .odt, plus a
publication of the user-ready version in PDF.
I don't think an HTML version would really be a useful idea.
--
David Nelson
I will chime in as well. I would rather see the ODF ve
Hi Nino,
Sorry I got there late. If you need any help with Alfresco, please do
feel free to buzz me. All the latest and greatest Engish docs stuff is
on Alfresco, as Jean explained, but the wiki is being used as the
final drop point for user-downloadable product.
I'm busy working on workflows on
57 matches
Mail list logo
