On 1/13/2011 10:20 AM, David Nelson wrote:
Hi, :-)
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 00:08, Barbara Duprey wrote:
I'd definitely be glad to capture it somewhere. It seems like an extension
of the "to-do" list that's on the wiki -- is that on Alfresco, too? (I
haven't gotten into Alfresco at all yet, sor
Hi, :-)
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 00:08, Barbara Duprey wrote:
> I'd definitely be glad to capture it somewhere. It seems like an extension
> of the "to-do" list that's on the wiki -- is that on Alfresco, too? (I
> haven't gotten into Alfresco at all yet, sorry -- I've been working from the
> wiki.
I'd definitely be glad to capture it somewhere. It seems like an extension of the "to-do" list
that's on the wiki -- is that on Alfresco, too? (I haven't gotten into Alfresco at all yet, sorry --
I've been working from the wiki.)
On 1/12/2011 8:38 PM, David Nelson wrote:
Hi, :-)
It would be i
Hi, :-)
It would be interesting to see how Sophie's offered content could be
incorporated into the Alfresco site, to make it a reference resource
available to docs workers. Would you have time for and feel like
investigating that, by any chance, Barbara?
David Nelson
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:3
On 1/12/2011 1:22 PM, Gary Schnabl wrote:
On 1/12/2011 1:14 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
OK, it seems that "context menu" is the preferred choice. Thanks!
Sometime around twenty years ago, Microsoft and Apple employed differing forms--context versus
contextual--in their documentation. I forgot
On 1/12/2011 1:14 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
OK, it seems that "context menu" is the preferred choice. Thanks!
Sometime around twenty years ago, Microsoft and Apple employed differing
forms--context versus contextual--in their documentation. I forgot which
one used which. Other developers typ
On 1/12/2011 4:32 AM, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Hi Barbara,
On 12/01/2011 01:42, Barbara Duprey wrote:
[...]
OK, thanks. Sounds as if we should change that as we go. And we also
seem agreed on "dialog" rather than "dialog box" -- right?
That is what is used in the help files.
- For contextual
On 1/10/2011 9:09 PM, David Nelson wrote:
Hi, :-)
The term I have always used in my own work is "context-sensitive menu".
Similarly, I prefer "dialog box" rather than just "dialog"
But Hal mentioned an idea that we could compile a terminology glossary
for the team, so that we all stay on the
Hi Barbara,
On 12/01/2011 01:42, Barbara Duprey wrote:
[...]
OK, thanks. Sounds as if we should change that as we go. And we also
seem agreed on "dialog" rather than "dialog box" -- right?
That is what is used in the help files.
- For contextual menu/context menu: Contextual menu doesn't e
Despite a couple of people prefering "dialog-box" i think we have agreed that
"dialog" is better for us because it is easier to make all documentation and
help consistent if we use "dialog".
The problem with pop-ups is that there really are so many different kinds and
they do sometimes need to
On 1/11/2011 11:29 AM, Sophie Gautier wrote:
On 11/01/2011 19:41, Barbara Duprey wrote:
On 1/10/2011 11:48 PM, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Hi Jean, Barbara,
On 11/01/2011 06:31, Barbara Duprey wrote:
On 1/10/2011 8:22 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
Seriously, shouldn't you get the glossary from Sophie and s
On 11/01/2011 19:41, Barbara Duprey wrote:
On 1/10/2011 11:48 PM, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Hi Jean, Barbara,
On 11/01/2011 06:31, Barbara Duprey wrote:
On 1/10/2011 8:22 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
Seriously, shouldn't you get the glossary from Sophie and start with
that? It will probably contain most
On 1/10/2011 11:48 PM, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Hi Jean, Barbara,
On 11/01/2011 06:31, Barbara Duprey wrote:
On 1/10/2011 8:22 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
Seriously, shouldn't you get the glossary from Sophie and start with
that? It will probably contain most of the terms that the team needs,
without le
On 1/10/2011 9:54 PM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 21:31 -0600, Barbara Duprey wrote:
On 1/10/2011 8:22 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
Seriously, shouldn't you get the glossary from Sophie and start with
that? It will probably contain most of the terms that the team needs,
without leng
but i tend
to
prefer just standing on the side-lines and complaining about everything!
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Jean Weber
To: "documentation@libreoffice.org"
Sent: Tue, 11 January, 2011 2:22:35
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] pop-up is generi
Hi Jean, Barbara,
On 11/01/2011 06:31, Barbara Duprey wrote:
On 1/10/2011 8:22 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
Seriously, shouldn't you get the glossary from Sophie and start with
that? It will probably contain most of the terms that the team needs,
without lengthy debate.
Jean
I agree. What I was think
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 21:31 -0600, Barbara Duprey wrote:
> On 1/10/2011 8:22 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
> > Seriously, shouldn't you get the glossary from Sophie and start with
> > that? It will probably contain most of the terms that the team needs,
> > without lengthy debate.
> > Jean
>
> I agree. Wh
On 1/10/2011 8:22 PM, Jean Weber wrote:
Seriously, shouldn't you get the glossary from Sophie and start with
that? It will probably contain most of the terms that the team needs,
without lengthy debate.
Jean
I agree. What I was thinking about is a compilation not just of the terms, but also of
Seriously, shouldn't you get the glossary from Sophie and start with
that? It will probably contain most of the terms that the team needs,
without lengthy debate.
Jean
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011, David Nelson wrote:
> Hi, :-)
>
> The term I have always used in my own work is "context-sensitive
Hi, :-)
The term I have always used in my own work is "context-sensitive menu".
Similarly, I prefer "dialog box" rather than just "dialog"
But Hal mentioned an idea that we could compile a terminology glossary
for the team, so that we all stay on the same track
terminology-wise... Interested in
20 matches
Mail list logo
