Felix,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:51:40PM +0100, Felix Kühling wrote:
>
> José, many people are having this libexpat problem. What's the
> recommended method to add some sort of trouble-shooting entry in the
> Wiki? The TroubleShooting template seems to be tailored for
> application-specific prob
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:06:23 +
"Sergey V. Oudaltsov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yess! I found! Strace is the girl's best friend!
>
> r200_dri.so is linked against libexpat.so.1 - while Fedora only provides
> libexpat.so.0. That is why libGL.so cannot load r200_dri.so - and
> reports missing
Yess! I found! Strace is the girl's best friend!
r200_dri.so is linked against libexpat.so.1 - while Fedora only provides
libexpat.so.0. That is why libGL.so cannot load r200_dri.so - and
reports missing DR! At the moment, I just symlinked libexpat.so.0 to
libexpat.so.1 - and got my DRI working. Y
# ldd /usr/bin/X11/glxinfo
...
libGL.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/tls/libGL.so.1 (0x00541000)
...
And this symlink points to the library (libGL.so.1.2) shipped with the
binary snapshot (well, the install.sh script had some problem - but I
fixed it manually).
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=... ldd /usr/bin/X11/glx
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 03:25:49PM +, Sergey V. Oudaltsov wrote:
> > It should be "radeon" actually. My bad...
> I knew! I knew! :)
>
> Well, anyway - this does not explain why libGL cannot find dri while
> xfree86.0.log says it is there...
>
> Sergey
It must be the TLS thingy. Do
ldd /
> It should be "radeon" actually. My bad...
I knew! I knew! :)
Well, anyway - this does not explain why libGL cannot find dri while
xfree86.0.log says it is there...
Sergey
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 02:02:50PM +, Sergey V. Oudaltsov wrote:
> > pre-install r200 modprobe -k agpgart
> Just one question. Should it be "r200" or "radeon"?
It should be "radeon" actually. My bad...
Jose Fonseca
---
This SF.net email
> pre-install r200 modprobe -k agpgart
Just one question. Should it be "r200" or "radeon"?
Thanks for the config line, I'll try it.
Sergey
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be mor
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:57:25AM +, Sergey V. Oudaltsov wrote:
>
> > Stock drivers never have. You may want to help with the kernel patches
> > floating around for this?
> Well, I don't really know. I am not a big kernel expert. I just say what
> I see: when I run "standard" Fedora X driver
> Stock drivers never have. You may want to help with the kernel patches
> floating around for this?
Well, I don't really know. I am not a big kernel expert. I just say what
I see: when I run "standard" Fedora X driver - agpgart is loaded without
my intervention. With dri snapshots - I have to loa
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 10:26, Sergey V. Oudaltsov wrote:
>
> (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available
> (EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI.
> (II) RADEON(0): [agp] You may want to make sure the agpgart kernel
> module
>
> So, first thing I found - X driver does not au
> > Well, in my previous mail I was citing the wrong XFree86.0.log. The
> > right one shows that DRI is actually disabled. And dmesg gives me this:
> >
> > [drm:radeon_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon_cp_init called without lock held
> > [drm:radeon_unlock] *ERROR* Process 5985 using kernel context 0
>
>
Sergey V. Oudaltsov wrote:
I just took the R200 snapshot and trying to run in on Radeon R250 Lf
(Mobility). First, I encountered the problem with ABI version (6 vs 7)
but after taking XFree86 executable from some well-known place
(mentioned in FAQ) XFree finally took off (first question - would it
Well, in my previous mail I was citing the wrong XFree86.0.log. The
right one shows that DRI is actually disabled. And dmesg gives me this:
[drm:radeon_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon_cp_init called without lock held
[drm:radeon_unlock] *ERROR* Process 5985 using kernel context 0
Googling around shows th
Hi all
I just took the R200 snapshot and trying to run in on Radeon R250 Lf
(Mobility). First, I encountered the problem with ABI version (6 vs 7)
but after taking XFree86 executable from some well-known place
(mentioned in FAQ) XFree finally took off (first question - would it be
possible to incl
15 matches
Mail list logo
