Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 17:00, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>Steven Paul Lilly wrote:
>>
>>>I thought I would add my vote to the whole debate about what to do with the
>>>mailing lists and SFBT. I would like both lists to continue and for their
>>>proper uses to be enforced. I am
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 17:00, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Steven Paul Lilly wrote:
> > I thought I would add my vote to the whole debate about what to do with the
> > mailing lists and SFBT. I would like both lists to continue and for their
> > proper uses to be enforced. I am not a developer or even a
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 11:43:21 -0700, Daryll Strauss wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:13:11PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>
> > True.
> >
> > The other alternative is to completely close the bug-tracking system
> > and don't allow it. Forcing people to email.
> >
> > It's currently what w
--- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 09:38:48AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On a separate topic - have you guys thought about replacing the user
> > mailing list with a real newsgroup? Yes, newsgroups are noisy as hell, but
> > they are also fairly easy to b
Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:20:47PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
>
>>On 2002.06.13 15:43 Alan Hourihane wrote:
>>
>>>...
>>>
>>>What would be great, is if someone assigned the bugs to relevant
>>>developers. Once someone is assigned to the bug report, they get
>>>emails whene
On 2002.06.13 17:38 Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> You shouldn't try to make developers work in some specific way ...
I wasn't. I was trying to avoid that a way which has shown just bad
results so far was once more forced upon the developers, and at the same
time suggesting what it seems (IMHO) the
On Thursday 13 June 2002 19:01, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:52:59PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> > On 2002.06.13 17:19 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >...
> > >
> > >If Dieter is volunteering to go through it - then power to him...
> >
> > Alan, it's not as simple as that. Althou
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 09:38:48AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On a separate topic - have you guys thought about replacing the user
> mailing list with a real newsgroup? Yes, newsgroups are noisy as hell, but
> they are also fairly easy to browse through (especially with a scoring
> newsreader,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:52:59PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.13 17:19 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >...
> >
> >If Dieter is volunteering to go through it - then power to him...
>
> Alan, it's not as simple as that. Although it's very kind of him to
> volunteer, we all must get to a cons
On 2002.06.13 17:19 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> ...
>
> If Dieter is volunteering to go through it - then power to him...
Alan, it's not as simple as that. Although it's very kind of him to
volunteer, we all must get to a consensus before taking actions.
Do you really think that that consensus exi
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> A system such as bugzilla can address everyone's needs (including Keith's
> and Jens').
The way to address the needs of Keith and Jens is probably to let them
ignore the bug tracking, and have others (maybe the originator, maybe just
somebody else) t
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:49:57PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.13 16:24 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >...
> >
> >What I'm afraid might happen with setting up something like bugzilla,
> >is the much more severe maintenance of it. If that person where to
> >walk away from the project, we're m
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:05:05PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:46:44PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> >>It's not that I'm being lazy when I say I don't want to use it.
> >>
> >>First of all, if someone has a bug they want me to fix, they s
Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:46:44PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>It's not that I'm being lazy when I say I don't want to use it.
>>
>>First of all, if someone has a bug they want me to fix, they should stick
>>around long enough to have an email conversation about it.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:46:44PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> It's not that I'm being lazy when I say I don't want to use it.
>
> First of all, if someone has a bug they want me to fix, they should stick
> around long enough to have an email conversation about it. I'm doing free
> work for
Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>
>>Here's one:
>>
>>On the radeon, the first time a 3d window is created, there is some screen
>>corruption. It's probably the 2d driver getting something wrong.
>>
>>Keith
>>
>
> What sort of corruption? I'm curious because
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Here's one:
>
> On the radeon, the first time a 3d window is created, there is some screen
> corruption. It's probably the 2d driver getting something wrong.
>
> Keith
What sort of corruption? I'm curious because we have a similar problem
with ma
On 2002.06.13 16:24 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> ...
