On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 17:15, Leif Delgass wrote:
> As I was doing some minor cleanups in the mach64 drm in the new branch, I
> made some additional search and replace conversions of the mach64 DRM to
> the os independence macros (I couldn't restrain myself ;) ). However, I
> want to share what I've
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 22:44, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
> Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> > The texmem-0-0-1 branch is a separate branch within DRI CVS. You
> > would check that branch out by doing:
[...]
> MMM, the modules in this snap shot does not compile. The Makefile.linux
> is corrupted or does no
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 11:24:10AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >>So, what happens if I have four identical video cards in my system?
> >
> > why would you want different configs for them?
>
> There are probably as many different reasons as there are different
> people that have such configurati
As I was doing some minor cleanups in the mach64 drm in the new branch, I
made some additional search and replace conversions of the mach64 DRM to
the os independence macros (I couldn't restrain myself ;) ). However, I
want to share what I've done so far and get some feedback, since there are
a cou
Dieter Nützel wrote:
Grepped latest stuff but multiple threads/apps do not work reliable.
Try 2 times "ipers" => X server locks up (hard).
First system run (?) but after SYSRQ+'K' hard hang.
SYSRQ+'S|U' works sometimes but after that SYSRQ+'B' do not ;-(
I do not belive that even Viewperf-6.1.2/
The DRI meeting on #dri-devel on irc.freenode.net is underway.
This is a reminder in case y'all forgot. ;o)
--
Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat
---
This sf.net email is
Ian Romanick wrote:
AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Thank you very much for your help , I've solved some problems, but
remains the problem with vendetta (and a problem with quake 3 that do
not play intro videos , but is not very important)
Do you have a link where I could get "Vendetta"? I can try
Ian Romanick wrote:
This is just a friendly reminder that the weekly dri-devel IRC meeting will
be starting in the #dri-devel channel on irc.freenode.net at 2100 UTC (or
4:00PM EST or 1:00PST, if you prefer).
Something has come up, and I won't be able to make today's meeting.
Just in case anyon
Ian Romanick wrote:
AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Thank you very much for your help , I've solved some problems, but
remains the problem with vendetta (and a problem with quake 3 that do
not play intro videos , but is not very important)
Do you have a link where I could get "Vendetta"? I can try
This is just a friendly reminder that the weekly dri-devel IRC meeting will
be starting in the #dri-devel channel on irc.freenode.net at 2100 UTC (or
4:00PM EST or 1:00PST, if you prefer).
Time zone conversion available at:
http://www.timezoneconverter.com/cgi-bin/tzc.tzc
Logs of previous IRC m
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 19:32, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
> But, what you mean with texmem-0-0-1 branch? Is a different branch of
> CVS or is the ordinary CVS branch? (This is out yet in CVS, right? )
See http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/cvs.html .
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/L
> > >> I think spam filtering for dri-devel and dri-users would be a good
> > >> solution -- IMO, that would be better than moderation. For
> > >dri-patches,> the Reply-To is dri-devel. I'd rather have just commit
> > >messages and> nothing else on dri-patches. Any comments/replies to
> > >spec
I believe that we're waiting to merge from XFree86 CVS until after the
official 4.3.0 release. Does anyone have any strong opinions one way or
another about this? My personal preference it to have to do as few
merges as possible. Merges tend to be fairly painful. :(
---
Philip Brown wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:52:34PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
Philip Brown wrote:
So, why not do it by PCI vendor/devid ? That sort of information is visible
from the DRI level, I believe. I think its just another Xserver internal
call, isnt it?
So, what happens if I hav
AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Thank you very much for your help , I've solved some problems, but
remains the problem with vendetta (and a problem with quake 3 that do
not play intro videos , but is not very important)
Do you have a link where I could get "Vendetta"? I can try that out
this week on
On 17 Feb 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
>> My point, is that freedom of speech grants me, and anyone else on
>> this mailing list the right to discuss the issue we are
>> discussing. You have the right to use procmail to filter out the
>> discussion when you are no longer interested in reading it.
>
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 19:25, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 18:32, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2003-02-16 at 12:42, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
I've downloaded mga pack
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 19:25, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 18:32, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Son, 2003-02-16 at 12:42, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> I've downloaded
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 18:32, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2003-02-16 at 12:42, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
I've downloaded mga packages from DRI site and installed it with sh
install.sh , and here all ok, but now at startup appears :
DR
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 17:03, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> My point, is that freedom of speech grants me, and anyone else on
> this mailing list the right to discuss the issue we are
> discussing. You have the right to use procmail to filter out the
> discussion when you are no longer interested in r
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2003-02-16 at 12:42, AnonimoVeneziano wrote:
I've downloaded mga packages from DRI site and installed it with sh
install.sh , and here all ok, but now at startup appears :
DRIUnlock called when locked, and in the session DRI have some problems.
I use debian SID
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, D. Hageman wrote:
>> As stated in my previous mail, I do use spamassassin, and as such
>> I do not have a problem with spam. If you're not interested in
>> the discussion on despamming, then simply hit DEL on the messages
>> that do not interest you, and you'll lose no tim
Thanks,
Dieter
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/l
Grepped latest stuff but multiple threads/apps do not work reliable.
Try 2 times "ipers" => X server locks up (hard).
First system run (?) but after SYSRQ+'K' hard hang.
SYSRQ+'S|U' works sometimes but after that SYSRQ+'B' do not ;-(
I do not belive that even Viewperf-6.1.2/7.x works flawlessly.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, D. Hageman wrote:
>
> >> I think spam filtering for dri-devel and dri-users would be a good
> >> solution -- IMO, that would be better than moderation. For dri-patches,
> >> the Reply-To is dri-devel. I'd rather have just commit
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 16:18, Sean E. Russell wrote:
>
> On Monday 17 February 2003 05:52 am, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > The patch is only an attempt to fix the crashes with software cursor.
>
> Heh. Sorry. I didn't try to crash the server.
>
> Y'know, this gets me to thinking... getting acceller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 17 February 2003 05:52 am, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> The patch is only an attempt to fix the crashes with software cursor.
Heh. Sorry. I didn't try to crash the server.
Y'know, this gets me to thinking... getting accellerated GL working on X
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 08:11, Sean E. Russell wrote:
>
> On Sunday 16 February 2003 04:47 pm, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> ...
> > 'Of course'? A crash is a bug. Does this patch help?
> ...
>
> Unfortunately, it doesn't. I made sure that I unloaded the radeon and agpgart
> kernel modules (although I d
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, D. Hageman wrote:
>> I think spam filtering for dri-devel and dri-users would be a good
>> solution -- IMO, that would be better than moderation. For dri-patches,
>> the Reply-To is dri-devel. I'd rather have just commit messages and
>> nothing else on dri-patches. Any comm
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:35:25AM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:52:34PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > Philip Brown wrote:
> > > So, why not do it by PCI vendor/devid ? That sort of information is visible
> > > from the DRI level, I believe. I think its just another Xserv
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 10:52:34PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Philip Brown wrote:
> > So, why not do it by PCI vendor/devid ? That sort of information is visible
> > from the DRI level, I believe. I think its just another Xserver internal
> > call, isnt it?
>
> So, what happens if I have four
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Philip Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 05:55:55PM -0600, D. Hageman wrote:
> > > So, why not do it by PCI vendor/devid ? That sort of information is visible
> > > from the DRI level, I believe. I think its just another Xserver internal
> > > call, isnt it?
> >
> > I
32 matches
Mail list logo
