I got a radeon, after upgrading to 2.4.19-rc1 I can't get direct hardware glx
to work, no matter what I try I only get indirect rendering with the tcl
branch. Did anyone else try rc1 with radeon?
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at
Hi Jos?!
Monday 24, at 10:16:51 PM you wrote:
As some of you already noticed, fixed binaries - i.e, including libdri.a
-, are now available on SF.
When [and if] the binary compatability of libdri.a is restored, let me
know and I'll restore the things as they were.
Jos? Fonseca
Hi Dri-devel!
Tuesday 25, at 12:16:57 AM you wrote:
Hi Smitty!
Monday 24, at 12:50:03 PM you wrote:
Well after beeing told to upgrade to XF4.2 from XF4.1 I did so:
So XF4.2 Indirect rendering
install the latest / last binary package from TG
XF4.2 with direct rendering (no TCL)
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:06:36PM +0400, Konstantin Lepikhov wrote:
Hi Jos?!
Monday 24, at 10:16:51 PM you wrote:
As some of you already noticed, fixed binaries - i.e, including libdri.a
-, are now available on SF.
When [and if] the binary compatability of libdri.a is restored, let me
In drm_context.h at line 558 we have:
queue = gamma_alloc(sizeof(*queue), DRM_MEM_QUEUES);
I think it should be:
queue = DRM(alloc)(sizeof(*queue), DRM_MEM_QUEUES);
so that it works with driver different from gamma doing alloc_queue.
Am I wrong? If not could someone fix that? Already done in
On Thursday 20 June 2002 13:11, you wrote:
I think you should upload it... Other people may be able to help finish it
or track down bugs...
Ok. Just uploaded the latest and greatest version of my driver in CVS.
The branch is named: s3virge-0-0-1-branch
1) Could someone have a try and let me
Would there be an interest in having binary snapshots [on the
bleeding-edge] for the s3virge-0-0-1-branch too?
José Fonseca
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:20:36AM -0700, Max Lingua wrote:
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
Module name: xc
Repository:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:53:53 +0200, max wrote:
In drm_context.h at line 558 we have:
queue = gamma_alloc(sizeof(*queue), DRM_MEM_QUEUES);
I think it should be:
queue = DRM(alloc)(sizeof(*queue), DRM_MEM_QUEUES);
so that it works with driver different from gamma doing alloc_queue.
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 13:37, you wrote:
Would there be an interest in having binary snapshots [on the
bleeding-edge] for the s3virge-0-0-1-branch too?
It could be a good idea for the ones (many users) who are not confortable in
building complex projects (like DRI).
Unluckily I still don't
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 02:43:39PM +0200, max wrote:
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 13:37, you wrote:
Would there be an interest in having binary snapshots [on the
bleeding-edge] for the s3virge-0-0-1-branch too?
It could be a good idea for the ones (many users) who are not confortable in
building
Hello
There are some Intel815 AGP changes in 2.4.19-rc1, but I am not sure
these are the problem.
Can you try to run testgart to see if problems are really agp-related ?
a+
--
Nicolas Aspert Signal Processing Institute (ITS)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)
On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 09:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Message: 11
From: max [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Keith Whitwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 12:22:01 +0200
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Dri-devel] S3 VIRGE DRI in CVS now
On Thursday 20 June 2002 13:11, you wrote:
I
I just tried to run my X in 1280x1024/24bpp (before it was 16bpp) and
lost DRM! I got it back only in 800x600/24. Now when we have AGP
textures working - what are the restrictions on resolutions/color depth?
Still no answer..:(
Could please anyone tell me why I cannot get 1280x1024/24bpp with
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:21:51PM +0100, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
I just tried to run my X in 1280x1024/24bpp (before it was 16bpp) and
lost DRM! I got it back only in 800x600/24. Now when we have AGP
textures working - what are the restrictions on resolutions/color depth?
Still no
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 02:43:39PM +0200, max wrote:
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 13:37, you wrote:
Would there be an interest in having binary snapshots [on the
bleeding-edge] for the s3virge-0-0-1-branch too?
It could be a good idea for the ones (many users) who are not confortable in
building
On June 25, 2002 10:43 am, Nicolas Aspert wrote:
Hello
There are some Intel815 AGP changes in 2.4.19-rc1, but I am not sure
these are the problem.
Can you try to run testgart to see if problems are really agp-related ?
a+
I'm not sure where to find the testgart util (I am indeed running
Is there anything reported on /var/log/XFree86.0.log or
/var/log/messages?
Nothing. In XFree86.0.log there is no word about DRI! I presume it is
because of this 3*screen size restriction.
Should this [3 * screen size] be in video memory or total AGP memory
would suffice?
The 3 * screen
Michel =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E4nzer?= writes:
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 14:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I noticed is that I did not have EnablePageFlip set to true
in my X config file. Setting this raised the fps to 660. Is there any
reason why this isn't the default?
There are
Jun 23 20:55:45 trinity last message repeated 638 times
Jun 23 20:56:46 trinity last message repeated 195 times
Jun 23 20:57:49 trinity last message repeated 366 times
Jun 23 20:58:50 trinity last message repeated 354 times
But this doesn't seem to be generated when I do a glxgears, only
Slava Polyakov wrote:
I'm not sure where to find the testgart util (I am indeed running it on an
i815B). Could you send me the tarball or give me a url to it?
http://ltswww.epfl.ch/~aspert/patches/testgart.c
or
http://dri.sourceforge.net/res/testgart.c
a+
--
Nicolas Aspert
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:29:40PM +0100, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
Is there anything reported on /var/log/XFree86.0.log or
/var/log/messages?