>
> What I'm afraid might happen with setting up something like bugzilla,
> is the much more severe maintenance of it. If that person where to
> walk away from the project, we're much more stuck that where we are
> now with SF. O.k. I admit that the
On Thursday 13 June 2002 17:17, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:03:05PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:13:40PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > >>On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > >>[-]
> > >>
> > >>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:20:47PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.13 15:43 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >...
> >
> >What would be great, is if someone assigned the bugs to relevant
> >developers. Once someone is assigned to the bug report, they get
> >emails whenever it's updated. But that som
On 2002.06.13 15:43 Alan Hourihane wrote:
> ...
>
> What would be great, is if someone assigned the bugs to relevant
> developers. Once someone is assigned to the bug report, they get
> emails whenever it's updated. But that someone needs to know who
> to charge with that bug report.
>
> Someone
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:03:05PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:13:40PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> >
> >>On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >>[-]
> >>
> >>>We really need to clean up the stuff on SF now. Probably about
Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:13:40PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
>>On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>>[-]
>>
>>>We really need to clean up the stuff on SF now. Probably about 90%
>>>don't even apply now, or should at least be re-tested.
>>>
>>Yes, let
Steven Paul Lilly wrote:
> I thought I would add my vote to the whole debate about what to do with the
> mailing lists and SFBT. I would like both lists to continue and for their
> proper uses to be enforced. I am not a developer or even a power user. I
> just like knowing what is going on with th
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:13:40PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> [-]
> > We really need to clean up the stuff on SF now. Probably about 90%
> > don't even apply now, or should at least be re-tested.
>
> Yes, let's start with that.
> There a
I thought I would add my vote to the whole debate about what to do with the
mailing lists and SFBT. I would like both lists to continue and for their
proper uses to be enforced. I am not a developer or even a power user. I
just like knowing what is going on with the development. Having a clear
def
> Sorry.
>
> The problem was not in the logic of operation but in in use of variable
> 'i' in this loop. After this loop it's value was never greater than
> RADEON_NR_SAREA_CLIPRECTS and this variable is used in other loop (the
> one containing 'smaller' one). It's value after the loop should
Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_ioctl.cWed Jun 12
>> 19:03:59 2002
>> +++ ../build/dri/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_ioctl.cWed
>> Jun 12 20:01:42 2002
>> @@ -8
>
>
>
> --- xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_ioctl.c Wed Jun 12 19:03:59 2002
> +++ ../build/dri/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/radeon_ioctl.c Wed Jun 12 20:01:42
>2002
> @@ -856,14 +856,14 @@
>clear.depth
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Jacek Rosik wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Dieter Nützel wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>>> [-]
>>>
We really need to clean up the stuff on SF now. Probably about 90%
don't even apply now, or should at least be re-tested.
>>>
>>> Y
Jacek Rosik wrote:
>
>
> Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
>> [-]
>>
>>> We really need to clean up the stuff on SF now. Probably about 90%
>>> don't even apply now, or should at least be re-tested.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, let's start with that.
>> There ar
Dieter Nützel wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> [-]
>
>>We really need to clean up the stuff on SF now. Probably about 90%
>>don't even apply now, or should at least be re-tested.
>>
>
> Yes, let's start with that.
> There are even several bugs for which the sen
Dieter Nützel wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> [-]
>
>>We really need to clean up the stuff on SF now. Probably about 90%
>>don't even apply now, or should at least be re-tested.
>
>
> Yes, let's start with that.
> There are even several bugs for which the sende
> "j" == j r fonseca writes:
j> In theory, dri-devel should be mainly for communication between all
j> developers and beta-testers. The dri-users should be for everybody else.
j> This is what I see in many other projects and it works quite well.
Giving the stage of the (e.g. R
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
[-]
> We really need to clean up the stuff on SF now. Probably about 90%
> don't even apply now, or should at least be re-tested.
Yes, let's start with that.
There are even several bugs for which the sender asked for closing but never
happen
35 matches
Mail list logo
