On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:52:34PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
Philip Brown wrote:
So, why not do it by PCI vendor/devid ? That sort of information is visible
from the DRI level, I believe. I think its just another Xserver internal
call, isnt it?
So, what happens if I have four
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:35:25AM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:52:34PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
Philip Brown wrote:
So, why not do it by PCI vendor/devid ? That sort of information is visible
from the DRI level, I believe. I think its just another Xserver
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 05:55:55PM -0600, D. Hageman wrote:
So, why not do it by PCI vendor/devid ? That sort of information is visible
from the DRI level, I believe. I think its just another Xserver internal
call, isnt it?
I thought about
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, D. Hageman wrote:
I think spam filtering for dri-devel and dri-users would be a good
solution -- IMO, that would be better than moderation. For dri-patches,
the Reply-To is dri-devel. I'd rather have just commit messages and
nothing else on dri-patches. Any
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, D. Hageman wrote:
I think spam filtering for dri-devel and dri-users would be a good
solution -- IMO, that would be better than moderation. For dri-patches,
the Reply-To is dri-devel. I'd rather have just commit messages
Grepped latest stuff but multiple threads/apps do not work reliable.
Try 2 times ipers = X server locks up (hard).
First system run (?) but after SYSRQ+'K' hard hang.
SYSRQ+'S|U' works sometimes but after that SYSRQ+'B' do not ;-(
I do not belive that even Viewperf-6.1.2/7.x works flawlessly.
Thanks,
Dieter
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2003-02-16 at 12:42, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
I've downloaded mga packages from DRI site and installed it with sh
install.sh , and here all ok, but now at startup appears :
DRIUnlock called when locked, and in the session DRI have some problems.
I use debian SID
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 18:32, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2003-02-16 at 12:42, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
I've downloaded mga packages from DRI site and installed it with sh
install.sh , and here all ok, but now at startup appears :
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 19:25, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 18:32, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2003-02-16 at 12:42, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
I've downloaded mga packages from DRI site and installed it
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 19:25, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 18:32, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2003-02-16 at 12:42, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
I've downloaded mga
AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Thank you very much for your help , I've solved some problems, but
remains the problem with vendetta (and a problem with quake 3 that do
not play intro videos , but is not very important)
Do you have a link where I could get Vendetta? I can try that out
this week on
Philip Brown wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:52:34PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
Philip Brown wrote:
So, why not do it by PCI vendor/devid ? That sort of information is visible
from the DRI level, I believe. I think its just another Xserver internal
call, isnt it?
So, what happens if I
I believe that we're waiting to merge from XFree86 CVS until after the
official 4.3.0 release. Does anyone have any strong opinions one way or
another about this? My personal preference it to have to do as few
merges as possible. Merges tend to be fairly painful. :(
I think spam filtering for dri-devel and dri-users would be a good
solution -- IMO, that would be better than moderation. For
dri-patches, the Reply-To is dri-devel. I'd rather have just commit
messages and nothing else on dri-patches. Any comments/replies to
specific patches, or
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 19:32, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
But, what you mean with texmem-0-0-1 branch? Is a different branch of
CVS or is the ordinary CVS branch? (This is out yet in CVS, right? )
See http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/cvs.html .
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian
This is just a friendly reminder that the weekly dri-devel IRC meeting will
be starting in the #dri-devel channel on irc.freenode.net at 2100 UTC (or
4:00PM EST or 1:00PST, if you prefer).
Time zone conversion available at:
http://www.timezoneconverter.com/cgi-bin/tzc.tzc
Logs of previous IRC
Ian Romanick wrote:
AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Thank you very much for your help , I've solved some problems, but
remains the problem with vendetta (and a problem with quake 3 that do
not play intro videos , but is not very important)
Do you have a link where I could get Vendetta? I can try
Ian Romanick wrote:
AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Thank you very much for your help , I've solved some problems, but
remains the problem with vendetta (and a problem with quake 3 that do
not play intro videos , but is not very important)
Do you have a link where I could get Vendetta? I can try
Dieter Nützel wrote:
Grepped latest stuff but multiple threads/apps do not work reliable.
Try 2 times ipers = X server locks up (hard).
First system run (?) but after SYSRQ+'K' hard hang.
SYSRQ+'S|U' works sometimes but after that SYSRQ+'B' do not ;-(
I do not belive that even
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, D. Hageman wrote:
As stated in my previous mail, I do use spamassassin, and as such
I do not have a problem with spam. If you're not interested in
the discussion on despamming, then simply hit DEL on the messages
that do not interest you, and you'll lose no time at
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 17:03, Mike A. Harris wrote:
My point, is that freedom of speech grants me, and anyone else on
this mailing list the right to discuss the issue we are
discussing. You have the right to use procmail to filter out the
discussion when you are no longer interested in
As I was doing some minor cleanups in the mach64 drm in the new branch, I
made some additional search and replace conversions of the mach64 DRM to
the os independence macros (I couldn't restrain myself ;) ). However, I
want to share what I've done so far and get some feedback, since there are
a
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:24:10AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
So, what happens if I have four identical video cards in my system?
why would you want different configs for them?
There are probably as many different reasons as there are different
people that have such configurations. One
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 22:44, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
The texmem-0-0-1 branch is a separate branch within DRI CVS. You
would check that branch out by doing:
[...]
MMM, the modules in this snap shot does not compile. The Makefile.linux
is corrupted or does not
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 08:11, Sean E. Russell wrote:
On Sunday 16 February 2003 04:47 pm, Michel Dänzer wrote:
...
'Of course'? A crash is a bug. Does this patch help?
...
Unfortunately, it doesn't. I made sure that I unloaded the radeon and agpgart
kernel modules (although I didn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 17 February 2003 05:52 am, Michel Dänzer wrote:
The patch is only an attempt to fix the crashes with software cursor.
Heh. Sorry. I didn't try to crash the server.
Y'know, this gets me to thinking... getting accellerated GL working on X
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 16:18, Sean E. Russell wrote:
On Monday 17 February 2003 05:52 am, Michel Dänzer wrote:
The patch is only an attempt to fix the crashes with software cursor.
Heh. Sorry. I didn't try to crash the server.
Y'know, this gets me to thinking... getting accellerated GL
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 17:15, Leif Delgass wrote:
As I was doing some minor cleanups in the mach64 drm in the new branch, I
made some additional search and replace conversions of the mach64 DRM to
the os independence macros (I couldn't restrain myself ;) ). However, I
want to share what I've
29 matches
Mail list logo
