On Monday 15 Jul 2002 9:33 pm, Charl P. Botha scribed numinously:"
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 09:25:18PM +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
> > I'm back to probing at the lockup now that I have my "hacking space"
> > back. I'll post the WAIT_UNTIL_3D_IDLE version in a minute so there's
> > "a" fix while I try
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 09:25:18PM +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
> I'm back to probing at the lockup now that I have my "hacking space" back.
> I'll post the WAIT_UNTIL_3D_IDLE version in a minute so there's "a" fix
> while I try to understand the true problem more. Heh. My boss is in the
Which lock
On Thursday 11 Jul 2002 9:25 pm, Michel Dänzer scribed numinously:"
> PS: Sorry if you wasted time on this. I worked on it on Monday but
> haven't gotten around to finish it until now, and I thought you didn't
> have time to work on it this week.
I was mucking around moving things over to the new
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 05:21, Jens Owen wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 15:36, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> >>Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 14:56, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >Looks good, but I think I've got an even better patch:
> >>>
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 15:36, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 14:56, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>>>
>>>
>Looks good, but I think I've got an even better patch:
>
>http://www.penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/radeon-nommio.diff
>>
On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 15:36, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 14:56, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> >>>Looks good, but I think I've got an even better patch:
> >>>
> >>>http://www.penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/radeon-nommio.diff
> >>>
> >>>I've moved the initiali
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 14:56, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>>Looks good, but I think I've got an even better patch:
>>>
>>>http://www.penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/radeon-nommio.diff
>>>
>>>I've moved the initialization and put the scratch registers right behind
>>>the ring read
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 14:56, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> > Looks good, but I think I've got an even better patch:
> >
> > http://www.penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/radeon-nommio.diff
> >
> > I've moved the initialization and put the scratch registers right behind
> > the ring read pointer, this sho
> Looks good, but I think I've got an even better patch:
>
> http://www.penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/radeon-nommio.diff
>
> I've moved the initialization and put the scratch registers right behind
> the ring read pointer, this should work with PCI GART and all kinds of
> AGP GART. I'll commit th
On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 19:04, Tim Smith wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 Jul 2002 12:11 am, Michel Dänzer scribed numinously:"
> > On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 20:17, Tim Smith wrote:
> > > On Monday 08 Jul 2002 12:49 am, Michel Dänzer scribed numinously:"
> > >
> > > > The scratch register values need to be read w
On Tuesday 09 Jul 2002 12:11 am, Michel Dänzer scribed numinously:"
> On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 20:17, Tim Smith wrote:
> > On Monday 08 Jul 2002 12:49 am, Michel Dänzer scribed numinously:"
> >
> > > The scratch register values need to be read with DRM_READ32(), which
> > > accounts both for endianne
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 01:39, Mike Mestnik wrote:
> --- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 20:17, Tim Smith wrote:
> > > On Monday 08 Jul 2002 12:49 am, Michel Dänzer scribed numinously:"
> > >
> > > > The scratch register values need to be read with DRM_READ32(),
--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 20:17, Tim Smith wrote:
> > On Monday 08 Jul 2002 12:49 am, Michel Dänzer scribed numinously:"
> >
> > > The scratch register values need to be read with DRM_READ32(), which
> > > accounts both for endianness and memory barrier
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 20:17, Tim Smith wrote:
> On Monday 08 Jul 2002 12:49 am, Michel Dänzer scribed numinously:"
>
> > The scratch register values need to be read with DRM_READ32(), which
> > accounts both for endianness and memory barriers. So it would be
> >
> > u32 done_age = DR
On Monday 08 Jul 2002 12:49 am, Michel Dänzer scribed numinously:"
> On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 00:32, Tim Smith wrote:
> > Here it is. It'll need cleaning up if it works, but it'll do as a test.
>
> Took me quite some fiddling to get it working here, but that's mostly
> due to the non-standard and not
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 13:07, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>>The scratch register values need to be read with DRM_READ32(), which
>>>accounts both for endianness and memory barriers. So it would be
>>>
>>> u32 done_age = DRM_READ32(&dev_priv->scratch[1]);
>>>
>>>etc.