Nothing. In XFree86.0.log there is no word about DRI! I presume it is
because of this 3*screen size restriction.
Strange... When the 3 * screen size is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The numbers are after some iterations, when they are stable.
I think the answer is on your last sentence :)
On 22:52, lunedì 24 giugno 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 22:46, Willy Gardiol wrote:
I feel big differences between
Strange... When the 3 * screen size is checked an error message is produced and DRI
is given as disabled in the X log.
Sorry for misinformation. After detailed investigation, I found the
complain. It just was not prefixed with [drm]:))) So I need 13440K:(
Even yesterday Leif and I
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 19:53, Nicolas Aspert wrote:
Slava Polyakov wrote:
I'm not sure where to find the testgart util (I am indeed running it on
an i815B). Could you send me the tarball or give me a url to it?
http://ltswww.epfl.ch/~aspert/patches/testgart.c
or
Pay Your Bills and get Cash Back Too
Now is the time to refinance your home or get a second mortgage to
consolidate all of your high interest credit card debt.
Get all the Smart Cash you'll need!
Cash out your equity while rates are low! (UP TO 125%)
All USA Homeowners Easily Qualify!
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 09:41:16PM +0100, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
Strange... When the 3 * screen size is checked an error message is produced and DRI
is given as disabled in the X log.
Sorry for misinformation. After detailed investigation, I found the
complain. It just was not prefixed with
On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 16:34, José Fonseca wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 02:43:39PM +0200, max wrote:
In http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ as mach64 branch, the
old radeon tcl branch, and soon the radeon 8500 branch, or for any other branch (x86
Linux only I'm afraid).
OK.
On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 16:48, John J. Tobin wrote:
Is the Virge MX+ supported? This is the one that was commonly found in
notebooks, as that is what I will be testing it out on.
Yep. That is the laptop on which I developed my driver on. so it will run
better on it than on everything else ;
As I said before I still have to investigate. I can't give more answers
until I actually do it. (PS: reboot my machine to windows is not
something I do often or even like to do..)
Looking forward...
No double buffering, i.e., you would see stuff getting drawed over the
previous frame. If
8 MB AGP 1280 x 1024 @16bpp, 1024 x 768 @24bpp
That's what I have now. 1280x1024 16bpp. And able to run OpenGL apps
perfectly.
Note that an 8MB PCI card could get 1280x1024@16, but there would only
be ~191kB left over for textures, which isn't likely to be useable.
Well, but I
Here is a sort of simple shell script that I just thought of that might
make people's lives a little easier. Cut paste this into a file
(maybe /usr/local/bin/dri_debug.sh) and then add this line to your
equivalent of /etc/rc.local:
/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/dri_debug.sh
to have it run at boot time
On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 19:28, Jens Owen wrote:
Wow, looks like you've been busy. Let's see what kind of feedback you get.
A bit I had to study (laws + Savage4 docs). A bit I have to workc.
A bit I had to drive my Toyota MR2 Roadster. A bit I had to live.
; )
Feedback is starting to rise.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:32:59PM +0200, Massimiliano Lingua wrote:
On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 16:34, José Fonseca wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 02:43:39PM +0200, max wrote:
In http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ as mach64 branch, the
old radeon tcl branch, and soon the radeon
On 25 Jun 2002, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
8 MB AGP 1280 x 1024 @16bpp, 1024 x 768 @24bpp
That's what I have now. 1280x1024 16bpp. And able to run OpenGL apps
perfectly.
I assume you're referring to Window here, right? I don't think the
current cvs will enable DRI at this
Vid. mem Card type Max. 3D resolutions
- ---
4 MB Any 800 x 600 @16bpp, 640 x 480 @24bpp
6 MB PCI 1024 x 768 @16bpp, 800 x 600 @24bpp
6 MB AGP 1152 x 864 @16bpp, 800 x 600 @24bpp
8 MB PCI
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
On 25 Jun 2002, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
8 MB AGP 1280 x 1024 @16bpp, 1024 x 768 @24bpp
That's what I have now. 1280x1024 16bpp. And able to run OpenGL apps
perfectly.
I assume you're referring to Window here, right? I don't
If the critical feedback is already big now,
then first fix a bit in drivers
and then widen the testing audience.
A bit I had to study (laws + Savage4 docs). A bit I have to workc.
A bit I had to drive my Toyota MR2 Roadster. A bit I had to live.
; )
Feedback is starting to rise.
That's what I have now. 1280x1024 16bpp. And able to run OpenGL apps
perfectly.
I assume you're referring to Window here, right? I don't think the
current cvs will enable DRI at this resolution yet.
Well, I run it with DRI/Linux+XFree4.2.0. My screen resolution is
1280x1024 16bpp:
...
Will try 20020625 tonight.
Liam
it depends
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc.
Don't miss the IM event of the season | Special offer for OSDN members!
JabConf 2002, Aug. 20-22, Keystone, CO http://www.jabberconf.com/osdn
39 matches
Mail list logo