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 13:07, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> >
> > The scratch register values need to be read with DRM_READ32(), which
> > accounts both for endianness and memory barriers. So it would be
> >
> > u32 done_age = DRM_READ32(&dev_priv->scratch[1]);
> >
> > etc.
> >
> >
>
>
> The scratch register values need to be read with DRM_READ32(), which
> accounts both for endianness and memory barriers. So it would be
>
> u32 done_age = DRM_READ32(&dev_priv->scratch[1]);
>
> etc.
>
>
> Nice work!
I think it's probably worthwhile to commit this now. Mi
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 00:32, Tim Smith wrote:
> Here it is. It'll need cleaning up if it works, but it'll do as a test.
Took me quite some fiddling to get it working here, but that's mostly
due to the non-standard and not-quite-finished agpgart implementation
for Macs. Nothing to worry about, wor
Sorry that this is late but I am behind in my reading of the list.
Original Radeons:
Radeon VE (no TCl)
Radeon SDR
Radeon DDR / LE
Rereleased Radeons:
Radeon 7000 (no TCl)
Radeon 7200 (SDR)
Radeon 7500 (DDR)
The only differences are more RAM and higher clock speeds (possible because
of a manuf
On Thu, 2002-07-04 at 02:20, Ian Molton wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 02:00:32 -0400
> Zilvinas Valinskas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:50:22AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> > >
> > > the QD is a 7200?
> > >
> > > I was ripped off! I was told it was a 7500!
> >
> > bac
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 02:00:32 -0400
Zilvinas Valinskas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:50:22AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> >
> > the QD is a 7200?
> >
> > I was ripped off! I was told it was a 7500!
>
> back then when I bought my card there were no such things as 7x00
> en
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 08:50:22AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
>
> the QD is a 7200?
>
> I was ripped off! I was told it was a 7500!
back then when I bought my card there were no such things as 7x00
enumerations I think that is must be 7200 ... :) Keith can confirm
or deny that ... as he has
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 17:48, Tim Smith wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 Jul 2002 12:27 am, Vedran Rodic scribed numinously:"
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:32:04PM +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
> > > Here it is. It'll need cleaning up if it works, but it'll do as a test.
> >
> > Thanks Tim
> >
> > Works fine here
On Wednesday 03 Jul 2002 5:03 am, David Willmore scribed numinously:"
> > On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:48:29PM +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
> > > Great. So we're OK on
> > >
> > > Radeon 7500
> > > Radeon 7200
> > >
> > > anyone got a Radeon 7000 or old Radeon no-number to try it on?
> >
> > 7200 is the
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:03:15PM -0500, David Willmore wrote:
>
> I have an ATI branded board, 64 MB SDR, chipset name 'QD'. Anyone
I think it must be 7200 (I have the same QD chipset - but the card is
ATI radeon VIVO 64MB DDR) ...
> know what I have? 7000, 7200, 7500? I think the generic
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:48:29PM +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
> >
> > Great. So we're OK on
> >
> > Radeon 7500
> > Radeon 7200
> >
> > anyone got a Radeon 7000 or old Radeon no-number to try it on?
>
> 7200 is the "old Radeon no-number" AFAIK ;)
This brings up something that I've been meaning
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:48:29PM +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
>
> Great. So we're OK on
>
> Radeon 7500
> Radeon 7200
>
> anyone got a Radeon 7000 or old Radeon no-number to try it on?
7200 is the "old Radeon no-number" AFAIK ;)
---
This sf.ne
On Tuesday 02 Jul 2002 12:27 am, Vedran Rodic scribed numinously:"
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:32:04PM +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
> > Here it is. It'll need cleaning up if it works, but it'll do as a test.
>
> Thanks Tim
>
> Works fine here on my old Radeon 7200 32MB SDR.
Great. So we're OK on
Rad
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:32:04PM +0100, Tim Smith wrote:
> Here it is. It'll need cleaning up if it works, but it'll do as a test.
Thanks Tim
Works fine here on my old Radeon 7200 32MB SDR.
-Vedran
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:Th
Here it is. It'll need cleaning up if it works, but it'll do as a test.
--
Tim Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
"A fray"
-- Groo the Wanderer
Index: xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_ioctl.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/dri/xc/xc/lib/
31 matches
Mail list logo
